Past research has examined women’s subjective satisfaction in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM), but the actual events that correlate with disengagement have not been identified. In this study, workplace conversations of 45 female and male STEM faculty were sampled using the Electronically Activated Recorder, a naturalistic observation method, coded for research or socializing content, and correlated with self-reported job disengagement. Both men and women were less likely to discuss research in conversations with female as compared to male colleagues, and when discussing research with men, women were rated as less competent than men. Consistent with the idea that women in STEM experience social identity threat, discussing research with male colleagues was associated with greater disengagement for women, whereas socializing with male colleagues was associated with less disengagement. These patterns did not hold for men. These findings point to the unique challenges women face in STEM disciplines.
BaumeisterR. F.VohsK. D.FunderD. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396–403.
2.
CialdiniR. (2009). We have to break up. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 5–6.
3.
DaviesP. G.SpencerS. J.QuinnD. M.GerhardsteinR. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615–1628.
4.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.NachreinerF.SchaufeliW. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499–512.
5.
EidM.DienerE. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
HirschJ. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 16569–16572.
7.
InzelichtM.Ben-ZeevT. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why women are susceptible to experience problem-solving deficits in the presence of men. Psychological Science, 11, 365–371.
8.
LukeR. H.DokeE. R. (1987). Marketing journal hierarchies: Faculty perceptions, 1986-1987. Journal of Academy Marketing Science, 15, 74–78.
9.
LynessK. S.ThompsonD. E. (2000). Climbing the corporate ladder: Do female and male executives follow the same route?Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 86–101.
10.
MarxD. M.RomanJ. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women’s math test performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1183–1193.
11.
MehlM. R.HolleranS. E. (2007). An empirical analysis of the obtrusiveness of and participants' compliance with the electronically activated recorder (EAR). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 248–257.
12.
MehlM. R.PennebakerJ. W.CrowM.DabbsJ.PriceJ. (2001). The Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR): A device for sampling naturalistic daily activities and conversations. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 33, 517–523.
13.
MehlM. R.VazireS.HolleranS. E.ClarkC. S. (2010). Eavesdropping on happiness: Well-being is related to having less small talk and more substantive conversations. Psychological Science, 21, 539–541.
14.
MehlM. R.VazireS.Ramirez-EsparzaN.SlatcherR. B.PennebakerJ. W. (2007). Are women really more talkative than men?Science, 317, 82.
15.
MurphyM. C.SteeleC. M.GrossJ. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879–885.
16.
NiemannY. F.DovidioJ. F. (1998). Relationship of solo status, academic rank, and perceived distinctiveness to job satisfaction of racial/ethnic minorities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 55–71.
17.
RobertsonL. J.BeanJ. P. (1998). Women faculty in family and consumer sciences: Influences on job satisfaction. Family and Consumer Science Research Journal, 27, 167–193.
18.
RozinP. (2009). What kind of empirical research should we publish, fund, and reward? A different perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 435–439.
19.
SchmaderT.JohnsM. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440–452.
20.
SettlesI. H.CortinaL. M.MalleyJ.StewartA. J. (2006). The climate for women in academic science: The good, the bad, and the changeable. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 47–58.
21.
SettlesI. H.CortinaL. M.StewartA. J.MalleyJ. (2007). Voice matters: Buffering the impact of a negative climate for women in science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 270–281.
22.
SinghS. N.MishraS.KimD. (1998). Research-related burnout among faculty in higher-education. Psychological Reports, 83, 463–473.
23.
WaberB. N.WuL.AralS.BryjolfssonE.PentlandA. (2008, June). Mining face-to-face interaction networks using sociometric badges: Evidence predicting productivity in IT configuration. Conference presentation at NetSci, Norwich, UK.
24.
SteeleC. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
25.
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 82–96.
26.
WinsteadB. A.DerlegaV. J.MontgomeryM. J.PilkingtonC. (1995). The quality of friendships at work and job satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12, 199–215.
