Social support is critical to personal and relational well-being. Yet, receiving support appears to be contingent upon adequately conveying need to a receptive partner who both understands and is willing to provide said support. Or is it? We provide the first evidence of a covert haptic support system between adult intimates, showing that literally reaching out to a loved one can result in feeling supported even when the receiver of haptic support requests does not perceive them as bids for comfort. We tested this by unobtrusively observing support interactions between dating partners. As expected, those experiencing distress were more likely to seek touch from their partners, which elicited responsive touch—even though receivers failed to discern need from support-seekers’ touch. Importantly, those who received responsive touch from their romantic partners felt more supported. Because touch begets touch, clear communication between intimates is not always necessary for successful support interactions.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
AmbadyN.RosenthalR. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274.
3.
AppB.McIntoshD. N.ReedC. L.HertensteinM. J. (2011). Nonverbal channel use in communication of emotion: How may depend on why. Emotion, 11, 603–617.
4.
BaeslerE. J.BurgoonJ. K. (1987). Measurement and reliability of nonverbal behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 11, 205–233.
5.
BarbeeA. P. (1990). Interactive coping: The cheering-up process in close relationships. In DuckS. W. (Ed.), Personal relationships and social support (pp. 46–65). London, England: Sage.
6.
BarbeeA. P.CunninghamM. R. (1995). An experimental approach to social support communications: Interactive coping in close relationships. Communication Yearbook, 18, 381–413.
7.
BaxterL. A.WilmotW. W. (1985). Taboo topics in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 253–269.
8.
BerscheidE.ReisH. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vols. 1 and 2 (4th ed., pp. 193–281). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
9.
BowlbyJ. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic. (Original work published 1969)
10.
BrockR. L.LawrenceE. (2009). Too much of a good thing: Underprovision versus overprovision of partner support. Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 181–192.
11.
BurlesonB. R. (2009). Understanding the outcomes of supportive communication: A dual-process approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 21–38.
12.
CameronJ. J.RobinsonK. J. (2010). Don’t you know how much I need you?: Consequences of miscommunication vary by self-esteem. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 136–142.
13.
CameronJ. J.VorauerJ. D. (2008). Feeling transparent: On metaperceptions and miscommunications. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1093–1108.
14.
CoanJ. A.SchaeferH. S.DavidsonR. J. (2006). Lending a hand social regulation of the neural response to threat. Psychological science, 17, 1032–1039.
15.
CohenS.Janicki-DevertsD.TurnerR. B.DoyleW. J. (2015). Does hugging provide stress-buffering social support? A study of susceptibility to upper respiratory infection and illness. Psychological Science, 26, 135–147. doi:10.1177/0956797614559284
16.
CohenS.WillsT. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.
17.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1053–1073.
18.
CutronaC. E.RussellD. W. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In SarasonB. R.SarasonI. G.PierceG. R. (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 319–366). Oxford, England: John Wiley.
19.
CutronaC. E.ShafferP. A.WesnerK. A.GardnerK. A. (2007). Optimally matching support and perceived spousal sensitivity. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 754–758.
20.
DePauloB. M.KahsyD. A.KirkendolS. E.WyerM. M.EpsteinJ. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 979–995.
21.
DewitteM.De HouwerJ.BuysseA.KosterE. W. (2008). Proximity seeking in adult attachment: Examining the role of automatic approach-avoidance tendencies. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 557–573.
22.
DovidioJ. F.EllysonS. L. (1982). Decoding visual dominance: Attributions of power based on relative percentages of looking while speaking and looking while listening. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 106–113.
23.
Dunkel-SchetterC.BennettT. L. (1990). Differentiating the cognitive and behavioral aspects of social support. In SarasonB. R.SarasonI. G. (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view, Wiley series on personality processes (pp. 267–296). Oxford, England: John Wiley.
24.
EidelsonR. J.EpsteinN. (1982). Cognition and relationship maladjustment: Development of a measure of dysfunctional relationship beliefs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 715–720.
25.
FerberS. G.FeldmanR.MakhoulI. R. (2008). The development of maternal touch across the first year of life. Early Human Development, 84, 363–370.
26.
FraleyR. C.ShaverP. R. (1998). Airport separations: A naturalistic study of adult attachment dynamics in separating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1198–1212.
27.
GableS. L.ReisH. T.DowneyG. (2003). He said, she said: A quasi-signal detection analysis of daily interactions between close relationship partners. Psychological Science, 14, 100–105.
28.
GallaceA.SpenceC. (2010). The science of interpersonal touch: An overview. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 246–259.
29.
GleasonM. E. J.IidaM. (2015). Social Support. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.SimpsonJ. A.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology, volume 3: Interpersonal relations (pp. 351–370). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30.
GoldsmithD. J.FitchK. (1997). The normative context of advice as social support. Human communication research, 23, 454–476.
31.
GrewenK. M.AndersonB. J.GirdlerS. S.LightK. C. (2003). Warm partner contact is related to lower cardiovascular reactivity. Behavioral Medicine, 29, 123–130.
32.
GulledgeA. K.GulledgeM. H.StahmannnR. F. (2003). Romantic physical affection types and relationship satisfaction. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 233–242.
33.
HenricsonM.ErssonA.MäättäS.SegestenK.BerglundA. (2008). The outcome of tactile touch on stress parameters in intensive care: a randomized controlled trial. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 14, 244–254.
34.
HertensteinM. J.HolmesR.McCulloughMKeltnerD. (2009). The communication of emotion via touch. Emotion, 9, 566–573.
Holt-LunstadJ.BirminghamW. A.LightK. C. (2008). Influence of a ‘warm touch’ support enhancement intervention among married couples on ambulatory blood pressure, oxytocin, alpha amylase, and cortisol. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70, 976–985.
37.
HowlandM.SimpsonJ. A. (2010). Getting in under the radar a dyadic view of invisible support. Psychological Science, 21, 1878–1885.
38.
LakeyB.LutzC. L. (1996). Increasing social support: preventive and therapeutic interventions. In PierceG. R.SarasonB. R.SarasonI. G. (Eds.), Handbook of social support and the family (pp. 435–466). New York, NY: Plenum.
39.
LaurenceauJ.BarrettL. F.PietromonacoP. R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in inter-personal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1238–1251.
40.
LemayE. P.JrClarkM. S. (2008). Walking on eggshells: How expressing relationship insecurities perpetuates them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 420–441.
41.
MaiselN. C.GableS. L.StrachmanA. (2008). Responsive behaviors in good times and bad. Personal Relationships, 15, 317–338.
42.
MajorB.ZubekJ. M.CooperM.CozzarelliC.RichardsC. (1997). Mixed messages: Implications of social conflict and social support within close relationships for adjustment to a stressful life event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1349–1363.
43.
MikulincerM.BirnbaumG.WoddisD.NachmiasO. (2000). Stress and accessibility of proximity-related thoughts: Exploring the normative and intraindividual components of attachment theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 509–523.
44.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In ZannaM. P (Ed), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35., pp. 53–152). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
45.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641.
46.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (1996). The self-fulfilling nature of positive illusions in romantic relationships: Love is not blind, but prescient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1155–1180.
47.
NollerP. (1980). Misunderstandings in marital communication: A study of couples’ nonverbal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1135–1148.
48.
PierceG. R.SarasonI. G.SarasonB. R. (1996). Coping and social support. In ZeidnerM.EndlerN. S.ZeidnerM.EndlerN. S. (Eds.), Handbook of coping: Theory, research, applications (pp. 434–451). Oxford, England: John Wiley.
49.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S.HolmesJ. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In MashekD.AronA. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
RobinsonK. J. (2008). Dating partners’ self-esteem levels and perceptions of conveyed social support needs in a stressful situation (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
51.
SarasonI. G.SarasonB. R.PierceG. R. (1990). Social support: An interactional view. New York, NY: John Wiley.
52.
SiewertK.AntoniwK.KubiakT.WeberH. (2011). The more the better? The relationship between mismatches in social support and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 621–631.
53.
SimpsonJ. A.BelskyJ. (2008). Attachment theory within a modern evolutionary framework. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 131–157). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
54.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.NelliganJ. S. (1992). Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 434–446.
55.
SimsS. (1988). The significance of touch in palliative care. Palliative Medicine, 2, 58–61.
56.
ThompsonE. H.HamptonJ. A. (2011). The effect of relationship status on communicating emotions through touch. Cognition and Emotion, 25, 295–306.
57.
UchinoB. N.Holt-LunstadJ.UnoD.BetancourtR.GarveyT. S. (1999). Social support and age-related differences in cardiovascular function: An examination of potential mediators. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 135–142.
58.
VangelistiA. L. (2009). Challenges in conceptualizing social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 39–51.
59.
YankeelovP. A.BarbeeA. P.CunninghamM. R.DruenP. B. (1995). The influence of negative medical diagnoses and verbal and nonverbal support activation strategies on the interactive coping process. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 19, 243–260.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
