Emoticons are graphic representations of facial expressions that many e-mail users embed in their messages. These symbols are widely known and commonly recognized among computer-mediated communication (CMC) users, and they are described by most observers as substituting for the nonverbal cues that are missing from CMC in comparison to face-to-face communication. Their empirical impacts, however, are undocumented. An experiment sought to determine the effects of three common emoticons on message interpretations. Hypotheses drawn from literature on nonverbal communication reflect several plausible relationships between emoticons and verbal messages. The results indicate that emoticons’ contributions were outweighed by verbal content, but a negativity effect appeared such that any negative message aspect—verbal or graphic—shifts message interpretation in the direction of the negative element.
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 1230-1240.
2.
Asteroff, J. F. (1987). Paralanguage in electronic mail: A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, New York.
3.
Barry, D. (1996). Dave Barry in cyberspace. New York: Fawcett Columbine.
4.
Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970). Kinesics and context: Understanding body motion. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
5.
Birnbaum, M. H. (Ed.). (2000). Psychological experiments on the Internet. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6.
Bolter, J. D. (1991). Writing space: The computer, hypertext, and the history of writing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Burgoon, J. K. (1985). Nonverbal signals. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 344-392). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, W. G. (1996). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Burgoon, J. K., & Le Poire, B. A. (1999). Nonverbal cues and interpersonal judgments: Participant and observer perceptions of intimacy, dominance, composure, and formality. Communication Monographs, 66, 105-124.
10.
Burgoon, J. K., & Newton, D. A. (1991). Applying a social meaning model to relational message interpretations of conversational involvement: Comparing observer and participant perspectives. Southern Communication Journal, 56, 96-113.
11.
Burton, M. C., & Walther, J. B. (2001, January). The value of Web log data in use-based Web design and testing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(2). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issue3/burton.html
12.
Carey, J. (1980). Paralanguage in computer mediated communication. In N. K. Sondheimer (Ed.), The 18th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and parasession on topics in interactive discourse: Proceedings of the conference (pp. 67-69). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
13.
Childers, T. L., & Houston, M. J. (1984). Conditions for a picture-superiority effect on consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 643-654.
14.
Danet, B., Ruedenberg-Wright, L., & Rosenbaum-Tamari, Y. (1997). “HMMM... WHERE’S THAT SMOKE COMING FROM?” Writing, play and performance on Internet Relay Chat. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2 (4). Retrieved June 15, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http:www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/danet.html
15.
DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1979). Ambivalence, discrepancy, and deception in nonverbal communication. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences (pp. 204-248). Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn, & Hain.
16.
deTurck, M. A., & Goldhaber, G. M. (1989). Effectiveness of product warning labels: Effects of consumer’s information processing objectives. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 23(1), 111-126.
17.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49-98.
18.
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial cues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19.
Freedman, N. (1977). Hands, words and mind: On the structuralization of body movements during discourse and the capacity for verbal representation. In N. Freedman & S. Grand (Eds.), Communicative structures and psychic structures: A psychoanalytic interpretation of communication (pp. 109-132). New York: Plenum.
20.
Fridlund, A. J., Ekman, P., & Oster, H. (1987). Facial expression of emotion: Review of the literature, 1970-1983. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Nonverbal behavior and communication (2nd ed., pp. 143-244). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Godin, S. (1993). The smiley dictionary. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit.
22.
Godwin, M. (1994, April). ASCII is too intimate. Wired, pp. 69-70.
23.
Heslin, R., & Patterson, M. L. (1982). Nonverbal behavior and social psychology. New York: Plenum.
24.
Kellermann, K. (1984). The negativity effect and its implications for initial interaction. Communication Monographs, 51, 19-56.
25.
Kendon, A. (1987). On gesture: Its complementary relationship with speech. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Nonverbal communication and behavior (pp. 65-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
27.
King, W. C., Dent, M. M., & Miles, E. W. (1991). The persuasive effect of graphics in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 269-279.
28.
Knapp, M. L., Wiemann, J. M., & Daly, J. A. (1978). Nonverbal communication: Issues and appraisal. Human Communication Research, 4, 271-280.
29.
Kraut, R., Mukhopadhyay, T., Szczypula, J., Kiesler, S., & Scherlis, B. (1999). Information and communication: Alternative uses of the Internet in households. Information Systems Research, 10, 287-303.
30.
LaCrosse, M. B. (1975). Nonverbal behavior and perceived counselor attractiveness and persuasiveness. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22, 563-566.
31.
Leathers, D. G. (1986). Successful nonverbal communication: Principles and applications. New York: Macmillan.
32.
Lutz, K. A., & Lutz, R. J. (1977), Effects of interactive imagery on learning: Applications to advertising. Journal of Applied Pyschology, 62, 493-498.
33.
Malinowski, B. (1946). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. Supplement 1 in C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards, The meaning of meaning (8th ed., pp. 296-336). New York: Harcourt, Brace, & Co. (Original work published 1923)
34.
Marvin, L. E. (1995). Spoof, spam, lurk and lag: The aesthetics of text-based virtual realities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(2). Retrieved June 15, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://207.201.161.120/jcmc/vol1/issue2/marvin.html
35.
McCormick, N. B., & McCormick, J. W. (1992). Computer friends and foes: Content of undergraduates’ electronic mail. Computers in Human Behavior, 8, 379-405.
36.
Mehrabian, A., & Ferris, S. R. (1967). Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31, 248-252.
37.
Mehrabian, A., & Williams, M. (1969). Nonverbal concomitants of perceived and intended persuasiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 37-58.
38.
Mitchell, A. A. (1986). The effect of verbal and visual components of advertisements on brand attitudes and attitude toward the ad. Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 12-24.
39.
Mitchell, W. J. (1995). City of bits: Space, place, and the Infobahn. Boston: MIT.
40.
Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
41.
Ochsman, R., & Chapanis, A. (1974). The effects of 10 communication modes on the behavior of teams during co-operative problem-solving. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 6, 579-619.
42.
Patterson, M. L. (1983). Nonverbal behavior: A functional perspective. New York: Springer-Verlag.
43.
Pettit, F. A. (1999). Exploring the use of the World Wide Web as a psychology data collection tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 15, 67-71.
44.
Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2000). Tracking online life: How women use the Internet to cultivate relationships with family and friends. Retrieved May 16, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/Report1.pdf
45.
Philpott, J. S. (1983). The relative contribution to meaning of verbal and nonverbal channels of communication: A meta-analysis. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
46.
Pollack, A. (1982, May 27). Technology: Conference by computer. New York Times, p. D2.
47.
Quina, K., Wingard, J. A., & Bates, H. G. (1987). Language style and gender stereotypes in person perception. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5(2), 111-122.
48.
Rezabek, L. L., & Cochenour, J. J. (1998). Visual cues in computer-mediated communication: Supplementing text with emoticons. Journal of Visual Literacy, 18, 201-215.
49.
Rice, R. E., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computer-mediated network. Communication Research, 14, 85-108.
50.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1984). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
51.
Sanderson, D. (1993). Smileys. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
52.
Sarbaugh-Thompson, M., & Feldman, M. S. (1998). Electronic mail and organizational communication: Does saying “hi” really matter?Organization Science, 9, 685-698.
53.
Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 156-163.
54.
Thompson, P. A., & Foulger, D. A. (1996). Effects of pictographs and quoting on flaming in electronic mail. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 225-243.
55.
Tidwell, L. C., & Walther, J. B. (2000, July). Getting to know one another a bit at a time: Computer-mediated communication effects on disclosure, impressions, and interpersonal evaluations. Paper presented at the International Conference on Language and Social Psychology, Cardiff, Wales.
56.
Utz, S. (2000). Social information processing in MUDs: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. Journal of Online Behavior, 1(1). Retrieved June 15, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n1/utz.html
57.
Walther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated communication: A relational perspective. Communication Research, 19, 52-90.
58.
Walther, J. B. (1994). Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20, 473-501.
59.
Walther, J. B. (1997). Group and interpersonal effects in international computer-mediated collaboration. Human Communication Research, 23, 342-369.
60.
Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
61.
Walther, J. B., & Tidwell, L. C. (1995). Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 5, 355-378.
62.
Whittaker, S., & O’Conaill, B. (1997). The role of vision on face-to-face and mediated communication. In K. E. Finn, A. J. Sellen, & S. B. Wilbur (Eds.), Video-mediated communication (pp. 23-49). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63.
Witmer, D., & Katzman, S. (1997). On-line smiles: Does gender make a difference in the use of graphic accents?Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4). Retrieved May 23, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol2/issue4/witmer1.html
64.
Wolf, A. (2000). Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 827-833.
