The Recursive Cycle of Perceived Mindset and Psychological Distress in College

Abstract

College students are experiencing a significant mental health crisis, with rising rates of psychological distress. To help understand this trend, this study examines recursive relationships in the classroom between perceived mindset beliefs—that is, whether students perceive others in their classroom to view intelligence as malleable or fixed—and psychological distress. Across three time points, 288 undergraduates taking a physics course completed measures of perceived classroom mindset and psychological distress. Random intercept cross-lagged panel analyses, which controlled for demographic factors and students’ own mindset beliefs, revealed that perceiving the classroom culture as more fixed-minded early in the semester was associated with increased psychological distress later. Likewise, increased psychological distress early in the semester was associated with perceiving the classroom culture to be more fixed-minded later. These findings suggest that perceived mindset and distress are mutually reinforcing, highlighting the importance of addressing both in interventions aimed at alleviating student distress.

Keywords

mindset cultures growth-mindset fixed-mindset psychological distress recursive processes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramson

L. Y.

Metalsky

G. I.

Alloy

L. B.

(1989). Hopelessness depression: A theory-based subtype of depression. Psychological Review, 96, 358–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.358

Al-Mosaiwi

Johnstone

(2018). In an absolute state: Elevated use of absolutist words is a marker specific to anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideation. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(4), 529–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617747074

Antoniou

E. E.

Bongers

Jansen

(2017). The mediating role of dichotomous thinking and emotional eating in the relationship between depression and BMI. Eating Behaviors, 26, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2017.01.007

Bar-Haim

Lamy

Pergamin

Bakermans-Kranenburg

M. J.

van IJzendoorn

M. H.

(2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1

Beck

A. T.

(2016). Cognitive therapy: Nature and relation to behavior therapy. Behavior Therapy, 47(6), 776–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2016.11.003

Burnette

J. L.

Knouse

L. E.

Vavra

D. T.

O’Boyle

Brooks

M. A.

(2020). Growth mindsets and psychological distress: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 77, 101816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101816

Canning

E. A.

Muenks

Green

D. J.

Murphy

M. C.

(2019). STEM faculty who believe ability is fixed have larger racial achievement gaps and inspire less student motivation in their classes. Science Advances, 5(2), Article eaau4734. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4734

Canning

E. A.

Ozier

Williams

H. E.

AlRasheed

Murphy

M. C.

(2022). Professors who signal a fixed mindset about ability undermine women’s performance in STEM. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(5), 927–937. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211030398

Cisler

J. M.

Koster

E. H. W.

(2010). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.003

10.

Duffy

M. E.

Twenge

J. M.

Joiner

T. E.

(2019). Trends in mood and anxiety symptoms and suicide-related outcomes among U.S. undergraduates, 2007–2018: Evidence from two national surveys. Journal of Adolescent Health, 65(5), 590–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.04.033

11.

Dweck

C. S.

(1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.

12.

Dweck

C. S.

Chiu

Hong

(1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285.

13.

Eaton

A. A.

Saunders

J. F.

Jacobson

R. K.

West

(2020). How gender and race stereotypes impact the advancement of scholars in STEM: Professors’ biased evaluations of physics and biology post-doctoral candidates. Sex Roles, 82(3/4), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01052-w

14.

Eid

Diener

(2001). Norms for experiencing emotions in different cultures: Inter- and intranational differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 869–885. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.869

15.

Ezarik

(2021, June 20). How COVID-19 damaged student success. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2021/06/21/what-worked-and-what-didn%E2%80%99t-college-students-learning-through-covid-19

16.

Good

Rattan

Dweck

C. S.

(2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026659

17.

Hamaker

E. L.

(2023). The within-between dispute in cross-lagged panel research and how to move forward. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000600

18.

Hamaker

E. L.

Kuiper

R. M.

Grasman

R. P. P. P.

(2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20, 102–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038889

19.

Kroeper

K. M.

Fried

A. C.

Murphy

M. C.

(2022). Towards fostering growth mindset classrooms: Identifying teaching behaviors that signal instructors’ fixed and growth mindsets beliefs to students. Social Psychology of Education, 25(2), 371–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09689-4

20.

Kroeper

K. M.

Muenks

Canning

E. A.

Murphy

M. C.

(2022). An exploratory study of the behaviors that communicate perceived instructor mindset beliefs in college STEM classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 114, 103717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103717

21.

Kubzansky

L. D.

Kim

E. S.

Boehm

J. K.

Davidson

R. J.

Huffman

J. C.

Loucks

E. B.

Lyubomirsky

Picard

R. W.

Schueller

S. M.

Trudel-Fitzgerald

VanderWeele

T. J.

Warran

Yeager

D. S.

Yeh

C. S.

Moskowitz

J. T.

(2023). Interventions to modify psychological well-being: Progress, promises, and an agenda for future research. Affective Science, 4(1), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-022-00167-w

22.

LaCosse

Murphy

M. C.

Garcia

J. A.

Zirkel

(2021). The role of STEM professors’ mindset beliefs on students’ anticipated psychological experiences and course interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(5), 949–971. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000620

23.

(2022). Physics students’ mindsets and their impact on learning and perceived satisfaction. Oregon State University.

24.

Lipson

S. K.

Lattie

E. G.

Eisenberg

(2019). Increased rates of mental health service utilization by U.S. college students: 10-year population-level trends (2007–2017). Psychiatric Services, 70(1), 60–63. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800332

25.

Liu

R. T.

Kleiman

E. M.

Nestor

B. A.

Cheek

S. M.

(2015). The hopelessness theory of depression: A quarter century in review. Clinical Psychology: A Publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association, 22(4), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpsp.12125

26.

MacLeod

Grafton

Notebaert

(2019). Anxiety-linked attentional bias: Is it reliable? Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 529–554. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095505

27.

Miyamoto

Petermann

A. G.

(2014). Cultural differences in hedonic emotion regulation after a negative event. Emotion, 14, 804–815. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036257

28.

Moeller

(2015). A word on standardization in longitudinal studies: Don’t. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 1389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01389

29.

Muenks

Canning

E. A.

LaCosse

Green

D. J.

Zirkel

Garcia

J. A.

Murphy

M. C.

(2020). Does my professor think my ability can change? Students’ perceptions of their STEM professors’ mindset beliefs predict their psychological vulnerability, engagement, and performance in class. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(11), 2119–2144. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000763

30.

Muenks

Yan

V. X.

(2022). University STEM instructors with stronger failure-as-debilitating mindsets are perceived to engage in fewer mastery-oriented teaching practices by their students: An exploratory study. Social Psychology of Education, 25(5), 1205–1219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-022-09718-2

31.

Muenks

Yan

V. X.

Telang

N. K.

(2021). Who is part of the “mindset context”? The unique roles of perceived professor and peer mindsets in undergraduate engineering students’ motivation and belonging. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 633570. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.633570

32.

Muenks

Yan

(2024). Do my peers have a fixed or growth mindset? Exploring the behaviors associated with undergraduate STEM students’ perceptions of their peers’ mindsets about intelligence. Motivation and Emotion, 48, 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-023-10049-8

33.

Mulder

J. D.

(2023). Power analysis for the random intercept cross-lagged panel model using the powRICLPM R-Package. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 30(4), 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2022.2122467

34.

Murphy

M. C.

Dweck

C. S.

(2010). A culture of genius: How an organization’s lay theory shapes people’s cognition, affect, and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(3), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209347380

35.

Murphy

M. C.

Reeves

S. L.

(2019). Personal and organizational mindsets at work. Research in Organizational Behavior, 39, 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2020.100121

36.

Murphy

M. C.

Zirkel

(2015). Race and belonging in school: How anticipated and experienced belonging affect choice, persistence, and performance. Teachers College Record, 117, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811511701204

37.

Orth

Clark

D. A.

Donnellan

M. B.

Robins

R. W.

(2021). Testing prospective effects in longitudinal research: Comparing seven competing cross-lagged models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(4), 1013–1034. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000358

38.

Rattan

Good

Dweck

C. S.

(2012). “It’s ok — Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012

39.

Rissanen

Kuusisto

Hanhimäki

Tirri

(2018). Teachers’ implicit meaning systems and their implications for pedagogical thinking and practice: A case study from Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(4), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1258667

40.

Rudolph

K. D.

Conley

C. S.

(2005). The socioemotional costs and benefits of social-evaluative concerns: Do girls care too much? Journal of Personality, 73(1), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2004.00306.x

41.

Schleider

J. L.

Abel

M. R.

Weisz

J. R.

(2015). Implicit theories and youth mental health problems: A random-effects meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 35, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.11.001

42.

Seo

Lee

H. Y.

Jamieson

J. P.

Reis

Josephs

R. A.

Beevers

C. G.

Yeager

D. S.

(2022). Trait attributions and threat appraisals explain why an entity theory of personality predicts greater internalizing symptoms during adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 34(3), 1104–1114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579420001832

43.

Shickel

Siegel

Heesacker

Benton

Rashidi

(2020). Automatic detection and classification of cognitive distortions in mental health text. In 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE) (pp. 275–280). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBE50027.2020.00052

44.

Sisk

L. M.

Gee

D. G.

(2022). Stress and adolescence: Vulnerability and opportunity during a sensitive window of development. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.10.005

45.

Skibba

(2019). Women in physics. Nature Reviews Physics, 1(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-019-0059-x

46.

Sun

K. L.

(2019). The mindset disconnect in mathematics teaching: A qualitative analysis of classroom instruction. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 56, 100706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.04.005

47.

Suresh

Heckler

A. F.

(2023). Evolution of grades and social comparison concern within an introductory physics course. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(1), 010129. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010129

48.

Walton

G. M.

Wilson

T. D.

(2018). Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems. Psychological Review, 125(5), 617–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000115

49.

Walton

G. M.

Yeager

D. S.

(2020). Seed and soil: Psychological affordances in contexts help to explain where wise interventions succeed or fail. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420904453

50.

Williams

C. L.

Hirschi

Hulleman

C. S.

Roksa

(2021). Belonging in STEM: Growth mindset as a filter of contextual cues. international Journal of Community Well-Being, 4(4), 467–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-021-00111-z

51.

Yeager

D. S.

Carroll

J. M.

Buontempo

Cimpian

Woody

Crosnoe

Muller

Murray

Mhatre

Kersting

Hulleman

Kudym

Murphy

Duckworth

A. L.

Walton

G. M.

Dweck

C. S.

(2022). Teacher mindsets help explain where a growth-mindset intervention does and doesn’t work. Psychological Science, 33(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976211028984

52.

Yeager

D. S.

Dweck

C. S.

(2023). Mindsets and adolescent mental health. Nature Mental Health, 1(2), 79–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-022-00009-5

53.

Yeager

D. S.

Hanselman

Walton

G. M.

Murray

J. S.

Crosnoe

Muller

Tipton

Schneider

Hulleman

C. S.

Hinojosa

C. P.

Paunesku

Romero

Flint

Roberts

Trott

Iachan

Buontempo

Yang

S. M.

Carvalho

C. M.

. . . Dweck

C. S.

(2019). A national experiment reveals where a growth mindset improves achievement. Nature, 573, 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.12 MB

0.04 MB