The present study aimed to examine whether the spillover effects existed between daily marital interactions and daily parenting practices after disentangling the between- and within-family effects and whether parents’ sensory processing sensitivity (SPS) would moderate such associations. The current study included 127 parents (83.3% female and 16.7% male; M age = 34.18, SD = 4.15) who reported their marital interactions and parenting practices over 14 consecutive days. The results of two separate dynamic structural equation models showed that the spillover effects of marital interactions to parenting occurred in a transient and mood-congruent pattern, and SPS traits moderated the relations between marital conflict and negative parenting practices.
AronE.AronA. (1997). Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(2), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.345
2.
AronE. N.AronA.JagiellowiczJ. (2012). Sensory processing sensitivity: a review in the light of the evolution of biological responsivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868311434213
3.
AssaryE.ZavosH.KrapohlE.KeersR.PluessM. (2021). Genetic architecture of Environmental Sensitivity reflects multiple heritable components: A twin study with adolescents. Molecular Psychiatry, 26(9), 4896–4904. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-0783-8
4.
BakkerK.MouldingR. (2012). Sensory-processing sensitivity, dispositional mindfulness and negative psychological symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(3), 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.006
5.
BarreraM.SandlerI. N.RamsayT. B. (1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students. American Journal of Community Psychology, 9(4), 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00918174
6.
BarryR. A.BundeM.BrockR. L.LawrenceE. (2009). Validity and utility of a multidimensional model of received support in intimate relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 23(1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014174
7.
BiS.HaakE. A.GilbertL. R.El-SheikhM.KellerP. S. (2018). Father attachment, father emotion expression, and children’s attachment to fathers: The role of marital conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(4), 456–465. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/fam0000395
8.
ChiaoJ. Y.BlizinskyK. D. (2010). Culture-gene coevolution of individualism-collectivism and the serotonin transporter gene. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1681), 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1650
9.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Eribaum.
10.
CoxM.PaleyB.HarterK. (2001). Interparental conflict and parent–child relationships. In GrychJ.FinchamF. (Eds.), Interparental conflict and child development: Theory, research and applications (pp. 249–272). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527838.011
11.
DillonL. M.NowakN.WeisfeldG. E.WeisfeldC. C.ShattuckK. S.ImamoğluO. E.ButovskayaM.ShenJ. (2015). Sources of marital conflict in five cultures. Evolutionary Psychology, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491501300101
12.
ElamK. K.ChassinL.EisenbergN.SpinradT. L. (2017). Marital stress and children’s externalizing behavior as predictors of mothers’ and fathers’ parenting. Development and Psychopathology, 29(4), 1305–1318. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579416001322
13.
ErelO.BurmanB. (1995). Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent-child relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 108–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.108
14.
EversA.RascheJ.SchabracqM. J. (2008). High sensory-processing sensitivity at work. International Journal of Stress Management, 15(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/1072-5245.15.2.189
15.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
GaoM.DuH.DaviesP. T.CummingsE. M. J. F. R. (2019). Marital conflict behaviors and parenting: Dyadic links over time. Family Relations, 68(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12322
18.
GottmanJ. M.DriverJ. L. (2005). Dysfunctional marital conflict and everyday marital interaction. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 43(3–4), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v43n03_04
19.
GrevenC. U.LionettiF.BoothC.AronE. N.FoxE.SchendanH. E.PluessM.BruiningH.AcevedoB.BijttebierP.HombergJ. (2019). Sensory processing sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and development of research agenda. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 98, 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.01.009
20.
GrolnickW. S.RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (1991). Inner resources for school achievement: Motivational mediators of children’s perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 508–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.4.508
21.
HouJ.FangX. (2015). Marital stress and marital quality: The moderating effect of marital commitment and spouse support. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 13(1), 87–98.
KatzL. F.GottmanJ. M. (1996). Spillover effects of marital conflict: In search of parenting and coparenting mechanisms. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1996(74), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219967406
24.
KitzmannK. M. (2000). Effects of marital conflict on subsequent triadic family interactions and parenting. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.36.1.3
25.
KjøbliJ.HagenK. A. J. F. R. (2009). A mediation model of interparental collaboration, parenting practices and child externalizing behavior in a clinical sample. Family Relations, 58(3), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2009.00552.x
26.
KoçakA.MouratidisA.UçanokZ.SelcukE.DaviesP. T. (2020). Need satisfaction as a mediator of associations between interparental relationship dimensions and autonomy supportive parenting: A weekly diary study. Family Process, 59(4), 1874–1890. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12523
27.
KourosC. D.PappL. M.Goeke-MoreyM. C.CummingsE. M. (2014). Spillover between marital quality and parent-child relationship quality: Parental depressive symptoms as moderators. Journal of Family Psychology, 28(3), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036804
28.
KrishnakumarA.BuehlerC. (2000). Interparental conflict and parenting behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Family Relations, 49(1), 25–44. https://doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00025.x
29.
KuoP. X.LeeK.JohnsonV. J.StarrE. J. (2023). Investigating moderators of daily marital to parent-child spillover: Individual and family systems approaches. Family Relations, 72(4), 1675–1693. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12777
30.
LiX.ZhouN.FangX.CaoH. (2020) Marital conflict resolution and marital affection in Chinese marriage: Integrating variable-centered and person-centered approaches, Marriage & Family.
31.
MabbeE.SoenensB.VansteenkisteM.van der Kaap-DeederJ.MouratidisA. (2018). Day-to-day variation in autonomy-supportive and psychologically controlling parenting: The role of parents’ daily experiences of need satisfaction and need frustration. Parenting, 18(2), 86–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2018.1444131
32.
MastrotheodorosS.PappL.GraaffJ. V.der DekovicM.MeeusW.BranjeS. (2021). Explaining heterogeneity of daily conflict spillover in the family: The role of dyadic marital conflict patterns. Family Process, 61, 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12648
33.
MastrotheodorosS.Van der GraaffJ.DekovićM.MeeusW. H.BranjeS. J. (2019). Interparental conflict management strategies and parent–adolescent relationships: Disentangling between-person from within-person effects across adolescence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(1), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12528
34.
MastrotheodorosS.Van LissaC. J.Van der GraaffJ.DekovićM.MeeusW. H. J.BranjeS. J. T. (2020). Day-to-day spillover and long-term transmission of interparental conflict to adolescent-mother conflict: The role of mood. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(8), 893–904. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000649
35.
MatsumotoD.YooS. H.NakagawaS. (2008). Culture, emotion regulation, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 925–937. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.925
36.
McGrawK. O.WongS. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30
37.
McNeishD.HamakerE. L. (2020). A primer on two-level dynamic structural equation models for intensive longitudinal data in Mplus. Psychological Methods, 25(5), 610–635. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000250
NelsonJ. A.BoyerB. P.VillarrealD. L.SmithO. A. (2017). Relations between mothers’ daily work, home, and relationship stress with characteristics of mother-child conflict interactions. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(4), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000276
40.
NgF. F. Y.PomerantzE. M.DengC. (2014). Why are Chinese mothers more controlling than American mothers? “My child is my report card.”Child Development, 85(1), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12102
41.
OhannessianC. M.De Los ReyesA. (2014). Discrepancies in adolescents’ and their mothers’ perceptions of the family and adolescent anxiety symptomatology. Parenting, 14(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2014.870009
42.
PluessM. (2013, April). Sensory-processing sensitivity: A potential mechanism of differential susceptibility. In Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development (SRCD), Seattle, WA, United States.
43.
SchultzbergM.MuthénB. (2018). Number of subjects and time points needed for multilevel time-series analysis: A simulation study of dynamic structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 25(4), 495–515. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2017.1392862
44.
SearsM. S.RepettiR. L.ReynoldsB. M.RoblesT. F.KrullJ. L. (2016). Spillover in the home: The effects of family conflict on parents’ behavior. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12265
45.
SherrillR. B.LochmanJ. E.DeCosterJ.StromeyerS. L. (2017). Spillover between interparental conflict and parent-child conflict within and across days. Journal of Family Psychology, 31(7), 900–909. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000332
46.
SmolewskaK. A.McCabeS. B.WoodyE. Z. (2006). A psychometric evaluation of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and “Big Five.”Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1269–1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.09.022
StrausM. A.HambyS. L.FinkelhorD.MooreD. W.RunyanD. (1998). Identification of child maltreatment with the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales: Development and psychometric data for a national sample of American parents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22(4), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(97)00174-9
49.
TimmonsA. C.MargolinG. (2015). Family conflict, mood, and adolescents’ daily school problems: Moderating roles of internalizing and externalizing symptoms. Child Development, 86(1), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12300
50.
Van Der Kaap-DeederJ.SoenensB.MabbeE.DielemanL.MouratidisA.CampbellR.VansteenkisteM. (2019). From daily need experiences to autonomy-supportive and psychologically controlling parenting via psychological availability and stress. Parenting, 19(3), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2019.1615791
51.
van EldikW. M.de HaanA. D.ParryL. Q.DaviesP. T.LuijkM. P. C. M.ArendsL. R.PrinzieP. (2020). The interparental relationship: Meta-analytic associations with children’s maladjustment and responses to interparental conflict. Psychological Bulletin, 146(7), 553–594. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000233
52.
WuX.ZhangR.LiX.FengT.YanN. (2021). The moderating role of sensory processing sensitivity in the link between stress and depression: A VBM study. Neuropsychologia, 150, 107704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107704
53.
ZempM.JohnsonM. D.BodenmannG. (2018). Within-family processes: Interparental and coparenting conflict and child adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(3), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000368
54.
ZengS.WangZ. (2022). Revision of the Chinese version of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale-parent report. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 20(1), 101–107.
55.
ZhouN.BuehlerC. (2017). Adolescents’ responses to marital conflict: The role of cooperative marital conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 31, 910–921.
56.
ZhouN.BuehlerC. (2019). Marital hostility and early adolescents’ adjustment: The role of cooperative marital conflict. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431617725193
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
