Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Prejudice against or affirmation of gender/sex minorities is often framed in terms of beliefs about the ontology of gender/sex (i.e., what gender/sex is), or gender/sex diversity beliefs. We constructed the Gender/Sex Diversity Beliefs Scale (GSDB) to assess ontological beliefs about the nature of gender/sex, including essentialist and social constructionist beliefs, and validated the GSDB across a series of studies. In Study 1 (N = 304), we explored the factor structure of the GSDB and found evidence of associations with prejudice against transgender and/or nonbinary people. In Study 2 (N = 300), we assessed the stability of the factor structure of the GSDB and examined its criterion-related validity, including its relationship to feelings toward multiple gender/sex groups. In Studies 3a (N = 48) and 3b (N = 500), we established test–retest reliability. We conclude that gender/sex diversity beliefs are important for understanding contemporary attitudes about gender/sex, including prejudice against gender/sex minorities, and that the GSDB is a reliable and valid way to measure them.

Keywords

essentialism gender/sex nonbinary prejudice transgender

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altemeyer

(1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.

Ansara

Y. G.

Hegarty

(2012). Cisgenderism in psychology: Pathologising and misgendering children from 1999 to 2008. Psychology & Sexuality, 3, 137–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2011.576696

Bettcher

T. M.

(2007). Evil deceivers and make-believers: On transphobic violence and the politics of illusion. Hypatia, 22, 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb01090.x

Billard

T. J.

(2018). The crisis in content validity among existing measures of transphobia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47, 1305–1306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1191-x

Callahan

M. P.

Zukowski

K. T.

(2019). Reactions to transgender women and men in public restrooms: Correlates and gender differences. Journal of Homosexuality, 66, 117–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1395661

Ching

B. H.-H.

J. T.

(2018). The effects of gender neuroessentialism on transprejudice: An experimental study. Sex Roles, 78, 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0786-3

Clark

K. A.

Hughto

J. M. W.

(2019). Development and psychometric evaluation of the Transgender Knowledge, Attitudes, and Beliefs (T-KAB) Scale. Sexuality Research and Social Policy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-019-00399-9

Clifford

Jewell

R. M.

Waggoner

P. D.

(2015). Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? Research & Politics. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015622072

Coleman

J. M.

Hong

Y.-Y.

(2008). Beyond nature and nurture: The influence of lay gender theories on self-stereotyping. Self and Identity, 7, 34–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860600980185

10.

Crowne

D. P.

Marlowe

(1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358

11.

Currah

Moore

L. J.

(2009). “We won’t know who you are”: Contesting sex designations in New York City birth certificates. Hypatia, 24, 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01048.x

12.

DeVellis

R. F.

(2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

13.

Diamond

L. M.

Rosky

C. J.

(2016). Scrutinizing immutability: Research on sexual orientation and U.S. legal advocacy for sexual minorities. The Journal of Sex Research, 53, 363–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1139665

14.

Escobar

(2016, August 5). How I told the world I’m neither a man nor a woman. Esquire. https://www.esquire.com/lifestyle/sex/news/a47378/non-binary-gender-coming-out/

15.

Fraser

(2018). Evaluating inclusive gender identity measures for use in quantitative psychological research. Psychology & Sexuality, 9, 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2018.1497693

16.

Garfinkel

(1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.

17.

Gelman

S. A.

(2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford University Press.

18.

Grzanka

P. R.

Zeiders

K. H.

Miles

J. R.

(2016). Beyond “born this way?” Reconsidering sexual orientation beliefs and attitudes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000124

19.

Harding

S. G.

(2004). The feminist standpoint theory reader: Intellectual and political controversies. Psychology Press.

20.

Haslam

Levy

S. R.

(2006). Essentialist beliefs about homosexuality: Structure and implications for prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 471–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205276516

21.

Haslam

Rothschild

Ernst

(2000). Essentialist beliefs about social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164363

22.

Haslam

Rothschild

Ernst

(2002). Are essentialist beliefs associated with prejudice? British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466602165072

23.

Hegarty

(2002). “It’s not a choice, it’s the way we’re built”: Symbolic beliefs about sexual orientation in the US and Britain. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 12, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.669

24.

Henig

R. J.

(2017, January). How science is helping us understand gender. National Geographic. http://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/2017/01/how-science-helps-us-understand-gender-identity/

25.

Herek

G. M.

(2007). Confronting sexual stigma and prejudice: Theory and practice. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 905–925. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00544.x

26.

Hill

D. B.

Willoughby

B. L. B.

(2005). The development and validation of the Genderism and Transphobia Scale. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 53, 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-7140-x

27.

A. K.

Sidanius

Kteily

Sheehy-Skeffington

Pratto

Henkel

K. E.

Foels

Stewart

A. L.

(2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033

28.

Hoskin

R. A.

(2019). Femmephobia: The role of anti-femininity and gender policing in LGBTQ+ people’s experiences of discrimination. Sex Roles, 81, 686–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01021-3

29.

Hyde

J. S.

Bigler

R. S.

Joel

Tate

C. C.

van Anders

S. M.

(2018). The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000307

30.

Jayaratne

T. E.

Gelman

S. A.

Feldbaum

Sheldon

J. P.

Petty

E. M.

Kardia

S. L. R.

(2009). The perennial debate: Nature, nurture, or choice? Black and White Americans’ explanations for individual differences. Review of General Psychology, 13, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014227

31.

Kanamori

Cornelius-White

J. H. D.

Pegors

T. K.

Daniel

Hulgus

(2017). Development and validation of the Transgender Attitudes and Beliefs Scale. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 1503–1515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0840-1

32.

Keller

(2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 686–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.686

33.

Kessler

S. J.

McKenna

(2000). Gender construction in everyday life: Transsexualism (abridged). Feminism & Psychology, 10, 11–29. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/0959353500010001003

34.

Kline

R. B.

(2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). The Guilford Press.

35.

Koenig

A. M.

Richeson

J. A.

(2010). The contextual endorsement of sexblind versus sexaware ideologies. Social Psychology, 41, 186–191. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000026

36.

Litman

Robinson

Abberbock

(2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z

37.

Lloyd

A. E.

Galupo

M. P.

(2019). What people with normative identities believe about sex, gender and sexual orientation. Psychology & Sexuality. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2019.1614088

38.

Mahalingam

(2007). Essentialism, power, and the representation of social categories: A folk sociology perspective. Human Development, 50, 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1159/000109832

39.

McKinnon

(2018). The epistemology of propaganda. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 96, 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12429

40.

Mikkola

(2017). Feminist perspectives on sex and gender. In Zalta

E. N.

(Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/feminism-gender/

41.

Morandini

J. S.

Blaszczynski

Ross

M. W.

Costa

D. S. J.

Dar-Nimrod

(2015). Essentialist beliefs, sexual identity uncertainty, internalized homonegativity and psychological wellbeing in gay men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 62, 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000072

42.

Morrison

M. A.

Bishop

C. J.

Gazzola

S. B.

McCutcheon

J. M.

Parker

Morrison

T. G.

(2017). Systematic review of the psychometric properties of transphobia scales. International Journal of Transgenderism, 18, 395–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2017.1332535

43.

Morton

T. A.

Postmes

Haslam

S. A.

Hornsey

M. J.

(2009). Theorizing gender in the face of social change: Is there anything essential about essentialism? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012966

44.

Muthén

L. K.

Muthén

B. O.

(2019). Mplus user’s guide. https://www.statmodel.com/

45.

Nagoshi

J. L.

Adams

K. A.

Terrell

H. K.

Hill

E. D.

Brzuzy

Nagoshi

C. T.

(2008). Gender differences in correlates of homophobia and transphobia. Sex Roles, 59, 521–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9458-7

46.

Norton

A. T.

Herek

G. M.

(2013). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of U.S. adults. Sex Roles, 68, 738–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6

47.

O’Connor

B. P.

(2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396–402. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200807

48.

Peer

Vosgerau

Acquisti

(2014). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y

49.

Pratto

Sidanius

Stallworth

L. M.

Malle

B. F.

(1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741

50.

Prentice

D. A.

Miller

D. T.

(2006). Essentializing differences between women and men. Psychological Science, 17, 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01675.x

51.

Pryzgoda

Chrisler

J. C.

(2000). Definitions of gender and sex: The subtleties of meaning. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 43, 553–569. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007123617636

52.

Reynolds

W. M.

(1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<119::AID-JCLP2270380118>3.0.CO;2-I

53.

Richards

Bouman

W. P.

Seal

Barker

M. J.

Nieder

T. O.

T’Sjoen

(2016). Non-binary or genderqueer genders. International Review of Psychiatry, 28, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2015.1106446

54.

Roberts

S. O.

A. K.

Rhodes

Gelman

S. A.

(2017). Making boundaries great again: Essentialism and support for boundary-enhancing initiatives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 1643–1658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217724801

55.

Roets

van Hiel

(2011a). Allport’s prejudiced personality today: Need for closure as the motivated cognitive basis of prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 349–354. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23213072

56.

Roets

van Hiel

(2011b). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 90–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004

57.

Rosenblatt

(2020, June 10). J. K. Rowling doubles down in what some critics call a “transphobic manifesto.” NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/j-k-rowling-doubles-down-what-some-critics-call-transphobic-n1229351

58.

Rothbart

Taylor

(1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In Semin

G. R.

Fiedler

(Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 11–36). SAGE Publications.

59.

Rowling

J. K.

(2020). J. K. Rowling writes about her reasons for speaking out on sex and gender issues. https://www.jkrowling.com/opinions/j-k-rowling-writes-about-her-reasons-for-speaking-out-on-sex-and-gender-issues/

60.

Rubin

(1975). The traffic in women: Notes on the “political economy” of sex. In Reiter

(Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women (pp. 157–210). Monthly Review Press.

61.

Ryazanov

A. A.

Christenfeld

N. J. S.

(2018). The strategic value of essentialism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12, Article e12370. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12370

62.

Saris

W. E.

Satorra

van der Veld

W. M.

(2009). Testing structural equation models or detection of misspecifications? Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16, 561–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903203433

63.

Scelfo

(2015, February 3). A university recognizes a third gender: Neutral. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/08/education/edlife/a-university-recognizes-a-third-gender-neutral.html

64.

Schermelleh-Engel

Moosbrugger

Müller

(2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research, 8, 23–74. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.509.4258&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

65.

Schudson

Z. C.

Beischel

W. J.

van Anders

S. M.

(2019). Individual variation in gender/sex category definitions. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 6, 448–460. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000346

66.

Schudson

Z. C.

Beischel

W. J.

van Anders

S. M.

(2021). Sexual configurations theory as an intervention to improve attitudes toward gender/sex minorities. Manuscript in preparation.

67.

Schudson

Z. C.

Dibble

E. R.

van Anders

S. M.

(2017). Gender/sex and sexual diversity via sexual configurations theory: Insights from a qualitative study with gender and sexual minorities. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 4, 422–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000241

68.

Skewes

Fine

Haslam

(2018). Beyond Mars and Venus: The role of gender essentialism in support for gender inequality and backlash. PLoS One, 13, Article e0200921. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200921

69.

Smiler

A. P.

Gelman

S. A.

(2008). Determinants of gender essentialism in college students. Sex Roles, 58, 864–874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9402-x

70.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.

71.

Tawa

(2017). The Beliefs About Race Scale (BARS): Dimensions of racial essentialism and their psychometric properties. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 23, 516–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000151

72.

Tawa

Montoya

A. K.

(2018). Construals of self and group: How racial nominalism can promote adaptive intergroup outcomes for interdependent selves. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218784652

73.

Tebbe

E. A.

Moradi

Ege

(2014). Revised and abbreviated forms of the Genderism and Transphobia Scale: Tools for assessing anti-trans* prejudice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61, 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000043

74.

Tee

Hegarty

(2006). Predicting opposition to the civil rights of trans persons in the United Kingdom. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 16, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.851

75.

Terwee

C. B.

Mokkink

L. B.

Knol

D. L.

Ostelo

R. W. J. G.

Bouter

L. M.

de Vet

H. C. W.

(2012). Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research, 21, 651–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1

76.

van Anders

S. M.

(2015). Beyond sexual orientation: Integrating gender/sex and diverse sexualities via sexual configurations theory. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 1177–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0490-8

77.

van Anders

S. M.

Caverly

N. L.

Johns

M. M.

(2014). Newborn bio/logics and US legal requirements for changing gender/sex designations on state identity documents. Feminism & Psychology, 24, 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353514526222

78.

van Anders

S. M.

Schudson

Z. C.

Abed

E. C.

Beischel

W. J.

Dibble

E. R.

Gunther

O. D.

Kutchko

V. J.

Silver

E. R.

(2017). Biological sex, gender, and public policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732217720700

79.

Walch

S. E.

Ngamake

S. T.

Francisco

Stitt

R. L.

Shingler

K. A.

(2012). The Attitudes Toward Transgendered Individuals Scale: Psychometric properties. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 1283–1291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9995-6

80.

Walter

S. D.

Eliasziw

Donner

(1998). Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980115)17:1<101::AIDSIM727>3.0.CO;2-E

81.

Watson

(2016). The woman question. Transgender Studies Quarterly, 31, 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1215/23289252-3334451

82.

Webster

D. M.

Kruglanski

A. W.

(1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049–1062. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049

83.

Wilton

L. S.

Bell

A. N.

Carpinella

C. M.

Young

D. M.

Meyers

Clapham

(2018). Lay theories of gender influence support for women and transgender people’s legal rights. Social Psychological and Personality Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618803608

84.

Wright

Candy

King

(2018). Conversion therapies and access to transition-related healthcare in transgender people: A narrative systematic review. BMJ Open, 8, Article e022425. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022425

85.

Zakrisson

(2005). Construction of a short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 863–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.026

86.

Zimman

(2017). Transgender language reform: Some challenges and strategies for promoting trans-affirming, gender-inclusive language. Journal of Language and Discrimination, 1, 84–105. https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.33139

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

0.47 MB

Gender/sex diversity beliefs: Scale construction,validation,and links to prejudice

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material