This research investigated the role of individual differences for the control of attention in the early stages of self-regulation. Theories on the development of addiction posit that repeated substance use alters memory structures referring to the substance through classical conditioning processes, leading to the attention-grabbing properties of the substance. The authors predicted that such memory structures influence attentional processes toward the substance, but only in individuals with low executive control. One executive function that is closely related to attention control is working memory capacity. Using eye-tracking methodology, the authors found individual differences in an alcohol single category implicit association test to predict indicators of attention allocation such as initial orienting and attention maintenance for social drinkers low but not high in working memory capacity. This effect primarily resulted from the controlled attention component as opposed to the short-term memory component of working memory capacity. Implications and directions for further research are discussed.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
BaddeleyA. D.HitchG. (1974). Working memory. In . In BowerG. A. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 47–89). Vol. 8, New York: Academic Press.
3.
BarrettL. F.TugadeM. M.EngleR. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 553–573.
4.
BaumeisterR. F.HeathertonT. F.TiceD. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5.
BluemkeM.FrieseM. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Single-Target IAT (ST-IAT): Assessing automatic affect toward multiple attitude objects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 977–997.
6.
ConwayA. R. A.CowanN.BuntingM. F.TherriaultD. J.MinkoffS. R. B. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163–183.
7.
ConwayA. R. A.KaneM. J.BuntingM. F.HambrickD. Z.WilhelmO.EngleR. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786.
8.
CowanN. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
CoxW. M.FadardiJ. S.PothosE. M. (2006). The addiction-Stroop test: Theoretical considerations and procedural recommendations. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 443–476.
10.
CoxW. M.YeatesG. N.ReganC. M. (1999). Effects of alcohol cues on cognitive processing in heavy and light drinkers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 55, 85–89.
11.
CurtisC. E.D’EspositoM. (2003). Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 415–423.
12.
De HouwerJ.Teige-MocigembaS.SpruytA.MoorsA. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347–368.
13.
De HouwerJ.ThomasS.BaeyensF. (2001). Associative learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 853–869.
14.
EgloffB.SchmukleS. C. (2002). Predictive validity of an implicit association test for assessing anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1441–1455.
15.
EngleR. W.TuholskiS. W.LaughlinJ. E.ConwayA. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.
16.
FazioR. H.OlsonM. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.
17.
FiedlerK.MessnerC.BluemkeM. (2006). Unresolved problems with the “I,” the “A,” and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the implicit association test (IAT). European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 74–147.
18.
FieldM.ChristiansenP.ColeJ.GoudieA. (2007). Delay discounting and the alcohol Stroop in heavy drinking adolescents. Addiction, 102, 579–586.
19.
FieldM.CoxW. M. (2008). Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 97, 1–20.
20.
FieldM.DukaT.EastwoodB.ChildR.SantarcangeloM.GaytonM. (2007). Experimental manipulation of attentional biases in heavy drinkers: Do the effects generalise?Psychopharmacology, 192, 593–608.
21.
FieldM.MunafòM. R.FrankenI. H. A. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 589–607.
22.
FlemingM. F.BarryK. L.MacDonaldR. (1991). The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) in a college sample. International Journal of the Addictions, 26, 1173–1185.
23.
FrankenI. H. A. (2003). Drug craving and addiction: Integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 27, 563–579.
24.
FrieseM.HofmannW. (2009). Control me or I will control you: Impulses, trait self-control, and the guidance of behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 795–805.
25.
FrieseM.HofmannW.SchmittM. (2008). When and why do implicit measures predict behavior? Empirical evidence for the moderating role of opportunity, motivation, and process reliance. European Review of Social Psychology, 19, 285–338.
26.
FrieseM.HofmannW.WänkeM. (2008). When impulses take over: Moderated predictive validity of explicit and implicit attitude measures in predicting food choice and consumption behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 397–419.
27.
FukudaK.VogelE. K. (2009). Human variation in overriding attentional capture. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8726–8733.
28.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731.
29.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R.RudmanL. A.FarnhamS. D.NosekB. A.MellottD. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3–25.
30.
GreenwaldA. G.NosekB. A.BanajiM. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test I: An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.
31.
HofmannW.De HouwerJ.PeruginiM.BaeyensF.CrombezG. (in press). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin.
32.
HofmannW.FrieseM.RoefsA. (2009). Three ways to resist temptation: The independent contributions of executive attention, inhibitory control, and affect regulation to the impulse control of eating behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 431–435.
33.
HofmannW.FrieseM.StrackF. (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 162–176.
34.
HofmannW.GschwendnerT.FrieseM.WiersR.SchmittM. (2008). Working memory capacity and self-regulatory behavior: Towards an individual differences perspective on behavior determination by automatic versus controlled processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 962–977.
35.
JaeggiS. M.BuschkuehlM.JonidesJ.PerrigW. J. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 105, 6829–6833.
36.
KaneM. J.ConwayA. R. A.HambrickD. Z.EngleR. W. (2007). Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control. In ConwayA. R. A.JarroldC.KaneM. J.MiyakeA.TowseJ. N. (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp. 21–48). New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
KaneM. J.EngleR. W. (2002). The role of prefrontal cortex in working memory capacity, executive attention, and general fluid intelligence: An individual differences perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 637–671.
38.
KarpinskiA.SteinmanR. B. (2006). The single category implicit association test as a measure of implicit social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16–32.
39.
KlauerK. C.SchmitzF.Teige-MocigembaS.VossA. (in press). Understanding the role of executive control in the implicit association test: Why flexible people have small IAT effects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
40.
KlauerK. C.VossA.SchmitzF.Teige-MocigembaS. (2007). Process components of the implicit association test: A diffusion-model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 353–368.
41.
KnudsenE. I. (2007). Fundamental components of attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 30, 57–78.
42.
LangP. J.BradleyM. M.CuthbertB. N. (2005). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual (Tech. Rep. A-6). Gainesville: University of Florida.
43.
MacLeodC.MathewsA.TataP. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15–20.
44.
MillerB. T.D’EspositoM. (2005). Searching for “the top” in top-down control. Neuron, 48, 535–538.
45.
MillerE. K.CohenJ. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 167–202.
46.
NormanD. A.ShalliceT. (1986). Attention to action. Willed and automatic control of behavior. In DavidsonR. J.SchwartzG. E.ShapiroD. (Eds.), Consciousness and self regulation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum.
47.
OberauerK.SüßH.-M.SchulzeR.WilhelmO.WittmannW. W. (2000). Working memory capacity—Facets of a cognitive ability construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 1017–1045.
48.
OlsonM. A.FazioR. H. (2001). Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12, 413–417.
49.
RobinsonT. E.BerridgeK. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 18, 247–291.
50.
RodriguezM. L.MischelW.ShodaY. (1989). Cognitive person variables in the delay of gratification of older children at-risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 358–367.
51.
SaundersJ. B.AaslandO. G.BaborT. F.de la FuenteJ. R.GrantM. (1993). Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction, 88, 791–804.
52.
SchoenmakersT.WiersR. W.FieldM. (2008). Effects of a low dose of alcohol on cognitive biases and craving in heavy drinkers. Psychopharmacology, 197, 169–178.
53.
ShodaY.MischelW.PeakeP. K. (1990). Predicting adolescent cognitive and self-regulatory competencies from preschool delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic conditions. Developmental Psychology, 26, 978–986.
54.
StrackF.DeutschR. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247.
55.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.).
Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
56.
ThushC.WiersR. W.AmesS. L.GrenardJ. L.SussmanS.StacyA. W. (2008). Interactions between implicit and explicit cognition and working memory capacity in the prediction of alcohol use in at-risk adolescents. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 94, 116–124.
57.
TiffanyS. T. (1990). A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: Role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychological Review, 97, 147–168.
58.
UnsworthN.SchrockJ. C.EngleR. W. (2004). Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 1302–1321.
59.
WittenbrinkB.SchwarzN. (Eds.). (2007). Implicit measures of attitudes. New York: Guilford.
