Digital nomadism introduces complex temporal–spatial paradoxes into traditional communities, challenging established notions of belonging. This article examines how digital work, while promising liberation from geographical constraints, creates ruptures in social fabrics where time and space remain intertwined with cultural identity. Nomads’ networked temporality (flexible, globally oriented work rhythms) conflicts with local community rhythms, generating a belonging deficit—a gap between physical presence and social integration. This temporal schism produces tangible consequences as nomads simultaneously seek authentic local experiences while maintaining temporal patterns precluding deep community engagement, raising pressing questions about sustainability, equity, and the future of place-based communities.
AntonsichM (2010) Searching for belonging—an analytical framework. Geography Compass4(6): 644–659.
2.
ArolesJGranterEde VaujanyF-X (2020) “Becoming mainstream”: The professionalisation and corporatisation of digital nomadism. New Technology, Work and Employment35(1): 114–129.
3.
AskewJ (2023) “People are really fired up”: Digital nomads blamed for Portugal's high prices and housing crisis. Euronews. https://www.euronews.com/travel/2023/05/12/proto-gentrifies-are-digital-nomads-ruining-portugal
4.
BastianM (2014) Time and community: A scoping study. Time & Society23(2): 137–166.
5.
BellC (2017) “We feel like the king and queen”: Western retirees in Bali, Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Science45(3): 271–293.
6.
BensonMO'ReillyK (2009) Migration and the search for a better way of life: A critical exploration of lifestyle migration. The Sociological Review57(4): 608–625.
7.
BozziA (2024) Digital nomadism from the perspective of places and mobilities: A literature review. European Transport Research Review16: 50.
8.
CastellsM (1999) Grassrooting the space of flows. Urban Geography20(4): 294–302.
9.
ChevtaevaEDenizci-GuilletB (2021) Digital nomads’ lifestyles and coworkation. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management21: 100633.
10.
CiolfiLde CarvalhoAF (2014) Work practices, nomadicity and the mediational role of technology. Computer Supported Cooperative Work23(2): 119–136.
11.
Cocola-GantA (2023) Place-based displacement: Touristification and neighborhood change. Geoforum138, 103665.
12.
CookD (2020) The freedom trap: Digital nomads and the use of disciplining practices to manage work/leisure boundaries. Information Technology & Tourism22(3): 355–390.
CookD (2023b) What is a digital nomad? Definition and taxonomy in the era of mainstream remote work. World Leisure Journal65(2): 256–275.
15.
ColombCGallentN (2022) Post-COVID-19 mobilities and the housing crisis in European urban and rural destinations. Policy challenges and research agenda. Planning Practice & Research37(5): 624–641.
16.
de AlmeidaMACorreiaABarbosaCE, et al. (2024, November) AI and digital nomads: Glimpsing the future human-computer interaction. In International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction Research and Applications (pp. 198–211). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
17.
de AlmeidaMACorreiaASchneiderD, et al. (2021) COVID-19 as opportunity to test digital nomad lifestyle. In: 2021 IEEE 24th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design (CSCWD), pp.1209–1214: IEEE.
18.
de CarvalhoEC (2024) Digital nomadism in liquid modernity: A case study of the Madeira Islands. Working papers series-Sapienza.
19.
de la BarreSBrouderP (2023) Culinary tourism. In: Jafari J and Xiao H (eds), Encyclopedia of Tourism (pp. 231–233). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
GreenP (2020) Disruptions of self, place and mobility: Digital nomads in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Mobilities15(3): 431–445.
22.
GreenP (2023) Homes, home lives and precarious privilege: Older western residents and differing lifestyle mobilities in Ubud, Bali. Asian Studies Review47(2): 374–391.
23.
GuptaSJaiswalRGuptaSK (2024) Digital nomads: a systematic literature review and future research agenda. Tourism Review. Forthcoming.
24.
HallCMMitchellIKeelanN (1993) The implications of Maori perspectives for the management and promotion of heritage tourism in New Zealand. GeoJournal29: 315–322.
25.
HannonenOAguiar QuintanaTLehtoXY (2023) A supplier side view of digital nomadism: The case of destination Gran Canaria. Tourism Management97: 104744.
26.
HarveyD (2013) The right to the city. In Shaw J and Štiks I (eds), Citizenship Rights (pp. 465–482). London: Routledge.
27.
HassanR (2013) Networked time and the “common ruin of the contending classes”. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique11(2): 359–374.
28.
HensellekSPuchalaN (2021) The emergence of the digital nomad: A review and analysis of the opportunities and risks of digital nomadism. The Flexible Workplace: Coworking and Other Modern Workplace Transformations: 195–214.
HolleranM (2022) Pandemics and geoarbitrage: Digital nomadism before and after COVID-19. City26(5-6): 831–847.
31.
HolleranMNottingM (2023) Mobility guilt: Digital nomads and COVID-19. Tourism Geographies25(5): 1341–1358.
32.
JaiswalRGuptaSGuptaSK (2025) The impending disruption of digital nomadism: Opportunities, challenges, and research agenda. World Leisure Journal67(1): 74–104.
33.
JoverJDíaz-ParraI (2020) Gentrification, transnational gentrification and touristification in Seville, Spain. Urban Studies57(15): 3044–3059.
34.
KenyonE (2000) Time, temporality and the dynamics of community. Time & Society9(1): 21–41.
35.
LähdesmäkiTSaresmaTHiltunenK, et al. (2016) Fluidity and flexibility of “belonging”: Uses of the concept in contemporary research. Acta Sociologica59(3): 233–247.
36.
LewisCMayV (2020) Material–temporal registers of belonging: Theorising the interplay between temporality and the built environment. Time & Society29(1): 28–50.
37.
LinaoPAHeimtunBMorganN (2024) Digital nomadism, gender and racial power relations. Cities148: 104871.
MakimotoTMannersD (1997) Digital Nomad. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
40.
MancinelliF (2020) Digital nomads: Freedom, responsibility and the neoliberal order. Information Technology & Tourism22(3): 417–437.
41.
MasseyD (1993) Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place. In BirdJCurtisBPutnamTTicknerL (eds), Mapping the Futures (pp. 59–69). New York: Routledge.
McElroyE (2020) Digital nomads in siliconising Cluj: Material and allegorical double dispossession. Urban Studies57(15): 3169–3189.
44.
MoutonMBurnsR (2021) (Digital) neo-colonialism in the smart city. Regional Studies55(12): 1890–1901.
45.
Mueller-HirthNOyolaSR (2018) Introduction: Temporal perspectives on transitional and post-conflict societies. In: Time and Temporality in Transitional and Post-Conflict Societies (pp. 1–16). London: Routledge.
46.
NashCJarrahiMHSutherlandW (2021) Nomadic work and location independence: The role of space in shaping the work of digital nomads. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies3(2): 271–282.
47.
OrelM (2019) Coworking environments and digital nomadism: Balancing work and leisure whilst on the move. World Leisure Journal61(3): 215–227.
48.
OrelMDemirFTagliaroC, et al. (2024) Pandemic-driven evolution: The reshaping of coworking spaces in the (post) COVID-19 era. Journal of Real Estate Literature32(1): 31–50.
ReichenbergerI (2018) Digital nomads—a quest for holistic freedom in work and leisure. Annals of Leisure Research21(3): 364–380.
51.
RichterSRichterA (2020) Digital nomads. Business & Information Systems Engineering62(1): 77–81.
52.
Sánchez-VergaraJIOrelMCapdevilaI (2023) “Home office is the here and now.” Digital nomad visa systems and remote work-focused leisure policies. World Leisure Journal65(2): 236–255.
53.
SassenS (2000) Spatialities and temporalities of the global: Elements for a theorization. Public Culture12(1): 215–232.
54.
SciuvaE (2025) Geographies of digital nomadism: A research agenda. Geography Compass19(2): e70016.
55.
SequeraJ (2025) Platform gentrification: The production of urban inequalities in the on-demand city. Open Research Europe5: 147.
56.
ShellerMUrryJ (2006) The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A38(2): 207–226.
57.
SiglerTWachsmuthD (2020) New directions in transnational gentrification: Tourism-led, state-led and lifestyle-led urban transformations. Urban Studies57(15): 3190–3201.
58.
ThompsonBY (2019) The digital nomad lifestyle: (Remote) work/leisure balance, privilege, and constructed community. International Journal of the Sociology of Leisure2(1): 27–42.
59.
ToivanenM (2023) Countercultural lifestyle no more? Digital nomadism and the commodification of neo-nomadic mobilities. Mobility Humanities2(2): 70–89.
von ZumbuschJSLalićicL (2020) The role of co-living spaces in digital nomads’ well-being. Information Technology & Tourism22(3): 439–453.
62.
WangBSchlagweinDCecez-KecmanovicD, et al. (2020) Beyond the factory paradigm: Digital nomadism and the digital future(s) of knowledge work post-COVID-19. Journal of the Association for Information Systems21(6): 1379–1401.
63.
WillmentN (2025) Travel bloggers as ‘Digital Nomads’—How can understanding this lifestyle migration help us to think about the future of work, migration and technology?International Migration Review. Forthcoming.
