Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

It has been widely documented that fluency (ease of information processing) increases positive evaluation. We proposed and demonstrated in three studies that this was not the case when people construed objects abstractly rather than concretely. Specifically, we found that priming people to think abstractly mitigated the effect of fluency on subsequent evaluative judgments (Studies 1 and 2). However, when feelings such as fluency were understood to be signals of value, fluency increased liking in people primed to think abstractly (Study 3). These results suggest that abstract thinking helps distinguish central decision inputs from less important incidental inputs, whereas concrete thinking does not make such a distinction. Thus, abstract thinking can augment or attenuate fluency effects, depending on whether fluency is considered important or incidental information, respectively.

Keywords

abstract thinking construal level fluency feelings evaluation charitable giving

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alter

A.L.

Oppenheimer

D.M.

(2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219–235.

Baron

R.M.

Kenny

D.A.

(1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

Berkowitz

Jaffee

Troccoli

B.T.

(2000). On the correction of feeling-induced judgmental biases. In Forgas

J.P.

(Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 131–152). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Bless

Clore

G.L.

Schwarz

Golisano

Rabe

Wölk

(1996). Mood and the use of scripts: Does being in a happy mood really lead to mindlessness? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 665–679.

Camerer

Hogarth

(1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 7–42.

Fujita

Trope

Liberman

Levin-Sagi

(2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 351–367.

Haddock

Rothman

A.J.

Reber

Schwarz

(1999). Forming judgments of attitude certainty, importance, and intensity: The role of subjective experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 771–782.

Häfner

Stapel

D.A.

(2010). Information to go: Fluency enhances the usability of primed information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 73–84.

Hsee

C.K.

Tsai

C.I.

(2008). Hedonomics in consumer behavior. In Haugtvedt

Herr

Kardes

(Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 639–658). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

10.

Labroo

A.A.

Kim

(2009). The “instrumentality” heuristic: Why metacognitive difficulty is desirable during goal pursuit. Psychological Science, 20, 127–134.

11.

Menon

Raghubir

(2003). Ease-of-retrieval as an automatic input in judgments: A mere-accessibility framework? Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 230–243.

12.

Navon

(1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.

13.

Pham

M.T.

(2009). The lexicon and grammar of affect as information in consumer decision making: The GAIM. In Wänke

(Ed.), Social psychology of consumer behavior (pp. 167–200). London, England: Psychology Press.

14.

Schwarz

(2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 332–348.

15.

Schwarz

Bless

Strack

Klumpp

Rittenauer-Schatka

Simons

(1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202.

16.

Schwarz

Clore

G.L.

(2007). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In Higgins

E.T.

Kruglanski

(Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 385–407). New York, NY: Guilford.

17.

Shanks

D.R.

Darby

R.J.

(1998). Feature- and rule-based generalization in human associative learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 405–415.

18.

Slovic

Finucane

Peters

MacGregor

D.G.

(2002). The affect heuristic. In Gilovich

Griffin

Kahneman

(Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397–420). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

19.

Smith

E.R.

Miller

D.A.

Maitner

A.T.

Crump

S.A.

Garcia-Marques

Mackie

D.M.

(2006). Familiarity can increase stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 471–478.

20.

Trope

Liberman

(2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421.

21.

Trope

Liberman

(2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463.

22.

Tsai

C.I.

McGill

A.L.

(in press). No pain, no gain? How construal level and fluency affect consumer confidence. Journal of Consumer Research.

23.

Tversky

Kahneman

(1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1130.

24.

Vallacher

R.R.

Wegner

D.M.

(1987). What do people think they’re doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3–15.

25.

A.J.

Wyer

R.S.

(2007). The effect of mindsets on consumer decision strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 34, 556–566.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.18 MB

When Does Feeling of Fluency Matter?

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material