Past research on academic success emphasizes the need to avoid pleasurable nonacademic activities. In the context of enjoying big-time collegiate sports, we examined the notion that students, especially academically successful ones, may strategically indulge in sports games to resolve the conflict with academic pursuit. After confirming that high- (vs. low-) grade point average (GPA) students indeed found game-related activities less disruptive (Npilot = 325), we proceeded to study whether strategic indulgence or single-minded avoidance was their preferred means to resolve the game–study conflict. High- (vs. low-) GPA students exhibited three features of strategic indulgence. They were more sensitive to the goodness of the opportunity to partake in collegiate sports (NStudy1 = 216), engaged in compensatory planning to study on nongame days (NSudy2 = 409), and actively engaged and enjoyed the game-related activities (Nstudy3 = 530). These results suggest that understanding strategic indulgence in tempting activities would enrich our knowledge of long-term goal pursuit.
AbrahamC.SheeranP. (2003). Acting on intentions: The role of anticipated regret. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 495–511. doi:10.1348/014466603322595248
2.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
3.
AtkinsonJ. W.BirchD. (1970). The dynamics of action. New York, NY: John Wiley.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
5.
BrewerM. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482. doi:10.1177/0146167291175001
6.
BuehlerR.GrinD.RossM. (1994). Exploring the “planning fallacy”: Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 366–381. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.366
7.
ClotfelterC. T. (2011). Big-time sports in American universities. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8.
de RidderD. T.Lensvelt-MuldersG.FinkenauerC.StokF. M.BaumeisterR. F. (2012). Taking stock of self-control: A meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 76–99. doi:10.1177/1088868311418749
9.
DowsonM.McInerneyD. M. (2003). What do students say about their motivational goals? Towards a more complex and dynamic perspective on student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 91–113. doi:10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00010-3
10.
DuckworthA. L.SeligmanM. E. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ in predicting academic performance of adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939–944. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01641.x
11.
DuckworthA. L.TsukayamaE.KirbyT. A. (2013). Is it really self-control? Examining the predictive power of the delay of gratification task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 843–855. doi:10.1177/0146167213482589
12.
FaulF. E.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
13.
FergusonM. J. (2008). On becoming ready to pursue a goal you don’t know you have: Effects of nonconscious goals on evaluative readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1268–1294. doi:10.1037/a0013263
14.
FishbachA.ShahJ. Y. (2006). Self control in action: Implicit dispositions toward goals and away from temptations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 820–832. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.820
15.
FujitaK. (2011). On conceptualizing self-control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 352–366. doi:10.1177/1088868311411165
16.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
17.
HirtE. R.ZillmannD.EricksonG. A.KennedyC. (1992). Costs and benefits of allegiance: Changes in fans’ self-ascribed competencies after team victory versus defeat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 724–738. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.724
18.
HoferM. (2010). Adolescents’ development of individual interests: A product of multiple goal regulation?Educational Psychologist, 45, 149–166. doi:10.1080/00461520.2010.493469
19.
HoferM.SchmidS.FriesS.DietzF.ClausenM.ReindersH. (2007). Individual values, motivational conflicts, and learning for school. Learning and Instruction, 17, 17–28. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.003
20.
HofmannW.BaumeisterR. F.FörsterG.VohsK. D. (2012). Everyday temptations: An experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1318–1335. doi:10.1037/a0026545
21.
HofmannW.FrieseM.StrackF. (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 162–176. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x
22.
HofmannW.LuhmannM.FisherR. R.VohsK. D.BaumeisterR. F. (2014). Yes, but are they happy? Effects of trait self-control on affective well-being and life satisfaction. Journal of Personality, 92, 265–277. doi:10.1111/jopy.12050
23.
HumphreysB. R.MondelloM. (2007). Intercollegiate athletic success and donations at NCAA division I institutions. Journal of Sport Management, 21, 265–280. doi:10.1123/jsm.21.2.265
24.
KruglanskiA. W.KöpetzC.BélangerJ. J.ChunW. Y.OrehekE.FishbachA. (2013). Features of multifinality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 22–39. doi:10.1177/1088868312453087
25.
KruglanskiA. W.ShahJ. Y.FriedmanR.FishbachA.FriedmanR.ChunW. Y.Sleeth-KepplerD. (2002). A theory of goal systems. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 331–378). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80008-9
26.
LindoJ. M.SwensenI. D.WaddellG. R. (2012). Are big-time sports a threat to student achievement?American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 4, 254–274. doi:10.3386/w17677
27.
MischelW.AydukO. (2004). Willpower in a cognitive-affective processing system: The dynamics of delay of gratification. In BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 99–129). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28.
PatrickV. M.ChunH. H.MacinnisD. J. (2009). Affective forecasting and self-control: Why anticipating pride wins over anticipating shame in a self-regulation context. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 537–545. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.05.006
TangneyJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.BooneA. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x
31.
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331, 1447–1451. doi:10.1126/science.1198364
32.
WannD. L. (2006). Examining the potential causal relationship between sport team identification and psychological well-being. Journal of Sport Behavior, 29, 79–95.
33.
WentzelK. R. (1994). Relations of social goal pursuit to social acceptance, classroom-behavior, and perceived social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 173–182. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.173
34.
ZhangL.KarabenickS. A.MarunoS. I.LauermannF. (2011). Academic delay of gratification and children’s study time allocation as a function of proximity to consequential academic goals. Learning and Instruction, 21, 77–94. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.11.003
35.
ZimmermanB. J.KitsantasA. (2014). Comparing students’ self-discipline and self-regulation measures and their prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 145–155. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.004
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
