The current research demonstrates that construal level has opposing effects on level of aspiration depending on the goal’s temporal distance: A concrete goal leads to a higher level of aspiration in the proximate future, but an abstract goal leads to a higher level of aspiration in the distant future. Two reasons are proposed for this interactive effect. First, these combinations of abstraction and distance afford functionaladvantages in goal pursuit. Second, given prior demonstrations of the relationship between concreteness and proximity on one hand and abstraction and distance on the other hand, these combinations provide value from fit in that goal pursuit subjectively seems appropriate and important. Taken together, this line of research points to one reason why prior research on the motivating effects of construal level has led to equivocal results by implicating the moderating role of temporal distance.
AbelsonR. P. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
AlbarracínD.HandleyI. M.NoguchiK.McCullochK. C.LiH.LeeperJ.… HartW. P. (2008). Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output: A model of general action and inaction goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 510–523.
3.
BanduraA.SchunkD. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598.
4.
BaytonJ. A. (1943). Interrelations between levels of aspiration, performance, and estimates of past performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 1–21.
5.
BaytonJ. A.WhyteE. (1950). Personality dynamics during success-failure sequences. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45, 583–591.
6.
BiancoA. T.HigginsE. T.KlemA. (2003). How “fun/importance” fit affects performance: Relating implicit theories to instructions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1091–1103.
7.
BowerG. H.BlackJ. B.TurnerT. J. (1979). Scripts in memory for text. Cognitive Psychology, 11, 177–220.
8.
BrendlM. C.HigginsE. T. (1996). Principles of judging valence: What makes events positive or negative?Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 95–160.
9.
BurrusJ.RoeseN. J. (2006). Long ago it was meant to be: The interplay between time, construal, and fate beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1050–1058.
10.
ChapmanD. W.VolkmannJ. (1939). A social determinant of the level of aspiration. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 34, 225–238.
11.
EpstudeK.RoeseN. J. (2008). The functional theory of counterfactual thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 168–192.
12.
EyalT.LibermanN.TropeY. (2009). Psychological distance and consumer behavior: A construal level theory perspective. In WänkeM. (Ed.), Social psychology of consumer behavior (pp. 65–87). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
13.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
14.
FishbachA.ZhangY.KooM. (2009). The dynamics of self-regulation. European Review of Social Psychology, 20, 315–344.
15.
FörsterJ.HigginsE. T.IdsonL. C. (1998). Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: Regulatory focus and the “goal looms larger” effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1115–1131.
16.
FörsterJ.LibermanN.FriedmanR. S. (2007). Seven principles of goal activation: A systematic approach to distinguishing goal priming from priming of non-goal constructs. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 211–233.
17.
FreitasA. L.GollwitzerP.TropeY. (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others' self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 739–752.
18.
FujitaK.TropeY.LibermanN.Levin-SagiM. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 351–367.
19.
GilovichT.KerrM.MedvecV. H. (1993). Effect of temporal perspective on subjective confidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 552–560.
20.
GouldR. (1939). An experimental analysis of “level of aspiration.”Genetic Psychology Monographs, 4, 3–115.
21.
HigginsE. T. (2000). Making a good decision: Value from fit. American Psychologist, 55, 1217–1230.
22.
HigginsE. T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 209–213.
23.
HigginsE. T. (2006). Value from hedonic experience and engagement. Psychological Review, 113, 439–460.
24.
HigginsE. T.IdsonL. C.FreitasA. L.SpiegelS.MoldenD. C. (2003). Transfer of value from fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1140–1153.
25.
HoppeF. (1976). Success and failure. In de RiveraJ. (Ed.), Field theory as human science (pp. 324–422). New York, NY: Gardner Press. (Original work published 1930).
26.
HullC. L. (1932). The goal gradient hypothesis and maze learning. Psychological Review, 39, 25–43.
27.
KanferR.AckermanP. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657–690.
28.
KarniolR.RossM. (1996). The motivational impact of temporal focus: Thinking about the future and the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 593–620.
29.
KimH.Roedder JohnD. (2008). Consumer response to brand extensions: Construal level as a moderator of the importance of perceived fit. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18, 116–126.
30.
KirschenbaumD. S.HumphreyL. L.MalettS. D. (1981). Specificity of planning in adult self-control: An applied investigation. Journal of Personality of Social Psychology, 40, 941–950.
31.
KivetzR.UrminskyO.ZhengY. (2006). The goal-gradient hypothesis resurrected: Purchase acceleration, illusionary goal progress, and customer retention. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 39–58.
32.
KruglanskiA. W.ShahJ. Y.FishbachA.FriedmanR.ChunW. Y.Sleeth-KepplerD. (2002). A theory of goal systems. In ZannaM. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 331–378). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33.
LathamG. P.SeijtsG. H. (1999). The effects of proximal and distal goals on performance on a moderately complex task. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 421–429.
34.
LibermanN.FörsterJ. (2008). Expectancy, value and psychological distance: A new look at goal gradients. Social Cognition, 26, 515–533.
35.
LibermanN.TropeY. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 5–18.
36.
LibermanN.TropeY. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322, 1201–1205.
37.
LibermanN.TropeY.McCreaS. M.ShermanS. J. (2007). The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 143–149.
38.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39.
LouroM. J.PietersR.ZeelenbergM. (2007). Dynamics of multiple-goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 174–193.
40.
MacIntoshA. (1942). Differential effect of the status of the competing group upon the levels of aspiration. American Journal of Psychology, 55, 546–554.
41.
MoultonR. W. (1965). Effect of success and failure on level of aspiration as related to achievement motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 399–406.
42.
MullerD.JuddC. M.YzerbytV. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852–863.
43.
NisanM. (1972). Dimension of time in relation to choice behavior and achievement orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 175–182.
44.
NisanM.MinkowichA. (1973). The effect of expected temporal distance on risk taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 375–380.
45.
PenningtonG. L.RoeseN. J. (2003). Regulatory focus and temporal distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 563–576.
46.
PhamL. B.TaylorS. E. (1999). From thought to action: Effects of process- versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 250–260.
47.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
48.
PrestonM. G.BaytonJ. A. (1941). Differential effect of a social variable upon three levels of aspiration. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 351–369.
49.
RossM.WilsonA. E. (2003). Autobiographical memory and conceptions of self: Getting better all the time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 66–69.
50.
RotterJ. B. (1942). Level of aspiration as a method of studying personality: I. A critical review of methodology. Psychological Review, 49, 463–474.
51.
StockJ.CervoneD. (1990). Proximal goal-setting and self-regulatory processes. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 483–498.
52.
StrackF.SchwarzN.GschneidingerE. (1985). Happiness and reminiscing: The role of time perspective, affect, and mode of thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1460–1469.
53.
TorelliC. J.KaikatiA. M. (2009). Values as predictors of judgments and behaviors: The role of abstract and concrete mindsets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 231–247.
54.
VallacherR. R.WegnerD. M. (1987). What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3–15.
55.
VallacherR. R.WegnerD. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 660–671.
56.
VasquezN. A.BuehlerR. (2007). Seeing future success: Does imagery perspective influence achievement motivation?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1392–1405.
57.
WilsonA.RossM. (2003). The identity function of autobiographical memory: Time is on our side. Memory, 11, 137–149.
