High Resolution Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography in the Evaluation of Rabbit Carotid Artery

Abstract

This study compared a high resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) sequence to conventional contrast-enhanced MRA sequence for imaging of rabbit carotid artery. Fifteen rabbits underwent an evaluation using both high resolution contrast-enhanced MRA sequence and conventional contrast-enhanced MRA sequence. Siemens 1.5 Tesla Magnetom Vision system was utilized. The parameters of high resolution sequence were: TR/TE= 6.2/2.0 msec, flip angle 25°, matrix 130×512, pixel size 0.96×0.49 mm, partition thickness 1.58 mm, acquisition time 24 sec. The parameters of conventional sequence were: TR/TE=3.8/1.4 msec, flip angle 35°, matrix 110×256, pixel size 1.48×1.02 mm, partition thickness 2mm, acquisition time 10 sec. Maximum intensity projection (MIP) images were created. Both original single slices and MIP images were used for image quality evaluation. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), distinctness of artery edge, and venous contamination were analyzed for both techniques. Higher average CNR and SNR were obtained with high resolution contrast-enhanced MRA, compared to average CNR and SNR with conventional contrast-enhanced MRA. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.01). The artery edge with high resolution method was more distinct than conventional method. Jugular venous contamination was found in five of 15 cases with high resolution contrast-enhanced MRA and in four of 15 cases with conventional contrast-enhanced MRA. High resolution contrast-enhanced MRA has significant potential for high quality noninvasive vascular imaging. The image quality with high resolution contrast-enhanced MRA sequence is better than conventional contrast-enhanced MRA sequence.

Keywords

magnetic resonance angiography contrast-enhanced high resolution rabbit carotid artery

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anonymous: Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 325: 445–453, 1991.

Kuntz

Skillman

Whittemore

: Carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients is contrast angiography necessary? A morbidity analysis. J Vasc Surg 22: 706–714, 1995.

Kaufmann

Kallmes

: Utility of MRA and CTA in the evaluation of carotid occlusive disease. Semin Vasc Surg 18: 75–82, 2005.

Dix

Evans

Kallmes

: Accuracy and precision of CT angiography in a model of carotid artery bifurcation stenosis. Am J Neuroradiol 18: 409–415, 1997.

Magarelli

Scarabino

Simeone

: Carotid stenosis: A comparison between MR and spiral CT angiography. Neuroradiology 40: 367–373, 1998.

Wise

Hopper

Ten Have

: Measuring carotid artery stenosis using CT angiography: The dilemma of artifactual lumen eccentricity. Am J Roentgenol 170: 919–923, 1998.

Yurdakul

Tola

Acu

: Power Doppler ultrasonography as a screening test in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Rivista di Neuroradiologia 18: 42–49, 2005.

Scarabino

Nemore

Giannatempo

: 3.0 T MR angiography. Rivista di Neuroradiologia 17: 777–783, 2004.

Cosottini

Pingitore

Puglioli

: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in atheromastic stenosis of the internal carotid artery as non-invasive method to establish an indication for revascularization. Rivista di Neuroradiologia 16: 196–198, 2003.

10.

Lin

Xiao

: Zero-filling interpolation processing technique can efficiently suppress segmental stenosis artifact on small arteries of anatomical phantoms. Rivista di Neuroradiologia 18: 169–174, 2005.

11.

Cloft

Murphy

Prince

: 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries. Magn Reson Imaging 14: 593–600, 1996.

12.

Huston

Fain

Riederer

: Carotid arteries: Maximizing arterial to venous contrast in fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced MR angiography with elliptic centric view ordering. Radiology 211: 265–273, 1999.

13.

Levy

Prince

: Arterial-phase three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 167: 211–215, 1996.

14.

Lin

Abendschein

Celik

: Intravascular contrast agent improves magnetic resonance angiography of carotid arteries in minipigs. J Magn Reson Imaging 7: 963–971, 1997.

15.

Isoda

Takehara

Isogai

: Technique for arterial-phase contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the carotid and vertebral arteries. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19: 1241–1244, 1998.

16.

Kollias

Binkert

Ruesch

: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supra-aortic vessels in 24 seconds: A feasibility study. Neuroradiology 41: 391–400, 1999.

17.

Kopka

Vosshenrich

Rodenwaldt

: Differences in injection rates on contrast-enhanced breath=hold three-dimensional MR angiography. Am J Roentgenol 170: 345–348, 1998.

18.

Kim

Farb

Wright

: Test bolus examination in the carotid artery at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 206: 283–289, 1998.

19.

Foo

Saranathan

Prince

: Automated detection of bolus arrival and initiation of data acquisition in fast, three-dimensional, gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 203: 275–280, 1997.

20.

Prince

Chenevert

Foo

: Contrast-enhanced abdominal MR angiography: Optimization of imaging delay time by automating the detection of contrast material arrival in the aorta. Radiology 203: 109–114, 1997.

21.

Lentschig

Reimer

Rausch-Lentschig

: Breath-hold gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the major vessels at 1.0 T: Dose-response findings and angiographic correlation. Radiology 208: 353–357, 1998.