Evaluations of individuals and social groups refer to two basic dimensions of social judgment: warmth and competence. Although previous research has explored the antecedents and consequences of these evaluations, there is a lack of understanding of the conditions under which warmth and competence information is used for social categorization in the first place. The present research developed a novel measure of individuals’ tendencies to categorize persons in terms of competence versus warmth and tested whether these tendencies are predicted by chronic (Study 1, N = 301) and experimentally induced (Study 2, N = 69) social conformity and superiority goals. Social conformity goals predicted greater relative use of warmth information, while superiority goals predicted greater relative use of competence information in categorizing persons. These findings attest to the relevance of chronic as well as contextually induced goals at an early stage of social information processing related to social categorization.
AbeleA. E.BruckmüllerS. (2011). The bigger one of the “Big Two”? Preferential processing of communal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 935–948.
2.
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 751–763.
3.
AltemeyerB. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
4.
AltemeyerB. (1996). The authoritarian specter., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
AsbrockF.SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2010). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice: A longitudinal test. European Journal of Personality, 24, 324–340.
6.
BrownR. J.HinkleS.ElyP. G.Fox-CardonneD. L.MarasP.TaylorL. A. (1992). Recognizing group diversity: Individualist-collectivist and autonomous-relational social orientations and their implications for intergroup processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 327–342.
7.
CaprarielloP. A.CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T. (2009). Social structure shapes cultural stereotypes and emotions: A causal test of the Stereotype Content Model. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 147–155.
8.
CisłakA. (2010). Power effects on person perception: Where power holders perceive competence, subordinates perceive communality., Paper presented at the European Social Cognition Network Transfer of Knowledge Conference “The ‘Big Two’ Content Dimensions in Social Cognition and Behaviour,”October13–16, Neuendettelsau, Germany.
9.
CohrsJ. C. (2005). Interindividuelle Unterschiede in Vorurteilen: Zur Konstruktvalidität und Erklärungskraft von rechtsgerichtetem Autoritarismus und sozialer Dominanzorientierung [Interindividual differences in prejudice: On the construct validity and explanatory power of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation]. Zeitschrift für Politische Psychologie, 13, 113–136.
10.
CohrsJ. C.AsbrockF. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and prejudice against threatening and competitive ethnic groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 270–289.
11.
CohrsJ. C.IblerS. (2009). Authoritarianism, threat, and prejudice: An analysis of mediation and moderation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 31, 81–94.
12.
CohrsJ. C.StelzlM. (2010). How ideological attitudes predict host society members’ attitudes toward immigrants: Exploring cross-national differences. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 673–694.
13.
CozzolinoP. J.SnyderM. (2008). Good times, bad times: How personal disadvantage moderates the relationship between social dominance and efforts to win. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1420–1433.
14.
CuddyA. J. C.FiskeS. T.GlickP. (2008). Warmth and competence as universal dimensions of social perception: The Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 61–149). 40, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15.
DruV. (2007). Authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and prejudice: Effects of various self-categorization conditions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 877–883.
16.
DuckittJ. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 41–113). 33, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17.
DuckittJ. (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684–696.
18.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21, 113–130.
19.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2010). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation differentially moderate intergroup effects on prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 24, 583–601.
20.
DuckittJ.WagnerC.du PlessisI.BirumI. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75–93.
21.
DuriezB.van HielA.KossowskaM. (2005). Authoritarianism and social dominance in western and eastern Europe: The importance of the sociopolitical context and of political interest and involvement. Political Psychology, 26, 299–320.
22.
EigenbergerM. E. (1998). Fear as a correlate of authoritarianism. Psychological Reports, 83, 1395–1409.
23.
FeldmanS. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41–74.
24.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.
25.
KervynN.YzerbytV.JuddC. M. (2010). Compensation between warmth and competence: Antecedents and consequences of a negative relation between the two fundamental dimensions of social perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 21, 155–187.
26.
LavineH.LodgeM.PolichakJ.TaberC. (2002). Explicating the black box through experimentation: Studies of authoritarianism and threat. Political Analysis, 10, 343–361.
27.
OldmeadowJ. A.FiskeS. T. (2007). System-justifying ideologies moderate status = competence stereotypes: Roles for belief in a just world and social dominance orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1135–1148.
28.
OysermanD. (1993). The lens in personhood: Viewing the self and others in a multicultural society. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 993–1009.
29.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.StallworthL. M.MalleB. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.
30.
RudmanL. A.GlickP. (1999). Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: The hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1004–1010.
31.
RussellA. M. T.FiskeS. T. (2008). It’s all relative: Competition and status drive interpersonal perception. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 1193–1201.
32.
SteffensM. C.MehlB. (2003). Erscheinen “Karrierefrauen” weniger sozial kompetent als “Karrieremänner”? Geschlechterstereotype und Kompetenzzuschreibung [Do “career women” appear less socially competent than “career men”? Gender stereotypes and the attribution of competence]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 34, 173–185.
33.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group. A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
34.
WojciszkeB. (1997). Parallels between competence–versus morality-related traits and individualistic versus collectivistic values. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 245–256.
35.
WojciszkeB. (2005). Morality and competence in person and self perception. European Review of Social Psychology, 16, 155–188.
36.
WojciszkeB.BazinskaR.JaworskiM. (1998). On the dominance of moral categories in impression formation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1251–1263.
37.
YbarraO.ChanE.ParkD. (2001). Young and old adults’ concerns about morality and competence. Motivation and Emotion, 25, 85–100.
