How do people respond when a close other, as opposed to a distant other, commits a moral transgression against a third person? Across five preregistered experiments (total N = 2,170), supplemented by pilot studies, we find that people navigate punishment differently depending on relational closeness: they seek less punishment by authorities (institutional punishment) for close others but impose more punishment by themselves (relational punishment) and are more likely to confront the perpetrator directly (Experiments 1–5). Moreover, transgressions of close others elicit both other-blaming and self-blaming emotions, and they prompt individuals to adopt both victim and perpetrator roles (Experiments 2–5). These effects intensify with increasing relational closeness (Experiment 3) and persist across transgressions of varying moral and criminal severity (Experiment 4).
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
2.
AronA.AronE. N.TudorM.NelsonG. (1991). Close relationships as including other in the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 241–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.241
3.
BergM. K.KitayamaS.KrossE. (2021). How relationships bias moral reasoning: Neural and self-report evidence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 95, 104156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104156
4.
EarpB. D.McLoughlinK. L.MonradJ. T.ClarkM. S.CrockettM. J. (2021). How social relationships shape moral wrongness judgments. Nature Communications, 12(1), 5776. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26067-4
5.
EverettJ. A.FaberN. S.CrockettM. (2015). Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00015
6.
FehrE.FischbacherU. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 63–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(04)00005-4
7.
FiskeA. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99(4), 689.
8.
ForbesR. C.StellarJ. E. (2022). When the ones we love misbehave: Exploring moral processes within intimate bonds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000272
9.
GuanK. W.HeineS. J. (2023). When good people break bad: Moral impression violations in everyday life. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221076685
10.
KaasaA.AndrianiL. (2022). Determinants of institutional trust: The role of cultural context. Journal of Institutional Economics, 18(1), 45–65. https://doi:10.1017/S1744137421000199
11.
LeeJ.HolyoakK. J. (2020). “But he’s my brother”: The impact of family obligation on moral judgments and decisions. Memory & Cognition, 48(1), 158–170. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-019-00969-7
12.
MarquesJ. M.PaezD. (1994). The “black sheep effect”: Social categorization, rejection of ingroup deviates, and perception of group variability. European Review of Social Psychology, 5(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779543000011
13.
MarquesJ. M.YzerbytV. Y.LeyensJ. P. (1988). The “black sheep effect”: Extremity of judgments towards ingroup members as a function of group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180102
14.
MendozaS. A.LaneS. P.AmodioD. M. (2014). For members only: Ingroup punishment of fairness norm violations in the ultimatum game. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(6), 662–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614527115
15.
MolhoC.TyburJ. M.Van LangeP. A.BallietD. (2020). Direct and indirect punishment of norm violations in daily life. Nature Communications, 11(1), 3432. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17286-2
16.
NiemiL.DorisJ. M.GrahamJ. (2023). Who attributes what to whom? Moral values and relational context shape causal attribution to the person or the situation. Cognition, 232, 105332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105332
17.
PiffP. K.MartinezA. G.KeltnerD. (2012). Me against we: In-group transgression, collective shame, and in-group-directed hostility. Cognition & Emotion, 26(4), 634–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.595394
18.
RaiT. S.FiskeA. P. (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021867
19.
RozinP.LoweryL.ImadaS.HaidtJ. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 574–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.574
20.
SoterL. K.BergM. K.GelmanS. A.KrossE. (2021). What we would (but shouldn’t) do for those we love: Universalism versus partiality in responding to others’ moral transgressions. Cognition, 217, 104886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104886
21.
TangS.ShepherdS.KayA. C. (2023). Morality’s role in the Black Sheep Effect: When and why ingroup members are judged more harshly than outgroup members for the same transgression. European Journal of Social Psychology, 53, 1605–1622. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.3001
TepeB.Aydinli-KarakulakA. (2019). Beyond harmfulness and impurity: Moral wrongness as a violation of relational motivations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(2), 310–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000169
24.
UhlmannE. L.PizarroD. A.DiermeierD. (2015). A person-centered approach to moral judgment. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(1), 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614556679
25.
WeidmanA. C.SowdenW. J.BergM. K.KrossE. (2020). Punish or protect? How close relationships shape responses to moral violations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(5), 693–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219873485
26.
WittmannM. K.KollingN.FaberN. S.SchollJ.NelissenN.RushworthM. F. S. (2016). Self-other-mergence in frontal cortex during cooperation and competition. Neuron, 91, 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.022
27.
WittmannM. K.LinY.PanD.BraunM. N.DicksonC.SpieringL.LuoS.HarbisonC.AbdurahmanA.HamiltonS.FaberN. S.KhalighinejadN.LockwoodP. L.RushworthM. F. S. (2025). Basis functions for complex social decisions in dorsomedial frontal cortex. Nature, 641, 707–717. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-08705-9
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
