Societal inequality has been found to harm the mental and physical health of its members and undermine overall social cohesion. Here, we tested the hypothesis that economic inequality is associated with a wish for a strong leader in a study involving 28 countries from five continents (Study 1, N = 6,112), a study involving an Australian community sample (Study 2, N = 515), and two experiments (Study 3a, N = 96; Study 3b, N = 296). We found correlational (Studies 1 and 2) and experimental (Studies 3a and 3b) evidence for our prediction that higher inequality enhances the wish for a strong leader. We also found that this relationship is mediated by perceptions of anomie, except in the case of objective inequality in Study 1. This suggests that societal inequality enhances the perception that society is breaking down (anomie) and that a strong leader is needed to restore order (even when that leader is willing to challenge democratic values).
AbelT. (1986). Why Hitler came into power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1938)
2.
AltemeyerB. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.” In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2
3.
AndersenR. (2012). Support for democracy in cross-national perspective: The detrimental effect of economic inequality. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30, 389–402. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2012.04.002
4.
ArendtH. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
5.
BurgoonB.van NoortS.RooduijnM.UnderhillG. (2018). Radical right populism and the role of positional deprivation and inequality (Working Paper No. 733). Esch-Belval: LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
6.
CamererC.DreberA.HolzmeisterF.HoT.HuberJ.JohannessonM.. . . WuH. (2018). Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour, 2, 637–644. doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z
7.
ChambersJ. R.SwanL. K.HeesackerM. (2014). Better off than we know: Distorted perceptions of incomes and income inequality in America. Psychological Science, 25, 613–618. doi:10.1177/0956797613504965
8.
DurkheimE. (1987). Suicide (SpauldingJ. A.SimpsonG., Trans.). London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1897)
ElgarF. J. (2010). Income inequality, trust, and population health in 33 countries. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 2311–2315. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.189134
GustavssonM.JordahlH. (2008). Inequality and trust in Sweden: Some inequalities are more harmful than others. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 348–365. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.06.010
13.
HaslamS. A.ReicherS. (2007). Identity entrepreneurship and the consequences of identity failure: The dynamics of leadership in the BBC prison study. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70, 125–147. doi:10.1177/019027250707000204
14.
HsiehC. C.PughM. D. (1993). Poverty, income inequality, and violent crime: A meta-analysis of recent aggregate data studies. Criminal Justice Review, 18, 182–202. doi:10.1177/073401689301800203
15.
InglehartR. F.NorrisP. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash (Harvard Kennedy School Working Paper No. RWP16-026). Retrieved from SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2818659
JettenJ.MolsF.PostmesT. (2015). Relative deprivation and relative wealth enhances anti-immigrant sentiments: The v-curve re-examined. PLOS ONE, 10(10), Article e0139156. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139156
18.
JettenJ.WangZ.SteffensN. K.MolsF.PetersK.VerkuytenM. (2017). A social identity analysis of responses to economic inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.05.011
19.
MessnerS. F.RosenfeldR. (2001). Crime and the American dream (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
20.
MolsF.JettenJ. (2016). Explaining the appeal of populist right-wing parties in times of economic prosperity. Political Psychology, 37, 275–292. doi:10.1111/pops.12258
21.
MolsF.JettenJ. (2017). The wealth paradox: Economic prosperity and the hardening of attitudes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
22.
MuddeC. (2013). Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: So what?European Journal of Political Research, 52, 1–19. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02065.x
23.
MuellerD.StratmannT. (2003). The economic effects of democratic participation. Journal of Public Economics, 87, 2129–2155. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00046-4
24.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
25.
NortonM. I.ArielyD. (2011). Building a better America—One wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 9–12. doi:10.1177/1745691610393524
26.
PikettyT. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
27.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.WillisG. B.JettenJ.Rodríguez-BailónR. (2018). Economic inequality enhances inferences that the normative climate is individualistic and competitive. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 1114–1127. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2557
30.
ScheepersP.FellingA.PetersJ. (1990). Social conditions, authoritarianism and ethnocentrism: A theoretical model of the early Frankfurt School updated and tested. European Sociological Review, 6, 15–29. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036543
31.
ScheepersP.FellingA.PetersJ. (1992). Anomie, authoritarianism and ethnocentrism: Update of a classic theme and an empirical test. Politics & the Individual, 2, 43–59.
32.
SoltF. (2008). Economic inequality and democratic political engagement. American Journal of Political Science, 52, 48–60. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00298.x
33.
SoltF. (2012). The origins of authoritarianism. Political Research Quarterly, 65, 703–713. doi:10.1177/1065912911424287
34.
StiglitzJ. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
35.
TeymooriA.BastianB.JettenJ. (2016). Towards a psychological analysis of anomie. Political Psychology, 38, 1009–1023. doi:10.1111/pops.12377
36.
TeymooriA.JettenJ.BastianB.AriyantoA.AutinF.AyubN.. . . WohlM. (2016). Revisiting the measurement of anomie. PLOS ONE, 11(7), Article e0158370. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158370
37.
United Nations Development Program. (2014). Statistical annex. In Human development report 2014: Sustaining human progress: Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. New York, NY: Author. doi.org/10.18356/429b38fd-en
38.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2019). Statistics and data: Global study on homicide. Retrieved from https://dataunodc.un.org/GSH_app
39.
Van de WerfhorstH. G.SalverdaW. (2012). Consequences of economic inequality: Introduction to a special issue. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30, 377–387. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2012.08.001
40.
WhitworthA. (2012). Inequality and crime across England: A multilevel modelling approach. Social Policy and Society, 11, 27–40. doi:10.1017/S1474746411000388
41.
WilkinsonR.PickettK. (2009). The spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London, England: Allen Lane.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
