It is not uncommon to witness individuals competing for social resources such as affection and status. Does this mean that people view social resources as inherently zero-sum—where gains for one person result in losses for another? Two preregistered studies found that U.S. adults and 4- to 9-year-old U.S. children did not view nonrival social resources (love and trust) or rival social resources (popularity and leadership) as zero-sum, both less zero-sum than material resources like stickers. Importantly, zero-sum thinking was not determined by the inherent properties of the resources but was influenced by renewability: Perceived renewability of resources predicted lower levels of zero-sum beliefs, and both social and material resources were perceived as less zero-sum when presented as renewable compared with nonrenewable. These findings shed light on the nature and origins of zero-sum beliefs, highlighting renewability as a key mechanism and a potential intervention for reducing competition and promoting cooperation.
AhlR. E.DunhamY. (2019). “Wealth makes many friends”: Children expect more giving from resource-rich than resource-poor individuals. Child Development, 90(2), 524–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12922
2.
Andrews FearonP.GötzF. M. (2024). The zero-sum mindset. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 127(4), 758–795. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000404
3.
ApesteguiaJ.Maier-RigaudF. P. (2006). The role of rivalry: Public goods versus common-pool resources. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(5), 646–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002706290433
4.
BlakeP. R.McAuliffeK. (2011). “I had so much it didn’t seem fair”: Eight-year-olds reject two forms of inequity. Cognition, 120(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.006
5.
BurleighT. J.RubelA. N.MeeganD. V. (2017). Wanting “the whole loaf”: Zero-sum thinking about love is associated with prejudice against consensual non-monogamists. Psychology & Sexuality, 8(1–2), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2016.1269020
EchelbargerM.GelmanS. A. (2017). The value of variety and scarcity across development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 156, 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.11.010
9.
EnrightE. A.GweonH.SommervilleJ. A. (2017). “To the victor go the spoils”: Infants expect resources to align with dominance structures. Cognition, 164, 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.008
10.
EssesV. M.DovidioJ. F.JacksonL. M.ArmstrongT. L. (2001). The immigration dilemma: The role of perceived group competition, ethnic prejudice, and national identity. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00220
HeckI. A.BasJ.KinzlerK. D. (2022). Small groups lead, big groups control: Perceptions of numerical group size, power, and status across development. Child Development, 93(1), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13670
13.
HeckI. A.ShuttsK.KinzlerK. D. (2022). Children’s thinking about group-based social hierarchies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(7), 593–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.04.004
14.
HuppertE.ShawA.DecetyJ. (2020). The effect of hunger on children’s sharing behavior and fairness preferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 192, 104786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.104786
15.
JiangX.HuX.LiuZ.SunX.XueG. (2020). Greed as an adaptation to anomie: The mediating role of belief in a zero-sum game and the buffering effect of internal locus of control. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, Article 109566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109566
16.
JohnsonS. G.ZhangJ.KeilF. C. (2022). Win–win denial: The psychological underpinnings of zero-sum thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(2), 455. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001083
KehnA.RuthigJ. C. (2013). Perceptions of gender discrimination across six decades: The moderating roles of gender and age. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 69(5–6), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-013-0303-2
19.
KillenM.BurkholderA. R.BreyE.CooperD.PaukerK. (2024). Children and adolescents rectify unequal allocations of leadership duties in the classroom. Child Development, 95(6), 1950–1966. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14123
20.
KrausM. W.PiffP. K.Mendoza-DentonR.RheinschmidtM. L.KeltnerD. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028756
21.
LitmanL.RobinsonJ.AbberbockT. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z
22.
LourencoS. F.BonnyJ. W.SchwartzB. L. (2016). Children and adults use physical size and numerical alliances in third-party judgments of dominance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 2050. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02050
23.
MeeganD. V. (2010). Zero-sum bias: Perceived competition despite unlimited resources. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, Article 191. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00191
24.
NortonM. I.SommersS. R. (2011). Whites see racism as a zero-sum game that they are now losing. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(3), 215–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406922
25.
OstromE. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
26.
PappertA. T.WilliamsA.MooreC. (2016). The influence of competition on resource allocation in preschool children. Social Development, 26(2), 367–381.
27.
PunA.BirchS. A.BaronA. S. (2016). Infants use relative numerical group size to infer social dominance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(9), 2376–2381. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514879113
28.
RadovanovicM.ChaoT. W. T.OnyshkoE.HuynhQ. D. T.LiuY. L.SommervilleJ. A. (2023). Not just if, but how much: Children and adults use cost and need to make evaluations about generosity across contexts. Cognition, 238, 105533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105533
29.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r-project.org/
30.
RhodesM.BrickmanD. (2011). The influence of competition on children’s social categories. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12(2), 194–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2010.535230
31.
RizzoM. T.ElenbaasL.CooleyS.KillenM. (2016). Children’s recognition of fairness and others’ welfare in a resource allocation task: Age related changes. Developmental Psychology, 52(8), 1307–1317. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000134
32.
Różycka-TranJ.BoskiP.WojciszkeB. (2015). Belief in a Zero-Sum Game as a social axiom: A 37-nation study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46(4), 525–548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022115572226
33.
Różycka-TranJ.PiotrowskiJ. P.Żemojtel-PiotrowskaM.JurekP.OsinE. N.AdamsB. G.MaltbyJ. (2021). Belief in a zero-sum game and subjective well-being across 35 countries. Current Psychology, 40, 3575–3584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00291-0
34.
RubinP. H. (2002). Darwinian politics: The evolutionary origin of freedom. Rutgers University Press.
ShawA.OlsonK. (2014). Fairness as partiality aversion: The development of procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 119, 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.10.007
SirolaN.PitesaM. (2017). Economic downturns undermine workplace helping by promoting a zero-sum construal of success. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1339–1359. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0804
ToppeT.HardeckerS.HaunD. B. (2019). Playing a cooperative game promotes preschoolers’ sharing with third-parties, but not social inclusion. PLOS ONE, 14(8), Article e0221092. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221092
41.
von NeumannJ.MorgensternO. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press.
WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.BabbittL. G.ToosiN. R.SchadK. D. (2015). You can win but I can’t lose: Bias against high-status groups increases their zero-sum beliefs about discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 57, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.10.008
44.
WilkinsC. L.WellmanJ. D.ToosiN. R.MillerC. A.LisnekJ. A.MartinL. A. (2022). Is LGBT progress seen as an attack on Christians? Examining Christian/sexual orientation zero-sum beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(1), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000363
45.
WrightR. (2000). Nonzero: The logic of human destiny. Vintage Books.
46.
YangF.ChoiY. J.MischA.YangX.DunhamY. (2018). In defense of the commons: Young children negatively evaluate and sanction free riders. Psychological Science, 29(10), 1598–1611. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618779061
47.
YangF.YangX.DunhamY. (2023). Beyond our tribe: Developing a normative sense of group-transcendent fairness. Developmental Psychology, 59(7), 1203–1217. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001545
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
