Abnormal Functioning of the Thalamocortical System Underlies the Conscious Awareness of the Phantom Limb Phenomenon

Abstract

Phantom limb (PL), a phenomenon experienced by most patients after amputation, has mostly served as a paradigm to study experiences that appear to be associated with neural plasticity within the CNS. However, the subjective nature of PL experiences has had no definitive means of reliable assessment other than using patients' direct reports, nor was there a way to study the neural mechanisms involved in the conscious awareness of this mental phenomenon. Here we obtained patients' indirect responses to PL experiences for an objective evaluation using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Six control subjects and six lower limb (LL) amputees participated in a motor imagery task for both the intact and the particular phantom toes. While all subjects shared neural processing of distinctive regional cerebral activations during motor imagery of the intact toes (prefrontal (PF), supplementary motor area (SMA), primary motor cortex (M1), superior temporal gyrus (STG)), it was only during motor imagery of the amputated toes in amputees that we observed an increased blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal in the contralateral basal ganglia at the medial globus pallidus (MGP), substantia nigra (SN), and thalamus. This increased BOLD signal in the basal ganglia-thalamus-cortex pathway during imaginary movement of the phantom toes may reflect an abnormal open loop functioning of the thalamocortical system underlying the conscious awareness of the phantom phenomenon. We suggest that the reduction in afferent information contributes to and coalesces with the higher-level reorganization resulting in the subjective conscious awareness of the phantom limb.

Keywords

fMRI sensory-motor cortex phantom limb imaginary movement basal ganglia

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Giummarra

Georgiou-Karistianis

Nicholls

MER

. Corporeal awareness and proprioceptive sense of the phantom [Internet]. Br J Psychol. (London, UK: 1953) 2010 Mar; Available from: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpsoc/bjp/pre-prints/bjp922.

Hunter

Katz

Davis

. Stability of phantom limb phenomena after upper limb amputation: a longitudinal study. Neuroscience. 2008;15 (4): 939–949.

Halligan

. Phantom limbs: the body in mind. Cogn Neuropsychiatr. 2002; 7: 251–269.

Ramachandran

Hirstein

. The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain. 1998; 121: 1603–1630.

Arzy

Thut

Mohr

. Neural basis of embodiment: distinct contributions of temporoparietal junction and extrastriate body area. J Neurosci. 2006; 26 (31): 8074.

Schreiber

Ball

Kristeva-Feige

. Primary and Secondary Motor Areas in fMRI and EEG. [s.d.];

Stippich

Freitag

Kassubek

. Motor, somatosensory and auditory cortex localization by fMRI and MEG. Neuroreport. 1998; 9: 1953–1957.

Flor

Elbert

Mühlnickel

. Cortical reorganization and phantom phenomena in congenital and traumatic upper-extremity amputees. Exp Brain Res. 1998; 119: 205–212.

Condés-Lara

Barrios

Romo

. Brain somatic representation of phantom and intact limb: a fMRI study case report. Eur J Pain. 2000; 4: 239–245.

10.

Nitschke

Kleinschmidt

Wessel

. Somatotopic motor representation in the human anterior cerebellum: A high-resolution functional MRI study. Brain. 1996; 119: 1023–1029.

11.

Ersland

Rosén

Lundervold

. Phantom limb imaginary fingertapping causes primary motor cortex activation: an fMRI study. Neuroreport 1996; 8: 207–210.

12.

Jeannerod

Frak

. Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999; 9: 735–739.

13.

Ganis

Thompson

Kosslyn

. Brain areas underlying visual mental imagery and visual perception: an fMRI study. Cogn Brain Res. 2004; 20: 226–241.

14.

Lotze

Flor

Grodd

. Phantom movements and pain An fMRI study in upper limb amputees. Brain. 2001; 124: 2268–2277.

15.

Lotze

Montoya

Erb

. Activation of cortical and cerebellar motor areas during executed and imagined hand movements: an fMRI study. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999; 11: 491–501.

16.

Diers

Christmann

Koeppe

. Mirrored, imagined and executed movements differentially activate sensorimotor cortex in amputees with and without phantom limb pain. Pain. 2010; 149: 296–304.

17.

Pasaye

Gutiérrez

Alcauter

. Event-related functional magnetic resonance images during the perception of phantom limb; a brushing task. The Neuroradiol Journal 2010; 23 (6): 665–670.

18.

Pick

. Zur pathologie des bewusstseins vom eigenen körper. Ein Beitrag aus der Kriegsmedizin. Neurol Cbl. 1915; 34: 257–265.

19.

Levine

. Unawareness of visual and sensorimotor defects: a hypothesis. Brain Cogn. 1990; 13: 233–281.

20.

Ramachandran

Hirstein

. The perception of phantom limbs. The DO Hebb lecture. Brain. 1998; 121: 1603–1630.

21.

Heilman

. Anosognosia: possible neuropsychological mechanisms. In: Prigatano

Schacter

, editors. Awareness of deficits after brain injury. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991. p. 53–62.

22.

Frith

Blakemore

Wolpert

. Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Phil Trans R Soc Biol Sci. 2000; 355: 1771–1788.

23.

Gallese

. The “conscious” dorsal stream: embodied simulation and its role in space and action conscious awareness. Psyche. 2007; 13: 1–20.

24.

Serino

Haggard

. Touch and the body. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010; 34: 224–236.

25.

Staub

Bogousslavsky

Maeder

. Intentional motor phantom limb syndrome. Neurology. 2006; 67: 2140–2146.

26.

Ramachandran

Brang

. Sensations evoked in patients with amputation from watching an individual whose corresponding intact limb is being touched. Arch Neurol. 2009; 66: 1281–1284.

27.

Fitzgibbon

Giummarra

Georgiou-Karistianis

. Shared pain: From empathy to synaesthesia. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010; 4: 500–512.

28.

Gurney

Prescott

Wickens

. Computational models of the basal ganglia: from robots to membranes. Trends Neurosci. 2004; 27: 453–459.

29.

Ramachandran

. Behavioral and magnetoencephalographic correlates of plasticity in the adult human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci US 1993; 90: 10413–10420.

30.

Decety

Perani

Jeannerod

. Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature. 2002; 371: 600–602.

31.

Stephan

Fink

Passingham

. Functional anatomy of the mental representation of upper extremity movements in healthy subjects. J Neurophysiol. 1995; 73: 373–386.

32.

Boussaoud

. Attention versus intention in the primate premotor cortex. Neuroimage. 2001; 14: S40–S45.

33.

Culham

Kanwisher

. Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001; 11: 157–163.

34.

Andersen

Buneo

. Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. Ann Rev Neurosci. 2002; 25: 189–220.

35.

Jeannerod

Bajcsy

Bueno

. The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Author's reply. Behav Brain Sci. 1994; 17: 187–245.

36.

Crammond

. Motor imagery: never in your wildest dream. Trends Neurosci. 1997; 20: 54–57.

37.

Jackson

Decety

. Motor cognition: a new paradigm to study self-other interactions. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2004; 14: 259–263.

38.

Jeannerod

Decety

. Mental motor imagery: a window into the representational stages of action. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995; 5: 727–732.

39.

Yang

Gallen

Ramachandran

. Noninvasive detection of cerebral plasticity in adult human somatosensory cortex. Neuroreport. 1994; 5: 701–704.

40.

Ramachandran

Brang

. Sensations evoked in patients with amputation from watching an individual whose corresponding intact limb is being touched. Arch Neurol. 2009; 66: 1281–1284.