Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales and Achievement Goal Questionnaire 3 × 2: More Different than Similar

Abstract

The present study examined the convergent validity between two frequently used achievement goal instruments: Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS) and the Achievement Goal Questionnaire 3 × 2 (AGQ 3 × 2). Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation models tested for relationships both within and across the scales in a sample of undergraduate students (N = 363). Main findings suggested that the PALS and AGQ 3 × 2 had stronger relationships within their respective instruments then between the scales. The PALS and AGQ 3 × 2 instruments had some similarities between mastery goals, but relationships between the performance goals of these two instruments were weaker or uncorrelated. These findings suggest/highlight the ongoing disparities in the measurement of achievement goal theory. Future research should consider that the PALS and AGQ 3 × 2 goal instrumently likely measure different theoretical constructs.

Keywords

achievement goals academic motivation academic goals

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ames

(1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261

Browne

M. W.

Cudeck

(1992). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005

Dijkstra

Kuyper

van der Werf

Buunk

A. P.

van der Zee

Y. G.

(2008). Social comparison in the classroom: A review. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 828–879. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321210

Dweck

C. S.

(1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040

Dweck

C. S.

Leggett

E. L.

(1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi-org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256

Elkind

(1967). Egocentrism in adolescence. Child Development, 38(4), 1025–1034. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127100

Elliot

A. J.

McGregor

H. A.

(2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501

Elliot

A. J.

Murayama

(2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 613–628. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.613

Elliot

A. J.

Murayama

Pekrun

(2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632–648. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023952

10.

Jackson

D. L.

Gillaspy

J. A.

Purc-Stephenson

(2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694

11.

Hackel

T. S.

Jones

M. H.

Carbonneau

K. J.

Mueller

C. E.

(2016). Re-examining achievement goal instrumentation: Convergent validity of AGQ and PALS. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46(July), 73–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.04.005

12.

Holden

S. M.

Mueller

C. E.

Harrell-Williams

L. M.

Ford

J. M.

Jones

M. H.

(2021). Comparison of motivational latent profiles using the PALS and AGQ-R. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 67(October). N.PAG. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101999

13.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

14.

Huang

(2012). Discriminant and criterion-related validity of achievement goals in predicting academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 48–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026223

15.

Hulleman

C. S.

Schrager

S. M.

Bodmann

S. M.

Harackiewicz

J. M.

(2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 422–449. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018947

16.

Midgley

Kaplan

Middleton

Urdan

Maehr

M. L.

Hicks

Anderman

Roeser

R. W.

(1998). Development and validation of scales assessing students’ achievement goal orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(2), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1998.0965

17.

Midgley

Maehr

M. L.

Hruda

L. Z.

Anderman

Freeman

K. E.

Urdan

(2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales. University of Michigan.

18.

Muis

K. R.

Winne

P. H.

Edwards

O. V.

(2009). Modern psychometrics for assessing achievement goal orientation: A rasch analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 547–576. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709908X383472

19.

Nicholls

J. G.

(1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328

20.

Noordzij

Giel

van Mierlo

(2021). A meta-analysis of induced achievement goals: The moderating effects of goal standard and goal framing. Social Psychology of Education, 24(1), 195–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09606-1

21.

Pintrich

P. R.

(2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1017

22.

Senko

Dawson

(2017). Performance-approach goal effects depend on how they are defined: Meta-analytic evidence from multiple educational outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(4), 574–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000160

23.

Senko

Hulleman

C. S.

Harackiewicz

J. M.

(2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.538646

24.

Somers

C. L.

Gill-Scalcucci

Flett

G. L.

Nepon

(2022). The utility of brief mattering subscales for adolescents: Associations with learning motivations, achievement, executive function, hope, loneliness, and risk behavior. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 40(1), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829211055342

25.

Strunk

K. K.

Lester

W. S.

Lane

F. C.

Hoover

P. D.

Betties

J. S.

(2021). Testing the mastery-avoidance construct in achievement goal theory: A meta-analytic confirmatory factor analysis (MA-CFA) of two achievement goals scales. Educational Psychology, 41(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1824268

26.

Thomas

C. L.

(2022). Predicting test anxiety using the 3x2 achievement goal model. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology, 10(2), 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2020.1816237

27.

Urdan

Mestas

(2006). The goals behind performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.354

28.

Utman

C. H.

(1997). Performance effects of motivational state: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 1(2), 170. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0102_4