Scholars have generally neglected the importance of the subjective aspects of time in the field of work stress. In this paper we analyze the joint effects of employee perceptions of subjective time and cultural, organizational, individual, and situational factors on employee experiences of stress. By explicitly considering the role of subjective time in stress research, we develop several propositions and discuss recommendations for future research. We discuss implications for organizational practice in reducing stress, revolving around the manipulation and experience of time.
AllenT. D.ChoE.MeierL. L. (2014). Work–family boundary dynamics. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 99–121.
2.
AnconaD. G.GoodmanP. S.LawrenceB. S.TushmanM. L. (2001). Time: A new research lens. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 645–663.
3.
AnconaD.OkhuysenG.PerlowL. (2001). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 512–529.
4.
ArndtJ.GronmoS.HawesD. (1981). The use of time as an expression of life-style: A cross-national study. Research in Marketing, 4, 1–28.
5.
AspinwallL. G.TaylorS. E. (1997). A stitch in time: Self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 417–436.
6.
BarnesC. M.WagnerD. T. (2009). Changing to daylight saving time cuts into sleep and increases workplace injuries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1305–1317.
7.
BaumA. (1990). Stress, intrusive imagery, and chronic distress. Health Psychology, 9(6), 653–675.
8.
BealD. J.GhandourL. (2011). Stability, change, and the stability of change in daily workplace affect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(4), 526–546.
9.
BeehrT. (1998). An organizational psychology meta-model of occupational stress. In CooperC. L. (Ed.), Theories of organizational stress (pp. 6–27). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
BeehrT.NewmanJ. (1978). Job stress, employee health, and organizational effectiveness: A facet analysis, model, and literature review. Personnel Psychology, 31(4), 665–669.
11.
BlountS.JanicikG. A. (2001). When plans change: Examining how people evaluate timing changes in work organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 566–585.
12.
BluedornA. C. (2002). The human organization of time: Temporary realities and experiences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
BluedornA. C.DenhardtR. B. (1988). Time and organizations. Journal of Management, 14(2), 299–319.
14.
BluedornA. C.JaussiK. S. (2008). Leaders, followers, and time. Leadership Quarterly, 19(6), 654–668.
15.
BluedornA. C.KalliathT. J.StrubeM. J.MartinG. D. (1999). Polychronicity and the Inventory of Polychronic Values (IPV): Development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(3–4), 205–230.
16.
BluedornA. C.KaufmanC. J.LaneP. M. (1992). How many things do you like to do at once? An introduction to monochronic and polychronic time. The Academy of Management Executive, 6(4), 17–26.
17.
BluedornA. C.MartinG. (2008). The time frames of entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(1), 1–20.
18.
BondM. J.FeatherN. T. (1988). Some correlates of structure and purpose in the use of time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(2), 321–329.
19.
BoswellW. R.Olson-BuchananJ. B.LePineM. A. (2004). Relations between stress and work outcomes: The role of felt challenge, job control, and psychological strain. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 165–181.
20.
BoyneG. A. (2002). Public and private management: What’s the difference?Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 97–122.
21.
BrotheridgeC. M.LeeR. T. (2005). Impact of work–family interference on general well-being: A replication and extension. International Journal of Stress Management, 12(3), 203–221.
22.
CavanaughM. A.BoswellW. R.RoehlingM. V.BoudreauJ. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 65–74.
23.
ChengG. H. L.ChanD. K.-S. (2008). Who suffers more from job insecurity? A meta-analytic review. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57(2), 272–303.
24.
ClarkP. A. (1985). A review of theories of time and structure for organizational sociology. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 4(1), 35–79.
25.
CohenS. (1980). Aftereffects of stress on human performance and social behavior: A review of research and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 88(1), 82–108.
26.
CojuharencoI.PatientD.BashshurM. R. (2011). Seeing the “forest” or the “trees” of organizational justice: Effects of temporal perspective on employee concerns about unfair treatment at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(1), 17–31.
27.
ConteJ. M.GintoftJ. N. (2005). Polychronicity, Big Five personality dimensions, and sales performance. Human Performance, 18(4), 427–444.
28.
CooperC. L.DeweP. J.O’DriscollM. P. (2001). Organizational stress: A review and critique of theory, research, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
CoxT. (1978). Stress. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
30.
CrossanM.ChunhaM.VeraD.CunhaJ. (2005). Time and organizational improvisation. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 129–145.
31.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
32.
CummingsT. G.CooperC. L. (2000). A cybernetic theory of organizational stress. In CooperC. L. (Ed.), Theories of stress (pp. 101–121). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33.
DeVoeS. E.PfefferJ. (2011). How higher economic value of time increases feelings of time pressure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 665–676.
34.
DubinskasF. A. (1988). Janus organizations: Scientists and managers in genetic engineering firms. In DubinskasF. A. (Ed.), Making time: Ethnographies of high-technology organizations (pp. 170–232). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
35.
EbyL. T.CasperW. J.LockwoodA.BordeauxC.BrinleyA. (2005). A retrospective on work and family research in IO/OB: A content analysis and review of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66(1), 124–197.
36.
EdenD. (2001). Vacation and other respites: Studying stress on and off the job. In CooperC. L.RobertsonI. T. (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 16, pp. 121–146). New York, NY: Wiley.
37.
EdwardsJ. R. (1992). A cybernetic theory of stress, coping, and well-being in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 238–274.
38.
EdwardsJ. R. (2008). Theories of person–environment fit: An assessment of theoretical progress. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 167–230.
39.
EdwardsJ. R.RothbardN. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Specifying the relationships between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 178–199.
40.
EdwardsJ. R.ShippA. J. (2007). The relationship between person–environment fit and outcomes: An integrative theoretical framework. In OstroffC.JudgeT. A. (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit: SIOP organizational frontier series (pp. 209–258). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41.
EllisA. D.TsuiA. S. (2007). Survival of the fittest or the least fit? When psychology meets ecology in organizational demography. In OstroffC.JudgeT. A. (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit: SIOP organizational frontier series (pp. 287–351). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
42.
FolkmanS.LazarusR. S. (1985). If it changes it must be a process: A study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(1), 150–170.
43.
FolkmanS.MoskowitzJ. T. (2000). Stress, positive emotion and coping. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(4), 115–118.
44.
FrancheR. L.WilliamsA.IbrahimS.GraceS. L. (2006). Path analysis of work conditions and work–family spillover as modifiable workplace factors associated with depressive symptomatology. Stress and Health, 22(2), 91–103.
45.
Francis-SmytheJ. A.RobertsonI. T. (2003). The importance of time congruity in the organization. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 52(2), 298–321.
46.
FriedY.GrantA. M.LeviA. S.HadaniM.SlowikL. H. (2007). Placing the job characteristics model in context: The contributing role of time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(7), 911–927.
47.
FriedY.ShiromA. (1984). Effects of job enrichment and social support on the stress–satisfaction relationship among engineers and technicians. In BurkeR. J. (Ed.), Current issues in occupational stress: Research and intervention (pp. 447–476). Toronto, Canada: York University Press.
48.
FriedY.SlowikL. H. (2004). Enriching goal-setting theory with time: An integrated approach. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 404–422.
49.
GeorgeJ. M.JonesG. R. (2000). The role of time in theory and theory building. Journal of Management, 26(4), 657–684.
50.
GoodmanP. S.LawrenceB. S.AnconaD. G.TushmanM. L. (2001). Introduction to the special issue. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 507–511.
51.
GreenhausJ.AllenT. D. (2011). Work–family balance: A review and extension of the literature. In QuickJ. C.TetrickL. E. (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (pp. 165–183). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
52.
GriffinM. A.NealA.ParkerS. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347.
53.
GruenR. J.FolkmanS.LazarusR. S. (1988). Centrality and individual differences in the meaning of daily hassles. Journal of Personality, 56(4), 743–763.
54.
GrzywaczJ. G.MarksN. F. (2000). Reconceptualizing the work–family interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(1), 111–126.
55.
GuoT.JiL. J.SpinaR.ZhangZ. (2012). Culture, temporal focus, and values of the past and the future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(8), 1030–1040.
56.
GuthrieE. R. (1935). The psychology of learning. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
57.
GuthrieE. R. (1942). Conditioning of learning in terms of stimulus, response, and association. In HenryN. B. (Ed.), The psychology of learning. 41st yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (Part II, pp. 17–60). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
58.
HalbeslebenJ. R. B. (2006). Sources of social support and burnout: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(5), 1134–1145.
59.
HallE. T.HallM. R. (1987). Understanding cultural differences. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
60.
HassardJ. (1996). Images of time in work and organization. In CleggS. R.HardyC.NordW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organizational studies (pp. 581–598). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
61.
HechtT. D.AllenN. J. (2005). Exploring links between polychronicity and well-being from the perspective of person–job fit: Does it matter if you prefer to only do one thing at a time?Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 98(2), 155–178.
62.
HillO. W.BlockR. A.BuggieS. E. (2000). Culture and beliefs about time: Comparisons among Black Americans, Black Africans, and White Americans. The Journal of Psychology, 134(4), 443–462.
63.
HobfollS. E. (1989). The conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.
64.
HobfollS. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50(3), 337–421.
65.
HolmanE. A.SilverR. C. (1998). Getting “stuck” in the past: Temporal orientation and coping with trauma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1146–1163.
66.
JansenK. J.Kristof-BrownA. (2006). Toward a multidimensional theory of person–environment fit. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(2), 193–212.
67.
JaquesE. (1982). The form of time. New York, NY: Crane & Russak.
68.
JohnsG. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386–408.
69.
JonesJ. M. (1988). Cultural differences in temporal perspectives: Instrumental and expressive behaviors in time. In McGrathJ. E. (Ed.), The social psychology of time (pp. 21–38). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
70.
KahnR. L.ByosiereP. (1992). Stress in organizations. In DunnetteM. D.HoughL. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 551–650). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
71.
KallebergA. L.RosenfeldR. A. (1990). Work in the family and in the labor market: A cross-national, reciprocal analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52(2), 331–346.
72.
KarasekR. A. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications of job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(2), 285–308.
73.
KaufmanC. J.LaneP. M.LindquistJ. D. (1991a). Time congruity in the organization: A proposed quality of life framework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 6(1), 79–106.
74.
KaufmanC. J.LaneP. M.LindquistJ. D. (1991b). Exploring more than 24 hours a day: A preliminary investigation of polychronic time use. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(3), 392–401.
75.
KossekE. E.OzekiC. (1998). Work–family conflict, policies, and the job–life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior-human resources research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 139–149.
76.
KristofA. L. (1996). Person–organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49.
77.
Kristof-BrownA. L.ZimmermanR. D.JohnsonE. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342.
78.
LandyF. J.RastegaryH.ThayerJ.ColvinC. (1991). Time urgency: The construct and its measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 644–657.
79.
LazarusR. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
80.
LazarusR. S. (1990). Theory-based stress measurement. Psychological Inquiry, 1(1), 3–12.
81.
LazarusR. S. (1991). Psychological stress in the workplace. In PerreweP. L. (Ed.), Handbook on job stress (pp. 1–13). Corte Madera, CA: Select Press.
82.
LazarusR. S. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 1–21.
83.
LazarusR. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. London, UK: Free Association.
84.
LazarusR. S.FolkmanS. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
85.
LazarusR. S.LaunierR. (1978). Stress-related transactions between person and environment. In PervinL. A.LewisM. (Eds.), Perspectives in interactional psychology (pp. 287–327). New York, NY: Plenum.
86.
LeeH.LiebenauJ. (1999). Time in organizational studies: Toward a new research direction. Organization Studies, 20(6), 1035–1058.
87.
LePineJ. A.LePineM. A.JacksonC. L. (2004). Challenge and hindrance stress: Relationships with exhaustion, motivation to learn, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 883–891.
88.
LePineJ. A.PodsakoffN. P.LePineM. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 764–775.
89.
LevineR. V. (1988). The pace of life across cultures. In McGrathJ. E. (Ed.), The social psychology of time (pp. 39–60). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
90.
LewinK. (1943). Defining the field at a given time. Psychological Review, 50(3), 292–310.
91.
LewinK. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (CartwrightD., Ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
92.
LourelM.GueguenN. (2007). Home–work interferences: Their consequences on organizational commitment and perceived stress. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 74, 49–58.
93.
MainemelisC. (2001). When the muse takes it all: A model for the experience of timelessness in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 548–565.
94.
MajorV. S.KleinK. J.EhrhartM. G. (2002). Work time, work interference with family, and psychological distress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(3), 427–436.
95.
McCauleyC. D.RudermanM. N.OhlottP. J.MorrowJ. E. (1994). Assessing the developmental components of managerial jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 544–560.
96.
McGrathJ. E. (1976). Stress and behavior in organizations. In DunnetteM. D. (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1351–1395). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
97.
McGrathJ. E.BeehrT. A. (1990). Time and the stress process: Some temporal issues in the conceptualization and measurement of stress. Stress and Medicine, 6(2), 93–104.
98.
McGrathJ. E.RotchfordN. L. (1983). Time and behavior in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 57–101.
99.
McGrathJ. E.TschanF. (2004). Temporal matters in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
100.
McGrathR. G. (1999). Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 13–30.
101.
MeichenbaumD. (1977). Cognitive behavior modification: An integrative approach. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
102.
MelamedS.ShiromA.TokerS.BerlinerS.ShapiraI. (2006). Burnout and risk of cardiovascular disease: Evidence, possible causal paths, and promising research directions. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 327–353.
103.
MitchellT. R.JamesL. R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 530–547.
104.
MitchellT. R.ThompsonL.PetersonE.CronkR. (1997). Temporal adjustments in the evaluation of events: The “rosy view.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(4), 421–448.
105.
MurrayH. A. (1938). Explorations in personality: A clinical and experimental study of fifty men of college age. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
106.
NewmanJ. E.BeehrT. A. (1979). Personal and organizational strategies for handling job stress: A review of research and opinion. Personnel Psychology, 32(1), 1–43.
107.
NowotnyH. (1992). Time and social theory. Time & Society, 1(3), 421–454.
OstroffC.SchulteM. (2007). Multiple perspectives of fit in organizations across levels of analysis. In OstroffC.JudgeT. A. (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit (pp. 3–69). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
110.
PodsakoffN. P.LePineJ. A.LePineM. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor– hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 438–454.
111.
RoeR. A. (2008). Time in applied psychology: Studying “what happens” rather than “what is.”European Psychologist, 13(1), 37–52.
112.
RoeR. A. (2014). Time, performance and motivation. In ShippA. J.FriedY. (Ed.), Time and work: How time impacts individuals (pp. 63–110). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
SannaL. J.StockerS. L.ClarkeJ. A. (2003). Rumination, imagination, and personality: Specters of the past and future in the present. In ChangE. C.SannaL. J. (Eds.), Virtue, vice, and personality: The complexity of behavior (pp. 105–124). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
115.
SaundersC.van SlykeC.VogelD. (2004). My time or yours? Managing time visions in global virtual teams. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 19–31.
116.
ScheinE. H. (1992). Organizational culture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
117.
SchmidtA. M.DolisC. M.TolliA. P. (2009). A matter of time: Individual differences, contextual dynamics, and goal progress effects on multiple-goal self-regulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 692–709.
118.
SchulerR. S. (1982). The integrative transformational process model of stress in organizations. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 3(1), 5–19.
119.
SengeP. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.
120.
ShippA. J.ColeM. S. (2015). Time in individual-level organizational studies: What it is, how it is used, and why isn’t it exploited more often?Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 237–260.
121.
ShippA. J.EdwardsJ. R.LambertL. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 1–22.
122.
ShippA. J.FriedY. (2014). Time research in management: Using temporal ambassadors to translate ideas into reality. In ShippA. J.FriedY. (Ed.), Time and work, Volume 1: How time impacts individuals (pp. 1–10). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
123.
ShippA. J.JansenK. J. (2011). Reinterpreting time in fit theory: Crafting and recrafting narratives of fit in medias res. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 76–101.
124.
ShiromA.TokerS.BerlinerS.ShapiraI. (2008). The job demand–control–support model and micro-inflammatory responses among healthy male and female employees: A longitudinal study. Work & Stress, 28(2), 661–669.
125.
ShupeE. I.McGrathJ. E. (2000). Stress and the sojourner. In CooperC. L. (Ed.), Theories of stress (pp. 86–100). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
126.
SitkinS. B. (1992). Learning through failure: The strategy of small losses. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 231–266.
127.
SlocombeT. E.BluedornA. C. (1999). Organizational behavior implications of the congruence between preferred polychronicity and experienced work-unit polychronicity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(1), 75–99.
128.
SodaG.UsaiA.ZaheerA. (2004). Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 893–906.
129.
SonnentagS. (2012). Time in organizational research: Catching up on a long neglected topic in order to improve theory. Organizational Psychology Review, 2(4), 361–368.
130.
SpenceJ. T.HelmreichR. L.PredR. S. (1987). Impatience versus achievement strivings in the Type A pattern: Differential effects on students’ health and academic achievement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72(4), 522–528.
131.
SverkeM.HellgrenJ.NaswallK. (2002). No security: A meta-analysis and review of job insecurity and its consequences. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(3), 242–264.
132.
TrougakosJ. P.HidegI.ChengB. H.BealD. J. (2014). Lunch breaks unpacked: The role of autonomy as a moderator of recovery during lunch. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 405–421.
133.
Van der WalZ.De GraafG.LasthuizenK. (2008). What’s valued most? Similarity and differences between the organization values of the public and private sector. Public Administration, 86(2), 465–482.
134.
WeissH. M.NicholasJ. P.DausC. S. (1999). An examination of the joint effects of affective experiences and job beliefs on job satisfaction and variations in affective experiences over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78(1), 1–24.
135.
WestmanM.EdenD. (1997). Effects of vacation on job stress and burnout: Relief and fade-out. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 516–527.
136.
WhippR. (1994). A time to be concerned. Time and Society, 3(1), 99–116.
137.
WilsonA. E.RossM. (2003). The identity function of autobiographical memory: Time is on our side. Memory, 11(2), 137–149.
138.
ZacherH. (2014). Individual difference predictors of change in career adaptability over time. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84(2), 188–198.
139.
ZaheerS.AlbertS.ZaheerA. (1999). Time scales and organizational theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 725–741.
140.
Zellmer-BruhnM. E.GibsonC. B.AldagR. J. (2001). Time flies like an arrow: Tracing antecedents and consequences of temporal elements of organizational culture. In CooperC. L.CartwrightS.EarleyP. C. (Eds.), The international handbook of organizational culture and climate (pp. 22–52). New York, NY: Wiley.
141.
ZimbardoP. G.BoydJ. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288.
142.
ZimbardoP. G.KeoughK. A.BoydJ. N. (1997). Present time perspective as a predictor of risky driving. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(6), 1007–1023.
