Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The evolution of hemophilia treatment and care is a fascinating one but has been fraught with many challenges at every turn. Over the last 50 years or so patients with hemophilia and providers have witnessed great advances in the treatment of this disease. With these advances, there has been a dramatic decrease in the mortality and morbidity associated with hemophilia. Even with the remarkable advancements in treatment, however, new and old challenges continue to plague the hemophilia community. The cost of factor replacement and the frequency of infusions, especially in patients with severe hemophilia on prophylaxis, remains a significant challenge for this population. Other challenges include obtaining reliable venous access, especially in younger patients, and the development of neutralizing alloantibodies (inhibitors). The development of extended half-life products, a bispecific antibody which mimics the coagulation function of factor VIII (FVIII) and inhibition of anticoagulation proteins such as antithrombin with antibodies, aptamers or RNA interference technology have offered novel therapeutic approaches to overcome some of these existing challenges. Additionally, ongoing gene therapy research offers a way to possibly cure hemophilia. These novel treatment tools in conjunction with the establishment of an increasing number of comprehensive hemophilia centers and worldwide advocacy efforts have continued to push the progress of hemophilia care to new frontiers. This review highlights and summarizes these novel therapeutic approaches and the current clinical progress of hemophilia A.

Keywords

anticoagulation inhibition bispecific antibody extended half life gene therapy hemophilia A novel therapies

Introduction

Hemophilia A and B are X-linked recessive congenital bleeding disorders due to a partial or complete absence of the clotting factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX), respectively. Hemophilia A accounts for 80–85% of patients with hemophilia and affects approximately 1 in 5000 male births. It has no ethnic or geographic predilection.^1,2 Factors VIII and IX are critical coagulation proteins which are important for the generation of thrombin and clot formation, both of which are negatively impacted by their absence.^3–5 The severity of hemophilia is classified according to the residual endogenous factor level and is divided into severe (<1 IU/dl), moderate (1–5 IU/dl) and mild (5–40 IU/dl) forms.^1,6,7 The bleeding phenotype generally correlates with the factor level.^8–10

The current treatment of hemophilia is based upon replacing the missing factor and can be done either as needed when bleeding episodes occur (episodic or on-demand therapy) or in a preventative manner (prophylaxis).⁷ In general, without prophylaxis, patients with severe hemophilia will develop severe, debilitating arthropathy. Therefore, the standard of care in countries with adequate resources is prophylaxis for all patients with severe hemophilia.^7,11 Prior to the advent of factor therapy and prophylaxis, the lack of effective treatment for hemophilia resulted in a shortened lifespan and severe morbidity.^12–14 However, the treatment landscape began to change in the 1930s after it was observed that plasma led to the correction of the clotting time of hemophilic blood. Whole blood and plasma were then used to achieve improved clotting function in patients with hemophilia.¹⁵ This was followed by the discovery of cryoprecipitate by Judith Graham Pool in 1964 which heralded a new era of treatment for patients with hemophilia.^16,17 In 1965 further purification of cryoprecipitate resulted in the development of new products which were called FVIII concentrates.¹⁸ Later in 1977 desmopressin, a synthetic drug which increases the plasma levels of FVIII and von Willebrand factor, was added to the armamentarium of treatment options for mild hemophilia A.^19,20 This momentum in the progress of hemophilia treatment, however, came almost to a grinding halt in the late 1970s and 1980s with the epidemics of transfusion-related viral infections such as hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). The hemophilia community was devastated but this tragedy brought to light the need for safer treatment options.^21,22 The implementation of more rigorous viral inactivation techniques and improved donor selection led to a dramatic decrease in the incidence of blood-borne viruses in the years following this unfortunate tragedy.^23–25 There continued to be renewed optimism for safer and effective treatment with the cloning of the gene for FVIII in 1984.^26,27 This subsequently paved the way for the production and successful clinical use of recombinant FVIII in 1989.²⁸ With the introduction of recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products, it was easier to shift the focus of hemophilia A care from primarily management of acute episodes of bleeding to one of prevention of bleeding and disease sequelae such as crippling arthropathy.^29–31

While the current treatments for hemophilia offer significant benefits to many patients, there remains several unmet needs. First, factor replacement is immunogenic and can result in the formation of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors), especially in hemophilia A. Inhibitors render factor replacement ineffective and patients who develop inhibitors have worse morbidity than patients with hemophilia who do not develop inhibitors.^12,32,33 Thus, one unmet need is the development of treatments that do not cause inhibitors. A second unmet need is for improved prophylactic therapies for patients with inhibitors, such that even if inhibitors develop, the morbidity for such patients would not be worse than for patients without inhibitors.^34–36 The major unmet need for patients who do not develop inhibitors is for treatments that reduce the treatment burden.^37–39 While factor therapy is very effective, it must be given intravenously and in general multiple times a week. This leads to a sizable proportion of patients who cannot adhere to the therapy due to venous access issues, time constraints, forgetfulness or other reasons.^39–42 Thus, novel therapies aimed at reducing the treatment burden are needed.

One recent development aimed at reducing the treatment burden is the licensure of several extended half-life factor products which allow for fewer infusions while attaining the same outcomes.^43,44 Recent advances in research have also led to the development of nonfactor replacement products such as bispecific antibodies which mimic FVIII or other molecules which function by inhibiting the natural anticoagulants such as antithrombin (AT) and tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI). These nonfactor replacement products are promising novel therapeutics which can shift the paradigm in the treatment approach for patients with hemophilia without and most importantly with inhibitors.⁴⁵ Lastly gene therapy research may offer a cure for hemophilia A in the future.⁴⁶ This review article will focus on these novel therapeutic strategies and the current clinical progress in hemophilia A, and will discuss only briefly gene therapy for hemophilia A.

Extended half-life products

Prophylaxis is now considered the standard of care for severe hemophilia A, with several clinical trials demonstrating the beneficial effect of prophylaxis on the health outcomes and quality of life of patients with hemophilia.^30,47 Existing FVIII products have an average half life of approximately 12 h.^30,44 This short half life requires prophylaxis treatment to be given every other day to maintain a trough level greater than 1% to achieve adequate hemostasis.^7,45,48 The requirement for relatively frequent intravenous administration of factor leads many patients (and parents of children with hemophilia) to have difficulties with treatment adherence.^40,49 The development of extended half-life factor concentrates seeks to reduce the treatment burden.⁵⁰

There are several techniques which have been utilized to extend the half life of the existing FVIII concentrates.^24,44 Currently two main approaches are utilized; these include PEGylation and Fc-fusion technology.^51,52 Alternative approaches using polysialic acid (PSA), hydrophilic protein polymers (XTEN), as well as the introduction of a covalent bond between the light and heavy chain of FVIII are also being explored.^53–58 Fc fusion was the first technology introduced into the hemophilia market which attempted to extend the half life of FVIII. This involves utilizing one of the body’s own mechanisms of prolonging the half life of certain proteins. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) is one such protein and can circulate in the system for approximately more than 21 days. The constant region (Fc) on IgG binds to the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn), allowing it to bypass lysosomal degradation and to be recycled back into circulation.^44,59 Researchers have exploited this fact and fused the Fc domain of the monomeric form of IgG to the FVIII molecule, resulting in decreased clearance and extended half life of the factor.^45,59 Efmoroctocog α (Eloctate, Bioverativ, Waltham, MA, USA), a B-domain deleted recombinant FVIII, is linked to the dimeric Fc domain (rFVIII Fc) of human IgG_1. It was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2014.^45,60,61 The mean half-life extension of rFVIII-Fc is about 1.5 fold that of recombinant FVIII (Table 1).⁴⁴ Results from pivotal phase III studies, A-LONG in adults and adolescents aged at least 12 years, Kids A-LONG in children aged under 12 years, and interim results from the ongoing extension study (ASPIRE) have demonstrated the long-term effectiveness and safety of rFVIII-Fc for the treatment and prevention of bleeding in previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe hemophilia A. There has also not been any sustained inhibitor development to rFVIII-Fc. rFVIII-Fc was generally well tolerated and adverse events observed were consistent with those expected in the general hemophilia population.^60,62,63

Table 1.

Available extended half-life products.

Product	Technology	Mean half life ± SD (h)	FDA approval/trial status	Manufacturer	References
Eloctate	Fc fusion	19.7 ± 2.3	2014	Bioverativ/Sobi (Waltham, USA)	Berntorp and Andersson,⁴³ Mancuso and Santagostino,⁴⁴ Mahlangu et al.⁶⁰
Adynovate (BAX 855)	Random PEGylation	14.7 ± 3.8	2015	Shire (Dublin, Ireland)	Mancuso and Santagostino,⁴⁴ Mullins et al.,⁶⁴ Turecek et al.⁶⁵
BAY 94-9027	Site-specific PEGylation	~19	Phase III	Bayer (Berlin, Germany)	Mancuso and Santagostino,⁴⁴ Knobe and Berntorp,⁵² Reding et al.⁶⁶
N8 GP	Single site-specific PEGylation	~19	Phase III	NovoNordisk (Copenhagen, Denmark)	Mancuso and Santagostino,⁴⁴ Konkle et al.⁶⁷

PEG, polyethylene glycol; SD, standard deviation; FDA, US Food and Drug Administration.

PEGylation, the second major technology that is being utilized, covalently binds polyethylene glycol (PEG) to FVIII. This protects the FVIII from proteolytic degradation, leading again to decreased clearance from the circulation and an extended half life of the FVIII molecule. The technique of PEGylation varies among the various manufacturers and products (Table 1).^64–66,68 For BAY 94-9027, N8-GP (turoctocog α pegol) and BAX855 (Adynovate, Shire, Dublin, Ireland), there was an approximate half-life extension of 1.5 in comparison to the standard half-life factors they were compared with in clinical trials (Table 1). The results of completed and ongoing studies with these products have in general shown excellent safety and efficacy for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in adults and children with severe hemophilia A. For most patients with severe hemophilia A exposed to these products, no inhibitory antibodies to FVIII, the PEGylated product or PEG was observed.^44,64,66,67 Of note, however, a phase III trial (Pathfinder 2) [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01480180], which evaluated the safety and efficacy of N8-GP for the treatment of bleeds and prophylaxis in 186 PTPs with severe hemophilia A aged 12 years and over, reported one patient who developed a de novo low-titer anti-FVIII inhibitor after 93 exposure days to N8-GP. Initially the patient was clinically doing well and continued to be treated with N8-GP. The patient, however, developed a high-titer inhibitor 3 months after being enrolled in the extension phase of the study and was subsequently withdrawn.⁶⁹ Some questions and concerns have also been raised about the retention of PEG and the long-term side effects of this, however no long-term toxicities have been observed in therapeutics which use PEG technology.^44,70

FVIII is predominantly synthesized by liver sinusoidal endothelial cells as a single-chain protein. When secreted, it circulates as a heterodimeric structure consisting of a heavy (A1-A2-B domains) and light chain (A3-C1-C2 domains) which are noncovalently linked by a metal ion. Under certain conditions this structure can dissociate, resulting in the formation of inactivated dissociated FVIII chains.^3,71 Increasing the stability of the bond between these two chains offers yet another way of potentially prolonging the half life of FVIII^44,55 CSL Behring (King of Prussia, PA, USA) has increased the stability of the FVIII molecule by producing a single-chain rFVIII where the heavy and light chains are covalently linked by a truncated B domain (Afstyla).^55,72,73 Additionally, this single-chain rFVIII has an increased affinity for von Willebrand factor (VWF), its carrier protein in circulation. This increased affinity for its carrier protein VWF should also assist in decreasing the clearance of this single-chain rFVIII from circulation.^73,74 It was well tolerated in the clinical studies and there was no development of inhibitory antibodies. The increase in the half life of FVIII using this technique, however, was even more modest compared with the other methods of extension described above, with the extension ranging from 1.1 to 1.4 times the baseline FVIII half life, with a geometric mean half life of approximately 14 h.^72,73,75 Lastly, other approaches of increasing the half life of FVIII involves the addition of negative surface charges and hydrophilic, unstructured polypeptides to the molecule by utilizing PSA and XTEN technology respectively.^53,54,56 Studies with these technologies are presently in the preclinical phases of development.^76–80

The overall maximum extension of the half life of FVIII, however, has only been between 1.5 and 1.8 times the baseline half life using most of these modification techniques. This is a modest increase compared with extended FIX products for which between 2.5 and 5 times the baseline FIX half life has been achieved. Alternative more effective therapeutic strategies for hemophilia A are thus needed.^44,50

A bispecific antibody

FVIII brings two key components of the coagulation cascade, activated FIX (FIXa) and FX, together to produce the tenase complex. The tenase complex is essential in the generation of activated factor X (FXa), which in turn is crucial for proper thrombin generation and hemostasis.⁵ Emicizumab (ACE910) is a bispecific monoclonal antibody (Mab) which mimics the function of the activated FVIII (FVIIIa) molecule (Table 2) by binding to FIXa with one variable region and to FX with the other.⁸¹

Table 2.

FVIII mimetics and anticoagulant inhibitors.

Product (generic name)	Manufacturer	Mechanism of action	Clinical trial status	Reference
ACE 910 (emicizumab)	Chugai/Hoffman-La Roche (Basel, Switzerland)	Humanized bispecific monoclonal antibody, mimics FVIII	Phase III	Shima et al.,⁸¹ Uchida et al.,⁸² Oldenburg et al.⁸³
NN-7415 (concizumab)	Novo Nordisk (Copenhagen, Denmark)	Humanized monoclonal antibody against TFPI	Phase I	Mancuso and Santagostino,⁴⁴ Chowdary et al.⁸⁴
BAY 1093884	Bayer (Berlin, Germany)	Humanized monoclonal antibody against TFPI	Phase I	Monahan et al.,⁸⁵ Gu et al.⁸⁶
ALT-AT3 (fitusiran)	Alnylam (Cambridge, Germany)	siRNA against AT3	Phase I/II	Sehgal et al.,⁸⁷ Pasi et al.,⁸⁸ Monahan,⁸⁹ Pasi et al.⁹⁰

FVIII factor VIII; TFPI, tissue factor pathway inhibitor.

Emicizumab increases peak thrombin generation in a dose-dependent manner. A phase I trial showed excellent safety and tolerability profiles of emicizumab given up to a dose of 3 mg/kg/week subcutaneously as well as a half life of between 4 and 5 weeks.^81,82 Additionally, the annualized bleeding rate (ABR) for inhibitor and noninhibitor patients was dramatically decreased from a median rate of 15.2 to 0.0 in the group administered the highest dose of emicizumab.^21,44,81 The long half life as well as the mode of administration offers possible solutions to address the unmet needs regarding treatment burden previously described.³⁸ Even more promising is its potential use in patients with inhibitors. While emicizumab mimics the function of FVIII, it does not resemble FVIII structurally or immunologically and thus is not affected by inhibitors. Given its substantial potential to change the treatment approach for this subset of patients, the FDA granted breakthrough therapy destination for emicizumab as a promising therapy in this group of patients with poor outcomes. The results of the phase III trial with emicizumab prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A with inhibitors demonstrated significant and clinically important results. The ABR in the group that was randomly assigned to emicizumab prophylaxis (group A, 35 participants) was 2.9 versus 23.3 in the group assigned to no prophylaxis (group B, 18 participants). Among subjects who had previously received bypassing agent prophylaxis, emicizumab significantly lowered their ABR as well. Importantly, four subjects developed serious thrombotic events (two with venous thrombosis and two with thrombotic microangiopathy). These events all occurred in subjects who received activated prothrombin complex concentrates at high doses (>100 IU/kg/day) for more than 24 h while treating breakthrough bleeds.^24,44,45,83 Of note, a fifth patient who also developed thrombotic microangiopathy died from rectal hemorrhage. His thrombotic microangiopathy was improving before he died, and his death was determined not to be due to emicizumab. No antidrug antibodies were detected to emicizumab.⁸³

Rebalancing the coagulation scale

The hemostatic system is delicately balanced between the natural procoagulants and anticoagulants in the body.⁹¹ A disruption in this balance can tilt the hemostatic scale either towards a bleeding tendency or a thrombotic tendency. While there is usually a close correlation between the bleeding phenotype and FVIII levels, it has been observed that some patients with severe hemophilia even with identical genetic mutations from the same family display different bleeding tendencies.^92–94 The overall bleeding phenotype of the patient with hemophilia appears to be the result of the combined effect of several modifiers which affect the natural hemostatic balance.^94,95 One of the postulated possible modifiers is the coinheritance of a thrombophilic risk factor.^52,95 There are several case reports and experiments describing the possible influence of an inherited thrombophilia, such as factor V Leiden mutation, prothrombin G20210A mutation, deficiencies of AT, protein C and protein S on the ultimate bleeding phenotypic expression of patients with hemophilia.^96–98 Researchers have utilized this information to develop novel therapeutics which target the natural anticoagulants in order to rebalance the hemostatic system in the setting of an inherited bleeding disorder.^45,52

Inhibition of TFPI

TFPI is a Kunitz-type serine protease inhibitor and is one of the natural anticoagulants being targeted by hemophilia researchers as a novel therapeutic agent.⁴⁵ It consists of three domains, domain 1 which binds to the tissue factor activated factor VII (TF-FVIIa) complex, domain 2 which acts on activated factor X (FXa) and domain 3 which interacts with protein S.⁹⁹ TFPI exerts its anticoagulant effects by inhibiting the TF-FVIIa complex as well as early forms of the prothrombinase complex.^99,100 Several animal studies have demonstrated that inhibition of TFPI can enhance the hemostatic activity of the TF-VIIa and prothrombinase complexes, leading to more stable clot formation and mitigation of hemophilia bleeding.^101–103 These promising results in animal models prompted further studies in patients with hemophilia with and without inhibitors.^104,105 Several different agents have been developed that target TFPI, however a Mab and an aptamer were the only ones with promising enough results to advance to clinical trials.^84,105–107

Concizumab (Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) is a humanized Mab (Table 2) which inhibits domain 2 of the TFPI molecule.¹⁰⁵ Prevention of the binding of FXa to TFPI by concizumab also negates the regulatory function of TFPI on the TF pathway by preventing inhibition of the TF-FVIIa complex.^45,105 This results in amplified generation of FXa and thrombin in vitro. In vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated the high affinity binding of concizumab to all forms of TFPI (free and cell-surface bound).^85,105,108 Possible advantages of this therapeutic approach and the use of a Mab are a longer half life and subcutaneous mode of administration. Results from a recent randomized first human dose multinational trial in healthy volunteers and patients with hemophilia showed that concizumab was well tolerated either as intravenous or subcutaneous delivery with no serious adverse events or development of antibodies. Free plasma TFPI levels decreased as the concentration of concizumab increased, with TFPI levels being decreased for at least 14 days post dosing at the highest dose level of concizumab.⁸⁴ Presently a phase II study [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02490787] has been initiated and will evaluate the safety, pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of concizumab administered at increasing doses subcutaneously in subjects with hemophilia A.^45,109 No serious adverse events or antibodies to concizumab have been reported thus far.⁸⁴ Additionally another Mab is under development, BAY 1093884 (Bayer Healthcare, Berlin, Germany), which similar to concizumab, is a humanized Mab with high affinity to domain 2 of TFPI with some activity against domain 1 as well. Preclinical studies with this antibody have demonstrated a dose-dependent decrease in TFPI activity. A phase I, first in human program with escalating doses will begin shortly.⁸⁶

Apatmers are short single-stranded RNA or DNA oligonucleotides which bind with high affinity and specificity to target molecules. BAX 499 (Shire) is a PEGylated nucleic acid aptamer which has high affinity for Kunitz domains 1 and 3 of TFPI.¹⁰⁶ Animal studies with BAX 499 showed promising results with effective inhibition and dampening of the TF pathway.¹⁰⁷ It advanced to a human phase I trial which unfortunately was terminated abruptly after there was an unexpected increase in TFPI levels and overall reduction in thrombin generation resulting in bleeding. Dockal and colleagues explained these unanticipated results after examining inhibition of a wide range of concentrations of TFPI by BAX 499 and discovered the molecule to be a partial inhibitor of TFPI, effectively inhibiting TFPI at lower concentrations but not as well at higher concentrations. The resultant increased concentrations of TFPI predominated, leading to excessive bleeding in these patients.^107,110,111

Inhibition of AT

Another potential natural anticoagulant target is AT. AT is the natural inhibitor of thrombin and FXa, key factors in the final pathway of the coagulation cascade. A significant reduction in the activity of AT would thus be predicted to increase the generation of FXa and thrombin, thereby improving hemostasis in patients with bleeding disorders.¹¹² One approach to decrease production of AT is by the use of small interfering RNA (siRNA) which interferes with post-transcriptional expression of the AT protein (Table 2). Fitusiran (ALN-AT3, Alnylam, Cambridge, MA, USA), utilizes this technology to suppress the hepatic synthesis of AT.^87,113 The results of a phase I dose-escalation study of fitusiran in healthy volunteers as well as patients with hemophilia A and B without inhibitors administered subcutaneously as weekly and monthly infusion schedules has shown promising results. It was carried out in three enrolled phases (part A, B, and C). Part A of the study involved randomization of healthy volunteers to receive either a single, low subcutaneous fitusiran dose (0.03 mg/kg) or placebo. This single, low dose resulted in 28–32% knockdown of AT. In the next open-label phases, parts B and C, participants with hemophilia A and B were either assigned to receive escalating doses of fitusiran in a once-weekly (part B) or once monthly dosing schedule (part C). In part B (weekly escalating doses: 15 μg/kg, 45 μg/kg, and 75 μg/kg), participants in the highest dose cohort group achieved a maximum of 86% AT knockdown, with an average AT knockdown of 61%. Part C assessed monthly dosing ranging from 225 to 1800 μg/kg or a fixed dose of 80 mg. Again, dose-dependent lowering of the AT and increase in thrombin generation was observed as with the weekly dosing of fitusiran. A post hoc exploratory analysis performed on the study to determine the bleeding rate with monthly administration of fitusiran showed a substantial decrease in bleeding rates per month after treatment with the drug compared with before treatment. The drug demonstrated a good safety profile with no significant adverse events and there was no development of antibodies to fitusiran.^88,89 Part D of the study is presently ongoing and is looking at two fixed monthly doses of either 50 mg or 80 mg of fitusiran in patients with hemophilia A and B with inhibitors. There are encouraging early data with the use of fitusiran in these patients with inhibitors, with AT decrease and thrombin generation increase consistent with those of noninhibitor patients.^45,89,90 There were no thromboembolic events described during the initial phase I study described previously,⁸⁸ however a recent press release in early September 2017 by Alnylam pharmaceuticals (Cambridge, MA, USA) reported the occurrence of a fatal thrombotic event in a patient with hemophilia A without inhibitors in the phase II open-label extension study of fitusiran [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02554773]. As a result, the company has suspended the fitusiran studies pending further review of the safety event and development of a risk mitigation strategy.¹¹⁴

Inhibition of activated protein C

The protein C system is also an attractive potential target for inhibition. Patients with severe hemophilia A with coinherited factor V Leiden mutation and partial activated protein C (APC) resistance have demonstrated a milder bleeding phenotype compared with genotypically similar patients with severe hemophilia A without factor V Leiden mutation. Several in vitro studies have also successfully shown this.^96,98,115 APC is one of the major natural inhibitors of the coagulation system. It exerts its anticoagulant effect by inhibiting the tenase and prothromnbinase complexes by cleavage inactivation of activated FVIII and factor V respectively. Inhibition of APC will thus allow the tenase and prothrombinase complexes more time to generate thrombin.¹¹⁶ Several preclinical studies are ongoing and show promising results using different molecules such as serpins, antibodies and aptamers for APC inhibition, and their potential use as novel therapeutic strategies for hemophilia treatment.^116–118

Gene therapy

Gene therapy offers the possibility of a longer-acting treatment option and possible cure for hemophilia.¹¹⁹ Hemophilia A and B are monogenic inherited diseases and as such lend themselves well to gene therapy. Even a modest elevation in the factor activity level using gene therapy in patients with hemophilia can result in a significant improvement in the overall clinical bleeding phenotype.¹²⁰ With the cloning of the factor IX and FVIII genes in the 1980s, the prospects of new and innovative hemophilia treatment options seemed vast. Not only did this new technology lead to the development of recombinant factor concentrates but it also stimulated early attempts of hemophilia gene therapy in animal models.^{26,27,121–123} Results from these animal trials prompted further work with human clinical gene therapy trials. The smaller size of the FIX complementary DNA (cDNA) sequence (1.4 Kb) compared with FVIII cDNA sequence (4.4 Kb) has allowed researchers to more easily identify suitable vectors to transfer the FIX cDNA into potential target cells, making the overall progress of gene therapy more rapid with hemophilia B compared with hemophilia A.

There were several earlier modes of gene transfer which have been attempted.^121,124,125 The adeno associated virus (AAV) vectors have shown consistent and promising results, especially in hemophilia B. This approach is at the frontline with the current wave of clinical trials in hemophilia gene therapy.^123,126 Some major challenges with gene transfer into target cells (mainly hepatocytes) using the AAV vector have been the development of an immune response to the vector or the actual transgene product, and as mentioned with respect to FVIII, the technical difficulties of incorporating the FVIII cDNA into appropriate vectors because of its larger size compared with FIX.¹²⁷ The present wave of trials seeks to refine and improve upon AAV vector transduction into potential target cells and to address some of these challenges.^123,128

To address the mismatch in the size of the FVIII cDNA and the capacity of the AAV vector to incorporate it adequately, techniques such as B domain deletion of the FVIII molecule have been successfully employed to produce a gene construct which can fit within the vector. Another barrier to AAV-mediated gene transfer for FVIII is its large coding sequence which is larger than the limited package capacity of the AAV vectors. Packaging of larger expression cassettes into the AAV vectors are generally inconsistent, yielding vector particles with reduced infectivity. Codon optimization of the B domain deleted (BDD) FVIII molecule assist in improving the expression of FVIII.^{46,122,129,130} Biomarin Pharmaceutical (Novato, CA, USA) launched a phase I/II trial in late 2015 with an AAV serotype five FVIII vector which contains a codon optimized BDD-FVIII cassette, BMN 270. Nine patients with severe hemophilia A were treated with vector doses ranging from 6 × 10¹² to 6 × 10¹³ vector genomes/kg (vg/kg) of BMN 270. The seven patients treated with the highest vector dose of 6 × 10¹³ vg/kg all achieved sustained FVIII levels within the range of 40–150% for over 12 weeks post infusion. BMN 270 received Orphan Drug status from the FDA in February 2016 and from the European Commission in March 2016. This trial opens new horizons for the management of hemophilia A and offers a possible real attainable curative treatment option for patients with hemophilia A.^{122,123,127,131}

Other gene therapy options are also being explored in parallel to the ongoing clinical trials with AAV vectors, namely cell-based gene therapy and gene editing techniques, and have also shown encouraging preliminary results.^{123,132–134}

Conclusion

For decades, hemophilia therapy has relied upon replacing the missing factor, however recently, there has been an explosion of treatment approaches which aim to overcome the shortcomings of factor replacement. While extended half-life products have some of the same limitations as standard factor replacement, they nevertheless have led to a reduction in the treatment burden for many patients.

Nonfactor alternatives such as emicizumab and the anticoagulant inhibitors such as fitusiran (ALN-AT3) and concizumab offer a dramatic reduction in treatment burden for patients without inhibitors, but perhaps more importantly, may offer patients with inhibitors significantly improved therapeutic options for the prevention of bleeding and reduction in morbidity. Finally, researchers continue to refine the technique of gene therapy for treatment of patients with hemophilia A, and while not yet perfected, the results are promising and in the future may offer a possible cure.

Footnotes

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Guy Young has the following conflicts of interest: Alnylam, Bayer, Bioverativ, CSL Behring, Genentech, Kedrion, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Shire. Dr Pauline Balkaransingh has none.

References

Hoyer

. Hemophilia A. N Engl J Med 1994; 330: 38–47.

Mannucci

Tuddenham

EGD

. The hemophilias – from royal genes to gene therapy. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1773–1779.

Chavin

. Factor VIII: structure and function in blood clotting. Am J Hematol 1984; 16: 297–306.

Lawson

Mann

. Cooperative activation of human factor IX by the human extrinsic pathway of blood coagulation. J Biol Chem 1991; 266: 11317–11327.

Repke

Gemmell

Guha

et al . Hemophilia as a defect of the tissue factor pathway of blood coagulation: effect of factors VIII and IX on factor X activation in a continuous-flow reactor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990; 87: 7623–7627.

White

II Rosendaal

Aledort

et al . Definitions in hemophilia. Recommendation of the scientific subcommittee on factor VIII and factor IX of the scientific and standardization committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Thromb Haemost 2001; 85: 560.

Srivastava

Brewer

Mauser-Bunschoten

et al . Guidelines for the management of hemophilia. Haemophilia 2013; 19: e1–47.

Aronstam

Rainsford

Painter

. Patterns of bleeding in adolescents with severe haemophilia A. Br Med J 1979; 1: 469–470.

Kulkarni

Lusher

. Intracranial and extracranial hemorrhages in newborns with hemophilia: a review of the literature. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 1999; 21: 289–295.

10.

van Dijk

Fischer

van der Bom

et al . Variability in clinical phenotype of severe haemophilia: the role of the first joint bleed. Haemophilia 2005; 11: 438–443.

11.

Roosendaal

Lafeber

. Pathogenesis of haemophilic arthropathy. Haemophilia 2006; 12(Suppl. 3): 117–121.

12.

Mannucci

. Back to the future: a recent history of haemophilia treatment. Haemophilia 2008; 14(Suppl. 3): 10–18.

13.

Plug

van der Bom

Peters

et al . Thirty years of hemophilia treatment in the Netherlands, 1972–2001. Blood 2004; 104: 3494–3500.

14.

Franchini

Mannucci

. Hemophilia A in the third millennium. Blood Rev 2013; 27: 179–184.

15.

Patek

Taylor

. Hemophilia. II. Some properties of a substance obtained from normal human plasma effective in accelerating the coagulation of hemophilic blood. J Clin Invest 1937; 16: 113–124.

16.

Hershgold

Pool

Pappenhagen

et al . A more potent human antihemophilic globulin concentrate: preparation and clinical trial. Bibl Haematol 1965; 23: 1214–1218.

17.

Pool

Gershgold

Pappenhagen

. High-potency antihaemophilic factor concentrate prepared from cryoglobulin precipitate. Nature 1964; 203: 312.

18.

Abildgaard

Simone

Corrigan

et al . Treatment of hemophilia with glycine-precipitated factor 8. N Engl J Med 1966; 275: 471–475.

19.

Mannucci

. Desmopressin: an historical introduction. Haemophilia 2008; 14(Suppl. 1): 1–4.

20.

Mannucci

. Desmopressin (DDAVP) in the treatment of bleeding disorders: the first twenty years. Haemophilia 2000; 6(Suppl. 1): 60–67.

21.

White

. Hemophilia: an amazing 35-year journey from the depths of HIV to the threshold of cure. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2010; 121: 61–73; discussion 4–5.

22.

Lee

. The natural history of HIV disease in haemophilia. Blood Rev 1998; 12: 135–144.

23.

McDougal

Martin

Cort

et al . Thermal inactivation of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome virus, human T lymphotropic virus-III/lymphadenopathy-associated virus, with special reference to antihemophilic factor. J Clin Invest 1985; 76: 875–877.

24.

Guelcher

. Evolution of the treatments for hemophilia. J Infus Nurs 2016; 39: 218–224.

25.

Oldenburg

Dolan

Lemm

. Haemophilia care then, now and in the future. Haemophilia 2009; 15(Suppl. 1): 2–7.

26.

Gitschier

Wood

Goralka

et al . Characterization of the human factor VIII gene. Nature 1984; 312: 326–330.

27.

Toole

Knopf

Wozney

et al . Molecular cloning of a cDNA encoding human antihaemophilic factor. Nature 1984; 312: 342–347.

28.

White

II McMillan

Kingdon

et al . Use of recombinant antihemophilic factor in the treatment of two patients with classic hemophilia. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 166–170.

29.

Lusher

. Prophylaxis in children with hemophilia: is it the optimal treatment? Thromb Haemost 1997; 78: 726–729.

30.

Lofqvist

Nilsson

Berntorp

et al . Haemophilia prophylaxis in young patients – a long-term follow-up. J Intern Med 1997; 241: 395–400.

31.

Manco-Johnson

Nuss

Geraghty

et al . Results of secondary prophylaxis in children with severe hemophilia. Am J Hematol 1994; 47: 113–117.

32.

Franchini

Mannucci

. Inhibitors of propagation of coagulation (factors VIII, IX and XI): a review of current therapeutic practice. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2011; 72: 553–562.

33.

Gringeri

Mantovani

Scalone

et al . Cost of care and quality of life for patients with hemophilia complicated by inhibitors: the COCIS Study Group. Blood 2003; 102: 2358–2363.

34.

Kempton

Meeks

. Toward optimal therapy for inhibitors in hemophilia. Blood 2014; 124: 3365–3372.

35.

Walsh

Soucie

Miller

. Impact of inhibitors on hemophilia A mortality in the United States. Am J Hematol 2015; 90: 400–405.

36.

Peyvandi

Ettingshausen

Goudemand

et al . New findings on inhibitor development: from registries to clinical studies. Haemophilia 2017; 23(Suppl. 1): 4–13.

37.

Zhou

Koerper

Johnson

et al . Burden of illness: direct and indirect costs among persons with hemophilia A in the United States. J Med Econ 2015; 18: 457–465.

38.

Petrini

. Identifying and overcoming barriers to prophylaxis in the management of haemophilia. Haemophilia 2007; 13(Suppl. 2): 16–22.

39.

Coppola

Tagliaferri

Di Capua

et al . Prophylaxis in children with hemophilia: evidence-based achievements, old and new challenges. Semin Thromb Hemost 2012; 38: 79–94.

40.

Schrijvers

Uitslager

Schuurmans

et al . Barriers and motivators of adherence to prophylactic treatment in haemophilia: a systematic review. Haemophilia 2013; 19: 355–361.

41.

Blanchette

Manco-Johnson

Santagostino

et al . Optimizing factor prophylaxis for the haemophilia population: where do we stand? Haemophilia 2004; 10(Suppl. 4): 97–104.

42.

Valentino

Ewenstein

Navickis

et al . Central venous access devices in haemophilia. Haemophilia 2004; 10: 134–146.

43.

Berntorp

Andersson

. Prophylaxis for hemophilia in the era of extended half-life factor VIII/Factor IX products. Semin Thromb Hemost 2016; 42: 518–525.

44.

Mancuso

Santagostino

. Outcome of clinical trials with new extended half-life FVIII/IX concentrates. J Clin Med 2017; 6: pii: E39.

45.

Peyvandi

Garagiola

Biguzzi

. Advances in the treatment of bleeding disorders. J Thromb Haemost 2016; 14: 2095–2106.

46.

George

Fogarty

. Gene therapy for hemophilia: past, present and future. Semin Hematol 2016; 53: 46–54.

47.

Manco-Johnson

Abshire

Shapiro

et al . Prophylaxis versus episodic treatment to prevent joint disease in boys with severe hemophilia. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 535–544.

48.

Fischer

Ljung

. Primary prophylaxis in haemophilia care: guideline update 2016. Blood Cells Mol Dis. Epub ahead of print 18 March 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2017.03.009.

49.

Hacker

Geraghty

Manco-Johnson

. Barriers to compliance with prophylaxis therapy in haemophilia. Haemophilia 2001; 7: 392–396.

50.

Saenko

Pipe

. Strategies towards a longer acting factor VIII. Haemophilia 2006; 12(Suppl. 3): 42–51.

51.

Mancuso

Mannucci

. Fc-fusion technology and recombinant FVIII and FIX in the management of the hemophilias. Drug Des Devel Ther 2014; 8: 365–371.

52.

Knobe

Berntorp

. New treatments in hemophilia: insights for the clinician. Ther Adv Hematol 2012; 3: 165–175.

53.

Schellenberger

Wang

Geething

et al . A recombinant polypeptide extends the in vivo half-life of peptides and proteins in a tunable manner. Nat Biotechnol 2009; 27: 1186–1190.

54.

Pisal

Balu-Iyer

. Phospholipid binding improves plasma survival of factor VIII. Thromb Haemost 2010; 104: 1073–1075.

55.

Schmidbauer

Witzel

Robbel

et al . Physicochemical characterisation of rVIII-SingleChain, a novel recombinant single-chain factor VIII. Thromb Res 2015; 136: 388–395.

56.

Podust

Balan

Sim

et al . Extension of in vivo half-life of biologically active molecules by XTEN protein polymers. J Control Release 2016; 240: 52–66.

57.

Pabinger-Fasching

. The story of a unique molecule in hemophilia A: recombinant single-chain factor VIII. Thromb Res 2016; 141(Suppl. 3): S2–S4.

58.

Podust

Sim

Kothari

et al . Extension of in vivo half-life of biologically active peptides via chemical conjugation to XTEN protein polymer. Protein Eng Des Sel 2013; 26: 743–753.

59.

Ober

Martinez

Lai

et al . Exocytosis of IgG as mediated by the receptor, FcRn: an analysis at the single-molecule level. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101: 11076–11081.

60.

Mahlangu

Powell

Ragni

et al . Phase 3 study of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein in severe hemophilia A. Blood 2014; 123: 317–325.

61.

Dumont

Liu

Low

et al . Prolonged activity of a recombinant factor VIII-Fc fusion protein in hemophilia A mice and dogs. Blood 2012; 119: 3024–3030.

62.

Nolan

Mahlangu

Perry

et al . Long-term safety and efficacy of recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) in subjects with haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2016; 22: 72–80.

63.

Young

Mahlangu

Kulkarni

et al . Recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein for the prevention and treatment of bleeding in children with severe hemophilia A. J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13: 967–977.

64.

Mullins

Stasyshyn

Alvarez-Roman

et al . Extended half-life pegylated, full-length recombinant factor VIII for prophylaxis in children with severe haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2017; 23: 238–246.

65.

Turecek

Bossard

Graninger

et al . BAX 855, a PEGylated rFVIII product with prolonged half-life. Development, functional and structural characterisation. Hamostaseologie 2012; 32(Suppl. 1): S29–S38.

66.

Reding

Poulsen

et al . Safety and efficacy of BAY 94–9027, a prolonged-half-life factor VIII. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15: 411–419.

67.

Konkle

Stasyshyn

Chowdary

et al . Pegylated, full-length, recombinant factor VIII for prophylactic and on-demand treatment of severe hemophilia A. Blood 2015; 126: 1078–1085.

68.

Bjornsdottir

Sternebring

Kappers

et al . Pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution and excretion of 40kDa PEG and PEGylated rFVIII (N8-GP) in rats. Eur J Pharm Sci 2016; 87: 58–68.

69.

Giangrande

Andreeva

Chowdary

et al . Clinical evaluation of glycoPEGylated recombinant FVIII: efficacy and safety in severe haemophilia A. Thromb Haemost 2017; 117: 252–261.

70.

Ivens

Baumann

McDonald

et al . PEGylated therapeutic proteins for haemophilia treatment: a review for haemophilia caregivers. Haemophilia 2013; 19: 11–20.

71.

Fay

. Factor VIII structure and function. Int J Hematol 2006; 83: 103–108.

72.

Stasyshyn

Djambas Khayat

Iosava

et al . Safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of rVIII-SingleChain in children with severe hemophilia A: results of a multicenter clinical trial. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15: 636–644.

73.

Mahlangu

Kuliczkowski

Karim

et al . Efficacy and safety of rVIII-SingleChain: results of a phase 1/3 multicenter clinical trial in severe hemophilia A. Blood 2016; 128: 630–637.

74.

Zollner

Raquet

Claar

et al . Non-clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rVIII-SingleChain, a novel recombinant single-chain factor VIII. Thromb Res 2014; 134: 125–131.

75.

Klamroth

Simpson

von Depka-Prondzinski

et al . Comparative pharmacokinetics of rVIII-SingleChain and octocog alfa (Advate((R))) in patients with severe haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2016; 22: 730–738.

76.

Peyvandi

Garagiola

Seregni

. Future of coagulation factor replacement therapy. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11(Suppl. 1): 84–98.

77.

Schiviz

Hoebarth

Wolfsegger

et al . Pharmacokinetics of BAX 826, a polysialylated full-length rFVIII, in hemophilia a mice, rats, and cynomolgus monkeys. Blood 2015; 126: 1073.

78.

Turecek

Siekmann

Mitterer

et al . Development of BAX 826, a polysialylated full-length rFVIII with significantly improved PK properties. Blood 2015; 126: 3536.

79.

Peyvandi

Garagiola

. Treatment of hemophilia in the near future. Semin Thromb Hemost 2015; 41: 838–848.

80.

Berntorp

Boulyjenkov

Brettler

et al . Modern treatment of haemophilia. Bull World Health Organ 73: 691–701.

81.

Shima

Hanabusa

Taki

et al . Factor VIII-mimetic function of humanized bispecific antibody in hemophilia A. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 2044–2053.

82.

Uchida

Sambe

Yoneyama

et al . A first-in-human phase 1 study of ACE910, a novel factor VIII-mimetic bispecific antibody, in healthy subjects. Blood 2016; 127: 1633–1641.

83.

Oldenburg

Mahlangu

Kim

et al . Emicizumab prophylaxis in hemophilia A with inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 809–818.

84.

Chowdary

Lethagen

Friedrich

et al . Safety and pharmacokinetics of anti-TFPI antibody (concizumab) in healthy volunteers and patients with hemophilia: a randomized first human dose trial. J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13: 743–754.

85.

Monahan

. Emerging genetic and pharmacologic therapies for controlling hemostasis: beyond recombinant clotting factors. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2015; 2015: 33–40.

86.

Zhao

Schwarz

et al . Mechanistic modeling of the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic relationship of tissue factor pathway inhibitor-neutralizing antibody (BAY 1093884) in cynomolgus monkeys. AAPS J 2017; 1186–1195.

87.

Sehgal

Barros

Ivanciu

et al . An RNAi therapeutic targeting antithrombin to rebalance the coagulation system and promote hemostasis in hemophilia. Nat Med 2015; 21: 492–497.

88.

Pasi

Rangarajan

Georgiev

et al . Targeting of antithrombin in hemophilia A or B with RNAi therapy. N Engl J Med 2017; 377: 819–828.

89.

Monahan

. Emerging genetic and pharmacologic therapies for controlling hemostasis: beyond recombinant clotting factors. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2015; 2015: 33–40.

90.

Pasi

Georgiev

Mant

et al . A subcutaneously administered investigational RNAi therapeutic (ALN-AT3) targeting antithrombin for treatment of hemophilia: interim weekly and monthly dosing results in patients with hemophilia A or B. Blood 2015; 126: 551.

91.

McMichael

. New models of hemostasis. Top Companion Anim Med 2012; 27: 40–45.

92.

Barnes

Blanchette

Lillicrap

et al . Different clinical phenotype in triplets with haemophilia A. Haemophilia 2007; 13: 202–205.

93.

Loomans

van Velzen

Eckhardt

et al . Variation in baseline factor VIII concentration in a retrospective cohort of mild/moderate hemophilia A patients carrying identical F8 mutations. J Thromb Haemost 2017; 15: 246–254.

94.

Nogami

Shima

. Phenotypic heterogeneity of hemostasis in severe hemophilia. Semin Thromb Hemost 2015; 41: 826–831.

95.

El-Din Hamdy

Nasr

Makhlouf

et al . Impact of prothrombotic risk factors in a cohort of Egyptian hemophilia A patients. Mol Diagn Ther 2016; 20: 151–159.

96.

van Dijk

van der Bom

Fischer

et al . Do prothrombotic factors influence clinical phenotype of severe haemophilia? A review of the literature. Thromb Haemost 2004; 92: 305–310.

97.

Franchini

Montagnana

Targher

et al . Interpatient phenotypic inconsistency in severe congenital hemophilia: a systematic review of the role of inherited thrombophilia. Semin Thromb Hemost 2009; 35: 307–312.

98.

Nichols

Amano

Cacheris

et al . Moderation of hemophilia A phenotype by the factor V R506Q mutation. Blood 1996; 88: 1183–1187.

99.

Mast

. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor: multiple anticoagulant activities for a single protein. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2016; 36: 9–14.

100.

Wood

Bunce

Maroney

et al . Tissue factor pathway inhibitor-alpha inhibits prothrombinase during the initiation of blood coagulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013; 110: 17838–17843.

101.

Erhardtsen

Ezban

Madsen

et al . Blocking of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) shortens the bleeding time in rabbits with antibody induced haemophilia A. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 1995; 6: 388–394.

102.

Prasad

Lillicrap

Labelle

et al . Efficacy and safety of a new-class hemostatic drug candidate, AV513, in dogs with hemophilia A. Blood 2008; 111: 672–679.

103.

Waters

Genga

Schwartz

et al . Aptamer ARC19499 mediates a procoagulant hemostatic effect by inhibiting tissue factor pathway inhibitor. Blood 2011; 117: 5514–5522.

104.

Maroney

Mast

. New insights into the biology of tissue factor pathway inhibitor. J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13(Suppl. 1): S200–S207.

105.

Petersen

. Hemostatic properties of a TFPI antibody. Thromb Res 2012; 129(Suppl. 2): S44– S45.

106.

Gissel

Orfeo

Foley

et al . Effect of BAX499 aptamer on tissue factor pathway inhibitor function and thrombin generation in models of hemophilia. Thromb Res 2012; 130: 948–955.

107.

Waters

Genga

Thomson

et al . Aptamer BAX 499 mediates inhibition of tissue factor pathway inhibitor via interaction with multiple domains of the protein. J Thromb Haemost 2013; 11: 1137–1145.

108.

Hilden

Lauritzen

Sorensen

et al . Hemostatic effect of a monoclonal antibody mAb 2021 blocking the interaction between FXa and TFPI in a rabbit hemophilia model. Blood 2012; 119: 5871–5878.

109.

Morfini

Zanon

. Emerging drugs for the treatment of hemophilia A and B. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2016; 21: 301–313.

110.

Willyard

. Thrombosis: balancing act. Nature 2014; 515: S168–S169.

111.

Dockal

Hartmann

Knappe

et al . Effect of increased tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) levels on factor Xa inhibition and global hemostasis in the presence of TFPI-antagonistic aptamer BAX 499. Blood 2012; 120: 2207.

112.

Bolliger

Szlam

Suzuki

et al . Heterozygous antithrombin deficiency improves in vivo haemostasis in factor VIII-deficient mice. Thromb Haemost 2010; 103: 1233–1238.

113.

Ragni

. Targeting antithrombin to treat hemophilia. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 389–391.

114.

National Hemophilia Federation. Alnylam Reports Patient Death in Fitusiran Clinical Study, https://www.hemophilia.org/Newsroom/Industry-News/Alnylam-Reports-Patient-Death-in-Fitusiran-Clinical-Study (2017, accessed 10 October 2017).

115.

van ‘t Veer

Golden

Kalafatis

et al . An in vitro analysis of the combination of hemophilia A and factor V(LEIDEN). Blood 1997; 90: 3067–3072.

116.

Shetty

Ghosh

. Novel therapeutic approaches for haemophilia. Haemophilia 2015; 21: 152–161.

117.

Polderdijk

Adams

Ivanciu

et al . Design and characterization of an APC-specific serpin for the treatment of hemophilia. Blood 2017; 129: 105–113.

118.

Hamedani

Ruhl

Zimmermann

et al . In vitro evaluation of aptamer-based reversible inhibition of anticoagulant activated protein C as a novel supportive hemostatic approach. Nucleic Acid Ther 2016; 26: 355–362.

119.

Kumar

Markusic

Biswas

et al . Clinical development of gene therapy: results and lessons from recent successes. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev 2016; 3: 16034.

120.

Baruteau

Waddington

Alexander

et al . Gene therapy for monogenic liver diseases: clinical successes, current challenges and future prospects. J Inherit Metab Dis 2017: 497–517.

121.

Pipe

High

Ohashi

et al . Progress in the molecular biology of inherited bleeding disorders. Haemophilia 2008; 14(Suppl. 3): 130–137.

122.

Nathwani

Davidoff

Tuddenham

EGD

. Advances in gene therapy for haemophilia. Hum Gene Ther 2017; 28: 1004–1012.

123.

Spencer

Riley

Doering

. State of the art: gene therapy of haemophilia. Haemophilia 2016; 22(Suppl. 5): 66–71.

124.

Nienhuis

Nathwani

Davidoff

. Gene therapy for hemophilia. Mol Ther 2017; 25: 1163–1167.

125.

Ward

Walsh

. Current and future prospects for hemophilia gene therapy. Expert Rev Hematol 2016; 9: 649–659.

126.

Cancio

Reiss

Nathwani

et al . Developments in the treatment of hemophilia B: focus on emerging gene therapy. Appl Clin Genet 2013; 6: 91–101.

127.

Arruda

Samelson-Jones

. Obstacles and future of gene therapy for hemophilia. Expert Opin Orphan Drugs 2015; 3: 997–1010.

128.

Nathwani

Tuddenham

Rangarajan

et al . Adenovirus-associated virus vector-mediated gene transfer in hemophilia B. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 2357–2365.

129.

Ward

Buckley

Waddington

et al . Codon optimization of human factor VIII cDNAs leads to high-level expression. Blood 2011; 117: 798–807.

130.

Nathwani

Davidoff

Tuddenham

EGD

. Gene therapy for hemophilia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2017; 31: 853–868.

131.

Hoffman

Herzog

. Covert warfare against the immune system: decoy capsids, stealth genomes, and suppressors. Mol Ther 2013; 21: 1648–1650.

132.

Fomin

Togarrati

Muench

. Progress and challenges in the development of a cell-based therapy for hemophilia A. J Thromb Haemost 2014; 12: 1954–1965.

133.

Guan

et al . CRISPR/Cas9-mediated somatic correction of a novel coagulator factor IX gene mutation ameliorates hemophilia in mouse. EMBO Mol Med 2016; 8: 477–488.

134.

Davidoff

Nathwani

. Genetic targeting of the albumin locus to treat hemophilia. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 1288–1290.

Novel therapies and current clinical progress in hemophilia A

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Extended half-life products

A bispecific antibody

Rebalancing the coagulation scale

Inhibition of TFPI

Inhibition of AT

Inhibition of activated protein C

Gene therapy

Conclusion

Footnotes

Funding

Conflict of interest statement

References