The current research examined the bidirectional relationship between belief in free will and perceptions of time. Studies 1 and 2 explored the association between free will beliefs (FWB) and future time perspective (FTP) in correlational and longitudinal studies, respectively. Results indicated a positive relationship between the two constructs. Study 3 manipulated FTP and assessed FWB. Study 4 manipulated FWB and assessed FTP about current goal-pursuit. While manipulating FTP did not directly influence FWB, attenuating FWB led participants to perceive time as more limited to accomplish their goals. Exploratory mediation suggests that the perception of increased paths to successful goal-pursuit accounts for this relationship. The interplay between FWB and FTP is discussed.
AartsH.van den BosK. (2011). On the foundations of beliefs in free will: Intentional binding and unconscious priming in self-agency. Psychological Science, 22, 532–537.
2.
AllemandM.HillP. L.GhaemmaghamiP.MartinM. (2012). Forgivingness and subjective well-being in adulthood: The moderating role of future time perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 32–39.
3.
AlquistJ. L.AinsworthS. E.BaumeisterR. F. (2013). Determined to conform: Disbelief in free will increases conformity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 80–86.
4.
BarghJ. A. (2008). Free will is un-natural. In BaerJ.KaufmanJ. C.BaumeisterR. F.BaerJ.KaufmanJ. C.BaumeisterR. F. (Eds.), Are we free? Psychology and free will (pp. 128–154). Oxford University Press.
5.
BauerD. J.PreacherK. J.GilK. M. (2006). Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 11, 142–163.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.BrewerL. E. (2012). Believing versus disbelieving in free will: Correlates and consequences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 736–745.
7.
BaumeisterR. F.MasicampoE. J.DeWallC. N. (2009). Prosocial benefits of feeling free: Disbelief in free will increases aggression and reduces helpfulness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 260–268.
8.
CarstensenL. L. (2006). The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science, 312, 1913–1915.
9.
CarstensenL. L.IsaacowitzD. M.CharlesS. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54, 165–181.
10.
CarstensenL. L.LangF. R. (1996). Future time perspective scale. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
11.
CateR. A.JohnO. P. (2007). Testing models of the structure and development of future time perspective: Maintaining a focus on opportunities in middle age. Psychology and Aging, 22, 186–201.
12.
ClarkC. J.LuguriJ. B.DittoP. H.KnobeJ.ShariffA. F.BaumeisterR. F. (2014). Free to punish: A motivated account of free will belief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 501–513.
13.
CrescioniA. W.BaumeisterR. F.AinsworthS. E.EntM.LambertN. M. (2016). Subjective correlates and consequences of belief in free will. Philosophical Psychology, 29, 1–23.
14.
DavisW. E.HicksJ. A. (2013). Maintaining hope at the 11th hour: Authenticity buffers the effect of limited time perspective on hope. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1634–1646.
15.
DennettD. C. (2003). The self as a responding—and responsible—artifact. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1001, 39–50.
16.
FeldmanG. (2017). Making sense of agency: Belief in free will as a unique and important construct. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11, 1–15.
17.
FeldmanG.BaumeisterR. F.WongK. F. E. (2014). Free will is about choosing: The link between choice and the belief in free will. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 239–245.
18.
FungH. H.CarstensenL. L. (2004). Motivational changes in response to blocked goals and foreshortened time: Testing alternatives to socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 19, 68–78.
19.
FungH. H.CarstensenL. L.LutzA. M. (1999). Influence of time on social preferences: Implications for life-span development. Psychology and Aging, 14, 595–604.
20.
GenschowO.RigoniD.BrassM. (2017). Belief in free will affects causal attributions when judging others’ behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114, 10071–10076.
21.
GenschowO.RigoniD.BrassM. (2019). The hand of god or the hand of Maradona? Believing in free will increases perceived intentionality of others’ behavior. Consciousness and Cognition, 70, 80–87.
22.
GrühnD.SharifianN.ChuQ. (2016). The limits of a limited future time perspective in explaining age differences in emotional functioning. Psychology and Aging, 31, 583–593.
23.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20, 102–116.
24.
HayesA. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Guilford.
25.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466, 29.
26.
HicksJ. A.TrentJ.DavisW. E.KingL. A. (2012). Positive affect, meaning in life, and future time perspective: An application of socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 27, 181–189.
27.
KooijD. T. A. M.KanferR.BettsM.RudolphC. W. (2018). Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 867–893.
28.
LangF. R.CarstensenL. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17, 125–139.
29.
LöckenhoffC. E.CarstensenL. L. (2004). Socioemotional selectivity theory, aging, and health: The increasingly delicate balance between regulating emotions and making tough choices. Journal of Personality, 72, 1395–1424.
30.
LynnM. T.Muhle-KarbeP. S.AartsH.BrassM. (2014). Priming determinist beliefs diminishes implicit (but not explicit) components of self-agency. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–8.
31.
MaxwellS. E.ColeD. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, 23–44.
32.
MonroeA. E.MalleB. F. (2010). From uncaused will to conscious choice: The need to study, not speculate about people’s folk concept of free will. European Review of Philosophy, 1, 211–224.
33.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Author.
34.
NahmiasE.MorrisS.NadelhofferT.TurnerJ. (2005). Surveying freedom: Folk intuitions about free will and moral responsibility. Philosophical Psychology, 18, 561–584.
35.
PaulhusD. L.CareyJ. M. (2011). The FAD-Plus: Measuring lay beliefs regarding free will and related constructs. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 96–104.
36.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
37.
RakosR. F.LaureneK. R.SkalaS.SlaneS. (2008). Belief in free will: Measurement and conceptualization innovations. Behavior and Social Issues, 17, 20–39.
38.
RockwoodN. J.HayesA. F. (2017, May). MLmed: An SPSS macro for multilevel mediation and conditional process analysis. Poster presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Psychological Science (APS), Boston, MA.
39.
RuckerD. D.PreacherK. J.TormalaZ. L.PettyR. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359–371.
40.
RuddM.VohsK. D.AakerJ. (2012). Awe expands people’s perception of time, alters decision making, and enhances well-being. Psychological Science, 23, 1130–1136.
41.
SarkissianH.ChatterjeeA.De BrigardF.KnobeJ.NicholsS.SirkerS. (2010). Is belief in free will a cultural universal?Mind & Language, 25, 346–358.
42.
SchönbrodtF. D.PeruginiM. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–612.
43.
SetoE.HicksJ. A. (2016). Disassociating the agent from the self: Undermining belief in free will diminishes true self-knowledge. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 726–734.
44.
ShariffA. F.GreeneJ. D.KarremansJ. C.LuguriJ. B.ClarkC. J.SchoolerJ. W.BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (2014). Free will and punishment: A mechanistic view of human nature reduces retribution. Psychological Science, 25, 1563–1570.
45.
ShippA. J.EdwardsJ. R.LambertL. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110, 1–22.
46.
SnyderC. R.SympsonS. C.YbascoF. C.BordersT. F.BabyakM. A.HigginsR. L. (1996). Development and validation of the State Hope Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 321–335.
47.
SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.FongG. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851.
48.
StillmanT. F.BaumeisterR. F.MeleA. R. (2011). Free will in everyday life: Autobiographical accounts of free and unfree actions. Philosophical Psychology, 24, 381–394.
49.
VohsK. D.SchoolerJ. W. (2008). The value of believing in free will: Encouraging a belief in determinism increases cheating. Psychological Science, 19, 49–54.
50.
WegnerD. M. (2004). Précis of the illusion of conscious will. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 649–659.
51.
ZhangZ.YuanK.-H. (2018). Practical statistical power analysis using Webpower and R. ISDSA Press. https://webpower.psychstat.org
