Risk evaluation of ballistic penetration by small caliber ammunition of live-fire shoot house facilities with comparison to numerical and experimental results

Abstract

The development of advanced small caliber weapon systems has resulted in rounds with more material penetration capabilities. The increased capabilities may mean that existing live-fire facilities will no longer be adequate for the training and certification of military and law enforcement personnel. Constraints on training in many live-fire shoot house facilities are already in place, with some allowing only single round impact during training. With little understanding of the probability of perforation, or failure, of existing containment systems, this study evaluates risk by studying the single round impact of small caliber ammunition against live-fire shoot house containment systems constructed from AR500 steel panels with two-inch ballistic rubber covering. An analytical and numerical study was conducted using an existing model for steel penetration developed by Alekseevskii-Tate and the EPIC finite element code. A modified form of the advancing cavity model for the ballistic resistance of the target material was used to account for the relatively unconfined material resulting from the studied impacts. These results are then compared to experimental tests conducted by Goodman for rounds of various small calibers impacting live-fire facility containment systems. Projectile and target characteristics were then modeled as continuous random variables, and Monte Carlo simulations were conducted using the validated analytical model to estimate the probability of a single round impact perforating the live-fire facility containment system. An importance sampling scheme was used to reduce the variance of the solution and provide a more accurate estimate of the probability of failure. The Alekseevskii-Tate model was found to provide accurate estimates of the depth of penetration when compared to experimental and numerical results at ordnance velocities and an estimate of the probability of failure is on the order of 1x10^-5. This study provides useful tools for the analysis of existing live-fire facilities against future and existing ammunition, and for the design of new facilities. When coupled with Monte Carlo simulation techniques, a risk-based approach to certify live-fire facilities for use with any variety of small arms ammunition can be applied.

Keywords

Steel penetration risk analysis finite element analysis Alekseevskii-Tate model target resistance live-fire facilities Monte Carlo simulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdel-Wahed

Salem

Zidan

, et al. (2010) Penetration of a small caliber projectile into single and multi-layered targets. EPJ Web of Conferences 6. DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20100602004.

Alekseevskii

(1966) Penetration of a rod into a target at high velocity. Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves 2(2): 63–66.

Allen

Rogers

(1961) Penetration of a rod into a semi-infinite target. Journal of the Franklin Institute 272(4): 275–284.

Anderson

Royal-Timmons

(1997) Ballistic performance of confined 99.5%-Al2O3 ceramic tiles. International Journal of Impact Engineering 19(8): 703–713.

Ang

Wilson

(1984) Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design Volume II: Decision, Risk, and Reliability. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Carlucci

Jacobson

(2014) Ballistics: Theory and Design of Guns and Ammunition Second. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

Christman

Gehring

(1966) Analysis of high-velocity projectile penetration mechanics. Journal of Applied Physics 37(October 1965): 1579–1587.

Forrestal

Luk

(1992) Penetration into soil targets. International Journal of Impact Engineering 12(3): 427–444.

Forrestal

Altman

Cargile

, et al. (1994) An empirical equation for penetration depth of ogive-nose projectiles into concrete targets. International Journal of Impact Engineering 15(4): 395–405.

10.

Freedman

Diaconis

(1981) On the histogram as a density estimator: L2 theory. Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte Gebiete 57(4): 453–476.

11.

Gilbert

(2019) Monte Carlo Simulation. Unpublished notes, University of Texas at Austin.

12.

Goldsmith

(1960) Impact. London: Edward Arnold.

13.

Gomez

Shukla

(2001) Multiple impact penetration of semi-infinite concrete. International Journal of Impact Engineering 25(10): 965–979.

14.

Goodier

(1965) On the Mechanics of indentation and cratering in solid targets of strain-hardening metal by impact of hard and soft spheres. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Hvper-Veloclty Impact Symposium VOL III, Orlando, FL, 1965, pp.215–259.

15.

Goodman

(2016) Live Fire Shoot House Wall Test. Aberdeen, MD: Aberdeen Test Center.

16.

Hanagud

Ross

(1971) Large deformation, deep penetration theory for a compressible strain-hardening target material. AIAA Journal 9(5): 905.

17.

Hazell

(2015) Armour: Materials, Theory, and Design. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

18.

Wen

, et al. (2019) A three-stage model for the perforation of finite metallic plates by long rods at high velocities. Defence Technology 15(3): 409–418.

19.

Hill

(1950) The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

20.

Hopkins

(1960) Dynamic expansion of spherical cavities in metals. In: Sneddon

Hill

(eds) Progress in Solid Mechanics. Amsterdam: North- Holland Publishing Company.

21.

Jamil

WNM

Aripin

Sajuri

, et al. (2016) Mechanical properties and microstructures of steel panels for laminated composites in armoured vehicles. International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering 13(3). Universiti Malaysia Pahang: 3741–3753.

22.

Johnson

Cook

(1983) A constitutive model and data from metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Proceedings of 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, The Hague, Netherlands.

23.

Johnson

Cook

(1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 21(1): 31–48.

24.

Johnson

Beissel

Gerlach

, et al. (2019) User Instructions for the 2019 Version of EPIC. San Antonio, TX: Southwest Research Institute.

25.

Kasilingam

Iqbal

Senthil

(2019) Influence of impactor nature, mass, size and shape on ballistic resistance of mild steel and Armox 500 T steel. International Journal of Protective Structures 10(2): 174–197.

26.

Kohn

(1969) Compilation of Hugoniot equations of state. Air Force Weapons Laboratory Report AFW.

27.

Kozhushko

Rykova

Sinani

(1991) Resistance of ceramics to penetration at impact velocities above 5 Km/S. Le Journal de Physique IV 01(C3): C3-117–C3-122.

28.

Lan

Wen

(2010) Alekseevskii-Tate revisited: An extension to the modified hydrodynamic theory of long rod penetration. Science China Technological Sciences 53(5): 1364–1373.

29.

Lee

Tupper

(1958) Analysis of plastic deformation in a steel cylinder striking a rigid target. Journal of Applied Mechanics 21(1): 63–70.

30.

Meyer

Herzig

Abdel-Malek

(2012) Estimation of the Parameters of the Johnson-Cook Model for Five Different Armor Steels. ARL-CR-701. Aberdeen, MD: Army Research Laboratory.

31.

Meyers

(2014) Dynamic Behavior of Materials. Experimental Mechanics. New York: Wiley.

32.

Nishiwaki

(1951) Resistance to the penetration of a bullet through an aluminum plate. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 6: 374–378.

33.

Orphal

Franzen

(1997) Penetration of confined silicon carbide targets by tungsten long rods at impact velocities from 1.5 to 4.6 km/s. International Journal of Impact Engineering 19(1): 1–13.

34.

Orphal

Franzen

Piekutowski

, et al. (1996) Penetration of confined aluminum nitride targets by tungsten long rods at 1.5–4.5 km/s. International Journal of Impact Engineering 18(4): 355–368.

35.

Orphal

Franzen

Charters

, et al. (1997) Penetration of confined boron carbide targets by tungsten long rods at impact velocities from 1.5 to 5.0 km/s. International Journal of Impact Engineering 19(1): 15–29.

36.

Probabilistic Model Code: Basis of Design (2001) Joint Committee on Structural Safety.

37.

Recht

(1978) Taylor ballistic impact modelling applied to deformation and mass loss determinations. International Journal of Engineering Science 16(11): 809–827.

38.

Recht

(1986) Ballistic Impact Dynamics. Research Triangle Institute.

39.

Recht

(1990) High velocity impact dynamics: analytical modeling and plate penetration dynamics. In: Zukas

(ed.). High Velocity Impact Dynamics. New York: Wiley.

40.

Rosenberg

Marmor

Mayseless

(1990) On The hydrodynamic theory of long-rod penetration. International Journal of Impact Engineering 10(1): 483–486.

41.

Sheldon

(2013) Simulation, 5th edn. New York: Elsevier.

42.

Shin

Chung

Kim

(2018) Test and estimation of ballistic armor performance for recent naval ship structural materials. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering 10(6): 762–781.

43.

Stewart

Dorrough

Netherton

(2019) Field testing and probabilistic assessment of ballistic penetration of steel plates for small calibre military ammunition. International Journal of Protective Structures 10(4): 421–438.

44.

Subramanian

Bless

(1995) Penetration of semi-infinite AD995 alumina targets by tungsten long rod penetrators from 1.5 to 3.5 km/s. International Journal of Impact Engineering 17(4–6): 807–816.

45.

Tate

(1967) A theory for the deceleration of long rods after impact. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 15(6): 387–399.

46.

Tate

(1969) Further results in the theory of long rod penetration. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 17(3): 141–150.

47.

Tate

(1986a) Long rod penetration models-part 2. Extensions to the hydrodynamic theory of penetration. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 28(9): 599–612.

48.

Tate

(1986b) Long rod penetration models-Part I. A flow field model for high speed long rod penetration. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 28(8): 535–548.

49.

Taylor

(1948) The use of flat-ended projectiles for determining dynamic yield stress I: Theoretical considerations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 194: 289–299.

50.

US Army (2017) Notification of authorized small arms ammunition for training on, indoor/outdoor baffle ranges and in live-fire shoot houses. ALARACT 003/2017.

51.

Wen

Lan

(2010) Analytical model for cratering of semi-infinite metallic targets by long rod penetrators. Science China Technological Sciences 53(12): 3189–3196.

52.

Wen

Lan

(2010) Analytical models for the penetration of semi-infinite targets by rigid, deformable and erosive long rods. Acta Mechanica Sinica/Lixue Xuebao 26(4): 573–583.

53.

Whiffin

(1948) The use of flat-ended projectiles for determining dynamic yield stress - II. Tests on various metallic materials. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences 194(1038): 300–322.

54.

Wilkins

Guinan

(1973) Impact of cylinders on a rigid boundary. Journal of Applied Physics 44(3): 1200.

55.

Zook

Frank

Silsby

(1992) Terminal Ballistics Test and Analysis Guidelines for the Penetration Mechanics Branch. Springfield, VA: U.S. Army Laboratory Command p.135.

56.

Zukas

(1982) Impact Dynamics. New York: Wiley.