What constitutes science? What is the relation between scientific practice and capitalist modernity? What are the responsibilities of scientists in the face of our planetary crisis? In 2016 the Zapatistas of Chiapas organized an event to reflect upon and discuss the practice and politics of science. This paper — based on a script of a presentation at the event — takes up these questions, drawing from radical thought and philosophy of science to consider science in our present conjuncture.
AltieriM., CompanioniN., CañizaresK., MurphyC., RossetP., BourqueM., and NichollsC (1999) The greening of the barrios: Urban agriculture for food security in Cuba.Agriculture and Human Values16(2): 131–140.
2.
AntoniniF. (2014) Science, history and ideology in Gramsci's prison notebooks. Journal ofHistory of Science and Technology, 9: 64–80.
3.
ArrighiG. (2010) The Long Twentieth Century.NY: Verso
4.
BarkanJ. (2013) Corporate sovereignty: Law and government under capitalism.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
5.
BirchK., LevidowL., and PapaioannouT. (2010) Sustainable capital? The neoliberalization of nature and knowledge in the European knowledge-based bio-economy.Sustainability2(9), 2898–2918.
6.
ChomskyN. (1968) Philosophers and public philosophy.Ethics79(1), 1–9.
EtzkowitzH., WebsterA., GebhardtC., and TerraB.R. (2000) The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm.Research policy29(2), 313–330.
9.
Engel-Di MauroS. (2014) Ecology, soils, and the left: An ecosocial approach.London: Springer
10.
EZLN [Sixth Commission of the Ejército Zapatista de Liberación Nacional] (2016) Critical thought in the face of the capitalist hydra I: Contributions by the Sixth Commission of the EZLN. Translation of El Pensamiento Crítico Frente a la Hidra Capitalista I [2015]. Durham, NC: PaperBoat.
11.
GraddyT.G. (2014) Situating in situ: a critical geography of agricultural biodiversity conservation in the Peruvian Andes and beyond.Antipode46(2), 426–454.
12.
GramsciA. (1979) Science and ‘scientific’ ideologies. Finocchiaro M, trans.Telos41, 151–155
13.
GramsciA. (1995) Further Selections from the Prison Notebooks.BoothmanD., ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
14.
HorkheimerM., and AdornoT (2002 [1947]) Dialectic of Enlightenment.Stanford: Stanford University
15.
HowardD.J., and LairdF.N. (2013) The new normal in funding university science.Issues in Science and Technology30(1), 71–76.
KloppenburgJ. (2005) First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology.Madison: University of Wisconsin
18.
LevinsR., & LewontinR (1985) The dialectical biologist.Harvard University Press.
19.
MarxK. (1977 [1867]) Capital Volume One. B Fowkes, trans. NY: Penguin
20.
MannG. (2009) Should political ecology be Marxist? A case for Gramsci's historical materialism.Geoforum40(3), 335–344.
21.
MercerK. (2018) Towards evolutionary agroecology.INTERdisciplina6(14), 51–68.
22.
MohrmanK., MaW., and BakerD. (2008) The research university in transition: The emerging global model.Higher education policy21(1), 5–27.
23.
Moises, and Galeano (2016) Memo: Invitation to the meeting. Unpublished manuscript
24.
NichollsC., and AltieriM (2018) Pathways for the amplification of agroecology.Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems42(10): 1–24.
25.
Nieto-GalanA. (2011) Antonio Gramsci revisited: Historians of science, intellectuals, and the struggle for hegemony.History of Science, 49(4), 453–478.
26.
PrudhamS. (2003) Taming trees: Capital, science, and nature in Pacific Slope tree improvement.Annals of the Association of American Geographers93(3), 636–656.
27.
ReadingsB. (1996) The university in ruins.Cambridge: Harvard University Press
28.
ReyesA. (2015) Zapatismo: other geographies circa ‘the end of the world’.Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33(3), 408–424.
29.
ReyesA. (2016) The Zapatista challenge: Politics after catastrophe.Cultural Dynamics, 28(2), 143–168.
30.
RocheleauD. (2008) Political ecology in the key of policy: From chains of explanation to webs of relation.Geoforum39(2), 716–727.
31.
RossetP., Machín SosaB., Roque JaimeA., and LozanoD Ávila (2011) The Campesino-to-Campesino agro-ecology movement of ANAP in Cuba: social process methodology in the construction of sustainable peasant agriculture and food sovereignty.The Journal of peasant studies38(1): 161–191.
32.
VeblenT. ([1918] 2015) The Higher Learning in America: The Annotated Edition: A Memorandum on the Conduct of Universities by Business Men.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins U Press
33.
WainwrightJ., and MercerK (2009) The dilemma of decontamination: a Gramscian analysis of the Mexican transgenic maize dispute.Geoforum40(3), 345–354.
