Serum uric acid levels are associated with homeostasis model assessment in obese nondiabetic patients: HOMA and uric acid

Abstract

Background:

Hyperuricemia leads to insulin resistance, whereas insulin resistance decreases renal excretion of uric acid. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a correlation between serum uric acid levels with homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) 1 in nondiabetic patients.

Methods:

We evaluated 88 nondiabetic patients, in whom uric acid levels were measured, in all of them HOMA of β-cell function (HOMA 1B) and HOMA of insulin resistance (HOMA 1IR) scores were performed. Uric acid and the HOMA 1 values were correlated using the Pearson coefficient.

Results:

We did not find any correlation between uric acid levels with both HOMA 1B (r = 0.102, p = 0.343), nor with HOMA 1IR (r = 0.158, p = 0.117). When patients were analyzed by sex, we found a significant correlation with HOMA 1IR (0.278, p = 0.01), but not with HOMA 1B (0.138, p = 0.257) in women. We found a correlation with HOMA 1B in men (r = 0.37, p = 0.044), but not with HOMA 1IR: 0.203, p = 0.283. The analysis performed based on body mass index did not show correlation in the patients with normal weight, (HOMA 1B r = 0.08, p = 0.5, HOMA 1IR = 0.034, p = 0.793), nor in the patients who were overweight (HOMA 1B: r = 0.05, p = 0.76, HOMA 1IR r = 0.145, p = 0.43). However, a significant correlation between uricemia with both HOMA 1B (0.559, p < 0.001), and HOMA 1IR (0.326, p < 0.05), was observed in obese patients.

Conclusion:

Our results suggest that serum uric acid levels seem to be associated with insulin resistance in women, and in obese patients, but not in nonobese men. Uric acid also modifies β-cell function in men and in obese patients.

Keywords

homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance obesity uric acid

Introduction

Uric acid is the end-product of purine metabolism in humans; hyperuricemia has been associated with hyperinsulinemia and insulin resistance. In fact, high uric acid levels induce insulin resistance and augments circulating insulin levels through several pathways, such as activation of the renin–angiotensin system and reduction of adiponectin circulating levels.¹

Hyperinsulinemia decreases uric acid clearance by the kidneys; the mechanism is an increased proximal tubular urate transport from the glomerular filtrate to the renal interstitium by stimulation of GLUT 9, one of its major transporters, which leads to hyperuricemia.²

In several epidemiological studies hyperuricemia has been associated with diseases related with insulin resistance, such as hypertension,³ obesity,¹ diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia,⁴ and with cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome.^1,3 However, it is still controversial whether high uric acid levels are a risk factor for metabolic syndrome or a consequence of lifestyle habits that favors hyperuricemia and metabolic syndrome too; indeed, some habits, as the intake of soft drinks and fructose are associated with hyperuricemia and with insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome.⁵

Uric acid reduction with allopurinol improves insulin resistance in animals with metabolic syndrome and in humans.⁶

Homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) of β-cell function and insulin resistance (IR) was first described in 1985 by Matthews and colleagues;⁷ and has been widely used in clinical research to assess both IR, and β-cell function.^8,9

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there are no studies that evaluate the association between serum uric acid concentrations with IR, assessed with HOMA 1IR, nor with β-cell function (assessed with HOMA 1B) in nondiabetic patients, especially in a Hispanic population.

The aim of this study was to correlate serum uric acid concentrations with IR and β-cell function assessed by the HOMA 2 model in nondiabetic patients.

Methods

We evaluated 88 nondiabetic patients without history of cardiovascular disease, in whom fasting serum uric acid concentrations were measured (enzymatic method), serum glucose (glucose oxidase), creatinine (JAFFE), lipid profile (CHODPAP) and triglycerides (Triglyceride-pap) were performed too. All venous samples were collected in the morning, after a 12-h overnight fast. The determinations were performed by personnel blinded to the study. Insulin levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DiagMex, USA), also by personnel blinded to the study. In all participants IR and β-cell function were estimated by the HOMA index and this was calculated from concentrations of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting plasma insulin (FPI) according to the report by Matthews and colleagues^7,8 with the formula HOMA IR = FPI in mU/l × FPG in mg/dl/405.

HOMA 1 B = FPI \times 360 / FPG - 63

Body mass index (BMI) was calculated with the formula:

\frac{Weight (in Kilograms)}{Height {(in meters)}^{2} .}

Normal weight was defined as BMI < 25 kg/m², overweight as BMI between 25 kg/m² and 29.9 kg/m², and obesity as BMI > 30 kg/m².

Hyperuricemia was defined as serum uric acid values >6.5 mg/dl (386.62 mmol/l) in men and >5.1 mg/dl (303.35 mmol/l) in women.

Patients with any of the following diagnoses were excluded from the study: diabetes mellitus; heart, hepatic, or renal failure; evidence of valvular heart disease; heart block or cardiac arrhythmia; hypertension; acute coronary syndrome or cerebrovascular disease 6 months before the study’s initiation; autoimmune disease, cancer or chemotherapy, fever, history of diuretic use, alcohol abuse or psychotropic drugs.

The study was conducted with the approval of the Research and Medical Ethics Committee of our hospitals, in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. Participants gave informed, written consent before their inclusion in the study protocol.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.

The correlation of uric acid concentrations with HOMA 2 indices was assessed with the Pearson’s coefficient.

Comparison of variables between groups of patients was performed using student’s t tests or analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests, in which a p < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

Basal characteristics of patients are shown in Table 1. We did not find any correlation between uric acid levels with both HOMA 1B (r = 0.102, p = 0.343), nor with HOMA 1IR. (r = 0.158, p =0.117) in our patients.

Table 1.

Basal characteristics of patients.

Age (years)	40.9 ± 2.61
Sex M/F	29/59
Blood pressure (mmHg)	121 ± 17 / 73 ± 9
Waist circumference (cm)	93.5 ± 3.02
Body mass index	28.8 ± 1.1
Fasting glucose (mmol/l)	5.06 ± 0.15
Uric acid (mmol/l)	336.06 ± 16.6
Insulin (mcU/ml)	8.4 ± 1.13
Total cholesterol (mmol/l)	47.93 ± 9.06
High density lipoproteins (mmol/l)	1.1606 ± 0.27075
Triglycerides (mmol/l)	1.88 ± 0.92

B, β-cell; F, female; HOMA, homeostatic model assessment; IR, insulin resistance; M, male.

When patients were analyzed by sex, we found a significant correlation with HOMA 1IR (0.278, p = 0.01, Figure 1), but not with HOMA 1B (0.138, p = 0.257) in women. We found a significant correlation with HOMA 1B in men (r = 0.37, p = 0.044), but not with HOMA 1IR (0.203, p = 0.283 Figure 2). Table 2 shows the clinical differences between sexes.

Figure 1.

Correlation between HOMA 1IR and uric acid in women.

Figure 2.

Correlation between HOMA 1B and uric acid in men.

Table 2.

Clinical differences between sexes.

	Male	Female	p
Age (years)	38.81	43.09	NS
Body mass index	27.85	29.28	0.01
Waist circumference (cm)	95.42	92.5	0.01
Uric acid (mmol/l)	398.52	297.99	0.0001
Fasting glucose (mmol/l)	4.92	5.29	0.02

NS, not significant.

The analysis performed based on BMI did not show correlation in the 24 patients with normal weight, (HOMA 1B r = 0.08, p = 0.5, HOMA 1IR = 0.034, p = 0.793), nor in the 31 patients who were overweight (HOMA 1B: r = 0.05, p = 0.76, HOMA 1IR r = 0.145, p = 0.43). However, a significant correlation between uricemia with both HOMA 1B (0.559, p < 0.001), and HOMA 1IR (0.326, p < 0.05), was observed in the 33 obese patients (Figure 3). Table 3 shows clinical characteristics of patients according to their weight.

Figure 3.

Correlation between HOMA 1IR and uric acid in obese.

Table 3.

Clinical differences by weight.

	Lean patients	Overweight	Obese	p-value (ANOVA)
Age (years)	36	41.7	43.7	NS
Sex M/F	19/19	13/18	9/24
Body mass index	23.2	27.49	33.85	0.0001
Waist circumference (cm)	80.66	90.59	105.3	0.0001
Uric acid (mmol/l)	303.35	333.09	349.74	0.011
Fasting glucose (mmol/l)	4.66	5.05	5.27	0.003
Insulin (mcU/ml)	6.3 ± 2.8	9.3 ± 2.67	13.2 ± 2.66	0.0001

ANOVA, analysis of variance; F, female; M, male; NS, not significant.

We did not find a significant correlation between uric acid and insulin concentrations (r = 0.128, p = 0.184)

Discussion

In this study we evaluated the association between uric acid concentrations and insulin resistance (measured as HOMA 1IR); we found that hyperuricemia correlates with HOMA 1IR in obese patients and in women.

It is expected that there is an association between serum uric acid concentrations and IR, since hyperuricemia leads to IR, and hyperinsulinemia provokes increased serum uric acid concentrations.¹ Also, a chronic rise in uricemia reduces nitric oxide levels in endothelial cells, leading to endothelial dysfunction, IR and a rise in cardiovascular risk.^10,11 In addition, Zhu and colleagues showed that high uric acid concentrations inhibit insulin signaling by interfering with the Insulin receptor 1 (IRS1) and Akt (a metabolic pathway stimulated by insulin) pathways, through phosphorylation of IRS1, which impairs Akt phosphorylation.¹²

Sluijs and colleagues found that circulating levels of uric acid do not have a causal effect on type 2 diabetes risk,¹³ and we found that uric acid does not correlate with HOMA 1IR in the 88 patients; both results are consistent with the fact that in the general population, uric acid may not have a role in the genesis of carbohydrate disorder.

Our results agree with those of Kivity and colleagues¹⁴ who found that high serum uric acid concentrations are associated with diabetes in women, but not in men, and with those from Nagahama and colleagues,¹⁵ who found that although hyperuricemia is a strong predictor of metabolic syndrome in both, male and female patients, the risk was higher in women. No explanation is available for this sex difference, but the distinct fat distribution between sexes, the different levels of uric acid in men and women, and the effects of estrogens on renal clearance of urate may explain it.^16,17

The relationship between uric acid and insulin resistance¹ explains the correlation between uricemia and HOMA 1IR in obese patients, which suffer a greater rate of insulin resistance, that we observed in this work, besides, Tsushima and colleagues reported that adipose tissue releases uric acid; this production is enhanced in obesity,¹⁸ both facts contribute to the explanation of why we found a greater correlation between HOMA 1IR and serum uric acid concentrations in patients with BMI > 30 kg/m². It is also important to note that in these individuals both, serum uric acid and insulin concentrations were higher. Interestingly, Norvik and colleagues found that uricemia predicted new onset impaired fasting glucose and elevated blood pressure in obese patients, but not in normal weight individuals,¹⁹ and Simental and colleagues reported that in nonobese patients with normal glucose tolerance, hyperuricemia is associated with the increase of early and late phases of insulin release.²⁰

We also found a correlation between HOMA 1B and uric acid concentrations in men but not in women, and in obese patients. High uric acid concentrations decreased insulin secretion by pancreatic islets,^21,22 and contributed to the metabolic alterations induced by uric acid. Although a negative correlation would be expected because it would be compatible with β-cell failure due to elevated uric acid concentrations, we do not have an explanation for our results; perhaps the increased β-cell function in patients with high uric acid concentration could be compensatory in nature.

Our results may have therapeutic implications, since the use of allopurinol improves IR in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricemia,⁶ and leads to a reduction in blood pressure and weigh loss in overweigh prehypertensive patients,²³ then the use of xanthine-oxidase inhibitors may prevent the development of some components of the metabolic syndrome, this fact requires further research.

Our study has some limitations, as a transversal study, it is difficult to establish a causal relationship between hyperuricemia and IR, we only describe an association. Besides, there are few men in the obese group.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that serum uric acid concentrations seem to be more strongly associated with IR in women, and in obese patients, but not in nonobese men.

Hyperuricemia also seems to affect beta cell function, especially in men and in obese patients.

Further research will tell us if treating asymptomatic hyperuricemia is going to be beneficial in reducing the complications of hyperinsulinemia and IR, such as type 2 diabetes and hypertension, and in which patients.

Footnotes

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary Material

The online supplementary material is available at: .

References

Rubio-Guerra

Morales-Lopez

Garro-Almendaro

et al . Circulating levels of uric acid and risk for metabolic syndrome. Curr Diabetes Rev 2017; 13: 87–90.

Perez-Ruiz

Aniel-Quiroga

Herrero-Beites

et al . Renal clearance of uric acid is linked to insulin resistance and lower excretion of sodium in gout patients. Rheumatol Int 2015; 35: 1519–1524.

Inokuchi

Tsutsumi

Takahashi

et al . Increased frequency of metabolic syndrome and its individual metabolic abnormalities in Japanese patients with primary gout. J Clin Rheumatol 2010; 16: 109–112.

Billet

Doaty

Katz

et al . Review of Hyperuricemia as New Marker for Metabolic Syndrome. ISRN Rheumatology 2014; 2014: 852954.

Dornas

de Lima

Pedrosa

et al . Health implications of high fructose intake and current research. Adv Nutr 2015; 6: 729–737.

Takir

Kostek

Ozkok

et al . Lowering Uric Acid with allopurinol improves insulin resistance and systemic inflammation in asymptomatic hyperuricemia. J Investig Med 2015; 63: 924–929.

Matthews

Hosker

Rudenski

et al . Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985; 28: 412–419.

Levy

Matthews

Hermans

MP.

Correct homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) evaluation uses the computer program (Letter). Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 2191–2192.

Wallace

Levy

Mathew

DR.

Use and abuse of HOMA modeling. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 1487–1495.

10.

Puddu

Cravero

et al . Relationships among hyperuricemia, endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular disease: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. J Cardiol 2012; 59: 235–242.

11.

Qiu

Gong

Liu

et al . Serum uric acid and impaired glucose tolerance: The Cardiometabolic Risk in Chinese (CRC) Study. Cell Biochem Biophys 2015; 73: 155–162.

12.

Zhu

Huang

et al . High uric acid directly inhibits insulin signalling and induces insulin resistance. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2014; 447: 707–714.

13.

Sluijs

Holmes

van der Schouw

et al . A mendelian randomization study of circulating uric acid and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2015; 64: 3028–3036.

14.

Kivity

Kopel

Steinlauf

et al . The association between serum uric acid and diabetes mellitus is stronger in women. J Womens Health 2013; 22: 782–789.

15.

Nagahama

Inoue

Kohagura

et al . Hyperuricemia predicts future metabolic syndrome: a 4-year follow-up study of a large screened cohort in Okinawa, Japan. Hypertens Res 2014; 37: 232–238.

16.

Yamada

Fukatsu

Suzuki

et al . Elevated serum uric acid predicts impaired fasting glucose and type 2 diabetes only among Japanese women undergoing health checkups. Diabetes Metab 2011; 37: 252–258.

17.

Liu

Jin

Xing

et al . Serum uric acid levels and the risk of impaired fasting glucose: a prospective study in adults of north China. PLoS One 2013; 8: e84712.

18.

Tsushima

Nishizawa

Tochino

et al . Uric acid secretion from adipose tissue and its increase in obesity. J Biol Chem 2013; 288: 27138–27149.

19.

Norvik

Storhaug

Ytrehus

et al . Overweight modifies the longitudinal association between uric acid and some components of the metabolic syndrome: The Tromsø Study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2016; 16: 85.

20.

Simental-Mendía

RodríguezMorán

et al . Hyperuricemia is associated with the increase of insulin release in non-obese subjects with normal glucose tolerance. Endocrine Research 2017; 42: 1–5.

21.

Rocić

Vucić-Lovrencić

Poje

et al . Uric acid may inhibit glucose-induced insulin secretion via binding to an essential arginine residue in rat pancreatic beta-cells. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2005; 15: 1181–1184.

22.

Zhang

Yamamoto

Hisatome

et al . Uric acid induces oxidative stress and growth inhibition by activating adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase and extracellular signal-regulated kinase signal pathways in pancreatic β cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2013; 375: 89–96.

23.

Madero

Rodríguez Castellanos

Jalal

et al . A pilot study on the impact of a low fructose diet and allopurinol on clinic blood pressure among overweight and prehypertensive subjects: a randomized placebo controlled trial. J Am Soc Hypertens 2015; 9: 837–844.