When negative events occur (e.g., a mass shooting, product failure, breakup), individuals naturally ask themselves why such things happen. Indeed, the search for explanations appears to be a fundamental aspect of humanity. The present research explores the role that more abstract, higher level construals play in individuals’ feelings of causal uncertainty. Specifically, we demonstrate that participants who were led to construe a negative event in a more abstract manner felt less uncertain about why that event happened (Experiments 1 and 2). Further, we demonstrate that participants who were led to construe a negative event more abstractly exhibited a more simplified understanding of the event (Experiment 3a) and that adopting a more simplified understanding of an event decreased participants’ causal uncertainty about the event (Experiment 3b). Finally, we discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.
AlterA. L.OppenheimerD. M. (2008). Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal (or why New York is a large city, but New York is a civilized jungle). Psychological Science, 19, 161–167.
2.
BabrowA. S. (2001). Uncertainty, value, communication, and problematic integration. Journal of Communication, 51, 553–573.
BrownR. (1958). How shall a thing be called?Psychological Review, 65, 14–21.
5.
BurgoonE.HendersonM. D.MarkmanA. (in press). There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5).
6.
CrammerJ. L. (1984). The special characteristics of suicide in hospital in-patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 460–476.
7.
DunningD. (2012). Confidence considered: Assessing the quality of decisions and performance. In BriñolP.DeMarreeK. (Eds.), Social metacognition (pp. 63–80). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
8.
EdwardsJ. A.WearyG. (1998). Antecedents of causal uncertainty and perceived control: A prospective study. European Journal of Personality, 12, 135–148.
9.
EdwardsJ. A.WearyG.ReichD. A. (1998). Causal uncertainty: Factor structure and relation to the big five personality factors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 451–462.
10.
FörsterJ. (2009). Cognitive consequences of novelty and familiarity: How mere exposure influences level of construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 444–447.
11.
FujitaK.RobertsJ. C. (2010). Promoting prospective self-control through abstraction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1049–1054.
12.
FujitaK.TropeY.LibermanN.Levin-SagiM. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 90, 351–367.
13.
GiacomantonioM.De DreuC. K. W.MannettiL. (2010). Now you see it, now you don’t: Interests, issues, and psychological distance in integrative negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 761–774.
14.
GuimondS.BeginG.PalmerD. L. (1989). Education and causal attributions: The development of “person-blame” and “system-blame” ideology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 126–140.
15.
HelzerE. G.EdwardsJ. A. (2012). Causal uncertainty prompts abstract construal of behavior. Social Cognition, 30, 519–536.
16.
HendersonM. D. (2013). When seeing the forest reduces the need for trees: The effect of abstraction on attraction to choice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 676–683.
17.
HoggM. A.AdelmanJ. R.BlaggR. D. (2010). Religion in the face of uncertainty: An uncertainty-identity theory account of religiousness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 72–83.
18.
KrossE.AydukO.MischelW. (2005). When asking “why” does not hurt distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions. Psychological Science, 16, 709–715.
19.
KruschkeJ. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22–44.
20.
LabrooA. A.PatrickV. M. (2009). Psychological distancing: Why happiness helps you see the big picture. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 800–809.
21.
LammersJ. (2012). Abstraction increases hypocrisy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 475–480.
22.
LedgerwoodA.CallahanS. P. (2012). The social side of abstraction: Psychological distance enhances conformity to group norms. Psychological Science, 23, 907–913.
23.
MarkmanK. D.ProulxT.LindbergM. J. (2013). The psychology of meaning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24.
MedinD. L.SchafferM. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 85, 207–238.
25.
MergenthalerE. (1996). Emotion–abstraction patterns in verbatim protocols: A new way of describing psychotherapeutic processes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1306–1315.
26.
NezlekJ. B. (2007). Reactions to daily events as a function of familiarity with an environment. European Journal of Personality, 21, 811–822.
27.
PalmerR. S.DanilukJ. C. (2007). The perceived role of others in facilitating or impeding healing from substance abuse. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 41, 199–212.
28.
PlaksJ. E.McNicholsN. K.FortuneJ. L. (2009). Thoughts versus deeds: Distal and proximal intent in lay judgments of moral responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1687–1701.
29.
PosnerM. I.KeeleS. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363.
30.
PrenticeD. A.MillerD. T. (1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 160–164.
31.
RimS.HansenJ.TropeY. (2012). What happens why? Psychological distance and focusing on causes versus consequences of events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 457–472.
32.
RoschE. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192–233.
33.
RossM.WilsonA. E. (2003). Autobiographical memory and conceptions of self getting better all the time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 66–69.
34.
SchankR. C.AbelsonR. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
SeminG. R.SmithE. R. (1999). Revisiting the past and back to the future: Memory systems and the linguistic representation of social events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 877–892.
37.
SmithE. E.ShobenE. J.RipsL. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions. Psychological review, 81, 214–241.
38.
SteidleA.WerthL.HankeE. (2011). You can’t see much in the dark: Darkness affects construal level and psychological distance. Social Psychology, 42, 174–184.
39.
TobinS. J.RaymundoM. M. (2010). Causal uncertainty and psychological well-being: The moderating role of accommodation (secondary control). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 371–383.
40.
TobinS. J.WearyG. (2008). The effects of causal uncertainty, causal importance, and initial attitude on attention to causal persuasive arguments. Social Cognition, 26, 44–65.
41.
TormalaZ. L.RuckerD. D. (2007). Attitude certainty: A review of past findings and emerging perspectives. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 469–492.
42.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463.
43.
VaughnL. A.WearyG. (2003). Causal uncertainty and correction of judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 516–524.
44.
WakslakC. J. (2012). The experience of cognitive dissonance in important and trivial domains: A construal-level theory approach. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 1361–1364.
45.
WearyG.EdwardsJ. A. (1994). Individual differences in causal uncertainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 308–318.
46.
WearyG.JacobsonJ. A. (1997). Causal uncertainty beliefs and diagnostic information seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 839–848.
47.
WilsonT. D.CenterbarD. B.KermerD. A.GilbertD. T. (2005). The pleasures of uncertainty: Prolonging positive moods in ways people do not anticipate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 5–21.
48.
WongP. T.WeinerB. (1981). When people ask “why” questions, and the heuristics of attributional search. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 650–663.
