Two large-scale surveys conducted in Israel (Study 1A) and the Palestinian Authority (Study 1B) show that the belief by group members that people in the “enemy” group acknowledge their victimhood (i.e., Holocaust and Nakba for Jews and Palestinians, respectively) is associated with Israeli-Jews’ readiness to accept responsibility for Palestinian sufferings and offer apologies. For Palestinians, this belief is linked to a perceived higher likelihood of a reconciled future with Israelis. Three field experiments demonstrate that a manipulated high level of acknowledgment of Jewish victimhood by Palestinians (Studies 2 and 4) and of Palestinian victimhood by Israeli-Jews (Study 3) caused greater readiness to make concessions for the sake of peace on divisive issues (e.g., Jerusalem, the 1967 borders, the right of return) and increased conciliatory attitudes. Additional analyses indicate the mediating role of increased trust and reduced emotional needs in these relationships.
Alarcón-HenríquezA.LicataL.LeysC.van der LindenN.KleinO.MercyA. (2010). Recognition of shared past sufferings, trust and improving intergroup attitudes in Belgium. Revista de Psicología, 28, 81-110.
2.
AndrighettoL.MariS.VolpatoC.BehluliB. (2012). Reducing competitive victimhood in Kosovo: The role of extended contact and common ingroup identity. Political Psychology, 33, 513-529.
3.
AuerbachY. (2009). The reconciliation pyramid—A narrative-based framework for analyzing identity conflicts. Political Psychology, 30, 291-318.
4.
BanduraA. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193-209.
5.
Bar-TalD. (2013). Intractable conflicts: Socio-psychological foundations and dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BerinskyA. J.HuberG. A.LenzG. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351-368.
7.
ByrneB. M. (2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
ČehajićS.BrownR. (2010). Silencing the past: Effects of intergroup contact on acknowledgment of ingroup responsibility. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 190-196.
9.
DavidR.ChoiS. Y. P. (2009). Getting even or getting equal? Retributive desires and transitional justice. Political Psychology, 30, 161-192.
10.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160.
11.
GublerJ. R.HalperinE.HirschbergerG. (2015). Humanizing the outgroup in contexts of protracted intergroup conflict. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2, 36-46.
12.
HalperinE.RussellA. G.TrzesniewskiK. H.GrossJ. J.DweckC. S. (2011). Promoting the Middle East peace process by changing beliefs about group malleability. Science, 333, 1767-1769.
13.
HameiriB.PoratR.Bar-TalD.BielerA.HalperinE. (2014). Paradoxical thinking as a new avenue of intervention to promote peace. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 10996-11001.
14.
HameiriB.SharvitK.Bar-TalD.ShaharE.HalperinE. (2016). Support for self-censorship among Israelis as a barrier to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Political Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/pops.12346
15.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16.
KalayjianA. S.ShahinianS. P.GergerianE. L.SaraydarianL. (1996). Coping with Ottoman Turkish genocide: An exploration of the experience of Armenian survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9, 87-97.
17.
KlarY.Schori-EyalN.KlarY. (2013). The “never again” State of Israel: The emergence of the Holocaust as a core feature of Israeli identity and its four incongruent voices. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 125-143.
18.
LeidnerB.CastanoE.ZaiserE.Giner-SorollaR. (2010). Ingroup glorification, moral disengagement, and justice in the context of collective violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1115-1129.
19.
MaerckerA.PovilonyteM.LianovaR.PöhlmannK. (2009). Is acknowledgement of trauma a protective factor? The sample case of refugees from Chechnya. European Psychologist, 14, 249-254.
20.
NadlerA. (2002). Postresolution processes: Instrumental and socioemotional routes to reconciliation. In SalomonG.NevoB. (Eds.), Peace education: The concept, principles, and practices around the world (pp. 127-144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
NadlerA. (2012). Intergroup reconciliation: Definitions, processes, and future directions. In TroppL. R. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of intergroup conflict (pp. 291-309). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
NadlerA.LiviatanI. (2006). Intergroup reconciliation: Effects of adversary’s expressions of empathy, responsibility, and recipients’ trust. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 459-470.
23.
NadlerA.ShnabelN. (2008). Instrumental and socioemotional paths to intergroup reconciliation and the needs-based model of socioemotional reconciliation. In NadlerA.MalloyT. E.FisherJ. D. (Eds.), Social psychology of intergroup reconciliation: From violent conflict to peaceful co-existence (pp. 37-56). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
NadlerA.ShnabelN. (2015). Intergroup reconciliation: Instrumental and socio-emotional processes and the needs-based model. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 93-125.
25.
NoorM.BrownR.PrenticeG. (2008). Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: A new model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 481-495.
26.
NoorM.ShnabelN.HalabiS.NadlerA. (2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 351-374.
27.
PaezD.LiuJ. H. (2011). Collective memory of conflicts. In Bar-TalD. (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 105-124). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
28.
Schori-EyalN.HalperinE.Bar-TalD. (2014). Three layers of collective victimhood: Effects of multileveled victimhood on intergroup conflicts in the Israeli-Arab context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 778-794.
29.
ShamirM.ArianA. (1999). Collective identity and electoral competition in Israel. American Political Science Review, 93, 265-277.
30.
ShnabelN.HalabiS.NoorM. (2013). Overcoming competitive victimhood and facilitating forgiveness through re-categorization into a common victim or perpetrator identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 867-877.
31.
ShnabelN.NadlerA. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116-132.
32.
ShnabelN.NadlerA. (2015). The role of agency and morality in reconciliation processes: The perspective of the needs-based model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 477-483.
33.
ShnabelN.NadlerA.DovidioJ. F. (2014). Beyond need satisfaction: Empowering and accepting messages from third parties ineffectively restore trust and consequent reconciliation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 126-140.
34.
ShnabelN.NadlerA.UllrichJ.DovidioJ. F.CarmiD. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1021-1030.
35.
SimanTov-NachlieliI.ShnabelN.HalabiS. (2015). Winning the victim status can open conflicting groups to reconciliation: Evidence from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 139-145.
36.
SkitkaL. J.BaumanC. W.MullenE. (2004). Political tolerance and coming to psychological closure following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks: An integrative approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 743-756.
37.
SorekT. (2011). The quest for victory: Collective memory and national identification among the Arab-Palestinian citizens of Israel. Sociology, 45, 464-479.
38.
VolkanV. (2006). Killing in the name of identity: A study of bloody conflicts. Charlottesville, VA: Pitchstone.
39.
VollhardtJ. R. (2009). The role of victim beliefs in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Risk or potential for peace?Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 15, 135-159.
40.
VollhardtJ. R.BilaliR. (2015). The role of inclusive and exclusive victim consciousness in predicting intergroup attitudes: Findings from Rwanda, Burundi, and DRC. Political Psychology, 36, 489-506.
41.
VollhardtJ. R.MazurL. B.LemahieuM. (2014). Acknowledgment after mass violence: Effects on psychological well-being and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17, 306-323.
42.
WohlM. J. A.BranscombeN. R. (2008). Remembering historical victimization: Collective guilt for current ingroup transgression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 988-1006.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
