Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The current research offers a cross-cultural examination of transgender prejudice, with a particular focus on the role of gender. Analyses of a survey conducted in 23 countries (with N’s ranging from 485 to 1,098) representing both Western and non-Western societies showed that there is greater bias toward transgender women (vs. men) overall, among both male and female participants. These differences were small and not reliable in most Western countries, whereas participants in China, Russia, South Korea, and Türkiye made greater distinctions. Men (vs. women) and conservatives reported higher prejudice, and this was more pronounced in Western (vs. non-Western) countries. Religiosity was associated with anti-transgender prejudice in Western (but not non-Western) countries, but this was completely accounted for by anti-gay attitudes. Finally, anti-gay and anti-transgender prejudice were strongly related to each other across samples, and the denial of gender identity predicted anti-transgender prejudice over and above anti-gay prejudice.

Keywords

transgender prejudice transphobia gender identity queer attitudes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alipour

(2017). Islamic shari’a law, neotraditionalist Muslim scholars and transgender sex-reassignment surgery: A case study of Ayatollah Khomeini’s and Sheikh al-Tantawi’s fatwas. International Journal of Transgenderism, 18(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.18352/rg.10170

Atwood

Morgenroth

Olson

K. R.

(2024). Gender essentialism and benevolent sexism in anti-trans rhetoric. Social Issues and Policy Review, 18(1), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12099

Bettinsoli

M. L.

Suppes

Napier

J. L.

(2020). Predictors of attitudes toward gay men and lesbian women in 23 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(5), 697–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619887785

Burke

S. E.

Dovidio

J. F.

LaFrance

Przedworski

J. M.

Perry

S. P.

Phelan

S. M.

. . .van Ryn

(2017). Beyond generalized sexual prejudice: Need for closure predicts negative attitudes toward bisexual people relative to gay/lesbian people. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71, 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.02.003

Callahan

M. P.

Vescio

T. K.

(2011). Core American values and the structure of antigay prejudice. Journal of Homosexuality, 58(2), 248–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2011.540180

Campbell

Hinton

J. D.

Anderson

J. R.

(2019). A systematic review of the relationship between religion and attitudes toward transgender and gender-variant people. International Journal of Transgenderism, 20(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2018.1545149

Chen

Anderson

V. N.

(2017). Chinese college students’ gender self-esteem and trans prejudice. International Journal of Transgenderism, 18(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2016.1256803

Dickemann

(1997). The Balkan sworn virgin: A cross-gendered female role. In Roscoe

Murray

S. O.

(Eds.), Islamic homosexualities: Culture, history and literature (pp. 197–203). New York University Press.

Doan

Quadlin

Powell

(2019). Americans’ perceptions of transgender people’s sex: Evidence from a national survey experiment. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 5, 237802311985201. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119852015

10.

Ekman

K. E.

(2019). Sweden’s proposed gender identity legislation leaves important questions about sex unanswered. Feminist Current. https://www.feministcurrent.com/2019/04/11/as-sweden-gears-up-to-adopt-new-gender-identity-legislation-important-questions-about-sex-need-answering/

11.

Elischberger

H. B.

Glazier

J. J.

Hill

E. D.

Verduzco-Baker

(2018). Attitudes toward and beliefs about transgender youth: A cross-cultural comparison between the United States and India. Sex Roles, 78, 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0778-3

12.

Feinman

(1981). Why is cross-sex-role behavior more approved for girls than for boys? A status characteristic approach. Sex Roles, 7, 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287543

13.

Feinman

(1984). A status theory of the evaluation of sex-role and age-role behavior. Sex Roles, 10(5–6), 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00287561

14.

Flores

A. R.

Brown

T. N. T.

Park

A. S.

(2016). Public support for transgender rights: A twenty-three country survey. The Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law. Retrieved from: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Public-Opinion-Trans-23-Countries-Dec-2016.pdf

15.

Flores

A. R.

Meyer

I. H.

Langton

Herman

J. L.

(2021). Gender identity disparities in criminal victimization: National Crime Victimization Survey, 2017–2018. American Journal of Public Health, 111(4), 726–729. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.306099

16.

Gallagher

N. M.

Bodenhausen

G. V.

(2021). Gender essentialism and the mental representation of transgender women and men: A multimethod investigation of stereotype content. Cognition, 217, 104887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104887

17.

Gelfand

M. J.

Raver

J. L.

Nishii

Leslie

L. M.

Lun

Lim

B. C.

. . .Yamaguchi

(2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332, 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754

18.

Goodier

(2023, October 5). Hate crimes against transgender people hit record high in England and Wales. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/oct/05/record-rise-hate-crimes-transgender-people-reported-england-and-wales

19.

Hatch

H. A.

Warner

R. H.

Broussard

K. A.

Harton

H. C.

(2022). Predictors of transgender prejudice: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 87, 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-022-01338-6

20.

Henrich

(2021). The WEIRDest people in the world: How the West became psychological peculiar and particularly prosperous. Picador.

21.

Henrich

Heine

S. J.

Norenzayan

(2010). The weirdest people in the world? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X

22.

Henry

P. J.

Napier

J. L.

(2017). Education is related to greater ideological prejudice. Public Opinion Quarterly, 81, 930–942. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfx038

23.

Herman

J. L.

Flores

A. R.

O’Neill

K. K.

(2022). How many adults and youth identify as transgender in the United States? The Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law. Retreived from: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Trans-Pop-Update-Jun-2022.pdf

24.

Higgins

. (2021, August). With more freedom, young women in Albania shun tradition of “sworn virigns.” New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/08/world/europe/sworn-virgins-albania.html

25.

Hofstede

(2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage.

26.

Hossain

(2017). The paradox of recognition: Hijra, third gender and sexual rights in Bangladesh. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 19(12), 1418–1431. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2017.1317831

27.

Ipsos. (n.d.). Public affairs: Global advisor . https://www.ipsos.com/en/global-advisor

28.

Jackson

(2022, July 12). Americans’ support for LGBTQ rights often stops with transgender rights. Five Thirty Eight. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/americans-support-for-lgbtq-rights-often-stops-with-transgender-rights/

29.

Jost

J. T.

Federico

C. M.

Napier

J. L.

(2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600

30.

Kite

M. E.

Deaux

(1986). Attitudes toward homosexuality: Assessment and behavioral consequences. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0702_4

31.

Klysing

Lindqvist

Björklund

(2021). Stereotype content at the intersection of gender and sexual orientation. Frontiers Psychology, 12, Article 713839. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713839

32.

Krys

Vignoles

V. L.

de Almeida

Uchida

(2022). Outside the “cultural binary”: Understanding why Latin American collectivist societies foster independent selves. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(4), 1166–1187. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211029632

33.

Leung

K.-Y.

Cohen

(2011). Within- and between-culture variation: Individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022151

34.

Lewis

D. C.

Flores

A. R.

Haider-Markel

D. P.

Miller

P. R.

Tadlock

B. L.

Taylor

J. K.

(2017). Degrees of acceptance: Variation in public attitudes toward segments of the LGBT community. Political Research Quarterly, 70(4), 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917717352

35.

Morgenroth

Ryan

M. K.

(2021). The effects of gender trouble: An integrative theoretical framework of the perpetuation and disruption of the gender/sex binary. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1113–1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620902442

36.

Morgenroth

Sendén

M. G.

Lindqvist

Renström

E. A.

Ryan

M. K.

Morton

T. A.

(2020). Defending the sex/gender binary: The role of gender identification and need for closure. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 731–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620937188

37.

Morgenroth

van der Toorn

Pliskin

McMahon

C. E.

(2024). Gender nonconformity leads to identity denial for cisgender and transgender individuals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 15, 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221144148

38.

Nagoshi

J. L.

Adams

K. A.

Terrell

H. K.

Hill

E. D.

Brzuzy

Nagoshi

C. T.

(2008). Gender differences in correlates of homophobia and transphobia. Sex Roles, 59(7–8), 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9458-7

39.

Nanda

(1986). The hijras of India: Cultural and individual dimensions of an institutionalized third gender role. Journal of Homosexuality, 11, 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v11n03_03

40.

Norton

A. T.

Herek

G. M.

(2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of U.S. adults. Sex Roles, 68, 738–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6

41.

Okimoto

T. G.

Brescoll

V. L.

(2010). The price of power: Power seeking and backlash against female politicians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 923–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210371949

42.

Perez-Arche

Miller

D. J.

(2021). What predicts attitudes toward transgender and nonbinary people? An exploration of gender, authoritarianism, social dominance, and gender ideology. Sex Roles, 85, 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01212-3

43.

Pratto

Sidanius

Levin

(2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772

44.

Ryabova

Ryabov

(2011). The real man of politics in Russia (on gender discourse as a resource for the authority). Social Sciences, 42, 58–71.

45.

Schulz

J. F.

Bahrami-Rad

Beauchamp

J. P.

Henrich

(2019). The Church, intensive kinship, and global psychological variation. Science, 366, Article eaau5141. https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aau5141

46.

Schwartz

S. H.

(2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5182, 137. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913306778667357

47.

Sirin

McCreary

Mahalik

(2004). Differential reactions to men and women’s gender role transgressions: Perceptions of social status, sexual orientation, and value dissimilarity. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 12(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.3149/jms.1202.119

48.

Smith

(2022, July 20). Where does the British public stand on transgender rights in 2022? YouGov. https://yougov.co.uk/society/articles/43194-where-does-british-public-stand-transgender-rights-1

49.

Stotzer

R. L.

(2012). Comparison of hate crime rates across protected and unprotected groups—an update. The Williams Institute. https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Hate-Crime-Rate-Compare-Update-Jan-2012.pdf

50.

Totton

Rios

(2021). Predictors of anti-transgender attitudes: Identity-confusion and deception as aspects of distrust. Self and Identity, 20(4), 496–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2019.1621928

51.

Triandis

H. C.

(2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 907–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696169

52.

Vandello

J. A.

Bosson

J. K.

Cohen

Burnaford

R. M.

Weaver

J. R.

(2008). Precarious manhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1325–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012453

53.

Veenstra

(2013). The gendered nature of discriminatory experiences by race, class, and sexuality: A comparison of intersectionality theory and the subordinate male target hypothesis. Sex Roles, 68, 646–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0243-2

54.

Von Hippel

. (2007). Aging, executive functioning, and social control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 240–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00512.x

55.

Wiedlack

(2020). Enemy number one or gay clown? The Russian president, masculinity and populism in US media. International Journal for Masculinity Studies, 15, 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2019.1707459

56.

Worthen

M. G. F.

(2016). Hetero-cis–normativity and the gendering of transphobia. International Journal of Transgenderism, 17(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2016.1149538

57.

Worthen

M. G. F.

(2022). This is my TERF! Lesbian feminists and the stigmatization of trans women. Sexuality & Culture, 26, 1782–1803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-022-09970-w

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB

A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Prejudice Against Transgender People

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material