The objective of the study was to evaluate the mechanical properties of living human knee cartilage using our ultrasonic device, and to compare the measurements with respect to cartilage degeneration and aging.
Design
A total of 95 knees which had undergone arthroscopic knee surgery, from 88 patients, were included in the study, with informed consent. All procedures were reviewed and approved by the ethical committee of our hospital. In the study group, there were 41 men, 47 women, 39 right knees, and 56 left knees. The conditions primarily included knee osteoarthritis and anterior cruciate ligament rupture. The mean operative age was 44.1 years old (range = 10-83). We compared mechanical properties of the knee cartilage with respect to aging and gender, in comparison with normal cartilage. A P value of <0.05 represented statistical significance.
Results
In the context of the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification of cartilage degeneration (grade 0-3), the signal intensity in grade 0 was significantly larger than that in grade 1, 2, or 3. The thickness in grade 0 was significantly higher than that in grade 1, 2, or 3. Normal cartilage in older women had the lowest signal intensity and the least cartilage thickness among all the groups.
Conclusion
The ultrasonic system we developed was able to detect early degenerative changes in living cartilage in knees. The lowest signal intensity and least cartilage thickness in normal cartilage among older women were correlated to a large prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in women.
Articular cartilage is a special type of connective tissue consisting of solid and fluid phases. Its main function is to provide a low-friction surface with a reasonable degree of lubrication to the underlying subchondral bone.1,2 Hip or knee osteoarthritis, also referred to as degenerative joint disease, is a slow destructive process of joints that affects millions of people worldwide. Although the exact biochemical cause of osteoarthritis remains unknown, the process usually begins with abnormal joint structures or with unusually high stress placed on joint surfaces.3,4 The incidence of osteoarthritis is influenced by many factors, such as work, sports participation, musculoskeletal injuries, obesity, and gender. With the aging and increasing obesity of the world’s population, health professions need to prepare for a large increase in the demand for health services to treat hip and knee osteoarthritis.5 A measurement system capable of detecting cartilage degeneration and aging would be very useful in diagnosing and managing cartilage disorders. Hybrid PET-CT and PET-MRI allow integration of high-resolution structural information on CT and MRI with metabolic information obtained from PET related to osteoarthritis disease process.6
We developed an ultrasound assessment system to assess mechanical properties of cartilage, including stiffness, surface roughness, and thickness of joints such as knee.7,8 We also used an arthroscopic probe with a diameter of 3 mm, slightly smaller than that used in knee arthroscopy. Thus, we were able to assess the mechanical properties of living human knee cartilage using arthroscopy and the assessment system and probe we developed.
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the mechanical properties of living human knee cartilage using the ultrasonic system we developed, and to compare changes with respect to cartilage degeneration and aging. We compared the mechanical properties of living knee cartilage at different grades of the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) classification (cartilage degeneration), and at grade 0, we compared the mechanical properties with respect to age and gender (cartilage aging).
Materials and Methods
During arthroscopy, acoustic evaluation is used to assess mechanical properties of cartilage, including stiffness, surface roughness, and thickness of the surrounding knee cartilage. The ultrasound assessment system we developed and used provides quantitative information on tissue properties.7-10 Briefly, the system8 consists of a digital oscilloscope, personal computer, and a transducer and pulser/receiver (Panametrics Japan, Tokyo, Japan). The diameter of the transducer, such as an arthroscopic ultrasonic probe, is approximately 3 mm. The central frequency of the ultrasound wave is 10 MHz. As the wave passes through interfaces between media of different acoustic impedances, reflections return to the transducer and generate electrical signals in the transducer proportional to the intensity.11 Mori et al.8 reported the validation study for this method. Figure 1 depicts measurement of cartilage mechanical properties using an arthroscopic ultrasonic probe; the probe was placed perpendicular to the measured cartilage surface because we could change the angle of the tip of probe by 5 grades from 0° to 90°. Therefore, as shown in Figure 1, we could examine the mechanical properties of the femoral condyle (Fig. 1A), tibial plateau (Fig. 1B), trochlea (Fig. 1C), and patella (Fig. 1D). Figure 1E shows the entire whole of the probe.
(A) The mechanical properties in the femoral condyle were measured. (B) The mechanical properties in the tibial plateau were measured. (C) The mechanical properties in the trochlea were measured. (D) The mechanical properties in the patella were measured. (E) The entire whole of the probe.
Patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria (needed arthroscopic knee surgery and provided informed consent) over a 3-year period were enrolled. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before their participation. All procedures were reviewed and approved by the research ethics committee of our hospital, and the study was performed in accordance with the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki.
To assess cartilage degeneration, each point was examined via arthroscopic assessment using the ICRS classification (grades 0, 1, 2, and 3); mechanical properties were also assessed and compared with respect to the ICRS classification. In grade 0 per ICRS classification, which was considered normal cartilage, we compared mechanical properties of the knee cartilage with respect to aging and gender.
A two-sample one-sided and Mann-Whitney U test were used to perform statistical comparison of cartilage mechanical properties and ICRS classification to assess cartilage degeneration, or age and gender to assess cartilage aging. The level of statistical significance was set to P value < 0.05.
Results
Eighty-eight patients and 95 knee joints were enrolled. There were 41 men, 47 women, 39 right knee joints, and 56 left knee joints. The mean operative age was 44.1 years old (range = 10-83 years). The conditions were the following: 30 cases of knee osteoarthritis, 26 cases of ligament injuries, 17 cases of osteonecrosis, and 15 cases of cartilage injuries. In terms of ICRS classification, there were 663 points in grade 0, 87 points in grade 1, 93 points in grade 2, and 51 points in grade 3.
With respect to cartilage degeneration, the comparison of cartilage stiffness with ICRS classification is shown in Figure 2A. The stiffness in grade 0 was significantly higher than those of grades 1, 2, and 3 (P < 0.0001). Stiffness in grade 1 was significantly higher than that in grade 3 (P = 0.0035). The comparison of cartilage surface roughness with ICRS classification is shown in Figure 2B. Surface roughness in grade 0 was significantly lower than that in grade 1 (P = 0.0024). Comparison of cartilage thickness with ICRS classification is shown in Figure 2C. Thickness in grade 0 is significantly greater than that in grade 1, 2, or 3 (P < 0.0001). Thickness in grade 1 is significantly greater than that in grade 2 or 3 (P < 0.0001). Thickness in grade 2 is significantly greater than that in grade 3 (P = 0.0047).
(A) The comparison of cartilage stiffness with ICRS classification. (B) The comparison of cartilage surface roughness with ICRS classification. (C) The comparison of cartilage thickness with ICRS classification. ICRS = International Cartilage Repair Society.
With respect to cartilage aging, the comparison of cartilage stiffness among the four groups is shown in Figure 3A. Stiffness in females of age more than 45 years is significantly lower than that in the other three groups. Comparison of cartilage thickness among the four groups is shown in Figure 3B. Thickness in females of age more than 45 years is significantly lower than that in the other three groups. Stiffness in females of age less than 45 years is significantly lower than that in males of age less than 45 years. This showed that normal cartilage in the younger group had higher signal intensity, lesser surface irregularity, and greater thickness than that in the older group. Normal cartilage in men had higher signal intensity, lesser surface irregularity, and greater thickness than that in women. Normal cartilage in older women had the lowest signal intensity and lowest cartilage thickness among all groups.
(A) The comparison of cartilage stiffness with 4 groups. (B) The comparison of cartilage thickness with 4 groups. YM = male less than 45 years old; YF = female less than 45 years old; OM = male more than 45 years old; OF = female more than 45 years old.
Discussion
The main findings of the present study are the following. In terms of cartilage degeneration, stiffness in grade 0 was significantly higher than that in grade 1, 2, or 3 (P < 0.0001). Stiffness in grade 1 was significantly higher than that in grade 3 (P = 0.0035). Surface roughness in grade 0 was significantly lesser than that in grade 1 (P = 0.0024). Thickness in grade 0 was significantly greater than that in grade 1, 2, or 3 (P < 0.0001). Thickness in grade 1 was significantly greater than that in grade 2 or 3 (P < 0.0001). Thickness in grade 2 was significantly greater than that in grade 3 (P = 0.0047). In terms of cartilage aging, stiffness in females of age more than 45 years was significantly lower than that in the other three groups. Thickness in females of age more than 45 years was significantly lesser than that in the other three groups. Stiffness in females of age less than 45 years was significantly lower than that in males of age less than 45 years. Thus, the ultrasonic system we developed was able to detect early degenerative changes in living cartilage in knee joints.
In assessing the mechanical properties of cartilage, Prakash et al.12 showed that arthroscopic near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) could substantially enhance identification of damaged cartilage by enabling quantitative evaluation of cartilage biomechanical properties. Svard et al.13 showed that cartilage degeneration could be identified both with mechanical indentation and T2-mapping in MRI. To evaluate changes in cartilage or meniscus thickness using MRI, Pelletier et al.14 showed that a single intraarticular corticosteroid injection in knee osteoarthritis was safe with no negative impact on structural changes, but that there was a transient meniscal thickness reduction. Paranjape et al.15 developed a cartilage stress test to measure the in vivo strain response of tibial cartilage in healthy human subjects to walking exercises. Karpinski et al.16 showed that vibroarthrography could be an effective, low-cost and accurate diagnostic modality for the evaluation of cartilage damage in tibio-femoral joints and in patella-femoral joints.17 Using our system, the stiffness, surface roughness and thickness of living human articular cartilage can be measured.
There have been some reports of measurement of cartilage characteristics using ultrasonic systems. Bedewi et al.18 reported that women have a thinner cartilage than men, in a group of healthy adults. Another study showed that in a group of diabetes mellitus patients, females tended to have thinner femoral cartilage at both medial femoral condyles.19 Schmitz et al.20 found that individuals who walked with a greater peak internal knee-extensor moment during gait had a cartilage structure that is generally considered beneficial in a healthy population. Shimizu et al.21 reported that their ultrasound measurement system offered potential for the detection of subtle change in cartilage. The measure of maximum magnitude was found to be particularly useful for quantitative assessment of the medial femoral condyle articular cartilage, and their system was useful for diagnosis of degenerate cartilage at the early stage.21 Our system is able to measure stiffness, surface roughness, and thickness of living human articular cartilage, and it was able to detect early degenerative changes in living cartilage in knee joints.
As previously described, Mori et al.7,8 developed a device to measure the mechanical properties of the articular cartilages via ultrasound. Several studies that utilized this device reported significant results in terms of the mechanical properties of articular cartilages in humans and rabbits.9,10,22-24 Hattori et al.25 reported that the acoustic properties of living human cartilage differ between the knee and ankle joints, as observed using his arthroscopic ultrasonic probe and Mori’s system. Using Mori’s system and their arthroscopic ultrasonic probe, Nakagawa’s study demonstrated that the mean values of stiffness (relative value) and surface roughness at mosaicplasty in the Theracurmin® group were not significantly different from those in the placebo group. However, stiffness and surface roughness at second-look arthroscopy in the Theracurmin® group were significantly improved compared with the placebo group.26 No significant differences existed in cartilage thickness between the two groups in the study. The study of Nicoliche et al.27 demonstrated no increase in cartilage thickness in knees of rats with induced arthritis treated with curcumin, and it was similar to these results. Kuroki et al.22 found that modified Mankin’s score was significantly correlated with stiffness and surface roughness.
In the relationship between cartilage degeneration and ultrasonic assessment, sonoelastography has been used to assess stiffness of the articular cartilage, hypothesizing that pathological cartilage was softer than normal cartilage.28,29 The measured instantaneous modulus in healthy cartilage was found to be significantly larger than that in diseased cartilage, and the thickness in healthy cartilage was significantly greater than that in diseased cartilage.30 Although the very earliest osteoarthritis stages may result in an increase in cartilage thickness, the development and progression of clinical osteoarthritis are commonly characterized by structural changes, including erosion and loss of articular cartilage.31,32 Surface roughness metrics were found to be sensitive to degenerative morphologic changes, and may be useful in osteoarthritis characterization and early diagnosis.33 Seitz et al.34 reported that the medial compartment of the knee was much more affected by degenerative changes than the lateral compartment and suggested that the menisci were potentially degenerative earlier than the adjacent articular cartilage. We are able to measure stiffness, surface roughness, and thickness of human living articular cartilage using our system, and these three parameters were distinguishable between normal cartilage and degenerative stages per the ICRS cartilage classification.
In terms of the relationship of mechanical properties of cartilage with healthy cartilage or aging, Peters et al.35 reported that cartilage shear modulus was strongly correlated to age, and Unal et al.36 insisted that aggregate modulus of older specimens was significantly lower than that of young specimens. In terms of cartilage thickness, Wang and Liang37 reported that the thickness of articular cartilage was gradually thinner at different ages. Bedewi18 and Baboli et al.38 showed that cartilage volume and thickness were significantly higher in male than female participants. Babayeva et al.39 showed that femoral cartilage thickness was greater among athletes than among sedentary individuals, and suggested that sports participation was an independent factor associated with right and left mean femoral cartilage thickness. In the present study, in terms of cartilage aging, the stiffness in females of age more than 45 years was significantly lesser than that in the other three groups. The thickness in females of age more than 45 years was significantly lesser than that in the other three groups.
In terms of the relationship between early knee osteoarthritis and mechanical properties of the cartilage, Knecht et al.40 reported that static modulus decreased below 80% of healthy controls and dynamic moduli below 30% of controls in early osteoarthritis. Fibril-reinforced poroelastic (FRPE) modeling revealed that non-fibrillar matrix modulus was higher in the healthy group compared with the early osteoarthritis and advanced osteoarthritis groups. The initial fibril network modulus was also higher in the healthy group compared with the early and advanced osteoarthritis groups.41,42 It was suggested that early degeneration could occur in the cartilage matrix prior to morphological changes, such as the loss of cartilage thickness.43 Early degeneration was found to occur in various knee cartilage compartments after acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture, especially in the superficial layer of lateral tibia.44 Storage modulus of osteoarthritis cartilage was shown to be significantly lower than that of healthy cartilage while having a higher capacity to hold water. Following mechanical testing, a significant increase in surface roughness of osteoarthritis cartilage was found.45 Nakamura et al.46 reported that stress relaxation optical coherence straingraphy could tomographically and nondestructively detect and visualize changes in the distribution of viscoelastic properties of articular cartilage in early osteoarthritis. In the present study, the ultrasonic system we developed was able to detect early degenerative changes in living cartilage in knee joints. In terms of cartilage aging, stiffness in females of age more than 45 years was significantly lesser than that in the other three groups. Thickness in females of age more than 45 years was significantly lesser than that in the other three groups. Mean cartilage stiffness and thickness in females of age more than 45 years were slightly similar to those of ICRS grade 1 cartilage. This may be one of the underlying factors for the overwhelmingly larger occurrence of knee osteoarthritis in females compared with males.
The limitations of the present study are in the relatively small number of cases (88), and the fact that it was an observational study and not longitudinal.
In conclusion, the ultrasonic system we developed was able to detect early degenerative changes in living cartilage in knee joints. The lowest signal intensity and least cartilage thickness in normal cartilage among older women were correlated to a large prevalence of knee osteoarthritis in women.
Footnotes
Authors’ Note
This manuscript has not been submitted or is not simultaneously being submitted elsewhere, and that no portion of the data has been or will be published in proceedings or transactions of meetings or symposium volumes.
Acknowledgments and Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethics Approval
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the institutional review board.
Informed Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before conducting this study.
EcksteinFPeterfyC.A 20 years of progress and future of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) of cartilage and articular tissue personal perspective. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;45(6):639-47.
3.
FelsonDTLawrenceRCHochbergMCMcAlindonTDieppePAMinorMA, et al. Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 2: treatment approaches. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:726-37.
4.
SmalleyWERayWADaughertyJRGriffinMR.Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the incidence of hospitalizations for peptic ulcer disease in elderly persons. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;141:539-45.
5.
CrossMSmithEHoyDNolteSAckermanIFransenM, et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1323-30.
6.
HayashiDRoemerFWGuermaziA.Imaging of osteoarthritis by conventional radiography, MR imaging, PET-computed tomography, and PET-MR imaging. PET Clin. 2019;14(1):17-29.
7.
HattoriKMoriKHabataTTakakuraYIkeuchiK.Measurement of the mechanical condition of articular cartilage with an ultrasonic probe: quantitative evaluation using wavelet transformation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003;18(6):553-7.
8.
MoriKHattoriKHabataTTakakuraYIkeuchiK.Measurement of the mechanical properties of regenerated articular cartilage using wavelet transformation. In: IkadaYUmakoshiYHottaT editors. Tissue Engineering for Therapeutic Use 6. Tokyo: Elsevier; 2002. p. 133-42.
9.
KurokiHNakagawaYMoriKIkeuchiKNakamuraT.Mechanical effects of autologous osteochondral surgical grafting procedures and instrumentation on grafts of articular cartilage. Am J Sport Med. 2004;32:612-20.
10.
KurokiHNakagawaYMoriKKobayashiMYasuraKOkamotoY, et al. Maturation-dependent change and regional variations in acoustic stiffness of rabbit articular cartilage: an examination of the superficial collagen-rich zone of cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14(8):784-92.
11.
RushfeldtPDMannRWHarrisWH.Improved techniques for measuring in vitro the geometry and pressure distribution in the human acetabulum-I. Ultrasonic measurement of acetabular surfaces, sphericity and cartilage thickness. J Biomech. 1981;14(4):253-60.
12.
PrakashMJoukainenATorniainenJHonkanenMKMRieppoLet al. Near-infrared spectroscopy enables quantitative evaluation of human cartilage biomechanical properties during arthroscopy. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019;27(8):1235-43.
13.
SvardTLakovaaraMPakarinenHHaapeaMKivirantaI, et al. Quantitative MRI of human cartilage in vivo: relationships with arthroscopic indentation stiffness and defect severity. Cartilage. 2018;9(1):46-54.
14.
PelletierJPRaynauldJPAbramFDoraisMPaiementP, et al. Intra-articular corticosteroid knee injection induces a reduction in meniscal thickness with no treatment effect on cartilage volume: a case-control study. Scientific Rep. 2020;10:13789.
15.
ParanjapeCSCutcliffeHCGrambowSCUtturkarGMCollinsAT, et al. A new stress test for knee joint cartilage. Scientific Rep. 2019;9:2283.
16.
KarpinskiRKrakowskiPJonakJMachrowskaAMaciejewskiMNogalskiA.Diagnostics of articular cartilage damage based on generated acoustic signals using ANN-Part I: femoral-tibial joint. Sensors. 2022;22:2176. doi:10.3390/s22062176.
17.
KarpinskiRKrakowskiPJonakJMachrowskaAMaciejewskiMNogalskiA.Diagnostics of articular cartilage damage based on generated acoustic signals using ANN-Part II: patellofemoral joint. Sensors. 2022;22:3765. doi:10.3390/s22103765.
18.
BedewiMAElsifeyAANaguibMFSalehAKNwihadhNBAbd-ElghanyAA, et al. Sonographic assessment of femoral cartilage thickness in healthy adults. J Inter Med Res. 2020;48(8):1-5.
19.
BedewiMAElsifeyAANaguibMFSalehAKAl-GhamdiSAAlhariqiBA, et al. Ultrasonographic measurement of femoral cartilage thickness in type II diabetic patients. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(14):e19455.
20.
SchmitzRJHarrisonDWangHMShultzSJ.Sagittal-plane knee moment during gait and knee cartilage thickness. J Athletic Training. 2017;52(6):560-6.
21.
ShimizuTWakitaniSTanakaYYonetaniYShiozakiYShimizuK, et al. Ultrasonic probe is useful for in vivo quantitative assessment of medial femoral condyle articular cartilage. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19(11):1895-900.
22.
KurokiHNakagawaYMoriKOhbaMSuzukiTMizunoY, et al. Acoustic stiffness and change in plug cartilage over time after autologous osteochondral grafting: correlation between ultrasound signal intensity and histological score in a rabbit model. Arthritis Res Ther. 2004;6(6):R492-504. doi:10.1186/ar1219.
23.
KurokiHNakagawaYMoriKKobayashiMOkamotoYYasuraK, et al. Sequential changes in implanted cartilage after autologous osteochondral transplantation: postoperative acoustic properties up to 1 year in an in vivo rabbit model. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:647-54.
24.
KurokiHNakagawaYMoriKKobayashiMYasuraKOkamotoY, et alUltrasound properties of articular cartilage in the tibio-femoral joint in knee osteoarthritis: relation to clinical assessment (International Cartilage Repair Society grade). Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10(4):R78. doi:10.1186/ar2452.
25.
HattoriKTakakuraYIshimuraMTanakaYHabataTIkeuchiK.Differential acoustic properties of early cartilage lesions in living human knee and ankle joints. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52(10):3125-31.
26.
NakagawaYMoriKYamadaSMukaiSHiroseANakamuraR.The oral administration of highly-bioavailable curcumin for one year has clinical and chondro-protective effects: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled prospective study. Arthros Sports Med Rehab. 2022;4(2):e393-402.
27.
NicolicheTMaidonadoDCFaberJSilvaMCPd. Evaluation of the articular cartilage in the knees of rats with induced arthritis treated with curcumin. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(3):e0230228. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0230228.
28.
AkkayaMCayNGursoySSimsekMETahtaMDoganM, et al. Sonoelastography of the knee joint. Clin Anat. 2019;32(1):99-104.
29.
CayNIpekAIsikCUnalOKartalMGArslanH, et al. Strain ratio measurement of femoral cartilage by real-time elastosonography: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(4):987-93.
30.
SeidenstueckerMWatrinetJBernsteinASuedkampNPLatorreSH, et al. Viscoelasticity and histology of the human cartilage in healthy and degenerated condition of the knee. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:256.
31.
CotofanaSBuckRWirthWRoemerFDuryeaJNevittM, et al. Cartilage thickening in early radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a within-person, between-knee comparison. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012;64(11):1681-90.
32.
FrobellRBNevittMCHudelmaierMWirthWWymanBTBenichouO, et al. Femorotibial subchondral bone area and regional cartilage thickness: a cross-sectional description in healthy reference cases and various radiographic stages of osteoarthritis in 1,003 knee from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritining S Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62(11):1612-23.
33.
NewtonMDOsborneJGawronskiKBakerKCMaerzT.Articular cartilage surface roughness as an imaging-based morphological indicator of osteoarthritis: a preliminary investigation of osteoarthritis initiative subjects. J Orthop Res. 2017;35(12):2755-64.
34.
SeitzAMOsthausFSchwerJWarneckeDFaschingbauerMSgrolM, et al. Osteoarthritis-related degeneration alters the biomechanical properties of human menisci before the articular cartilage. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:659989. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.659989.
35.
PetersAEAkhtarRComerfordEJBatesKT.The effect of ageing and osteoarthritis on the mechanical properties of cartilage and bone in the human knee joint. Scientific Rep. 2018;8:5931. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-24258-6.
36.
UnalMAkkusOSunJCaiLErolULSabriL, et al. Raman spectroscopy-based water content is a negative predictor of articular human cartilage mechanical function. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019;27(2):304-13.
37.
WangZLiangL.Research on quantitative measurement method of articular cartilage thickness change based on MR image. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(12):1993-6.
38.
BaboliRSharafiAChangGRegatteRR.Isotropic morphometry and multicomponent T1 Rou mapping of human knee articular cartilage in vivo at 3T. J Magn Reason Imaging. 2018;48(6):1707-16.
39.
BabayevaNDonmezGOzcakerLTorgutalpSSKaracobanLGedikE, et al. Mean femoral cartilage thickness is higher in athletes as compared with sedentary individuals. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(4):1206-14.
40.
KnechtSVanwanseeleBStussiE.A review on the mechanical quality of articular cartilage-implications for the diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006;21(10):999-1012.
41.
EbrahimiMOjanenSMohammadiAFinnilaMAJoukainenAKrogerH, et al. Elastic, viscoelastic and fibril-reinforced poroelastic material properties of healthy and osteoarthritic human tibial cartilage. Ann Biomed Eng. 2019;47:953-966. doi:10.1007/s10439-019-02213-4.
42.
EbrahimiMFinnilaMAJTurkiewiczAEnglundMSaarakkalaSKorhonenRK, et al. Elastic, dynamic viscoelastic and model-derived fibril-reinforced poroelastic mechanical properties of normal and osteoarthritic human femoral condyle cartilage. Ann Biomed Eng. 2021;49(9):2622-34. doi:10.1007/s10439-021-02838-4.
43.
LiHTaoHHuaYChenYLiYChenS.Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cartilage status: a comparison between young men with and without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(12):2012-9.
44.
TaoHQiaoYHuYXieYLuRYanX, et al. Quantitative T2-mapping and T2*-mapping evaluation of changes in cartilage matrix after acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture and the correlation between the results of both methods. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:7985672. doi:10.1155/2018/7985672.
45.
CookeMELawlessBMJonesSWGroverLM.Matrix degradation in osteoarthritis primes the superficial region of cartilage for mechanical damage. Acta Biomaterialia. 2018;78:320-8.
46.
NakamuraSIkebuchiMSaekiSFurukawaDOritaKNiimiN, et al. Changes in viscoelastic properties of articular cartilage in early stage of osteoarthritis, as determined by optical coherence tomography-based strain rate tomography. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019;20:417. doi:10.1185/s12891-019-2789-4.