Past research shows that when forming an impression of an interdependent person, perceivers are motivated to look for information relevant to their goals and interests. The present experiments examined what happens after this information-seeking stage and showed that the relevance of the target’s attributes for one’s goals and interests drives warmth impressions. Using both a scenario (Experiment 1) and realistic methodologies (Experiment 3), we showed that when the perceiver had to collaborate with a target, the more competent the target, the more perceivers anticipated success and the more the target came across as warm. By contrast, in a competition setting, the competence of the target negatively affected prospects of success and impressions of warmth. Experiment 2 further showed that the target’s competence drove warmth impressions only when perceivers attached a great value to the success of the task, suggesting that these inferences have a motivational underpinning.
AbeleA. E.BruckmüllerS. (2011). The bigger one of the “Big Two?” Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 935-948. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.028
2.
AbeleA. E.CuddyA. J. C.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2008). Editorial : Fundamental dimensions of social judgment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1063-1065. doi:10.1002/ejsp.574
3.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2014). Communal and agentic content in social cognition: A dual perspective model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 50, 195-255. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800284-1.00004-7
4.
AmesD. R.BianchiE. C. (2008). The agreeableness asymmetry in first impressions: Perceivers’ impulse to (mis)judge agreeableness and how it is moderated by power. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1719-1736. doi:10.1177/0146167208323932
5.
BarghJ.GreenM.FitzsimonsG. M. (2008). The selfish goal: Unintended consequences of intended goal pursuits. Social Cognition, 26, 534-554. doi:10.1521/soco.2008.26.5.534
6.
BerscheidE.GrazianoW.MonsonT.DermerM. (1976). Outcome dependency: Attention, attribution, and attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 978-989.
7.
BocianK.WojciszkeB. (2014). Self-interest bias in moral judgments of others’ actions. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 898-909. doi:10.1177/0146167214529800
8.
CambonL.YzerbytV.YakimovaS. (2014). Compensation in intergroup relations: An investigation of its structural and strategic foundations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 140-158. doi:10.1111/bjso.12067
9.
CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.BeningerA. (2011). The dynamics of warmth and competence judgments, and their outcomes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 73-98. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2011.10.004
10.
De BruinE. N. M.van LangeP. A. M. (2000). What people look for in others: Influences of the perceiver and the perceived on information selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 206-219. doi:10.1177/0146167200264007
11.
DeutschM. (1949). A theory of co-operation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129-152. doi:10.1177/001872674900200204
12.
EpleyN.CarusoE. M. (2004). Egocentric ethics. Social Justice Research, 17, 171-187. doi:10.1023/B:SORE.0000027408.72713.45
13.
ErberR.FiskeS. T. (1984). Outcome dependency and attention to inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 709-726. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.709
14.
FergusonM. J.BarghJ. A. (2004). Liking is for doing: The effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 557-572. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.557
15.
FiskeS. T. (1992). Thinking is for doing: Portraits of social cognition from Daguerreotype to laserphoto. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 877-889.
16.
FiskeS. T. (1993). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 155-194. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.44.020193.001103
17.
FiskeS. T. (2015). Intergroup biases: A focus on stereotype content. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 45-50.
18.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
19.
FiskeS. T.DépretE. (1996). Control, interdependence and power : Understanding social cognition in its social context. European Review of Social Psychology, 7, 31-61. doi:10.1080/14792779443000094
20.
FiskeS. T.NeubergS. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1-74. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60317-2
21.
FitzsimonsG. M.FishbachA. (2010). Shifting closeness: Interpersonal effects of personal goal progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 535-549.
22.
FitzsimonsG. M.ShahJ. Y. (2008). How goal instrumentality shapes relationship evaluations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 319-337. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.319
23.
GereJ.SchimmackU.PinkusR. T.LockwoodP. (2011). The effects of romantic partners’ goal congruence on affective well-being. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 549-559. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.06.010
24.
GoodwinG. P.PiazzaJ.RozinP. (2014). Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 148-168. doi:10.1037/a0034726
25.
HiltonJ. L.DarleyJ. M. (1991). The effects of interaction goals on person perception. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 236-267). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26.
JamesW. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Holt.
27.
JuddC. M.James-HawkinsL.YzerbytV.KashimaY. (2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 899-913. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899
28.
KervynN.FiskeS. T.YzerbytV. (2015). Forecasting the primary dimension of social perception: Symbolic and realistic threats together predict warmth in the stereotype content model. Social Psychology, 46, 36-45. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000219
29.
KervynN.YzerbytV.JuddC. M. (2010). Compensation between warmth and competence: Antecedents and consequences of a negative relation between the two fundamental dimensions of social perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 155-187. doi:10.1080/13546805.2010.517997
30.
LeachC. W.EllemersN.BarretoM. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 234-249. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234
31.
LewinK. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
32.
MontoyaR. M.HortonR. S. (2014). A two-dimensional model for the study of interpersonal attraction. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 59-86. doi:10.1177/1088868313501887
33.
MoorsA.De HouwerJ.EelenP. (2004). Automatic stimulus-goal comparisons: Evidence from motivational affective priming studies. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 29-54. doi:10.1080/02699930244000462
34.
NeubergS. L.FiskeS. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 431-444. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.431
35.
PeetersG. (1992). Evaluative meanings of adjectives in vitro and in context: Some theoretical implications and practical consequences of positive-negative asymmetry and behavioral-adaptive concepts of evaluation. Psychologica Belgica, 32, 211-231.
36.
ReederG. D.BrewerM. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61-79. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.86.1.61
37.
RosenbergS.NelsonC.VivekananthanP. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283-294. doi:10.1037/h0026086
38.
RuscherJ. B.FiskeS. T. (1990). Interpersonal competition can cause individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 832-843. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.832
39.
TauschN.KenworthyJ. B.HewstoneM. (2007). The confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts revisited: Does content matter?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 542-556. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.3.542
40.
TomaC.YzerbytV.CorneilleO. (2012). Nice or smart? Task relevance of self-characteristics moderates interpersonal projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 335-340. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.013
41.
VonkR. (1998). Effects of cooperative and competitive outcome dependency on attention and impression preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 265-288. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1350
42.
WillisJ.TodorovA. (2006). First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17, 592-598. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
43.
WojciszkeB.AbeleA. E. (2008). The primacy of communion over agency and its reversals in evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1139-1147. doi:10.1002/ejsp.549
44.
YzerbytV. Y. (2016). Intergroup stereotyping. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 90-95. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.06.009
45.
YzerbytV. Y.CambonL. (2017). The dynamics of compensation: When ingroup favoritism paves the way for outgroup praise. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 587-600. doi.org/10.1177/0146167216689066
46.
YzerbytV. Y.ProvostV.CorneilleO. (2005). Not competent but warm . . . Really? Compensatory stereotypes in the French-speaking world. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 291-308. doi.org/10.1177/1368430205053944
47.
YzerbytV. Y.SchadronG.LeyensJ.-P.RocherS. (1994). Social judgeability: The impact of meta-informational cues on the use of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 48-55. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.48
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
