Populists combine anti-elitism with a conviction that they hold a superior vision of what it means to be a true citizen of their nation. We expected support for populism to be associated with national collective narcissism—an unrealistic belief in the greatness of the national group, which should increase in response to perceived in-group disadvantage. In Study 1 (Polish participants; n = 1,007), national collective narcissism predicted support for the populist Law and Justice party. In the experimental Study 2 (British participants; n = 497), perceived long-term in-group disadvantage led to greater support for Brexit and this relationship was accounted for by national collective narcissism. In Study 3 (American participants; n = 403), group relative deprivation predicted support for Donald Trump and this relationship was accounted for by national collective narcissism. These associations were present even when we controlled for conventional national identification. We discuss implications of the link between collective narcissism and support for populism.
AdornoT. (1998). Critical models: Interventions and catchwords. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1963)
2.
BlancharJ. C.EidelmanS. (2013). Perceived system longevity increases system justification and the legitimacy of inequality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 238–245. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1960
3.
BullockJ. G.GreenD. P.HaS. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (Don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 550–558. doi:10.1037/a0018933
4.
CameronJ. E. (2004). A three-factor model of social identity. Self and Identity, 3, 239–262. doi:10.1080/13576500444000047
5.
CichockaA. (2016). Understanding defensive and secure in-group positivity: The role of collective narcissism. European Review of Social Psychology, 27, 283–317. doi:10.1080/10463283.2016.1252530
6.
CichockaA.DhontK.MakwanaA. (2017). On self-love and outgroup hate: Opposite effects of narcissism on prejudice via social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. European Journal of Personality, 31, 366–384. doi: 10.1002/per.2114
7.
CichockaA.Golec de ZavalaA.MarchlewskaM.BilewiczM.JaworskaM.OlechowskiM. (In Press). Personal control decreases narcissistic but increases non-narcissistic in-group positivity. Journal of Personality. doi:10.1111/jopy.123281025
8.
CichockaA.GórskaP.JostJ. T.SuttonR.BilewiczM. (in press). What inverted U can do for your country: A curvilinear relationship between confidence in the social system and political engagement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000168.
9.
CichockaA.MarchlewskaM.Golec de ZavalaA.OlechowskiM. (2016). ‘They will not control us’: Ingroup positivity and belief in intergroup conspiracies. British Journal of Psychology, 107, 556–576. doi:10.1111/bjop.12158
10.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
11.
CramerK. J. (2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
DixonJ.LevineM.ReicherS.DurrheimK. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 411–425. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11002214
13.
DoosjeB.LosemanA.BosK. (2013). Determinants of radicalization of Islamic youth in the Netherlands: Personal uncertainty, perceived injustice, and perceived group threat. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 586–604. doi:10.1111/josi.12030
FrommE. (1973). The anatomy of human destructiveness. London, England: Pimlico/Random House.
16.
Golec de ZavalaA. (2010). Negative evaluation of the group increases collective narcissism and intergroup hostility under intergroup threat (Working Paper). London, England: British Academy.
17.
Golec de ZavalaA. (2011). Collective narcissism and intergroup hostility: The dark side of ‘in-group love’. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 309–320. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00351.x
18.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA. (2012). Collective narcissism and anti-Semitism in Poland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15, 213–229. doi:10.1177/1368430211420891
19.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.BilewiczM. (2013). The paradox of in-group love: Differentiating collective narcissism advances understanding of the relationship between in-group and out-group attitudes. Journal of Personality, 81, 16–28. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00779.x
20.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.Iskra-GolecI. (2013). Collective narcissism moderates the effect of in-group image threat on intergroup hostility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 1019–1039. doi:10.1037/a0032215
21.
Golec de ZavalaA.CichockaA.EidelsonR.JayawickremeN. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1074–1096. doi:10.1037/a0016904
22.
GórskaP.BilewiczM. (2017). Opposing effects of secure and narcissistic in-group identification on non-normative collective action. Manuscript in preparation.
23.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
HernandezE.KriesiH. (2015). The electoral consequences of the financial and economic crisis in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 55, 203–224. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12122
25.
JacobsB. (2016, 913). Fresh violence at Trump rally as supporter allegedly punches protester. The Guardian. Retrieved fromhttps://www.theguardian.com/uk
26.
JaworskaM. (2016). Czym jest dojrzała identyfikacja z grupą? W poszukiwaniu komponentów identyfikacji grupowej mających pozytywne konsekwencje dla grupy własnej i relacji międzygrupowych[What is secure in-group identification? Looking for in-group identification components that lead to in-group’s benefit and positive inter-group relations]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Warsaw, Poland.
KellnerD. (2016). American nightmare: Donald Trump, media spectacle, and authoritarian populism (Vol. 117). New York, NY: Springer.
29.
KostermanR.FeshbachS. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10, 257–274. doi:10.2307/3791647
30.
LeachC. W.Van ZomerenM.ZebelS.VliekM. L.PennekampS. F.DoosjeB.…SpearsR. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144–165. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.144
31.
LuhtanenR.CrockerJ. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 302–318. doi:10.1177/0146167292183006
32.
LyonsP. A.CourseyL. E.KenworthyJ. B. (2013). National identity and group narcissism as predictors of intergroup attitudes toward undocumented Latino immigrants in the United States. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 35, 323–335. doi:10.1177/0739986313488090
33.
LyonsP. A.KenworthyJ.PopanJ. (2010). Ingroup identification and group-level narcissism as predictors of U.S. citizens’ attitudes and behavior toward Arab immigrants. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1267–1280. doi:10.1177/0146167210380604
34.
MacKinnonD. P.KrullJ. L.LockwoodC. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1, 173–181. doi:10.1023/A:1026595011371
35.
MolsF.JettenJ. (2016). Explaining the appeal of populist right-wing parties in times of economic prosperity. Political Psychology, 37, 275–292. doi:10.1111/pops.12258
36.
MüllerJ. W. (2016). What is populism?Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
37.
PettigrewT. F. (2017). Social psychological perspectives on Trump supporters. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5, 107–116. doi:10.5964/jspp.v5i1.750
38.
PettigrewT. F.ChristO.WagnerU.MeertensR. W.Van DickR.ZickA. (2008). Relative deprivation and intergroup prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 385–401. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00567.x
39.
PettigrewT. F.MeertensR. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420250106
40.
RogersonP. A. (2001). Statistical Methods for Geography. London: SAGE.
RuncimanW. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in Twentieth-century England. Berkeley: University of California.
43.
SidesJ.TeslerM. (2016). How political science helps explain the rise of Trump (part 3): It’s the economy, stupid. Monkey Cage, The Washington Post. Retrieved fromhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/
44.
Van ZomerenM.PostmesT.SpearsR. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
45.
WalkerI.PettigrewT. F. (1984). Relative deprivation theory: An overview and conceptual critique. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 301–310. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1984.tb00645.x
46.
WiniewskiM.JurczyszynL.BilewiczM.BenedaM. (2015). Podłoże prawicowych preferencji wyborczych młodych Polaków. [Underpinnings of right-wing preferences of young Poles]. Warsaw, Poland: Center for Research on Prejudice.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
