Research suggests that generativity may serve as a path to the experience of purpose in life. However, little is known about how this relationship is influenced by age and future time perspective (FTP). The present study aimed to investigate age and FTP as moderators of the association between generativity and sense of purpose. A total of 787 participants ranging in age from 19 to 94 years (M = 50.23; SD = 16.47) completed self-report measures of generativity, FTP, and sense of purpose as part of a broader study. Correlational analyses revealed that generativity, age, and FTP were positively associated with a sense of purpose. Moderation analyses found that FTP, but not age, significantly moderated the relationship between generativity and sense of purpose. Specifically, individuals with a more limited FTP exhibited a stronger association between generativity and purpose. Findings lend support for a robust association between generativity and sense of purpose (r = .54), and they suggest that generativity may be particularly important for sense of purpose when time is perceived as limited. This study paves the way for future research examining the role of FTP on the development of generativity across the lifespan.
AllemandM.HillK. C.HillP. L. (2024). Perceptions of the future and health behavior in adulthood. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00914150241268018
2.
BuschH.HoferJ. (2012). Self-regulation and milestones of adult development: Intimacy and generativity. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025521
3.
CarstensenL. L. (1993). Motivation for social contact across the life span: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. In JacobsJ. (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Developmental perspectives on motivation (pp. 209–254). University of Nebraska Press.
4.
CarstensenL. L.IsaacowitzD. M.CharlesS. T. (1999). Taking time seriously: A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.165
5.
CohenR.BavishiC.RozanskiA. (2016). Purpose in life and its relationship to all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events: A meta-analysis. Psychosomatic Medicine, 78(2), 122–133. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000274
6.
de St. AubinE. (2013). Generativity and the meaning of life. In HicksJ. A.RoutledgeC. (Eds.), The experience of meaning in life: Classical perspectives, emerging themes, and controversies (pp. 241–255). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6527-6_19
7.
EinolfC. J. (2014). Stability and change in generative concern: Evidence from a longitudinal survey. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.04.003
8.
EriksonE. H. (1963). Childhood and society. Norton.
9.
EriksonE. H.EriksonJ. M.KivnickH. Q. (1986). Vital involvement in old age. Norton.
GrossbaumM. F.BatesG. W. (2002). Correlates of psychological well-being at midlife: The role of generativity, agency and communion, and narrative themes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(2), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250042000654
12.
GrossmanM. R.GruenewaldT. L. (2020). Failure to meet generative self-expectations is linked to poorer cognitive–affective well-being. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(4), 792–801. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby069
13.
GruenewaldT. L.LiaoD. H.SeemanT. E. (2012). Contributing to others, contributing to oneself: Perceptions of generativity and health in later life. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 67(6), 660–665. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbs034
14.
GruenewaldT. L.TannerE. K.FriedL. P.CarlsonM. C.XueQ.-L.ParisiJ. M.RebokG. W.YarnellL. M.SeemanT. E. (2016). The Baltimore Experience Corps Trial: Enhancing generativity via intergenerational activity engagement in later life. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 71(4), 661–670. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbv005
15.
HayesA. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
16.
HillP. L.BurrowA. L.BrandenbergerJ. W.LapsleyD. K.QuarantoJ. C. (2010). Collegiate purpose orientations and well-being in early and middle adulthood. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31(2), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2009.12.001
17.
HillP. L.WestonS. J. (2019). Evaluating eight-year trajectories for sense of purpose in the health and retirement study. Aging & Mental Health, 23(2), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2017.1399344
18.
HoferJ.BuschH.AuA.Poláčková ŠolcováI.TavelP.Tsien WongT. (2014). For the benefit of others: Generativity and meaning in life in the elderly in four cultures. Psychology and Aging, 29(4), 764–775. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037762
19.
HutaV.ZuroffD. C. (2007). Examining mediators of the link between generativity and well-being. Journal of Adult Development, 14(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-007-9030-7
20.
IrvingJ.DavisS.CollierA. (2017). Aging with purpose: Systematic search and review of literature pertaining to older adults and purpose. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 85(4), 403–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415017702908
21.
KooijD.KanferR.BettsM.RudolphC. W. (2018). Future time perspective: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(8), 867–893. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000306
22.
KooijD.Van De VoordeK. (2011). How changes in subjective general health predict future time perspective, and development and generativity motives over the lifespan. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(2), 228–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2010.02012.x
23.
KotreJ. N. (1984). Outliving the self: Generativity and the interpretation of lives. Johns Hopkins University Press.
24.
KozikP.HoppmannC. A.GerstorfD. (2014). Future time perspective: Opportunities and limitations are differentially associated with subjective well-being and hair cortisol concentration. Gerontology, 61(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1159/000368716
25.
LangF. R.CarstensenL. L. (2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.125
26.
LawfordH. L.RameyH. L. (2015). “Now I know I can make a difference”: Generativity and activity engagement as predictors of meaning making in adolescents and emerging adults. Developmental Psychology, 51(10), 1395–1406. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000034
27.
Lodi-SmithJ.PonterioE. J.NewtonN. J.PoulinM. J.BaranskiE.WhitbourneS. K. (2021). The codevelopment of generativity and well-being into early late life. Psychology and Aging, 36(3), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000446
28.
MajorR. J.WheltonW. J.SchimelJ.SharpeD. (2016). Older adults and the fear of death: The protective function of generativity. Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue Canadienne du Vieillissement, 35(2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980816000143
29.
MartelaF.StegerM. F. (2023). The role of significance relative to the other dimensions of meaning in life—An examination utilizing the three dimensional meaning in life scale (3DM). The Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(4), 606–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2022.2070528
30.
McAdamsD. P.de St. AubinE. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 1003–1015. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.1003
31.
McAdamsD. P.de St. AubinE.LoganR. L. (1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.221
32.
MoieniM.IrwinM. R.SeemanT. E.RoblesT. F.LiebermanM. D.BreenE. C.OkimotoS.LengacherC.ArevaloJ. M. G.OlmsteadR.ColeS. W.EisenbergerN. I. (2020). Feeling needed: Effects of a randomized generativity intervention on well-being and inflammation in older women. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 84, 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2019.11.014
33.
MoieniM.SeemanT. E.RoblesT. F.LiebermanM. D.OkimotoS.LengacherC.IrwinM. R.EisenbergerN. I. (2021). Generativity and social well-being in older women: Expectations regarding aging matter. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(2), 289–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa022
34.
MorselliD.PassiniS. (2015). Measuring prosocial attitudes for future generations: The social generativity scale. Journal of Adult Development, 22(3), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-015-9210-9
35.
PfundG. N.BrazeauH.AllemandM.HillP. L. (2020). Associations between sense of purpose and romantic relationship quality in adulthood. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520903807
36.
PfundG. N.HoferM.AllemandM.HillP. L. (2022). Being social may be purposeful in older adulthood: A measurement burst design. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 30(7), 777–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2021.11.009
37.
PfundG. N.LewisN. A. (2020). Aging with purpose: Developmental changes and benefits of purpose in life throughout the lifespan. In HillP. L.AllemandM. (Eds.), Personality and healthy aging in adulthood: New directions and techniques (pp. 27–42). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32053-9_3
38.
PfundG. N.OlaruG.AllemandM.HillP. L. (2024). Purposeful and purposeless aging: Structural issues for sense of purpose and their implications for predicting life outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 60(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001633
39.
PfundG. N.RatnerK.AllemandM.BurrowA. L.HillP. L. (2022). When the end feels near: Sense of purpose predicts well-being as a function of future time perspective. Aging & Mental Health, 26(6), 1178–1188. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2021.1891203
40.
ReiniläE.SaajanahoM.FadjukoffP.TörmäkangasT.KokkoK. (2023). The development of generativity in middle adulthood and the beginning of late adulthood: A longitudinal study from age 42 to 61. Journal of Adult Development, 30(3), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-022-09436-1
41.
RohrM. K.JohnD. T.FungH. H.LangF. R. (2017). A three-component model of future time perspective across adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 32(7), 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000191
42.
ScheierM. F.WroschC.BaumA.CohenS.MartireL. M.MatthewsK. A.SchulzR.ZdaniukB. (2006). The life engagement test: Assessing purpose in life. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 29(3), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-005-9044-1
43.
SchoklitschA.BaumannU. (2012). Generativity and aging: A promising future research topic?Special Section: Innovative Approaches to International Comparisons, 26(3), 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2012.01.002
44.
SpringerK. W.PudrovskaT.HauserR. M. (2011). Does psychological well-being change with age? Longitudinal tests of age variations and further exploration of the multidimensionality of Ryff’s model of psychological well-being. Social Science Research, 40(1), 392–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.05.008
45.
VillarF. (2012). Successful ageing and development: The contribution of generativity in older age. Ageing and Society, 32(7), 1087–1105. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X11000973
46.
VillarF.SerratR.PrattM. W. (2023). Older age as a time to contribute: A scoping review of generativity in later life. Ageing & Society, 43(8), 1860–1881. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X21001379
47.
WindsorT. D.CurtisR. G.LuszczM. A. (2015). Sense of purpose as a psychological resource for aging well. Developmental Psychology, 51(7), 975–986. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000023
48.
ZhangJ. W.HowellR. T.AllemandM.SnellA. N.JanuchowskiJ. A.JohnO. P. (2024). Future time perspective: Factor structure, age pattern, and implications for psychological well-being and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 92(2), 636–648. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12856
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
