Past research on close relationships has increasingly focused on the assessment of implicit constructs to shed new light on relationship processes. However, virtually nothing is known about the role of such constructs in understanding ongoing affective and behavioral romantic realities and how implicit and explicit relationship constructs interact in the context of daily relationship outcomes. Using a 21-day diary approach, the present research examined the unique and interactive role of implicit partner evaluations and explicit partner perceptions on relationship outcomes (daily relationship quality and positive relationship behaviors enacted toward partner). Results showed that more positive implicit partner evaluations uniquely predicted more positive relationship outcomes during the 21-day diary period, but that this was especially pronounced in individuals who did not explicitly perceive their partner’s attributes in an overly positive manner. Implications for the close relationship literature are discussed.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BaccusJ. R.BaldwinM. W.PackerD. J. (2004). Increasing implicit self-esteem through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 15, 498–502.
3.
BaldwinM. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461–484.
4.
BaldwinM. W.LydonJ. E.McClureM. J.EtchisonS. (2010). Measuring implicit processes in close relationships. In GawronskiBertramPayneKeith (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications. New York, NY: Guilford.
5.
BanseR. (1999). Automatic evaluation of self and significant others: Affective priming in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 803–821.
6.
BanseR.KowalickC. (2007). Implicit attitudes toward romantic partners predict well-being in stressful life conditions: Evidence from the antenatal maternity ward. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 1–9.
7.
BossonJ. K.LakeyC. E.CampbellW. K.Zeigler-HillV.JordanC. H.KernisM. H. (2008). Untangling the links between narcissism and self-esteem: A theoretical and empirical review. Personality and Social Psychology Compass, 2, 1415–1439.
8.
CampbellL.KashyD. A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A guided tour. Personal Relationships, 9, 327–342.
9.
CampbellL.SimpsonJ. A.BoldryJ. G.RubinH. (2010). Trust, variability in relationship evaluations, and relationship processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 14–31.
10.
CrowneD. P.MarloweD. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.
11.
DeHartT.PelhamB.FiedorowiczL.CarvalloM.GabrielS. (2011). Including others in the implicit self: Implicit evaluation of significant others. Self and Identity, 10, 127–135.
12.
DeHartT.PelhamB.MurrayS. (2004). Implicit dependency regulation: Self-esteem, relationship closeness, and implicit evaluations of close others. Social Cognition, 22, 126–146.
13.
DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (2004). Aversive racism. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 36, pp. 1–51). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14.
FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. H. (2006). Relationship satisfaction. In PerlmanD.VangelistiA. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 579–594). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A.ThomasG.GilesT. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 72–89.
16.
GawronskiB.HofmannW.WilburC. J. (2006). Are “implicit“ attitudes unconscious?Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 485–499.
17.
JordanC. H.SpencerS. J.ZannaM. P.Hoshino-BrowneE.CorrellJ. (2003). Secure and defensive high self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 969–978.
18.
KashyD. A.KennyD. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 451–477). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
19.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20.
KooleS. L.DijksterhuisA.van KnippenbergA. (2001). What’s in a name: Implicit self-esteem and the automatic self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 669–685.
21.
KrizanZ. (2008). What is implicit about implicit self-esteem?Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1635–1640.
22.
LeBelE. P.CampbellL. (2009). Implicit partner affect, relationship satisfaction, and the prediction of romantic breakup. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1291–1294.
23.
LeBelE. P.Gawronski (2009). How to find what's in a name: Scrutinizing the optimality of five scoring algorithms for the name-letter task. European Journal of Personality, 23, 85–106.
24.
LeeS.RoggeR. D.ReisH. T. (2010). Assessing the seeds of relationship decay: Using implicit evaluations to detect the early stages of disillusionment. Psychological Science, 21, 857–864.
25.
MurrayS. L.AloniM.HolmesJ. G.DerrickJ. L.StinsonD. A.LederS. (2009a). Fostering partner depedence as trust insurance: The implicit contingencies of the exchange script in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 324–348.
26.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.AloniM.PinkusR. T.DerrickJ. L.LederS. (2009b). Commitment insurance: Compensating for the autonomy costs of interdependence in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 256–278.
27.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79–98.
28.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.PinkusR. T. (2010). A smart unconscious? Procedural origins of automatic partner attitudes in marriage. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 650–656.
29.
MurrayS. L.PinkusR. T.HolmesJ. G.HarrisB.GomillionS.AloniM.LederS. (2011). Signaling when (and when not) to be cautious and self-protective: Impulsive and reflective trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 485–502.
30.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
31.
NuttinM. J.Jr. (1985). Narcissism beyond Gestalt and awareness: The name letter effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 64, 723–739.
32.
PaulhusD. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.
33.
RusbultC. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117.
34.
ScintaA.GableS. L. (2007). Automatic and self-reported attitudes in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1008–1022.
35.
Son HingL. S.Chung-YanG.HamiltonL.ZannaM. (2008). A two-dimensional model that employs explicit and implicit attitudes to characterize prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 971–987.
36.
StoneA. A.TurkkanJ. S.BachrachC. A.JobeJ. B.KurtzmanH. S.CainV. S. (2000). The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37.
ZayasV.ShodaY. (2005). Do automatic reactions elicited by thoughts of romantic partner, mother, and self relate to adult romantic attachment?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1011–1025.
