The Politics of Vaccine Hesitancy: An Ideological Dual-Process Approach

Abstract

Ideological convictions are known to shape attitudes and behavior in various life domains. Based on existing psychological analyses of political ideology, we use an ideological dual-process approach to explain people’s vaccine hesitancy, which distinguishes between authoritarian (right-wing authoritarianism [RWA]) and hierarchical (social dominance orientation [SDO]) facets of conservatism as potential antecedents of vaccination attitudes. In a large international study performed in Germany (N = 1,210), Poland (N = 1,209), and the United Kingdom (N = 1,222), we tested the roles of SDO and RWA in predicting vaccination hesitancy, as well as cross-cultural universality of the pattern of relationships between political ideologies and attitudes toward vaccines. In all three countries, high SDO was associated with higher vaccine hesitancy, whereas high RWA was associated with lower vaccine hesitancy. These findings contribute to our understanding of the distinctive roles that these two facets of right-wing ideology might play in the domain of public health.

Keywords

vaccine hesitancy RWA SDO ideology authoritarianism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adorno

T. W.

Frenkel-Brunswik

Levinson

D. J.

Sanford

R. N.

(1951). The authoritarian personality. Harper & Row.

Ahmed

Pissarides

Stiglitz

(2020). Why inequality could spread COVID-19. The Lancet Public Health, 5(5), Article e240. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2468-2667(20)30085-2

Altemeyer

(1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.

Altemeyer

(1996). The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.

Altemeyer

(1998). The other “authoritarian personality.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2

Asbrock

Fritsche

(2013). Authoritarian reactions to terrorist threat: Who is being threatened, the me or the we? International Journal of Psychology, 48(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2012.695075

Beierlein

Asbrock

Kauff

Schmidt

(2014) Die Kurzskala Autoritarismus-3 (KSA-3): Ein ökonomisches messinstrument zur erfassung dreier subdimensionen autoritärer einstellungen [A short scale for measuring three dimensions of authoritarianism, GESIS Working Papers]. GESIS.

Bilewicz

Marchlewska

Soral

Winiewski

(2014). Hate speech in Poland 2014—Summary of the national opinion poll. Stefan Batory Foundation.

Bilewicz

Soral

Marchlewska

Winiewski

(2017). When authoritarians confront prejudice: Differential effects of SDO and RWA on support for hate-speech prohibition. Political Psychology, 38(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12313

10.

Brauer

Chaurand

(2010). Descriptive norms, prescriptive norms, and social control: An intercultural comparison of people’s reactions to uncivil behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(3), 490–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.640

11.

Brune

Asbrock

Sibley

C. G.

(2016). Meet your neighbours: Authoritarians engage in intergroup contact when they have the opportunity. Community & Applied Social Psychology, 26(6), 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2289

12.

Bürkner

P. C.

(2017). Brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v080.i01

13.

Callaghan

Moghtaderi

Lueck

J. A.

Hotez

P. J.

Strych

Dor

Fowler

E. F.

Motta

(2020). Correlates and disparities of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3667971

14.

Choma

B. L.

Hodson

Sumantry

Hanoch

Gummerum

(2021). Ideological and psychological predictors of COVID-19-related collective action, opinions, and health compliance across three nations. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5585

15.

Cisłak

Marchlewska

Wojcik

A. D.

Śliwiński

Molenda

Szczepańska

Cichocka

(2021). National narcissism and support for anti-vaccination policy: The mediating role of vaccination conspiracy beliefs. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 24(5), 701–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220959451

16.

Cohrs

J. C.

Asbrock

(2009). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 270–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.545

17.

Cohrs

J. C.

Ibler

(2009). Authoritarianism, threat, and prejudice: An analysis of mediation and moderation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530802659638

18.

Costello

T. H.

Bowes

S. M.

Stevens

S. T.

Waldman

I. D.

Tasimi

Lilienfeld

S. O.

(2021). Clarifying the structure and nature of left-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000341

19.

Crowson

H. M.

Thoma

S. J.

Hestevold

(2005). Is political conservatism synonymous with authoritarianism? The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(5), 571–592. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.5.571-592

20.

Dube

Laberge

Guay

Bramadat

Roy

Bettinger

J. A.

(2013). Vaccine hesitancy. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 9(8), 1763–1773. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.24657

21.

Duckitt

(2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6

22.

Duckitt

Sibley

C. G.

(2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028540

23.

Duckitt

Sibley

C. G.

(2010). Personality, ideology, prejudice, and politics: A dual-process motivational model. Journal of Personality, 78(6), 1861–1894. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00672.x

24.

Dyrendal

Kennair

L. E. O.

Bendixen

(2021). Predictors of belief in conspiracy theory: The role of individual differences in schizotypal traits, paranormal beliefs, social dominance orientation, right wing authoritarianism and conspiracy mentality. Personality and Individual Differences, 173, Article 110645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110645

25.

Eigenberger

M. E.

(1998). Fear as a correlate of authoritarianism. Psychological Reports, 83(3), 1395–1409. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1998.83.3f.1395

26.

Feldman

(2003). Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes. In Sears

D. O.

Huddy

Jervis

(Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 477–508). Oxford University Press.

27.

Feldman

Stenner

(1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18(4), 741–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00077

28.

Fridman

Gershon

Gneezy

(2021). COVID-19 and vaccine hesitancy: A longitudinal study. PLOS ONE, 16(4), Article e0250123. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250123

29.

Górska

Stefaniak

Lipowska

Malinowska

Skrodzka

Marchlewska

(2021). Authoritarians go with the flow: Social norms moderate the link between right-wing authoritarianism and outgroup-directed attitudes. Political Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12744

30.

Hornsey

M. J.

Champan

C. M.

Alvarez

Bentley

Casara

B. G. S.

Crimston

C. R.

Ionescu

Krug

Selvanathan

H. P.

Steffens

N. K.

Jetten

(2021). To what extent are conspiracy theorists concerned for self versus others? A COVID-19 test case. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(2), 285–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2737

31.

Hornsey

M. J.

Finlayson

Chatwood

Begeny

C. T.

(2020). Donald Trump and vaccination: The effect of political identity, conspiracist ideation and presidential tweets on vaccine hesitancy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 88, Article 103947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103947

32.

Jarrett

Wilson

O’Leary

Eckersberger

Larson

H. J.

(2015). Strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy—A systematic review. Vaccine, 33(34), 4180–4190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.040

33.

Jost

Federico

C. M.

Napier

J. L.

(2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600

34.

Jost

J. T.

Glaser

Kruglanski

A. W.

Sulloway

F. J.

(2003). Exceptions that prove the rule—Using a theory of motivated social cognition to account for ideological incongruities and political anomalies: Reply to Greenberg and Jonas (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129(3), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.383

35.

Kempthorne

J. C.

Terrizzi

J. A.

(2021). The behavioral immune system and conservatism as predictors of disease-avoidant attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 178, Article 110857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110857

36.

Kennedy

(2019). Populist politics and vaccine hesitancy in Western Europe: An analysis of national-level data. European Journal of Public Health, 29(3), 512–516. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz004

37.

Kossowska

Szwed

Czarnek

(2021) Ideology shapes trust in scientists and attitudes towards vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(5), 720–737. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hcbmw

38.

Lavine

Lodge

Freitas

(2005). Threat, authoritarianism, and selective exposure to information. Political Psychology, 26(2), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00416.x

39.

Lobato

E. J. C.

Powell

Padilla

L. M. K.

Holbrook

(2020). Factors predicting willingness to share COVID-19 misinformation. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 566108. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389%2Ffpsyg.2020.566108

40.

Lovakov

Agadullina

E. R.

(2021). Empirically derived guidelines for effect size interpretation in social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 485–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2752

41.

MacDonald

N. E.

(2015). Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine, 33(34), 4161–4164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036

42.

Murphy

Vallières

Bentall

R. P.

Shevlin

McBride

Hartman

T. K.

McKay

Bennett

Mason

Gibson-Miller

Levita

Martinez

A. P.

Stocks

T. V. A.

Karatzias

Hyland

(2021). Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom. Nature Communications, 12(29), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20226-9

43.

Pratto

Sidanius

Levin

(2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 271–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772

44.

Pratto

Sidanius

Stallworth

L. M.

Malle

B. F.

(1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741

45.

Reese

(2012). When authoritarians protect the earth—Authoritarian submission and proenvironmental beliefs: A pilot study in Germany. Ecopsychology, 4(3), 232–236. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2012.0035

46.

Saldin

R. P.

(2010). Healthcare reform: A prescription for the 2010 Republican landslide? The Forum, 8(4), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.2202/1540-8884.1404

47.

Sibley

C. G.

Duckitt

(2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 248–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308319226

48.

Sibley

C. G.

Wilson

M. S.

Duckitt

(2007). Antecedents of men’s hostile and benevolent sexism: The dual roles of social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206294745

49.

Sidanius

Pratto

(1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.

50.

van Assche

Roets

van Hiel

Dhont

. (2019). Diverse reactions to ethnic diversity: The role of individual differences in authoritarianism. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(6), 523–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419857769

51.

van Prooijen

J. W.

Krouwel

A. P. M.

Pollet

T. V

. (2015). Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(5), 570–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614567356