Trust is the social glue that holds society together. The academic consensus is that trust is weaker among lower-class individuals and in unequal regions/countries, which is often considered a threat to a healthy society. However, existing studies are inconsistent and have two limitations: (i) variability in the measurement of social class and (ii) small numbers of higher level units (regions/countries). We addressed these problems using large-scale (cross-)national representative surveys (encompassing 560,000+ participants from 1,500+ regional/national units). Multilevel analysis led to two consistent sets of findings. First, the effects of social class on social trust were systematically positive, whereas the effects on institutional trust depended on the way social class was measured. Second, the effects of income inequality on social and institutional trust were systematically nonsignificant and smaller than the smallest negative effect of interest. Our findings suggest that researchers need to update their knowledge: social class—not income inequality—predicts trust.
AlesinaA.La FerraraE. (2002). Who trusts others?Journal of Public Economics, 85, 207–234.
2.
BotteroW. (2004). Stratification: Social division and inequality. Routledge.
3.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.
4.
BrandtM. J.WetherellG.HenryP. J. (2015). Changes in income predict change in social trust: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 36, 761–768.
5.
Brown-IannuzziJ. L.LundbergK. B.KayA. C.PayneB. K. (2015). Subjective status shapes political preferences. Psychological Science, 26, 15–26.
6.
ButtonK. S.IoannidisJ. P.MokryszC.NosekB. A.FlintJ.RobinsonE. S.MunafòM. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 365–376.
7.
ButtrickN. R.OishiS. (2017). The psychological consequences of income inequality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11, 1–12.
8.
CatterbergG.MorenoA. (2006). The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18, 31–48.
9.
ChoiJ. M. (2016). Income inequality and its source decomposition before and after global financial crisis [Master’s thesis]. University, Seoul, Korea: Sungkyunkwan University.
EndersC. K.TofighiD. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12, 121–138.
12.
FairbrotherM. (2014). Two multilevel modeling techniques for analyzing comparative longitudinal survey datasets. Political Science Research and Methods, 2, 119–140.
13.
FairbrotherM.MartinI. W. (2013). Does inequality erode social trust? Results from multilevel models of US states and counties. Social Science Research, 42, 347–360.
14.
FlakeJ. K.FriedE. I. (2019, March15). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hs7wm
15.
FukuyamaF. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity (Vol. 99). Free press.
16.
HamakerE. L.MuthénB. (2020). The fixed versus random effects debate and how it relates to centering in multilevel modeling. Psychological Methods, 25, 365–379.
17.
HastingsO. P. (2018). Less equal, less trusting? Longitudinal and cross-sectional effects of income inequality on trust in US States, 1973–2012. Social Science Research, 74, 77–95.
18.
HauserO. P.NortonM. I. (2017). (Mis)perceptions of inequality. Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 21–25.
19.
KawachiI.KennedyB. P.LochnerK.Prothrow-StithD. (1997). Social capital, income inequality, and mortality. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 1491–1498.
20.
KelleyJ.EvansM. D. (2017). Societal inequality and individual subjective well-being: Results from 68 societies and over 200,000 individuals, 1981–2008. Social Science Research, 62, 1–23.
21.
KimJKangJKimSKimCParkWLeeYChoiSKimS. (2017). Korean general social survey 2003–2016. Sungkyunkwan University.
22.
KnackS.KeeferP. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1251–1288.
23.
KrausM. W.ParkJ. W.TanJ. J. (2017). Signs of social class: The experience of economic inequality in everyday life. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 422–435.
24.
KrausM. W.StephensN. M. (2012). A road map for an emerging psychology of social class. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 642–656.
25.
LaurinK.EngstromH. R.AlicA. (2019). Motivational accounts of the vicious cycle of social status: An integrative framework using the United States as a case study. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 107–137.
LountR. B.JrPettitN. C. (2012). The social context of trust: The role of status. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 15–23.
28.
MaasC. J.HoxJ. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86–92.
29.
Medve-BálintG.BodaZ. (2014). The poorer you are, the more you trust? The effect of inequality and income on institutional trust in East-Central Europe. Czech Sociological Review, 50, 419–454.
30.
Navarro-CarrilloG.Valor-SeguraI.MoyaM. (2018). Do you trust strangers, close acquaintances, and members of your ingroup? Differences in trust based on social class in Spain. Social Indicators Research, 135, 585–597.
PerssonM. (2015). Education and political participation. British Journal of Political Science, 45, 689–703.
33.
PiffP. K.KrausM. W.CôtéS.ChengB. H.KeltnerD. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 771–784.
34.
PsacharopoulosG.PatrinosH. A. (2010). Returns to investment in education: A decennial review of the global literature. Education Economics, 26, 445–458.
35.
PutnamR. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.
36.
QuertemontE. (2011). How to statistically show the absence of an effect. Psychologica Belgica, 51, 109–127.
37.
Rodríguez-BailónR.Sánchez-RodríguezÁ.García-SánchezE.PetkanopoulouK.WillisG. B. (2020). Inequality is in the air: Contextual psychosocial effects of power and social class. Current Opinion in Psychology, 33, 120–125.
38.
SchröderM. (2016). How income inequality influences life satisfaction: Hybrid effects evidence from the German SOEP. European Sociological Review, 32, 307–320.
39.
SidaniusJ.PrattoF. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
40.
SommetN.MorselliD.SpiniD. (2018). Income inequality affects the psychological health of only the people facing scarcity. Psychological Science, 29, 1911–1921.
41.
TwengeJ. M.CampbellW. K.CarterN. T. (2014). Declines in trust in others and confidence in institutions among American adults and late adolescents, 1972–2012. Psychological Science, 25, 1914–1923.
42.
UslanerE. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge University Press.
43.
UslanerE. M. (2018). The Oxford handbook of social and political trust. Oxford University Press.
44.
UslanerE. M.BrownM. (2005). Inequality, trust, and civic engagement. American Politics Research, 33, 868–894.
45.
Van der MeerT. (2010). In what we trust? A multi-level study into trust in parliament as an evaluation of state characteristics. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76, 517–536.
46.
Van OorschotW.ArtsW. (2005). The social capital of European welfare states: The crowding out hypothesis revisited. Journal of European Social Policy, 15, 5–26.
47.
Van OorschotW.ArtsW.GelissenJ. (2006). Social capital in Europe: Measurement and social and regional distribution of a multifaceted phenomenon. Acta Sociologica, 49, 149–167.
48.
WilkinsonR.PickettK. (2010). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. Bloomsbury Press.
49.
Zak & Knack. (2001). Trust and growth. The Economic Journal, 111, 295–321.
50.
ZmerliS.CastilloJ. C. (2015). Income inequality, distributive fairness and political trust in Latin America. Social Science Research, 52, 179–192.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
