Moral Expansiveness Around the World: The Role of Societal Factors Across 36 Countries

Abstract

What are the things that we think matter morally, and how do societal factors influence this? To date, research has explored several individual-level and historical factors that influence the size of our ‘moral circles.' There has, however, been less attention focused on which societal factors play a role. We present the first multi-national exploration of moral expansiveness—that is, the size of people’s moral circles across countries. We found low generalized trust, greater perceptions of a breakdown in the social fabric of society, and greater perceived economic inequality were associated with smaller moral circles. Generalized trust also helped explain the effects of perceived inequality on lower levels of moral inclusiveness. Other inequality indicators (i.e., Gini coefficients) were, however, unrelated to moral expansiveness. These findings suggest that societal factors, especially those associated with generalized trust, may influence the size of our moral circles.

Keywords

moral circles moral expansiveness economic inequality trust anomie

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bates

Mächler

Bolker

B. M.

Walker

S. C.

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Bloom

(2010). How do morals change? Nature, 464(7288), 490. https://doi.org/10.1038/464490a

Bryan

M. L.

Jenkins

S. P.

(2016). Multilevel modelling of country effects: A cautionary tale. European Sociological Review, 32(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv059

Côté

House

Willer

(2015). High economic inequality leads higher-income individuals to be less generous. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(52), 15838–15843. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511536112

Crimston

C. R.

Bain

P. G.

Hornsey

M. J.

Bastian

(2016). Moral expansiveness: Examining variability in the extension of the moral world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(4), 636–653. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000086

Crimston

C. R.

Hornsey

M. J.

Bain

P. G.

Bastian

(2018a). Moral expansiveness short form: Validity and reliability of the MESx. PLoS ONE, 13(10), e0205373. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205373

Crimston

C. R.

Hornsey

M. J.

Bain

P. G.

Bastian

(2018b). Toward a psychology of moral expansiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417730888

Economist Intelligence Unit. (2019). Democracy index 2019. https://www.eiu.com/topic/democracy-index

Elgar

F. J.

(2010). Income inequality, trust, and population health in 33 countries. American Journal of Public Health, 100(11), 2311–2315. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.189134

10.

Frank

M. W.

(2014). A new state-level panel of annual inequality measures over the period 1916-2005. Journal of Business Strategies, 31(1), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.54155/jbs.31.1.241-263

11.

Glei

D. A.

Goldman

Weinstein

(2018). Perception has its own reality: Subjective versus objective measures of economic distress. Population and Development Review, 44(4), 695–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12183

12.

Goodman

Adler

N. E.

Kawachi

Frazier

A. L.

Huang

Colditz

G. A.

(2001). Adolescents’ perceptions of social status: Development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics, 108(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.108.2.e31

13.

Graham

Nosek

B. A.

Haidt

Iyer

Koleva

Ditto

P. H.

(2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021847

14.

Henrich

Heine

S. J.

Norenzayan

(2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2-3), 61–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X

15.

Heydari

Teymoori

Haghish

E. F.

Mohamadi

(2014). Influential factors on ethnocentrism: The effect of socioeconomic status, anomie, and authoritarianism. Social Science Information, 53(2), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018413517521

16.

Jetten

Wang

Steffens

N. K.

Mols

Peters

Verkuyten

(2017). A social identity analysis of responses to economic inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.011

17.

Knell

Stix

(2020). Perceptions of inequality. European Journal of Political Economy, 65, 101927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101927

18.

Legatum Institute. (2019). Legatum Prosperity Index. https://www.prosperity.com/rankings

19.

Meyer

Lohr

Gronenborn

Alt

K. W.

(2015). The massacre mass grave of Schöneck-Kilianstädten reveals new insights into collective violence in Early Neolithic Central Europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(36), 11217–11222. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504365112

20.

Grossmann

Varnum

M. E. W.

Kitayama

Gonzalez

Nisbett

R. E.

(2010). Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(14), 6192–6197. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1001911107

21.

Nannestad

(2008). What have we learned about generalized trust, if anything? Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 413–436. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135412

22.

Norton

M. I.

Ariely

(2011). Building a better America - one wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393524

23.

Oishi

Kesebir

Diener

(2011). Income inequality and happiness. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1095–1100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417262

24.

Oshio

Urakawa

(2014). The association between perceived income inequality and subjective well-being: Evidence from a social survey in Japan. Social Indicators Research, 116(3), 755–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0323-x

25.

Phillips

L. T.

Tepper

S. J.

Goya-Tocchetto

Davidai

Ordabayeva

Mirza

M. U.

Szaszi

Day

M. V.

Hauser

O. P.

Jachimowicz

J. M.

(2020). Inequality in people’s minds. Psyarxiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/vawh9

26.

Pinker

(2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. Viking.

27.

R Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In R foundation for statistical computing (Vol. 739). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74686-7

28.

Rotter

J. B.

(1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35(4), 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x

29.

Rottman

Crimston

C. R.

Syropoulos

(2021). Tree-huggers versus human-lovers: Anthropomorphism and dehumanization predict valuing nature over outgroups. Cognitive Science, 45(4), e12967. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12967

30.

Rousseau

D. M.

Sitkin

S. B.

Burt

R. S.

Camerer

(1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.926617

31.

Saladié

Rodríguez-Hidalgo

(2017). Archaeological evidence for cannibalism in prehistoric Western Europe: From Homo antecessor to the Bronze Age. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24(4), 1034–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-016-9306-y

32.

Sánchez-Rodríguez

Á.

Willis

G. B.

Jetten

Rodríguez-Bailón

(2018). Economic inequality enhances inferences that the normative climate is individualistic and competitive. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(6), 1114–1127. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2557

33.

Singer

(1981). The expanding circle: Ethics and sociobiology. Clarendon Press.

34.

Singh-Manoux

Adler

N. E.

Marmot

M. G.

(2003). Subjective social status: Its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study. Social Science and Medicine, 56(6), 1321–1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00131-4

35.

Sprong

Jetten

Wang

Peters

Mols

Verkuyten

Bastian

Ariyanto

Autin

Ayub

Badea

Besta

Butera

Costa-Lopes

Cui

Fantini

Finchilescu

Gaertner

Gollwitzer

. . .Wohl

M. J. A.

(2019). “Our country needs a strong leader right now”: Economic inequality enhances the wish for a strong leader. Psychological Science, 30(11), 1625–1637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619875472

36.

Starmans

Sheskin

Bloom

(2017). Why people prefer unequal societies. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0082

37.

Teymoori

Bastian

Jetten

(2017). Towards a psychological analysis of anomie. Political Psychology, 38(6), 1009–1023. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12377

38.

Umemura

(2017). Attitudes toward ingroups versus outgroups as unique distinctions between political trust and generalized social trust: A study of ethnically diverse youth in the Czech Republic. Ceskoslovenska Psychologie, 61(5), 433–448.

39.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2019). Victims of intentional homicide, 1990-2018. https://dataunodc.un.org/content/data/homicide/homicide-rate

40.

Uslaner

E. M.

Brown

(2005). Inequality, trust, and civic engagement. American Politics Research, 33(6), 868–894. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X04271903

41.

Van Lange

P. A. M.

(2015). Generalized trust: Four lessons from genetics and culture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(1), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414552473

42.

Waytz

Iyer

Young

Haidt

Graham

(2019). Ideological differences in the expanse of the moral circle. Nature Communications, 10(1), 4389. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12227-0

43.

Hayes

(2022). Gini Index. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/gini-index.asp

44.

Wilkinson

R. G.

Pickett

K. E.

(2007). The problems of relative deprivation: Why some societies do better than others. Social Science and Medicine, 65(9), 1965–1978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.041

45.

Wilkinson

R. G.

Pickett

K. E.

(2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. Allen Lane.

46.

The World Bank. (2019a). GDP per capita, PPP (current international $). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD?end=2019&name_desc=false&start=1990&view=chart

47.

The World Bank. (2019b). Gini index (World Bank estimate). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

6.97 MB