Children Value Animals More Than Adults Do: A Conceptual Replication and Extension

Abstract

Recent psychological research finds that U.S. American children have a weaker tendency than U.S. American adults to value humans more than animals. We aimed to conceptually replicate and extend this finding in a preregistered study (N = 412). We investigated whether 6- to 9-year-old Polish children (Study 1a) are less likely to prioritize humans over animals than Polish adults are (Studies 1b and 1c). We presented participants with moral dilemmas where they had to prioritize either humans or animals (dogs or chimpanzees) in situations that involved harming (i.e., a trolley problem) or benefiting (i.e., giving a snack). We found that Polish children prioritized humans over animals less than Polish adults did. This was the case both in dilemmas that involved preventing harm and in dilemmas that involved providing snacks. Both children and adults prioritized humans over chimpanzees more than humans over dogs.

Keywords

speciesism moral judgment children animals moral circle

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aboud

F. E.

(2008). A social-cognitive developmental theory of prejudice. In Quintana

S. M.

McKown

(Eds.), Handbook of race, racism, and the developing child (pp. 55–71). John Wiley & Sons.

Alves

R. R. N.

Barboza

R. R. D.

(2018). Chapter 15: The role of animals in human culture. In Nóbrega Alves

R. R.

Albuquerque

U. P.

(Eds.), Ethnozoology (pp. 277–301). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809913-1.00015-6

Amiot

C. E.

Bastian

(2015). Toward a psychology of human–animal relations. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 6–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038147

Awad

Dsouza

Kim

Schulz

Henrich

Shariff

Bonnefon

J.-F.

Rahwan

(2018). The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6

Bostyn

D. H.

Sevenhant

Roets

(2018). Of mice, men, and trolleys: Hypothetical judgment versus real-life behavior in trolley-style moral dilemmas. Psychological Science, 29, 1084–1093. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617752640

Bożewicz

(2020, June). Religijność Polaków w ostatnich 20 latach [Religiosity of Poles in the last 20 years]. Public Opinion Research Center (CBOS), 63. https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2020/K_063_20.PDF

Bürkner

P.-C.

(2017). Brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01

Caviola

Everett

J. A. C.

Faber

N. S.

(2019). The moral standing of animals: Towards a psychology of speciesism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 1011–1029. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000182

Caviola

Kahane

Everett

J. A. C.

Teperman

Savulescu

Faber

N. S.

(2021). Utilitarianism for animals, Kantianism for people? Harming animals and humans for the greater good. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150, 1008–1039. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000988

10.

Caviola

Schubert

Kahane

Faber

N. S.

(2022). Humans first: Why people value animals less than humans. Cognition, 225, 105139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105139

11.

Collado

Rodríguez-Rey

Sorrel

M. A.

(2022). Does beauty matter? The effect of perceived attractiveness on children’s moral judgments of harmful actions against animals. Environment and Behavior, 54, 247–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139165211014626

12.

Cooper

J. J.

Ashton

Bishop

West

Mills

D. S.

Young

R. J.

(2003). Clever hounds: Social cognition in the domestic dog ( Canis familiaris). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 81, 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00284-8

13.

Dhont

Hodson

Leite

A. C.

(2016). Common ideological roots of speciesism and generalized ethnic prejudice: The social dominance human–animal relations model (SD-HARM). European Journal of Personality, 30, 507–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2069

14.

Dhont

Hodson

Leite

A. C.

Salmen

(2019). The psychology of speciesism. In Dhont

Hodson

(Eds.), Why we love and exploit animals (pp. 29–49). Routledge.

15.

Dhont

Hodson

Loughnan

Amiot

C. E.

(2019). Rethinking human-animal relations: The critical role of social psychology. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22, 769–784. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219864455

16.

Foot

(1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5–15.

17.

Gross

A. S.

(2017). Religion and animals. In Oxford handbooks online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935420.013.10

18.

Hare

Tomasello

(2005). Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 439–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.003

19.

Henrich

Heine

S. J.

Norenzayan

(2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a

20.

Henseler Kozachenko

Piazza

. (2021). How children and adults value different animal lives. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 210, Article 105204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105204

21.

Hofstede

(2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. SAGE.

22.

Horta

(2010). What is speciesism? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 23, 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-009-9205-2

23.

Hussar

K. M.

Harris

P. L.

(2010). Children who choose not to eat meat: A study of early moral decision-making. Social Development, 19, 627–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00547.x

24.

Hussar

K. M.

Harris

P. L.

(2018). Vegetarian and nonvegetarian children’s judgments of harm to animals and humans. Ecopsychology, 10, 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2017.0039

25.

Inglehart

Baker

W. E.

(2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657288

26.

Is LEGO the most popular toy? Brick bucks. (2021). https://brickbucks.net/is-lego-the-most-popular-toy/

27.

Jaquet

(2019). A debunking argument against speciesism. Synthese, 198, 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02080-5

28.

Kass

R. E.

Raftery

A. E.

(1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2291091

29.

Killen

Mulvey

K. L.

Richardson

Jampol

Woodward

(2011). The accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of mind. Cognition, 119, 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.006

30.

Laham

S. M.

(2009). Expanding the moral circle: Inclusion and exclusion mindsets and the circle of moral regard. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 250–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.012

31.

Etz

Marsman

Wagenmakers

E.-J.

(2019). Replication Bayes factors from evidence updating. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 2498–2508. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1092-x

32.

Małecki

Sorokowski

Pawłowski

Cieński

(2020). Human minds and animal stories: How narratives make us care about other species. Routledge.

33.

Marshall

Gollwitzer

Mermin-Bunnell

Shinomiya

Retelsdorf

Bloom

(2022). How development and culture shape intuitions about prosocial obligations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151, 1866–1882. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001136

34.

McGuire

Fry

Palmer

S. B.

Faber

N. S.

(2022). Age-related differences in reasoning about the acceptability of eating animals. Social Development, 32, 690–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12655

35.

McGuire

Palmer

S. B.

Faber

N. S.

(2023). The development of speciesism: Age-related differences in the moral view of animals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 14, 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506221086182

36.

Miklósi

Á.

Topál

. (2004). Review Comparative social cognition: What can dogs teach us? Animal Behaviour, 67, 995–1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.10.008

37.

Misiak

Butovskaya

Sorokowski

(2018). Ecology shapes moral judgments towards food-wasting behavior: Evidence from the Yali of West Papua, the Ngorongoro Maasai, and Poles. Appetite, 125, 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.12.031

38.

Muthukrishna

Bell

A. V.

Henrich

Curtin

C. M.

Gedranovich

McInerney

Thue

(2020). Beyond Western, Educated, Industrial, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) psychology: Measuring and mapping scales of cultural and psychological distance. Psychological Science, 31, 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916782

39.

Neldner

Crimston

Wilks

Redshaw

Nielsen

(2018). The developmental origins of moral concern: An examination of moral boundary decision making throughout childhood. PLOS ONE, 13, Article e0197819. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197819

40.

Neldner

Wilks

(2022). How do children value animals? A developmental review. Psychology of Human-Animal Intergroup Relations, 1, Article e9907. https://doi.org/10.5964/phair.9907

41.

Neldner

Wilks

Crimston

C. R.

Jaymes

R. W. M.

Nielsen

(2023). I may Not like you, but I still care: Children differentiate moral concern from other constructs. Developmental Psychology, 59, 549–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001485

42.

Nielsen

Haun

(2016). Why developmental psychology is incomplete without comparative and cross-cultural perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371, Article 20150071. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0071

43.

Nielsen

Haun

Kärtner

Legare

C. H.

(2017). The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: A call to action. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 162, 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.017

44.

Piazza

Landy

J. F.

Goodwin

G. P.

(2014). Cruel nature: Harmfulness as an important, overlooked dimension in judgments of moral standing. Cognition, 131, 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.013

45.

Piazza

Simpson

McGuire

(2023). Why children moralise harm to animals but not meat. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 27, 685–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2023.05.004

46.

Prokop

Z. M.

Zvarík

Fedor

(2021). The effect of animal bipedal posture on perceived cuteness, fear and willingness to protect them. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9, Article 681241.

47.

Reinecke

M. G.

Wilks

Bloom

(2021). Developmental changes in perceived moral standing of robots. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 43. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8f32d068

48.

Rustemovich

A. R.

(2017). Exploration of animals exploitation in food, clothes, entertainment and testing industries, its impact on economy and ecology. https://doi.org/10.20861/2410-2873-2017-32-003

49.

Rutland

Killen

Abrams

(2010). A new social-cognitive developmental perspective on prejudice: The interplay between morality and group identity. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369468

50.

Saarni

(2010). The plasticity of emotional development. Emotion Review, 2, 300–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073909357969

51.

Scanes

C. G.

Chengzhong

(2018). Chapter 11: Animals and religion, belief systems, symbolism and myth. In Scanes

C. G.

Toukhsati

S. R.

(Eds.), Animals and human society (pp. 257–280). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805247-1.00017-4

52.

Schein

(2020). The importance of context in moral judgments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15, 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620904083

53.

Singer

(2011). The expanding circle. Ethics, evolution, and moral progress. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400838431

54.

Sorokowski

Marczak

Misiak

Białek

(2020). Trolley dilemma in Papua: Yali horticulturalists refuse to pull the lever. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27, 398–403. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01700-y

55.

Turpin

M. H.

Walker

A. C.

Fugelsang

J. A.

Sorokowski

Igor

Białek

(2021). The search for predictable moral partners: Predictability and moral (character) preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 97, Article 104196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104196

56.

(2015). The index of cultural tightness and looseness among 68 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 46, 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022114563611

57.

Verhagen

Wagenmakers

E.-J.

(2014). Bayesian tests to quantify the result of a replication attempt. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 1457–1475. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036731

58.

Wilks

Caviola

Kahane

Bloom

(2021). Children prioritize humans over animals less than adults do. Psychological Science, 32, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620960398

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.87 MB