Time should be an important aspect of organizational theory, but it has been neglected for decades. In this essay, I describe four different ways in which time can be conceptualized in organizational research. I give examples from recent theoretical work that include a temporal perspective. I also specify some directions about how future theory development and refinement should incorporate time.
AnconaD. G.ChongC.-L. (1996). Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 251–284.
2.
AnconaD. G.GoodmanP. S.LawrenceB. S.TushmanM. L. (2001). Time: A new research lens. Academy of Management Review, 26, 645–663.
3.
AnconaD. G.OkhuysenG. O.PerlowL. A. (2001). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, 26, 512–529.
4.
BellS. T.MarentetteB. J. (2011). Team viability for long-term and ongoing organizational teams. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 275–292.
5.
BidwellM.BriscoeF. (2010). The dynamics of interorganizational careers. Organization Science, 21, 1034–1053.
6.
CampbellJ.CothrenD.BurgA. (2010). The perpetuation of entrained behavior during computer-mediated communication. Social Influence, 5, 59–73.
7.
ChenG.PloyhartR. E.ThomasH. C.AndersonN.BlieseP. D. (2011). The power of momentum: A new model of dynamic relationships between job satisfaction change and turnover intentions. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 159–181.
8.
ChidaY.HamerM. (2008). Chronic psychosocial factors and acute physiological responses to laboratory-induced stress in healthy populations: A quantitative review of 30 years of investigations. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 829–885.
9.
CrossanM.CunhaM. P.VeraD.CunhaJ. (2005). Time and organizational improvisation. Academy of Management Review, 30, 129–145.
10.
FreseM.KringW.SooseA.ZempelJ. (1996). Personal initiative at work: Differences between East and West Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 37–63.
11.
FriedY.SlowikL. H. (2004). Enriching goal-setting theory with time: An integrated approach. Academy of Management Review, 29, 404–422.
12.
GeorgeJ. M. (2011). Dual tuning: A minimum condition for understanding affect in organizations. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 147–164.
13.
GeorgeJ. M.JonesG. R. (2000). The role of time in theory and theory building. Journal of Management, 26, 657–684.
14.
GerhartB. (1990). Voluntary turnover and alternative job opportunities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 467–476.
15.
GeversJ. M. P.RutteC. G.van EerdeW. (2006). Meeting deadlines in work groups: Implicit and explicit mechanisms. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 55, 52–72.
16.
JohnsG. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 286–408.
17.
KellyJ. R.FutoranG. C.McGrathJ. E. (1990). Capacity and capability: Seven studies of entrainment of task performance rates. Small Group Research, 21, 283–314.
18.
LuhmannM.HofmannW.EidM.LucasR. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 592–615.
19.
McGrathJ. E.TschanF. (2007). Temporal matters in the study of work groups in organizations. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 10, 3–12.
20.
MitchellT. R.JamesL. R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review, 26, 530–547.
21.
MohammedS.NadkarniS. (2011). Temporal diversity and team performance: The moderating role of team temporal leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 489–508.
22.
PearceJ. L.BranyiczkiI.BakacsiG. (1994). Person-based reward systems: A theory of organizational reward practices in reform-communist organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 261–282.
23.
PloyhartR. E.VandenbergR. J. (2010). Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management, 36, 94–120.
24.
RoeR. A. (2008). Time in applied psychology: A study of “what happens” rather than “what is”. European Psychologist, 13, 37–52.
25.
RuppD. E. (2011). An employee-centered model of organizational justice and social responsibility. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 72–94.
26.
ShippA. J.EdwardsJ. R.LambertL. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 1–22.
27.
ShippA. J.JansenK. J. (2011). Reinterpreting time in fit theory: Crafting and recrafting narratives of fit in medias res. Academy of Management Review, 36, 76–101.
28.
ShossM. K.PenneyL. M. (in press). The economy and absenteeism: A macro-level study. Journal of Applied Psychology.
29.
SodaG.UsaiA.ZaheerA. (2004). Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 893–906.
30.
StandiferR.BluedornA. (2006). Alliance management teams and entraintment: Sharing temporal mental models. Human Relations, 59, 903–927.
31.
SteelP.KönigC. J. (2006). Integrating theories of motivation. Academy of Management Review, 31, 889–913.
32.
TeslukP. E.JacobsR. R. (1998). Towards an integrated model of work experience. Personnel Psychology, 51, 321–355.
33.
van KnippenbergD.De DreuC. K. W.HomanA. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1008–1022.
34.
van KnippenbergD.SchippersM. C. (2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541.
35.
WhettonD. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution. Academy of Management Review, 14, 490–495.
36.
ZaheerS.AlbertA.ZaheerA. (1999). Time scales and organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 24, 725–741.
