Existing work indicates that socio-political attitudes (or: ideology) are associated with personality, with Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism relating most strongly to honesty-humility and openness to experience, the two value-related domains of the HEXACO framework. Using a sample of 7067 twins and siblings of twins (including 1376 complete twin pairs), we examined the degree to which these relations arise from common genetic and environmental sources. Heritability estimates for the HEXACO personality and ideology variables ranged from .34 to .58. Environmental factors shared by twins reared together showed negligible effects on individual differences in personality and ideology. At the phenotypic level, Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism dimensions related most strongly to honesty-humility and openness to experience. These associations were mostly explained by genetic factors (48%–93%). Genetic correlations between openness to experience and the ideology scales ranged from –.29 to –.53; those between honesty-humility and the ideology scales ranged from –.31 to –.43. None of the environmental correlations exceeded |r| = .18. These results suggest that the relations between the two value-related domains of the HEXACO personality model and ideology are mostly genetic in nature, and that there is substantial overlap in the heritable components of personality and ideology.
AltemeyerB. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.
2.
AltemeyerB. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–92). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60382-2
AshtonM. C.LeeK. (2020). Objections to the HEXACO model of personality structure—And why those objections fail. European Journal of Personality, 34, 492–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2242
5.
AshtonM. C.LeeK.De VriesR. E. (2014). The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality factors: A review of research and theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314523838
6.
AshtonM. C.LeeK.PeruginiM.SzarotaP.De VriesR. E.Di BlasL.BoiesK.De RaadB. (2004). A six-factor structure of personality-descriptive adjectives: Solutions from psycholexical studies in seven languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.356
7.
BarendsA. J.de VriesR. E.van VugtM. (2019). Power influences the expression of Honesty-Humility: The power-exploitation affordances hypothesis. Journal of Research in Personality, 82, 103856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103856
8.
BokerS.NealeM.MaesH.WildeM.SpiegelM.BrickT., … & MehtaP. (2011). OpenMx: An open source extended structural equation modeling framework. Psychometrika, 76(2), 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-010-9200-6
9.
BrileyD. A.Tucker-DrobE. M. (2014). Genetic and environmental continuity in personality development: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1303–1331. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037091
10.
Camperio CianiA.CapiluppiC. (2011). Gene flow by selective emigration as a possible cause for personality differences between small islands and mainland populations. European Journal of Personality, 25, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.774
11.
ChenC.BurtonM.GreenbergerE.DmitrievaJ. (1999). Population migration and the variation of dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) allele frequencies around the globe. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20, 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00015-X
12.
ClaessensS.FischerK.ChaudhuriA.SibleyC. G.AtkinsonQ. D. (2020). The dual evolutionary foundations of political ideology. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(4), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0850-9
13.
CohrsJ. C.MoschnerB.MaesJ.KielmannS. (2005). The motivational bases of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation: Relations to values and attitudes in the aftermath of September 11, 2001. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1425–1434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167205275614
14.
De RaadB.BareldsD. P.TimmermanM. E.De RooverK.MlačićB.ChurchA. T. (2014). Towards a pan‐cultural personality structure: Input from 11 psycholexical studies. European Journal of Personality, 28, 497–510. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1953
De VriesR. E.TyburJ. M.PolletT. V.van VugtM. (2016). Evolution, situational affordances, and the HEXACO model of personality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37, 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.04.001
17.
DesimoniM.LeoneL. (2014). Openness to experience, honesty–humility and ideological attitudes: A fine-grained analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 116–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.031
18.
DeYoungC. G.QuiltyL. C.PetersonJ. B.GrayJ. R. (2014). Openness to experience, intellect, and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96, 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.806327
19.
DuckittJ.BizumicB. (2013). Multidimensionality of right‐wing authoritarian attitudes: Authoritarianism‐conservatism‐traditionalism. Political Psychology, 34, 841–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12022
20.
DuckittJ.SibleyC. G. (2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028540
21.
DuffyD. L.MartinN. G. (1994). Inferring the direction of causation in cross‐sectional twin data: Theoretical and empirical considerations. Genetic Epidemiology, 11, 483–502. https://doi.org/10.1002/gepi.1370110606
22.
DunlopP. D.MorrisonD. L.KoenigJ.SilcoxB. (2012). Comparing the Eysenck and HEXACO models of personality in the prediction of adult delinquency. European Journal of Personality, 26, 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.824
23.
DunwoodyP. T.FunkeF. (2016). The Aggression-Submission-Conventionalism Scale: Testing a new three factor measure of authoritarianism. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4, 571–600. doi:10.5964/jspp.v4i2.168
24.
DuriezB.Van HielA. (2002). The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1199–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00086-1
25.
DuriezB.Van HielA.KossowskaM. (2005). Authoritarianism and social dominance in Western and Eastern Europe: The importance of the sociopolitical context and of political interest and involvement. Political Psychology, 26, 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00419.x
26.
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (adult and junior). London: Hodder & Stoughton.
27.
FeatherN. T.McKeeI. R. (2008). Values and prejudice: Predictors of attitudes towards Australian Aborigines. Australian Journal of Psychology, 60, 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530701449513
28.
FeatherN. T.McKeeI. R. (2012). Values, right‐wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and ambivalent attitudes toward women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42, 2479–2504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00950.x
29.
FunkC. L.SmithK. B.AlfordJ. R.HibbingM. V.EatonN. R.KruegerR. F., … & HibbingJ. R. (2013). Genetic and environmental transmission of political orientations. Political Psychology, 34(6), 805–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00915.x
HoA. K.SidaniusJ.KteilyN.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ.PrattoF.HenkelK. E., … & StewartA. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033
32.
JulianA. M.WijngaardO.De VriesR. E. (2021). Compensation preferences: The role of personality and values. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.550919
33.
KamC.SchermerJ. A.HarrisJ.VernonP. A. (2013). Heritability of acquiescence bias and item keying response style associated with the HEXACO Personality Scale. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 16, 790–798. https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.38
34.
KandlerC. (2015). Quellen politischer Orientierung: Genetische, soziale, kulturelle und Persönlichkeitsfaktoren [Sources of political orientation: Genetic, social, cultural, and personality factors]. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 50, 39–64. http://doi.org/10.5771/9783845254418-44
35.
KandlerC.BellE.RiemannR. (2016). The structure and sources of right‐wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. European Journal of Personality, 30, 406–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2061
36.
KandlerC.BratkoD.ButkovićA.Vukasović HlupićT.TyburJ. M.WesseldijkL.De VriesR. E.JernP.LewisG. J. (2021). How genetic and environmental variance in personality traits shift across the lifespan: Evidence from a cross-national twin study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000366
37.
KandlerC.LewisG. J.FeldhausL. H.RiemannR. (2015). The genetic and environmental roots of variance in negativity toward foreign nationals. Behavior Genetics, 45, 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-014-9700-8
38.
KandlerC.RichterJ.Zapko-WillmesA. (2019). The Nature and Nurture of HEXACO Personality Trait Differences. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 227, 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000378
39.
KandlerC.ZimmermannJ.McAdamsD. P. (2014). Core and surface characteristics for the description and theory of personality differences and development. European Journal of Personality, 28, 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1952
40.
KellerM. C.MedlandS. E.DuncanL. E. (2010). Are extended twin family designs worth the trouble? A comparison of the bias, precision, and accuracy of parameters estimated in four twin family models. Behavior Genetics, 40, 377–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-009-9320-x
41.
KleppestøT. H.CzajkowskiN. O.VassendO.RøysambE.EftedalN. H.Sheehy-SkeffingtonJ., … & ThomsenL. (2019). Correlations between social dominance orientation and political attitudes reflect common genetic underpinnings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 17741–17746, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818711116
42.
LeeK.AshtonM. C. (2004). Psychometric properties of the HEXACO personality inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 329–358. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3902_8
LeeK.AshtonM. C.OgunfoworaB.BourdageJ. S.ShinK. H. (2010). The personality bases of socio-political attitudes: The role of Honesty–Humility and Openness to Experience. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.08.007
45.
LeeK.AshtonM. C.PozzebonJ. A.VisserB. A.BourdageJ. S.OgunfoworaB. (2009). Similarity and assumed similarity in personality reports of well-acquainted persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 460–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014059
46.
LeeK.AshtonM. C.WiltshireJ.BourdageJ. S.VisserB. A.GallucciA. (2013). Sex, power, and money: Prediction from the Dark Triad and Honesty–Humility. European Journal of Personality, 27, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1860
47.
LeoneL.ChirumboloA.DesimoniM. (2012a). The impact of the HEXACO personality model in predicting socio-political attitudes: The moderating role of interest in politics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 416–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.049
48.
LeoneL.DesimoniM.ChirumboloA. (2012b). HEXACO, social worldviews and socio-political attitudes: A mediation analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 995–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.07.016
49.
LewisG. J.BatesT. C. (2014a). Common heritable effects underpin concerns over norm maintenance and in‐group favoritism: Evidence from genetic analyses of right‐wing authoritarianism and traditionalism. Journal of Personality, 82, 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12055
50.
LewisG. J.BatesT. C. (2014b). How genes influence personality: Evidence from multi-facet twin analyses of the HEXACO dimensions. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.04.004
51.
LudekeS. G.KruegerR. F. (2013). Authoritarianism as a personality trait: Evidence from a longitudinal behavior genetic study. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 480–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.04.015
52.
MatthewsL. J.ButlerP. M. (2011). Novelty‐seeking DRD4 polymorphisms are associated with human migration distance out‐of‐Africa after controlling for neutral population gene structure. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 145, 382–389. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21507
53.
McCourtK., Bouchard Jr, T. J., Lykken, D. T., Tellegen, A., & Keyes, M. (1999). Authoritarianism revisited: Genetic and environmental influences examined in twins reared apart and together. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(5), 985–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00048-3
54.
MelchersM.PliegerT.MontagC.ReuterM.SpinathF. M.HahnE. (2018). The heritability of response styles and its impact on heritability estimates of personality: A twin study. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.05.023
55.
MilfontT. L.BainP. G.KashimaY.Corral-VerdugoV.PasqualiC.JohanssonL. O.GuanY.GouveiaV. V.GarðarsdóttirR. B.DoronG.BilewiczM.UtsugiA.AragonesJ. I.StegL.SolandM.ParkJ.Otto.S.DemarqueC.WagnerC.MadsenO. J., …, & BilewiczM. (2018). On the relation between social dominance orientation and environmentalism: A 25-nation study. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9, 802–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617722832
56.
MuellerJ. S.MelwaniS.GoncaloJ. A. (2012). The bias against creativity why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23, 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611421018
57.
NealeM. C.CardonL. R.NorthAtlantic Treaty Organization, Scientific Affairs Division. (1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
58.
OsborneD.MilojevP.SibleyC. G. (2017). Authoritarianism and national identity: Examining the longitudinal effects of SDO and RWA on nationalism and patriotism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 1086–1099. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217704196
59.
OskarssonS.CesariniD.DawesC. T.FowlerJ. H.JohannessonM.MagnussonP. K.TeorellJ. (2015). Linking genes and political orientations: Testing the cognitive ability as mediator hypothesis. Political Psychology, 36, 649–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12230
60.
PerryR.SibleyC. G. (2012). Big-Five personality prospectively predicts social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.009
61.
PozzebonJ. A.AshtonM. C. (2009). Personality and values as predictors of self-and peer-reported behavior. Journal of Individual Differences, 30(3), 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.30.3.122
62.
PrattoF.SidaniusJ.LevinS. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772
SaucierG. (2009). Recurrent personality dimensions in inclusive lexical studies: Indications for a Big Six structure. Journal of Personality, 77, 1577–1614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00593.x
65.
SchwartzS. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
66.
SibleyC. G.DuckittJ. (2013). The dual process model of ideology and prejudice: A longitudinal test during a global recession. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 448–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.757544
67.
StanleyS. K.WilsonM. S.SibleyC. G.MilfontT. L. (2017). Dimensions of social dominance and their associations with environmentalism. Personality and Individual Differences, 107, 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.051
68.
ThielmannI.AkramiN.BabarovićT.BellochA.BerghR.ChirumboloA.ČolovićP.De VriesR. E.DostálD.EgorovaM.GnisciA.HeydaschT.HilbigB. E.HsuK.-Y.IzdebskiP.LeoneL.MarcusB.MeđedovićJ.NagyJ., … LeeK. (2020). The HEXACO–100 across 16 languages: A large-scale test of measurement invariance. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102, 714–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1614011
69.
ThielmannI.De VriesR. E. (2021). Who wants to change and how? On the trait-specificity of personality change goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000304
70.
TyburJ. M.WesseldijkL. W.JernP. (2020). Genetic and environmental influences on disgust proneness, contamination sensitivity, and their covariance. Clinical Psychological Science, 8, 1054–1061. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702620951510
71.
VerhulstB.HatemiP. K.MartinN. G. (2010). The nature of the relationship between personality traits and political attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 306–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.013
72.
VerhulstB.EavesL. J.HatemiP. K. (2012). Correlation not causation: The relationship between personality traits and political ideologies. American Journal of Political Science, 56, 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00568.x
73.
VerweijK. J.MosingM. A.ZietschB. P.MedlandS. E. (2012). Estimating heritability from twin studies. Methods in Molecular Biology, 850, 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-555-8_9.
74.
VeselkaL.PetridesK. V.SchermerJ. A.CherkasL. F.SpectorT. D.VernonP. A. (2010). Phenotypic and genetic relations between the HEXACO dimensions and trait emotional intelligence. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 13, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.13.1.66
75.
VeselkaL.SchermerJ. A.MartinR. A.CherkasL. F.SpectorT. D.VernonP. A. (2010). A behavioral genetic study of relationships between humor styles and the six HEXACO personality factors. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 6, 9–33. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v6i3.206
76.
VeselkaL.SchermerJ. A.PetridesK. V.CherkasL. F.SpectorT. D.VernonP. A. (2009). A general factor of personality: Evidence from the HEXACO model and a measure of trait emotional intelligence. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12, 420–424. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.12.5.420
77.
VukasovićT.BratkoD. (2015). Heritability of personality: A meta-analysis of behavior genetic studies. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 769–785. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000017
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
