Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Previous theory and research has suggested that right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) is a unitary construct related to attitudes regarding obedience to authority. Recently, scholars have suggested that RWA is multidimensional. To adjudicate these competing notions, we test whether the associations between RWA components and moral attitudes regarding obedience differ depending on the ideology of the authority. Across three studies and an integrative data analysis, we found that the RWA component capturing obedience to and respect for authorities (i.e., submission) related to judgments that it is moral to obey all authorities, and perhaps also nonauthorities, regardless of the targets’ political ideologies. In contrast, the RWA component capturing socially conservative beliefs (i.e., traditionalism) related to judgments that it is moral to obey conservative authorities and immoral to obey liberal authorities. These results suggest that RWA is not a unitary construct and that its components differentially relate to moral judgments regarding obedience to authorities.

Keywords

right-wing authoritarianism obedience to authority moral judgments political ideology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altemeyer

(1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.

Altemeyer

. (2006). The authoritarians. Unpublished manuscript.

Blass

(1991). Understanding behavior in the Milgram obedience experiment: The role of personality, situations, and their interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 398–413.

Cohen

G. L.

(2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 808–822. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.808

Crawford

J. T.

Brady

J. L.

Pilanski

J. M.

Erny

(2013). Differential effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on political candidate support: The moderating role of message framing. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1, 5–28.

Crawford

J. T.

Mallinas

S. R.

Furman

B. J.

(2015). The balanced ideological antipathy model: Explaining the effects of ideological attitudes on intergroup antipathy across the political spectrum. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1607–1622.

Curran

P. J.

Hussong

A. M.

(2009). Integrative data analysis: The simultaneous analysis of multiple data sets. Psychological Methods, 14, 81–100.

Dambrun

Vatiné

(2010). Reopening the study of extreme social behaviors: Obedience to authority within an immersive video environment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 760–773.

Danso

Hunsberger

Pratt

(1997). The role of parental religious fundamentalism and right-wing authoritarianism in child-rearing goals and practices. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36, 496–511.

10.

Duckitt

Bizumic

(2013). Multidimensionality of right-wing authoritarian attitudes: Authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism. Political Psychology, 34, 841–862.

11.

Duckitt

Bizumic

Krauss

S. W.

Heled

(2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31, 685–715.

12.

Elms

A. C.

Milgram

(1966). Personality characteristics associated with obedience and defiance toward authoritative command. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1, 282–289.

13.

Eysenck

H. J.

(1981). Left-wing authoritarianism: Myth or reality? Political Psychology, 3, 234–238.

14.

Faul

Erdfelder

Lang

A. G.

Buchner

(2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.

15.

Feldman

Stenner

(1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18, 741–770.

16.

Frimer

J. A.

Gaucher

Schaefer

N. K.

(2014). Political conservatives’ affinity for obedience to authority is loyal, not blind. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1205–1214.

17.

Graham

Haidt

Nosek

B. A.

(2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046.

18.

Haslam

S. A.

Reicher

S. D.

Birney

M. E.

(2014). Nothing by mere authority: Evidence that in an experimental analogue of the Milgram paradigm participants are motivated not by orders but by appeals to science. Journal of Social Issues, 70, 473–488.

19.

Jost

J. T.

Glaser

Kruglanski

A. W.

Sulloway

F. J.

(2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.

20.

Leone

Chirumbolo

(2008). Conservatism as motivated avoidance of affect: Need for affect scales predict conservatism measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 755–762.

21.

Malka

Soto

C. J.

Inzlicht

Lelkes

(2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 1031–1051.

22.

Mavor

K. I.

Louis

W. R.

Laythe

(2011). Religion, prejudice, and authoritarianism: Is RWA a boon or bane to the psychology of religion? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 50, 22–43.

23.

Mavor

K. I.

Louis

W. R.

Sibley

C. G.

(2009). A bias-corrected exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of right-wing authoritarianism: Support for a three-factor structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 28–33.

24.

Pratto

Sidanius

Stallworth

L. M.

Malle

B. F.

(1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.

25.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Bryk

A. S.

Congdon

(2017). HLM 7.03 for Windows [Computer software]. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International.

26.

Roets

E. W. M.

Van Hiel

(2015). Can authoritarianism lead to greater liking of out-groups? The intriguing case of Singapore. Psychological Science, 26, 1972–1974.

27.

Stone

W. F.

(1980). The myth of left-wing authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 2, 3–19.

28.

Van Hiel

Duriez

Kossowska

(2006). The presence of left-wing authoritarianism in Western Europe and its relationship with conservative ideology. Political Psychology, 27, 769–793.

29.

West

B. T.

Welch

K. B.

Galecki

A. T.

(2007). Linear mixed models. A practical guide using statistical software. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.08 MB

Subcomponents of Right-Wing Authoritarianism Differentially Predict Attitudes Toward Obeying Authorities

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material