The present research examined whether women’s daily experience of social identity threat in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) settings is triggered by a lack of acceptance during workplace conversations with male colleagues that then predicts daily experiences of burnout. To test these hypotheses, participants from two samples (N = 389) rated their daily interactions with colleagues across 2 weeks. Results revealed that (1) women reported greater daily experiences of social identity threat on days when their work conversations with men cued a lack of acceptance, (2) these daily fluctuations of social identity threat predicted feelings of mental burnout, and (3) these effects were not found among men or for nonwork-relevant conversations. Additional analyses showed that these results were not driven by highly hostile workplace conversations between men and women, nor were they accounted for by individual differences in women’s sensitivity to perceiving gender bias, status differences, or by women being explicitly undermined by colleagues.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York, NY: Addison.
2.
AnderssonL. M.PearsonC. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471.
3.
ApfelbaumE. P.PhillipsK. W.RichesonJ. A. (2014). Rethinking the baseline in diversity research: Should we be explaining the effects of homogeneity?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 235–244.
4.
AronsonJ.DeeT. (2012). Stereotype threat in the real world. In InzlichtM.SchmaderT.InzlichtM.SchmaderT. (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 264–278). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
BaronR. A.NeumanJ. H. (1996). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence on their relative frequency and potential causes. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 161–173.
6.
BatesD.MaechlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS.ChristensenR. H. B.SingmannH. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4, 2014. R package version, 1, 1–23.
7.
BerdahlJ. L. (2007). Harassment based on sex: Protecting social status in the context of gender hierarchy. Academy of Management Review, 32, 641–658.
8.
BerdahlJ. L.RaverJ. L. (2011). Sexual harassment. In APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 3: Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (pp. 641–669). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9.
BlockK.HallW. M.SchmaderT.InnessM.CroftE. (in press). Should I stay or should I go: Women’s implicit associations predict their commitment and fit in STEM. Social Psychology.
10.
CasadB. J., & BryantW. J. (2016). Addressing stereotype threat is critical to diversity and inclusion in organizational psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 8.
11.
CazaB. B.WrzesniewskiA. (2013). How work shapes well-being. In DavidS. A.BoniwellI.Conley AyersA.DavidS. A.BoniwellI.Conley AyersA. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 693–710). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
CortinaL. M. (2008). Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 33, 55–75.
13.
CortinaL. M.MagleyV. J.WilliamsJ. H.LanghoutR. D. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64–80.
14.
CostafredaS. (2009). Pooling fMRI data: Meta-analysis, mega-analysis and multi-center studies. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 3, 33. doi:10.3389/neuro.11.033.2009
15.
DaviesP. G.SpencerS. J.QuinnD. M.GerhardsteinR. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1615–1628.
16.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.NachreinerF.SchaufeliW. B. (2001). The job demands—Resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 499–512.
17.
DuffyM. K.GansterD. C.PagonM. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331–351.
18.
EaglyA. H. (2016). When passionate advocates meet research on diversity, does the honest broker stand a chance?Journal of Social Issues, 72, 199–222.
19.
FouadN. A.ChangW. H.WanM.SinghR. (2017). Women’s reasons for leaving the engineering field. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00875
20.
GreenT. K.KalevA. (2007). Discrimination-reducing measures at the relational level. Hastings Law Journal, 59, 1435–1461.
21.
HallW. M.SchmaderT.AdayA.InnessM.CroftE. (in press). Climate control: cultural predictors of social identity threat for women in engineering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
22.
HallW. M.SchmaderT.CroftE. (2015). Engineering exchanges: Daily social identity threat predicts burnout among female engineers. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 528–534.
23.
HolleranS. E.WhiteheadJ.SchmaderT.MehlM. R. (2011). Talking shop and shooting the breeze: A study of workplace conversation and job disengagement among STEM faculty. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2, 65–71.
24.
HoxJ. J.LeeuwE. D. (2003). Multilevel models for meta-analysis. In ReiseS. P.DuanN.ReiseS. P.DuanN. (Eds.), Multilevel modeling: Methodological advances, issues, and applications (pp. 90–111). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25.
InzlichtM.TullettA. M.LegaultL.KangS. K. (2011). Lingering effects: Stereotype threat hurts more than you think. Social Issues and Policy Review, 5, 227–256.
26.
JacksonS. E.JoshiA.ErhardtN. L. (2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29, 801–830.
27.
JohnsM.InzlichtM.SchmaderT. (2008). Stereotype threat and executive resource depletion: Examining the influence of emotion regulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 691.
28.
KalokerinosE. K.von HippelC.ZacherH. (2014). Is stereotype threat a useful construct for organizational psychology research and practice?Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 381–402.
29.
KingE. B.HeblM. R.BealD. J. (2009). Conflict and cooperation in diverse workgroups. Journal of Social Issues, 65, 261–285.
30.
LogelC.WaltonG. M.SpencerS. J.IsermanE. C.von HippelW.BellA. E. (2009). Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1089–1103.
31.
MajorB.CrockerJ. (1993). Social stigma: The consequences of attributional ambiguity. In MackieD. M.HamiltonD. L. (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 345–370). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
32.
MaslachC.SchaufeliW. B.LeiterM. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397–422.
33.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
34.
Purdie-VaughnsV.SteeleC. M.DaviesP. G.DitlmannR.CrosbyJ. R. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 615–630.
35.
RaynerC.HoelH. (1997). A summary review of literature relating to workplace bullying. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 7, 181–191.
36.
SackettP. R.RyanA. M. (2012). Concerns about generalizing stereotype threat research findings to operational high-stakes testing. In InzlichtM.SchmanderT. (Eds.), Stereotype threat: Theory, processes, and application (pp. 249–263). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
37.
SchimmackU. (2012). The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. Psychological Methods, 17, 551–566.
38.
SchmaderT.JohnsM.ForbesC. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115, 336–356.
39.
SteeleC. M.AronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797–811.
40.
SteeleC. M.SpencerS. J.AronsonJ. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 379–440.
41.
SteinbergK. K.SmithS. J.StroupD. F.OlkinI.LeeN. C.WilliamsonG. D.ThackerS. B. (1997). Comparison of effect estimates from a meta-analysis of summary data from published studies and from a meta-analysis using individual patient data for ovarian cancer studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 45, 917–925.
42.
SungY. J.SchwanderK.ArnettD. K.KardiaS. L. R.RankinenT.BouchardC.…HuntS. C. (2014). An empirical comparison of meta-analysis and mega-analysis of individual participant data for identifying gene-environment interactions. Genetic Epidemiology, 38, 369–378. doi:10.1002/gepi.21800
43.
von HippelC.SekaquaptewaD.McFarlaneM. (2015). Stereotype threat among women in finance: Negative effects on identity, workplace well-being, and recruiting. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39, 405–414.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
