First impressions are heavily influenced by emotional expressions such as smiles. In face-to-face contact, smiling individuals are perceived as warmer and as more competent than nonsmiling individuals. In computer-mediated communication, which is primarily text-based, the “smiley” (☺) constitutes the digital representation of a smile. But is a smiley a suitable replacement for a smile? We conducted three experiments to examine the impact of smiley use on virtual first impressions in work-related contexts. Our findings provide first-time evidence that, contrary to actual smiles, smileys do not increase perceptions of warmth and actually decrease perceptions of competence. Perceptions of low competence in turn undermined information sharing. The adverse effects of smiley use are moderated by the formality of the social context and mediated by perceptions of message appropriateness. These results indicate that a smiley is not a smile. The findings have implications for theorizing on the social functionality of virtual emotional expressions.
AbramsL. C.CrossR.LesserE.LevinD. Z. (2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. The Academy of Management Executive, 17, 64–77.
2.
AmesD. R.JoharG. V. (2009). I’ll know what you’re like when I see how you feel: How and when affective displays influence behavior-based impressions. Psychological Science, 20, 586–593. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02330.x
3.
AokiK. (1995). Synchronous multi-user textual communication in international tele-collaboration. Electronic Journal of Communication, 5, 1–17.
4.
BallewC. C.TodorovA. (2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 17948–17953.
5.
BarsadeS. G. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 644–675.
6.
BeaupréM. G.HessU. (2003). In my mind, we all smile: A case of in-group favoritism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 371–377.
7.
BeersmaB.Van KleefG. A. (2011). How the grapevine keeps you in line: Gossip increases contributions to the group. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 642–649. doi:10.1177/1948550611405073
8.
BelkinL. Y.RothmanN. B. (2017). Do I trust you? Depends on what you feel: Interpersonal effects of emotions on initial trust at zero-acquaintance. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 10, 3–27.
9.
ByronK. (2008). Carrying too heavy a load? The communication and miscommunication of emotion by email. The Academy of Management Review, 33, 309–327.
10.
CheshinA.RafaeliA.BosN. (2011). Anger and happiness in virtual teams: Emotional influences of text and behavior on others’ affect in the absence of non-verbal cues. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 2–16.
11.
CohenJ. (1998). Statistical power analyses for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
CrystalD. (2001). Language and the internet. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
13.
CuddyA. J.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149.
14.
CuddyA. J.GlickP.BeningerA. (2011). The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 73–98.
15.
DerksD.BosA. E.Von GrumbkowJ. (2007). Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: The importance of social context. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 842–849.
16.
DerksD.BosA. E.Von GrumbkowJ. (2008). Emoticons in computer-mediated communication: Social motives and social context. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 11, 99–101.
17.
DerksD.FischerA. H.BosA. E. (2008). The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 766–785.
18.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.
19.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J.GlickP. & XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.
20.
FullwoodC.MartinoO. I. (2007). Emoticons and impression formation. Applied Semiotics, 19, 4–14.
21.
FullwoodC.OrchardL. J.FloydS. A. (2013). Emoticon convergence in Internet chat rooms. Social Semiotics, 23, 648–662. doi:10.1080/10350330.2012.739000
22.
GansterT.EimlerS. C.KrämerN. C. (2012). Same same but different!? The differential influence of smilies and emoticons on person perception. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15, 226–230. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0179
23.
GarrisonA.RemleyD.ThomasP.WierszewskiE. (2011). Conventional faces: Emoticons in instant messaging discourse. Computers and Composition, 28, 112–125.
24.
GrossM. A.GuerreroL. K. (2000). Managing conflict appropriately and effectively: An application of the competence model to Rahim’s organizational conflict styles. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 200–226.
25.
GueguenN.De GailM. (2003). The effect of smiling on helping behavior: Smiling and good Samaritan behavior. Communication Reports, 16, 133–140.
26.
HancockJ. T.DunhamJ. D. (2001). Impression formation in computer mediated communication revisited: An analysis of the breadth and intensity of impressions. Communication Research, 28, 325–347.
27.
HatfieldE.CacioppoJ. T.RapsonR. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
29.
HessU.AdamsR.JrKleckR. (2005). Who may frown and who should smile? Dominance, affiliation, and the display of happiness and anger. Cognition & Emotion, 19, 515–536.
30.
HuangA. H.YenD. C.ZhangX. (2008). Exploring the potential effects of emoticons. Information & Management, 45, 466–473. doi:10.1016/j.im.2008.07.001
31.
JuddC. M.James-HawkinsL.YzerbytV.KashimaY. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899–913.
32.
KammrathL. K.AmesD. R.ScholerA. A. (2007). Keeping up impressions: Inferential rules for impression change across the Big Five. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 450–457.
33.
KatoY.KatoS.AkahoriK. (2007). Effects of emotional cues transmitted in e-mail communication on the emotions experienced by senders and receivers. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1894–1905.
34.
KayeL. K.WallH. J.MaloneS. A. (2016). Turn that frown upside-down: A contextual account of emoticon usage on different virtual platforms. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 463–467.
35.
KeltnerD.HaidtJ. (1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition & Emotion, 13, 505–521.
36.
KrohnF. B. (2004). A generational approach to using emoticons as nonverbal communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 34, 321–328.
37.
KurlandN. B.PelledL. H. (2000). Passing the word: Toward a model of gossip and power in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 25, 428–438.
38.
LeaM.SpearsR. (1992). Paralanguage and social perception in computer-mediated communication. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 2, 321–341.
39.
LoS. (2008). The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer-mediated communication. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 11, 595–597.
40.
LuorT. T.WuL.LuH.TaoY. (2010). The effect of emoticons in simplex and complex task-oriented communication: An empirical study of instant messaging. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 889–895.
41.
McAllisterD. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 24–59.
42.
Mesmer-MagnusJ. R.DeChurchL. A.Jimenez-RodriguezM.WildmanJ.ShufflerM. (2011). A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 214–225. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.002
43.
MunterM.RogersP. S.RymerJ. (2003). Business e-mail: Guidelines for users. Business Communication Quarterly, 66, 26–40.
44.
MusselP.GöritzA. S.HewigJ. (2013). The value of a smile: Facial expression affects ultimatum-game responses. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 381–385.
45.
NoyC. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11, 327–344.
46.
OhriA. (2012). From a distance: Impression formation and impression accuracy among geographically distributed coworkers. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1997–2006.
47.
OzonoH.WatabeM.YoshikawaS.NakashimaS.RuleN. O.AmbadyN.AdamsR. B. (2010). What’s in a smile? Cultural differences in the effects of smiling on judgments of trustworthiness. Letters on Evolutionary Behavioral Science, 1, 15–18.
48.
ParkinsonB.FischerA. H.MansteadA. S. R. (2005). Emotion in social relations: Cultural, group, and interpersonal processes. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
49.
PennebakerJ. W.MehlM. R.NiederhofferK. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 547–577.
50.
PlantE. A.HydeJ. S.KeltnerD.DevineP. G. (2000). The gender stereotyping of emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 81–92.
51.
ProvineR. R.SpencerR. J.MandellD. L. (2007). Emotional expression online: Emoticons punctuate website text messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26, 299–307.
52.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN. (2008). The face of success: Inferences of personality from chief executive officers’ appearance predict company profits. Psychological Science, 19, 109–111.
53.
ShieldsS. A. (2005). The politics of emotion in everyday life: “Appropriate” emotion and claims on identity. Review of General Psychology, 9, 3–15.
54.
SkovholtK.GronningA.KankaanrantaA. (2014). The communicative functions of emoticons in workplace e-mails:-). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 780–797. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12063
55.
StawB. M.BarsadeS. G. (1993). Affect and managerial performance. A test of the sadder-but-wiser vs. happier-and-smarter hypotheses. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 304–331.
56.
StirratM.PerrettD. I. (2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust: Male facial width and trustworthiness. Psychological Science, 21, 349–354.
57.
Van Der SchalkJ.HawkS. T.FischerA. H.DoosjeB. (2011). Moving faces, looking places: Validation of the Amsterdam dynamic facial expression set (ADFES). Emotion, 11, 907–920.
58.
Van KleefG. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 184–188.
59.
Van KleefG. A. (2016). The interpersonal dynamics of emotion: Toward an integrative theory of emotions as social information. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Van KleefG. A.CheshinA.FischerA. H.SchneiderI. K. (2016). Editorial: The social nature of emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–5. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00896
61.
Van KleefG. A.De DreuC. K. W.MansteadA. S. R. (2004). The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 57–76.
62.
Van KleefG. A.HomanA. C.CheshinA. (2012). Emotional influence at work: Take it EASI. Organizational Psychology Review, 2, 311–339.
63.
VignovicJ. A.ThompsonL. F. (2010). Computer-mediated cross-cultural collaboration: Attributing communication errors to the person versus the situation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 265–276.
64.
WallH. J.KayeL. K.MaloneS. A. (2016). An exploration of psychological factors on emoticon usage and implications for judgement accuracy. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 70–78.
65.
WaltherJ. B.D’AddarioK. P. (2001). The impacts of emoticons on message interpretation in computer-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 324–347.
66.
WeisbuchM.IvcevicZ.AmbadyN. (2009). On being liked on the web and in the “real world”: Consistency in first impressions across personal webpages and spontaneous behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 573–576.
67.
WillisJ.TodorovA. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592–598.
