On Ladders and Pyramids: Hierarchy’s Shape Determines Relationships and Performance in Groups

Abstract

Hierarchies take different forms, which individuals mentally represent using different geometric shapes. We propose and empirically demonstrate that individuals’ mental representations of the shape hierarchy takes affect its consequences. Five studies compared two common mental representations of hierarchy shapes—ladders and pyramids—to explore whether, why, and how individuals’ perceptions of hierarchy’s shape undermine constructive relationships within groups and group performance. Study 1 demonstrated that individuals commonly mentally represent hierarchies as ladders and pyramids. In Studies 2 and 3, employees who perceived their workplace hierarchies to be shaped like ladders (as compared with pyramids) experienced worse intragroup relationships. Finally, Studies 4 and 5 experimentally manipulated groups’ hierarchical shape in the lab and found that ladder-shaped hierarchies undermined social relationships and group performance relative to pyramid-shaped hierarchies. Taken together, these findings enhance our understanding of hierarchies’ multifaceted consequences and help shed light on the (dis)utility of hierarchy for group functioning.

Keywords

group processes hierarchy trust conflict and cooperation performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baumeister

R. F.

Leary

M. R.

(1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.

Bendersky

Hays

N. A.

(2012). Status conflict in groups. Organization Science, 23, 323-340.

Berson

Oreg

Dvir

(2008). CEO values, organizational culture and firm outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 29, 615-633.

Biemann

Kearney

(2010). Size does matter: How varying group sizes in a sample affect the most common measures of group diversity. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 582-599.

Blader

S. L.

Tyler

T. R.

(2003). What constitutes fairness in work settings? A four-component model of procedural justice. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 107-126.

Blau

P. M.

(1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure. New York: Free Press.

Bloom

(1999). The performance effects of pay dispersion on individuals and organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 25-40.

Boehm

S. A.

Kunze

Bruch

(2014). Spotlight on age-diversity climate: The impact of age-inclusive HR practices on firm-level outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 67, 667-704.

Boyle

(2001). Performance reviews: Perilous curves ahead. Fortune, 143, 187-188.

10.

Bunderson

J. S.

Van der Vegt

G. S.

(2018). Diversity and inequality in management teams: A review and integration of research on vertical and horizontal member differences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 47-73.

11.

Bunderson

J. S.

Van der Vegt

G. S.

Cantimur

Rink

(2016). Different views of hierarchy and why they matter: Hierarchy as inequality or as cascading influence. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1265-1289.

12.

De Jong

B. A.

Elfring

. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 535-549.

13.

Eisenberger

Huntington

Hutchison

Sowa

(1986). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698-714.

14.

Erickson

. (2007, June 12). Climbing the corporate ladder: Whom to impress? And how? [Online article]. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2007/06/climbing-the-corporate-ladder

15.

Festinger

(1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.

16.

Fiske

S. T.

(2010). Interpersonal stratification: Status, power, and subordination. In Fiske

S. T.

Gilbert

Lindzey

(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 941-982). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

17.

Gallistel

C. R.

(2001). Mental representations, psychology of. In Smelser

N. J.

Baltes

P. B.

(Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioural sciences (pp. 9691-9695). New York, NY: Elsevier.

18.

Garcia

S. M.

Tor

(2007). Rankings, standards, and competition: Task vs. scale comparisons. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 95-108.

19.

Garcia

S. M.

Tor

(2009). The N-effect: More competitors, less competition. Psychological Science, 20, 871-877.

20.

Garcia

S. M.

Tor

Schiff

T. M.

(2013). The psychology of competition: A social comparison perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 634-650.

21.

Greer

L. L.

Caruso

H. M.

Jehn

K. A.

(2011). The bigger they are, the harder they fall: Linking team power, team conflict, and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 116-128.

22.

Greer

L. L.

de Jong

B. A.

Schouten

M. E.

Dannals

J. E.

(2018). Why and when hierarchy impacts team effectiveness: A meta-analytic integration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103, 591-613.

23.

Greer

L. L.

Van Bunderen

(2017). The dysfunctions of power in teams: A review and emergent conflict perspective. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 103-124.

24.

Greer

L. L.

Van Kleef

G. A.

(2010). Equality versus differentiation: The effects of power dispersion on group interaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1032-1044.

25.

Gruenfeld

Tiedens

(2010). Organizational preferences and their consequences. In Fiske

S. T.

Gilbert

Lindzey

(Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 1252-1286). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

26.

Halevy

(2018). Managing team paradoxes. Manuscript in preparation.

27.

Halevy

Chou

E. Y.

Galinsky

A. D.

(2011). A functional model of hierarchy: Why, how, and when vertical differentiation enhances group performance. Organizational Psychology Review, 1, 32-52.

28.

Harbring

Irlenbusch

(2011). Sabotage in tournaments: Evidence from a laboratory experiment. Management Science, 57, 611-627.

29.

Harrison

D. A.

Klein

K. J.

(2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1199-1228.

30.

Hays

N. A.

Bendersky

(2015). Not all inequality is created equal: Effects of status versus power hierarchies on competition for upward mobility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 867-882.

31.

Kahneman

Slovic

Tversky

(1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

32.

Kearney

Gebert

Voelpel

S. C.

(2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 581-598.

33.

Krackhardt

. (1994). Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations. In Carley

Prietula

(Eds.), Computational organizational theory (pp. 89-111). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

34.

La Guardia

J. G.

Ryan

R. M.

Couchman

C. E.

Deci

E. L

. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 367-384.

35.

Lazear

E. P.

Rosen

(1981). Rank order tournaments as an optimum labor contract. Journal of Political Economy, 89, 561-580.

36.

Magee

J. C.

Galinsky

A. D.

(2008). Social hierarchy: The self-reinforcing nature of power and status. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 351-398.

37.

Markus

H. R.

Kitayama

(2010). Cultures and selves: A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 420-430.

38.

Mason

Suri

(2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1-23.

39.

McGrath

J. E.

(1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

40.

Mueller

J. S.

(2012). Why individuals in larger teams perform worse. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 111-124.

41.

Nayar

(2008, October 8). It’s time to invert the management pyramid. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2008/10/its-time-to-invert-the-managem

42.

Neeley

T. B.

(2013). Language matters: Status loss and achieved status distinctions in global organizations. Organization Science, 24, 476-497.

43.

Nisbett

Ross

(1991). The person and the situation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

44.

Pettit

N. C.

Doyle

S. P.

Lount

R. B.

(2016). Cheating to get ahead or to avoid falling behind? The effect of potential negative versus positive status change on unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 172-183.

45.

Rauthmann

J. F.

Gallardo-Pujol

Guillaume

E. M.

Todd

Nav

C. S.

Sherman

R. A.

. . . Funder

D. C.

(2014). The situational Eight DIAMONDS: A taxonomy of major dimensions of situation characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 677-718.

46.

Ronay

Greenaway

Anicich

E. M.

Galinsky

A. D.

(2012). The path to glory is paved with hierarchy when hierarchical differentiation increases group effectiveness. Psychological Science, 23, 669-677.

47.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.

48.

Ryan

R. M.

Deci

E. L.

(2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.

49.

Shrout

P. E.

Bolger

(2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.

50.

Sligte

D. J.

de Dreu

C. K. W.

Nijstad

B. A.

(2011). Power, stability of power, and creativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 891-897.

51.

Staats

B. R.

Milkman

K. L.

Fox

C. R.

(2012). The team scaling fallacy: Underestimating the declining efficiency of larger teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 132-142.

52.

Stasser

Titus

(1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.

53.

Van Bunderen

Greer

L. L.

Van Knippenberg

. (2018). When interteam conflict spirals into intrateam power struggles: The pivotal role of team power structures. Academy of Management Journal, 61, 1100-1130.

54.

Wilson

G. L.

Hanna

M. S.

(1990). Groups in context: Leadership and participation in small groups (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

55.

Woolley

A. W.

Chabris

C. F.

Pentland

Hashmi

Malone

T. W.

(2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science, 330, 686-688.

56.

Wright

T. A.

Bonett

D. G.

(1997). The contribution of burnout to work performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 491-499.

57.

Zitek

E. M.

Tiedens

L. Z.

(2012). The fluency of social hierarchy: The ease with which hierarchical relationships are seen, remembered, learned, and liked. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 98-115.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.23 MB

0.16 MB