Affectionate touch is crucial to the development of attachment security in infancy, yet little is known about how attachment and touch are related in adulthood. For adults high in anxiety, touch provision can maintain proximity, and received touch can signal reassurance of a partner’s affections that relatively anxious people desperately desire. Adults high in avoidance likely view touch as a threat to independence, should be less inclined to provide touch, and may perceive received touch as intrusive. In two studies, we demonstrated that attachment anxiety was associated with positive feelings about touch but unrelated to daily touch provision. However, the benefits associated with daily received touch were amplified among people higher in anxiety. Conversely, attachment avoidance was associated with negative feelings about touch, and reductions in daily touch provision, but did not moderate the benefits associated with received touch.
AinsworthM. D.BellS. M.StaytonD. J. (1972). Individual differences in the development of some attachment behaviors. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 18, 123–143.
2.
AnisfeldECasperVNozyceMCunninghamN. (1990). Does infant carrying promote attachment? An experimental study of the effects on increased physical contact on the development of attachment. Child Development, 61, 1617–1627.
3.
AronA.AronE. N.SmollanD. (1992). Inclusion of Other in Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 596–612.
4.
BellR. A.DalyJ. A.GonzalezM. C. (1987). Affinity-maintenance in marriage and its relationship to women’s marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 445–454.
5.
BolgerN.DavisA.RafaeliE., (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616.
6.
BowlbyJ. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. Tavistock.
7.
BrennanK. A.WuS.LoevJ. (1998). Adult romantic attachment and individual differences in attitudes toward physical contact in the context of adult romantic relationships. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 394–428). Guilford Press.
8.
BrethertonI.MunhollandK. A. (1999). Internal working models in attachment relationships: A construct revisited. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 89–111). Guilford.
9.
BurlesonM. H.TrevathanW. R.ToddM. (2007). In the mood for love or vice versa? Exploring the relations among sexual activity, physical affection, affect, and stress in the daily lives of mid-aged women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 357–368.
10.
ChopikW. J.EdelsteinR. S.van AndersS. M.WardeckerB. M.ShipmanE. L.Samples-SteeleC. R. (2014). Too close for comfort? Adult attachment and cuddling in romantic and parent-child relationship. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 212–216.
11.
CoanJ. A.BeckesL.GonzalezM. Z.MareshE. L.BrownC. L.HasselmoK. (2017). Relationship status and perceived support in the social regulation of neural responses to threat. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12, 1574–1583.
12.
CohenS.Janicki-DevertsD.TurnerR. B.DoyleW. J. (2015). Does hugging provide stress-buffering social support? A study of susceptibility to upper respiratory infection and illness. Psychological Science, 26, 135–147.
13.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2004). Working models of attachment shape perception of social support: Evidence from experimental and observational studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 363–383.
14.
DebrotA.SchoebiD.PerezM. (2014). Stroking your beloved one’s white bear: Responsive touch by the romantic partner buffers the negative effect of thought suppression on daily mood. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 33, 75–97.
15.
DebrotA.SchoebiD.PerrezM.HornA. B. (2013). Touch as an interpersonal emotion regulation process in couples’ daily lives: The mediating role of psychological intimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1373–1385.
16.
DunbarR. I. M. (2010). The social role of touch in humans and primates: Behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 260–268.
17.
DykasM. J.CassidyJ. (2011). Attachment and the processing of social information across the life span: Theory and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 19.
18.
FairhurstM. R.LökenL.GrossmanT. (2014). Physiological and behavioral responses reveal 9-month-old infants’ sensitivity to pleasant touch. Psychological Science, 25, 1124–1131.
19.
FieldT. (2010). Touch for socioemotional and physical well-being: A review. Developmental Review, 30, 367–383.
20.
FloydK.BorenJ. P.HannawaA. F.HesseC.McEwanB.VekslerA. E. (2009). Kissing in marital and cohabiting relationships: Effects on blood lipids, stress, and relationship satisfaction. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 113–133.
21.
FraleyR. C.ShaverP. R. (1998). Airport separations: A naturalistic study of adult attachment dynamics in separating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1198–1212.
22.
FraleyR. C.VicaryA. M.BrumbaughC. C.RoismanG. I. (2011). Patterns of stability in adult attachment: An empirical test of two models of continuity and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 974–992.
23.
FraleyR. C.WallerN. G.BrennanK. A. (2000). An item-response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365.
24.
GableS. L.ReisH. T.DowneyG. (2003). He said, she said: A quasi-signal detection analysis of daily interactions between close relationship partners. Psychological Science, 14, 100–105.
25.
GallaceA.SpenceC. (2010). The science of interpersonal touch: An overview. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34, 246–259.
26.
GrewenK. M.AndersonB. J.GirdlerS. S.LightK. C. (2003). Warm partner contact is related to lower cardiovascular reactivity. Behavioral Medicine, 29, 123–130.
27.
GulledgeA. K.GulledgeM. H.StahmannnR. F. (2003). Romantic physical affection types and relationship satisfaction. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 233–242.
28.
HazanC.ShaverP. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.
29.
HertensteinM. J.HolmesR.McCulloughM.KeltnerD. (2009). The communication of emotion via touch. Emotion, 9, 566–573.
30.
HeslinR.NguyenT. D.NguyenM. L. (1983). Meaning of touch: The case of touch from a stranger or same sex person. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 7, 147–157.
31.
HillM. T. (2009). Intimacy, passion, commitment, physical affection and relationship stage as related to romantic relationship satisfaction. https://shareok.org/handle/11244/7430
32.
Holt-LunstadJ.BirminghamW. A.LightK. C. (2008). Influence of a “warm touch” support enhancement intervention among married couples on ambulatory blood pressure, oxytocin, alpha amylase, and cortisol. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70, 976–985.
33.
JakubiakB. K.FeeneyB. C. (2016). A sense of security: Touch promotes state attachment security. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 745–753.
34.
JakubiakB. K.FeeneyB. C. (2017). Affectionate touch to promote relational, psychological, and physical well-being in adulthood: A theoretical model and review of the research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21, 228–252.
35.
JakubiakB. K.FeeneyB. C. (2019). Interpersonal touch as a resource to facilitate positive personal and relational outcomes during stress discussions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 369, 2918–2936.
36.
JayamahaS. D.GirmeY. U.OverallN. C. (2017). When attachment anxiety impedes support provision: The role of feeling unvalued and unappreciated. Journal of Family Psychology, 31, 181.
37.
JohnsonP. O.NeymanJ. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their applications to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57–93.
38.
KimK. J.JakubiakB. K.FeeneyB. C. (2018). Touch reduces romantic jealousy in the anxiously attached. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35, 1019–1041.
39.
KumashiroM.RusbultC. E.FinkelE. J. (2008). Navigating personal and relational concerns: The quest for equilibrium. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 94–110.
40.
LemayE. P.Jr.ClarkM. S.FeeneyB. C. (2007). Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 834.
41.
LorahJ. (2018). Effect size measures for multilevel models: Definition, interpretation, and TIMSS example. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 6, 1–11.
42.
MassC. J. MHoxJ. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86–92.
43.
MooreE. R.AndersonG. C.BergmanN.DowswellT. (2012). Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 5, Article CD003519.
44.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2006). Computation tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448.
45.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S.CongdonR. (2013). HLM 7.01 for Windows [Computer software]. Scientific Software International.
46.
ReisH. T.CrastaD.RoggeR. D.ManiaciM. R.CarmichaelC. L. (2018). Perceived Partner Responsiveness Scale (PPRS). In WorthingtonD. L.BodieG. D. (Eds.), The sourcebook of listening research: Methodology and measures (pp. 516–521). John Wiley & Sons.
47.
ReisH. T.GableS. L.ManiaciM. R. (2014). Methods for studying everyday experience in its natural context. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 373–403). Cambridge University Press.
48.
ReisH. T.SmithS. M.CarmichaelC. L.CaprarielloP. A.TsaiF. F.RodriguesA.ManiaciM. R. (2010). Are you happy for me? How sharing positive events with others provides personal and interpersonal benefits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 311–329.
49.
RusbultC. E.VeretteJ.WhitneyG. A.SlovikL. F.LipkusI. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78.
50.
SethiA.MischelW.AberJ. L.ShodaY.RodriguezM. L. (2000). The role of strategic attention deployment in development of self-regulation: Predicting preschoolers’ delay of gratification from mother–toddler interactions. Developmental Psychology, 36, 767.
51.
ShaverP. R.MikulincerM. (2002). Attachment-related psychodynamics. Attachment and Human Development, 4, 133–161.
52.
SimonsD. J.ShodaY.LindsayD. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1123–1128.
53.
SimpsonJ. A.OverallN. C. (2014). Partner buffering of attachment insecurity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 54–59.
54.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.NelliganJ. S. (1992). Support seeking and support giving within couples in an anxiety-provoking situation: The role of attachment styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 434.
55.
VacharkulksemsukT.FredricksonB. L. (2012). Strangers in sync: Achieving embodied rapport through shared movements. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 399–402.
56.
van IjzendoornM. H.Sagi-SchwartzA. (2008). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: Universal and contextual dimensions. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 880–905). The Guilford Press.
57.
ZayasV.MischelW.ShodaY.AberJ. L. (2011). Roots of adult attachment: Maternal caregiving at 18 months predicts adult peer and partner attachment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 289–297.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
