This research examines the effects of intergroup contact on readiness to acknowledge in-group responsibility for atrocities and harm committed in the past. One correlational study (N = 284) set in the context of the postconflict intergroup relations of Bosnia and Herzegovina found that good-quality contact with members from the victim group predicted acknowledgment of in-group responsibility through an increase in perspective taking and a decrease in perceived victimhood. Ordinary Serbian adolescents who engaged in contact with Bosnian Muslims were more ready to acknowledge that their own group was responsible for atrocities committed during the 1992-1995 war. Practical and social implications of these findings are discussed.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York: Perseus.
2.
BaehrP. (2000). The portable Hannah Arendt. Organized guilt and universal responsibility. New York: Penguin.
3.
Bar-TalD. (2000). Shared beliefs in a society: Social psychological analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Bar-TalD.BenninkG. H. (2004). The nature of reconciliation as an outcome and as a process. In Bar-Siman-TovY. (Ed.), From conflict resolution to reconciliation (pp. 11–38). New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Bar-TalD.CehajicS. (in press). The road to violent conflict and then to reconciliation: The case of war in the former Yugoslavia. In SpiniD. (Eds.), Facing massive violence and social change: Collective experiences in former Yugoslavia.
6.
BinderJ.ZagefkaH.BrownR.FunkeF.KesslerT.MummendeyA. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis amongst majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 843–856.
7.
BranscombeN. R.DoosjeB. (2004). Collective guilt: International perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BranscombeN. R.DoosjeB.McGartyC. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of collective guilt. In MackieD. M.SmithE. R. (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 49–66). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
9.
BranscombeN. R.MironA. M. (2004). Interpreting the ingroup’s negative actions toward another group: Emotional reactions to appraised harm. In TiedensL. Z.LeachC. W. (Eds.), The social life of emotions (pp. 314–335). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BranscombeN. R.SlugoskiB.KappenD. M. (2004). The measurement of collective guilt: what it is and what it is not. In BranscombeN.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 16–34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BrewerM. B.BrownR. J. (1998). Intergroup relations. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T.LindzeyG. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology. (4th ed., pp. 554–594).
New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
BrownR.CehajicS. (2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: Mediators of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 669–684.
13.
BrownR.GonzalezR.ZagefkaH.ManziJ.CehajicS. (2008). Nuestra culpa: Collective guilt as a predictor for reparation for historical wrong-doing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 75–90.
14.
BrownR.HewstoneM. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 255–343). London: Elsevier.
15.
BrownR.MarasP.MasserB.VivianJ.HewstoneM. (2001). Life on the ocean wave: Testing some intergroup hypotheses in a naturalistic setting. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4(2):81–97.
16.
CalicM. J. (2009). Ethnic cleansing and war crimes. In IngraoC.EmmertT. A. (Eds.), Confronting the Yugoslav controversies (pp. 115–151). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
17.
ČehajićS.BrownR. (2008). Not in my name: A social psychological study of antecedents and consequences of acknowledgment of ingroup atrocities. Genocide Studies and Prevention, 3(2):195–212.
18.
ČehajićS.BrownR.CastanoE. (2008). Forgive and forget? Antecedents and consequences of intergroup forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Political Psychology, 29, 351–368.
19.
ČehajićS.HalperinE. (2009). Supporting reparation through group-based guilt: The central role of self-affirmation and acknowledgment of ingroup responsibility. Manuscript under review.
20.
CohenS. (2001). States of denial: Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
21.
CookS. W. (1962). The systematic analysis of socially significant events: A strategy for social research. Journal of Social Issues, 18, 66–84.
DoosjeB.BranscombeN. R.SpearsR.MansteadA. S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one's group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872–886.
24.
EllerA.AbramsD. (2003). “Gringos” in Mexico: Cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of language school-promoted contact on intergroup bias. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 55–75.
25.
GilbertM. (2001). Collective remorse. In JokicA. (Ed.), War crimes and collective wrongdoings (pp. 216–235). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
26.
HewstoneM.CairnsE.VociA.McLernonF.NiensU.NoorM. (2004). Intergroup forgiveness and guilt in Northern Ireland: Social psychological dimensions of “the troubles.” In BranscombeN. R.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 193–215). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
HewstoneM.RubinM.WillisH. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575–604.
28.
IgnatieffM. (1994). Blood and belonging. Journeys into the new nationalism. London: Vintage.
29.
Internal Displacement and Monitoring Centre. (2009). Bosnia and Herzegovina: A profile of the internal displacement situation. Retrieved fromwww.internal-displacement.org
IyerA.LeachC. W.CrosbyF. J. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117–129.
32.
LeachC. W.IyerA.PedersenA. (2006). Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1232–1245.
33.
LederachJ. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: U.S. Institute of Peace Press.
34.
McGartyC.PedersonA.LeachC. W.MansellT.WallerJ.BliucA.-M. (2005). Group-based guilt as a predictor of commitment to apology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 659–680.
35.
MinowM. (1998). Between vengeance and forgiveness: Facing history after genocide and mass violence. Boston: Beacon.
36.
NadlerA.LiviatanI. (2004). Intergroup reconciliation process in Israel: Theoretical analysis and empirical findings. In BranscombeN. R.DoosjeB. (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 216–235). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
NoorM.BrownR.GonzalezR.ManziJ.LewisC. A. (2008). On positive psychological outcomes: What helps groups with a history of conflict to forgive and reconcile with each other?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 819–832.
38.
PettigrewT. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.
39.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
40.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922–934.
41.
RametS. P. (2007). The denial syndrome and its consequences: Serbian political culture since 2000. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 40, 41–58.
42.
StamkoskiG. (2002). With no peace to keep: United Nations peacekeeping and the wars in former Yugoslavia. London: Volatile Media.
43.
StaubE. (2006). Reconciliation after genocide, mass killing, or intractable conflict: Understanding the roots of violence, psychological recovery, and steps toward a general theory. Political Psychology, 27, 867–894.
44.
StaubE. (2007, March). Reconciliation and the prevention of group violence: From Rwanda and the Congo to contemporary terrorism. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the British Psychological Society, Kent, UK.
45.
StephanW. G.Diaz-LovingR.DuranA. (2000). Integrated threat theory and intercultural attitudes: Mexico and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 240–249.
46.
TutuD. (1999). No future without forgiveness. London: Rider.
47.
VociA.HewstoneM. (2003). Intergroup contact and prejudice towards immigrants in Italy: The mediational role of anxiety and the moderational role of group salience. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 6, 37–54.
48.
WohlM. J. A.BranscombeN. R.KlarY. (2006). Collective guilt: Emotional reactions when one’s group has done wrong or been wronged. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 1–37.
49.
ZagefkaH.BrownR. (2002). The relationship between acculturation strategies, relative fit and intergroup relations: Immigrant-majority relations in Germany. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 171–188.
