Social investment theory (SIT) proposes that the transition to parenthood triggers positive personality trait change in early adulthood. Using data from a representative sample of first-time parents compared to nonparents, the results of rigorous tests do not support the propositions of SIT. Specifically, we found no evidence for the proposition that parents show more pronounced mean-level increases in emotional stability, agreeableness, and conscientiousness compared to nonparents. We did find that agreeableness and openness changed depending on how long someone was in the parent role. Finally, our results suggest that high extraversion and low openness in both genders and high conscientiousness in females predict the likelihood to enter into parenthood. Discussion focuses on why this transition seems to be unrelated to mean-level personality trait change and the implications of these results for SIT.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2011). Births, Australia, 2010. Canberra: Australian Government Press.
2.
BandalosD. L.FinneyS. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In MarcoulidesG. A.SchmackerR. E. (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269–296). Mahwah, NJ: Academic Press.
3.
BelskyJ.RovineM. (1990). Patterns of marital change across the transition to parenthood: Pregnancy to three years postpartum. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52, 5–19.
4.
BleidornW. (2015). What accounts for personality maturation in early adulthood?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 245–252. doi:10.1177/0963721414568662
5.
BleidornW.KlimstraT. A.DenissenJ. J. A.RentfrowP. J.PotterJ.GoslingS. D. (2013). Personality maturation around the world a cross-cultural examination of social-investment theory. Psychological Science, 24, 2530–2540. doi:10.1177/0956797613498396
6.
BleidornW.Buyukcan-TetikA.SchwabaT.van ScheppingenM. A.DenissenJ. J. A.FinkenauerC. (2015). Stability and change in self-esteem during the transition to parenthood. Manuscript in preparation.
7.
ColeD. A.PerkinsC. E.ZelkowitzR. L. (2015). Impact of homogeneous and heterogeneous parceling strategies when latent variables represent multidimensional constructs. Psychological Methods, 50. doi:10.1037/met0000047
8.
DijkstraP.BareldsD. P. (2009). Women’s well-being: The role of individual differences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50, 309–315. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00711.x
9.
GaldioloS.RoskamI. (2014). Development of personality traits in response to childbirth: A longitudinal dyadic perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 223–230. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.002
10.
HenneckeM.BleidornW.DenissenJ. J. A.WoodD. (2014). A three-part framework for self-regulated personality development across adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 28, 289–299. doi:10.1002/per.1945
11.
HillJ. (2004). Reducing bias in treatment effect estimation in observational studies suffering from missing data (Working paper 04-01). New York: Columbia University, Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy (ISERP).
12.
HoD. E.ImaiK.KingG.StuartE. A. (2007). Matching as nonparametric preprocessing for reducing model dependence in parametric causal inference. Political Analysis, 15, 199–236. doi:10.1093/pan/mpl013
13.
HoganD. P.AstoneN. M. (1986). The transition to adulthood. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 109–130. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.000545
14.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
15.
HuttemanR.BleidornW.KerestešG.BrkovićI.ButkovićA.DenissenJ. J. A. (2014). Reciprocal associations between parenting challenges and parents’ personality development in young and middle adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 28, 168–179. doi:10.1002/per.1932
16.
HuttemanR.BleidornW.PenkeL.DenissenJ. J. (2013). It takes two: A longitudinal dyadic study on predictors of fertility outcomes. Journal of Personality, 81, 487–498. doi:10.1111/jopy.12006
17.
JacksonJ. J.HillP. L.PayneB. R.RobertsB. W.Stine-MorrowE. A. L. (2012). Can an old dog learn (and want to experience) new tricks? Cognitive training increases openness to experience in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 27, 286. doi:10.1037/a0025918
18.
JacksonJ. J.ThoemmesF.JonkmannK.LüdtkeO.TrautwienU. (2012). Military training and personality trait development: Does the military make the man or does the man make the military?Psychological Science, 23, 270–277. doi:10.1177/0956797611423545
19.
JokelaM.AlvergneA.PolletT. V.LummaaV. (2011). Reproductive behavior and personality traits of the Five Factor Model. European Journal of Personality, 25, 487–500. doi:10.1002/per.822
20.
JokelaM.KivimäkiM.ElovainioM.Keltikangas-JärvinenL. (2009). Personality and having children: a two-way relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 218.
21.
Katz-WiseS. L.PriessH. A.HydeJ. S. (2010). Gender-role attitudes and behavior across the transition to parenthood. Developmental Psychology, 46, 18. doi:10.1037/a0017820
22.
LittleT. D.CunninghamW. A.ShaharG.WidamanK. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1
23.
LittleT. D.RhemtullaM.GibsonK.SchoemannA. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psycholocial Methods, 18, 285. doi:10.1037/a0033266
24.
Lodi-SmithJ.RobertsB. W. (2007). Social investment and personality: A meta-analysis of the relationship of personality traits to investment in work, family, religion, and volunteerism. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 68–86. doi:10.1177/1088868306294590
25.
LosonczI. (2009). Personality traits in HILDA. Australian Social Policy No. 8, 169.
26.
LuhmannM.OrthU.SpechtJ.KandlerC.LucasR. E. (2014). Studying changes in life circumstances and personality: It’s about time. European Journal of Personality, 28, 256–266. doi:10.1002/per.1951
27.
McCraeR. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 323. doi:0033-2909.120.3.323
28.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. Sage Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment, 1, 273–294.
29.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
30.
NeyerF. J.AsendorpfJ. B. (2001). Personality-relationship transaction in young adulthood. Journnal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1190–1204. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.81.6.1190
31.
NeyerF. J.LehnartJ. (2007). Relationships matter in personality development: Evidence from an 8-year longitudinal study across young adulthood. Journal of Personality, 75, 535–568. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00448.x
32.
NyströmK.ÖhrlingK. (2004). Parenthood experiences during the child’s first year: Literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46, 319–330. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.02991.x
33.
ParisR.HelsonR. (2002). Early mothering experience and personality change. Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 172–185. doi:10.1037//0893-3200.16.2.172
34.
ReisO.DörnteM.von der LippeH. (2011). Neuroticism, social support, and the timing of first parenthood: A prospective study. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 381–386. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.028
35.
RobertsB. W.CaspiA.MoffittT. E. (2003). Work experiences and personality development in young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 582–593. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.582
36.
RobertsB. W.JacksonJ. J. (2008). Sociogenomic personality psychology. Journal of Personality, 76, 1523–1544. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00530.x
37.
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.BoggT.CaspiA. (2006). De-investment in work and non-normative personality trait change in young adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 20, 461–474. doi:10.1002/per.607
38.
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
39.
RobertsB. W.WoodD. (2006). Personality development in the context of the neo-socioanalytic model of personality. In MroczekD.LittleT. D. (Eds.), Handbook of personality development (pp. 11–39). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. doi:10.4324/9781315805610.ch2
40.
RobertsB. W.WoodD.SmithJ. L. (2005). Evaluating Five Factor Theory and social investment perspectives on personality trait development. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 166–184. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2004.08.002
41.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55. doi:10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
42.
SaucierG. (1994). Mini-markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–516. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8
43.
SchlegelA. (1995). A cross-cultural approach to adolescence. Ethos, 23, 15–32. doi:10.1525/eth.1995.23.1.02a00020
44.
SpechtJ.EgloffB.SchmukleS. C. (2011). Stability and change of personality across the life course: the impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 862. doi:10.1037/a0024950
45.
ThoemmesF. J.KimE. S. (2011). A systematic review of propensity score methods in the social sciences. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46, 90–118. doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.540475
46.
WoodenM.WatsonN. (2007). The HILDA Survey and its contribution to economic and social research (so far). Economic Record, 83, 208–231. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00721.x
47.
WortmanJ.LucasR. E.DonnellanM. B. (2012). Stability and change in the Big Five personality domains: Evidence from a longitudinal study of Australians. Psychology and Aging, 27, 867. doi:10.1037/a0029322
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
