The greater acceptance of gay, compared with transgender, people in Western countries may be a result of a specific trajectory—where queer rights was centered by and around White, middle class, gender-conforming gay men—and may not generalize to other places. Two surveys of respondents in 23 countries (Ns∼ = 500 or 1,000 per country) showed that bias toward gay and transgender people is lower in Western (vs. non-Western) countries, but that the relative bias changes as a function of region: there is greater acceptance of gay (vs. transgender) people in most Western countries, whereas the reverse is true in most non-Western countries. Analyses of legal frameworks (N = 193) show that recognition of same-gender unions is prevalent in Western countries but virtually nonexistent elsewhere, whereas recognition of gender marker changes is prevalent throughout the world. Overall, in the most intolerant places, transgender people are relatively more accepted than gay people.
AdamczykA. (2017). Cross-national public opinion about homosexuality: Examining attitudes across the globe. University of California Press.
2.
AdamsK. A.NagoshiC. T.Filip-CrawfordG.TerrellH. K.NagoshiJ. L. (2016). Components of gender-nonconformity prejudice. International Journal of Transgenderism, 17(3–4), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2016.1200509
3.
AksoyC. G.CarpenterC. S.De HaasR.TranK. D. (2020). Do laws shape attitudes? Evidence from same-sex relationship recognition policies in Europe. European Economic Review, 124, 103399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103399
4.
AlipourM. (2017). Transgender identity, the sex-reassignment surgery fatwās and Islāmic theology of a third gender. Religion and Gender, 7(2), 164–179. https://doi.org/10.18352/rg.10170
BadgettM. V.NezhadS.WaaldijkK.van der Meulen RodgersY. (2014). The relationship between LGBT inclusion and economic development: An analysis of emerging economies. World Development, 120, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.03.011
BettinsoliM. L.SuppesA.NapierJ. L. (2020). Predictors of attitudes toward gay men and lesbian women in 23 countries. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(5), 697–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619887785
9.
ChengC.LayK. L.HsuY. F.TsaiY. M. (2021). Can Likert scales predict choices? Testing the congruence between using Likert scale and comparative judgment on measuring attribution. Methods in Psychology, 5, 100081. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100081
10.
CheonB. K.MelaniI.HongY. Y. (2020). How USA-centric is psychology? An archival study of implicit assumptions of generalizability of findings to human nature based on origins of study samples. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(7), 928–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620927269
11.
ColeW. M.GeistC. (2023). Don’t you be my neighbor! Perceptions of homosexuality in global cross-cultural perspective, 1990 to 2019. Socius, 9, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023123117842
12.
CunninghamG. B.PickettA. C. (2018). Trans prejudice in sport: Differences from LGB prejudice, the influence of gender, and changes over time. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 78(3–4), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0791-6
13.
CurrahP.JuangR.MinterS. P. (2006). Transgender rights. University of Minnesota Press.
14.
DavisD. A. (2017). The normativity of recognition: Non-binary gender markers in Australian law and policy. In DemosV.SegalM. T. (Eds.), Gender panic, gender policy (Advances in gender research, Vol. 24) (pp. 227–250). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-212620170000024014
15.
DunhamY.OlsonK. R. (2016). Beyond discrete categories: Studying multiracial, intersex, and transgender children will strengthen basic developmental science. Journal of Cognition and Development, 17, 642–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2016.1195388
FoucaultM. (1978). The history of sexuality volume 1: An introduction [English translation]. Random House.
22.
FoxR. (1967). Kinship and marriage: An anthropological perceptive. Cambridge University Press.
23.
FrankD. J.McEneaneyE. H. (1999). The individualization of society and the liberalization of state policies on same-sex sexual relations, 1984–1995. Social Forces, 77(3), 911–943. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/77.3.911
24.
FrankD. J.MeyerJ. W. (2002). The profusion of individual roles and identities in the postwar period. Sociological Theory, 20(1), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9558.00152
25.
GelfandM. J.RaverJ. L.NishiiL.LeslieL. M.LunJ.LimB. C.. . . YamaguchiS. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332, 1100–1104. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754
GülgözS.GlazierJ. J.EnrightE. A.AlonsoD. J.DurwoodL. J.FastA. A.LoweR.JiC.HeerJ.MartinC. L.OlsonK. R. (2019). Similarity in transgender and cisgender children’s gender development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 16, 24480–24485. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1909367116
28.
HenrichJ. (2021). The WEIRDest people in the world: How the West became psychological peculiar and particularly prosperous. Picador.
29.
HinchyJ. (2019). Governing gender and sexuality in colonial India: The Hijra, c. 1850–1900. Cambridge University Press.
JacksonJ. C.Van EgmondM.ChoiV. K.EmberC. R.HalberstadtJ.BalanovicJ.. . . GelfandM. J. (2019). Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice. PLOS ONE, 14(9), Article e0221953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221953
JacobsS. E.CromwellJ. (1992). Visions and revisions of reality: Reflections on sex, sexuality, gender, and gender variance. Journal of Homosexuality, 23(4), 43–70.
39.
JafariF. (2014). Transsexuality under surveillance in Iran: Clerical control of Khomeini’s fatwas. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 10(2), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.2979/jmiddeastwomstud.10.2.31
40.
KatzJ. N. (2007). The invention of heterosexuality. The University of Chicago Press.
41.
KerryS. C. (2014). Sistergirls/brotherboys: The status of Indigenous transgender Australians. International Journal of Transgenderism, 15(3–4), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2014.995262
42.
KrysK.VignolesV. L.de AlmeidaI.UchidaY. (2022). Outside the “cultural binary”: Understanding why Latin American collectivist societies foster independent selves. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(4), 1166–1187. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211029632
43.
LangC.KuhnleU. (2008). Intersexuality and alternative gender categories in non-Western cultures. Hormone Research, 69, 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1159/000113025
44.
LeitenbergH.SlavinL. (1983). Comparison of attitudes toward transsexuality and homosexuality. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 12, 337–346.
45.
LewisD. C.FloresA. R.Haider-MarkelD. P.MillerP. R.TadlockB. L.TaylorJ. K. (2017). Degrees of acceptance: Variation in public attitudes toward segments of the LGBT community. Political Research Quarterly, 70, 861–875. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129177173
46.
LikertR. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22, 140, 5–55.
47.
LindahlM. W.BackK. W. (1987). Lineage identity and generational continuity: Family history and family reunions. Comprehensive Gerontology. Section B, Behavioural, Social, and Applied Sciences, 1(1), 30–34. https://europepmc.org/article/med/3453280
48.
MeyerowitzJ. (2002). How sex changed: A history of transsexuality. Harvard University Press.
49.
MhaoileoinN. N. (2019). The ironic gay spectator: The impacts of centring Western subjects in international LGBT rights campaigns. Sexualities, 22(1–2), 148–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460717699778
50.
MorgenrothT.RyanM. K. (2021). The effects of gender trouble: An integrative theoretical framework of the perpetuation and disruption of the gender/sex binary. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1113–1142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620902442
51.
NagoshiJ. L.AdamsK. A.TerrellH. K.HillE. D.BrzuzyS.NagoshiC. T. (2008). Gender differences in correlates of homophobia and transphobia. Sex Roles, 59, 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9458-7
NapierJ. L. (2024). A cross-cultural investigation of prejudice against transgender people. Social Psychological and Personality Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506241289638
OjilereA. (2018). The dipolomacy of homocapitalism against Africa: Same-sex marriage and the West’s promotion of homosexuality. World Affairs: The Journal of International Issues, 22(1), 152–163. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48520054
57.
OyěwùmíO. (1997). The invention of women: Making an African sense of western gender discourses. University of Minnesota Press.
58.
PageB. I.ShapiroR. Y. (1992). The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. University of Chicago Press.
59.
PeletzM. G. (2006). Transgenderism and gender pluralism in Southeast Asia since early modern times. Current Anthropology, 47(2), 309–340. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/498947
60.
Perez-ArcheH.MillerD. J. (2021). What predicts attitudes toward transgender and nonbinary people? An exploration of gender, authoritarianism, social dominance, and gender ideology. Sex Roles, 85, 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01212-3
StrykerS. (2008). Transgender history. Seal Press.
68.
UluboyZ.HusnuS. (2022). Turkish speaking young adults’ attitudes toward transgender individuals: Transphobia, homophobia, and gender ideology. Journal of Homosexuality, 69, 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2020.1813510
69.
ValentineD. (2007). Imagining transgender: An ethnography of a category. Duke University Press.
70.
WolframS. (1987). In-laws and outlaws: Kinship and marriage in England. Routledge.
71.
WorthenM. (2020). Queers, bis, and straight lies: An intersectional examination of LGBTQ stigma. Routledge.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
