Past research on pay dispersion has found that hierarchy hurts commitment, cooperation, and performance. In contrast, functional theories of social hierarchy propose that hierarchy can facilitate coordination and performance. We investigated the effects of hierarchical differentiation using a sample of professional basketball teams from the National Basketball Association (NBA). Analyses of archival data revealed that hierarchical differentiation in pay and participation enhanced team performance by facilitating intragroup coordination and cooperation. The data provide the basis for a theoretical analysis which suggests that hierarchy is particularly beneficial for procedurally interdependent tasks (e.g., basketball) but can harm team performance for procedurally independent tasks (e.g., baseball; Bloom, 1999). Overall, the current data indicate that team structure (hierarchy) affects team outcomes (performance) through team processes (cooperation and coordination). Thus, under certain conditions, hierarchical differentiation helps lead groups to victory.
AndersonC.BrownC.E. (2010). The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. In BriefA. P.StawB. M. (Eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 30, pp. 55–89). Amsterdam, The Netherlands. DOI: 10.1016/j.riob.2010.08.002.
2.
AltemeyerB. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 47–91). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3.
BaronJ. N.PfefferJ. (1994). The social psychology of organizations and inequality. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 190–209.
4.
BenderskyC.HaysN. (in press). Status conflict in groups. Organization Science. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0544,
5.
BenderskyC.ShahN. (in press). The cost of status enhancement: Performance effects of individual’s status mobility in task groups. Organization Science. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0543,
6.
BermanS. L.DownJ.HillC. W. L. (2002). Tacit knowledge as a source of competitive advantage in the National Basketball Association. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 13–31.
7.
BloomM. (1999). The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 25–40.
8.
CohenB. P.ZhouX. (1991). Status processes in enduring work groups. American Sociological Review, 56, 179–188.
9.
CooperW. H.WitheyM. J. (2009). The strong situation hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 62–72.
10.
EdmondsonA. C.BohmerR. M.PisanoG. P. (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology in implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 685–716.
11.
FiskeA. P. (1992). Four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689–723.
12.
GalinskyA. D.GruenfeldD. H.MageeJ. C. (2003). From power to action. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 85, 453–466.
13.
GalinskyA. D.MageeJ. C.GruenfeldD. H.WhitsonJ. A.LiljenquistK. A. (2008). Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1450–1466.
14.
GouldR. V. (2002). The origins of status hierarchies: A formal theory and empirical test. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 1143–1178.
15.
GreerL. L.Van KleefG. A. (2010). Equality versus differentiation: The effects of power dispersion on group interaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1032–1044.
16.
GroysbergB.PolzerJ.ElfenbeinH. A. (2011). Too many cooks spoil the broth: How high status individuals decrease group effectiveness. Organization Science, 22, 722–737.
17.
GruenfeldD. H.MannixE. A.WilliamsK. Y.NealeM. A. (1996). Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 1–15.
18.
GruenfeldD. H.TiedensL. Z. (2010). Organizational preferences and their consequences. In FiskeS. T.GilbertD. T.LindsayG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed.), (pp. 1252–1287). New York, NY: John Wiley.
19.
HalevyN.ChouE.GalinskyA. D. (2011). A functional model of hierarchy: Why, how and when hierarchical differentiation enhances group performance. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 32–52.
20.
HoffmanE.McCabeK.ShachatK.SmithV. (1994). Preferences, property rights and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7, 346–380.
21.
HofstedeG. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
22.
HouseR. J.HangesP. J.JavidanM.DorfmanP. W.GuptaV. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–920.
24.
KeidelR. W. (1987). Team sport models as a generic organizational framework. Human Relations, 40, 591–612.
25.
KelmanH. C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57–78.
26.
KelmanH. C. (2006). Interests, relationships, identities: Three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 1–26.
KwaadstenietE. W.van DijkE. (2010). Social status as a cue for tacit coordination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 515–524.
29.
LewisK. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50, 1519–1533.
30.
MageeJ. C.GalinskyA. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351–398.
31.
McCoyS. K.MajorB. (2007). Priming meritocracy and psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341–351.
32.
MurnighanJ. K.ConlonD. E. (1991). The dynamics of intense work-groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 165–186.
33.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide. (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
34.
OverbeckJ. R.CorrellJ.ParkB. (2005). Internal status sorting in groups: The problem of too many stars.”. In NealeM. A.MannixE. A.Thomas-HuntM. (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 7, pp. 169–199). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.
35.
PfefferJ.Davis-BlakeA. (1986). Administrative succession and organizational performance: How administrator experience moderates the succession effect. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 72–83.
36.
PfefferJ.LangtonN. (1993). The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively-evidence from college and university-faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38, 382–407.
37.
RavenB. H. (2008). The bases of power and the power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 8, 1–22.
38.
RicoR.Sanchez-ManzanaresM.GilF.GibsonC. (2008). Coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33, 163–184.
39.
SchwartzS. H. (2010). Cultural value orientations: Nature and implications of national differences. Jerusalem, Israel: The Hebrew University.
StawB. M.HoangH. (1995). Sunk costs in the NBA: Why draft order affects playing time and survival in professional basketball. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 474–494.
42.
StirohK. J. (2007). Playing for keeps: Pay and performance in the NBA. Economic Inquiry, 45, 145–161.
43.
TiedensL. Z.UnzuetaM. M.YoungM. J. (2007). An unconscious desire for hierarchy? The motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 402–414.
44.
TropeY.SmithP. K. (2006). You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: Power priming and abstract information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 578–596.
45.
TylerT. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.
46.
Van VugtM. (2006). Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 354–372.
47.
Van VugtM.HoganR.KaiserR. B. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63, 182–196.
48.
WadeJ. B.O’ReillyC. A.IIIPollockT. G. (2006). Overpaid CEOs and underpaid managers: Fairness and executive compensation. Organization Science, 17, 527–544.
49.
WangL. (2009). Money and fame: Vividness effects in the National Basketball Association. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 22, 20–44.
50.
WolfeR. A.WeickK. E.UsherJ. M.TerborgJ. R.PoppoL.MurrellA. J.… JourdanJ. S. (2005). Sport and organizational studies: Exploring synergy. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14, 182–210.
51.
WoolleyA. W.ChabrisC. F.PentlandA.HashmiN.MaloneT. W. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330, 686–688.
