This study investigated Cambodian principals’ concerns in implementing inclusive education, centering on resources, workloads, academic standards, and acceptance, and examined how their training experiences related to these concerns. It surveyed 193 principals across Cambodia using the Concerns about Inclusive Education Scale (CIES), with data analyzed through descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, reliability tests, and linear regression. The findings revealed significant concerns, including a lack of paraprofessionals, limited knowledge and skills, increased workloads, and challenges in managing students with low self-care skills. Principals with training had significantly fewer concerns, highlighting the need for enhanced policy support and training.
AgbenyegaJ. (2007). Examining teachers’ concerns and attitudes to inclusive education in Ghana. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 3(1), 41–56.
2.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
3.
AldosariM. S. (2024). Factors affecting the attitudes of principals of Saudi general education public schools toward the inclusion of students with disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 148, Article 104720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104720
4.
ArceL. Y. (2017). Elementary teachers’ and principals’ concerns in the implementation of inclusion in a South Texas school district [Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley].
5.
AvramidisE.NorwichB. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250210129056
6.
BallK. F. (2012). An investigation of the attitudes of school leaders toward the inclusion of students with disabilities in the general education setting [Doctoral dissertation, University of Memphis].
7.
BhatnagarN.DasA. (2014). Regular school teachers’ concerns and perceived barriers to implement inclusive education in New Delhi, India. International Journal of Instruction, 7(2), 89–102.
8.
BoscardinM. L. (2005). The administrative role in transforming secondary schools to support inclusive evidence-based practices. American Secondary Education, 33(3), 21–32.
9.
BoyleM. J.HernandezC. M. (2016). An investigation of the attitudes of Catholic school principals towards the inclusion of students with disabilities. Journal of Catholic Education, 20(1), 190–219. https://doi.org/10.15365/joce.2001092016
10.
Cambodia National Assembly. (2007). The law on education.
11.
CarringtonS.ParkE.McKayL.SaggersB.Harper-HillK.SomerwilT. (2024). Evidence of transformative leadership for inclusive practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 141, Article 104466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104466
12.
CohenE. (2015). Principal leadership styles and teacher and principal attitudes, concerns and competencies regarding inclusion. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 758–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.105
13.
DeMatthewsD. E. (2015). Clearing a path for inclusion: Distributing leadership in a high performing elementary school. Journal of School Leadership, 25(6), 1000–1038. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461502500601
14.
DeMatthewsD. E.SerafiniA.WatsonT. N. (2021). Leading inclusive schools: Principal perceptions, practices, and challenges to meaningful change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(1), 3–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20913897
15.
EdmundsA.MacmillanR.SpechtJ.NowickiE.EdmundsG. (2009). Principals and inclusive schools: Insight into practice. EAF Journal, 20(1), 1.
16.
EmmersE.BaeyensD.PetryK. (2020). Attitudes and self-efficacy of teachers towards inclusion in higher education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 35(2), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2019.1628337
17.
FitzgeraldJ.RadfordJ. (2022). Leadership for inclusive special education: A qualitative exploration of SENCOs’ and principals’ experiences in secondary schools in Ireland. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(10), 992–1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1760365
18.
FowlerF. J. (2009). Survey research methods. Sage Publications, Inc.
19.
FullanM. (2015). The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press.
20.
Garrison-WadeD.SobelD.FulmerC. L. (2007). Inclusive leadership: Preparing principals for the role that awaits them. Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development, 19, 117–132.
21.
HessI.ZamirS. (2016). Principals’ and teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion in Israel. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 1, 140–153.
22.
KartikaD.KurodaK. (2019). Implications for teacher training and support for inclusive education: Empirical evidence from Cambodia. In SchuelkaM. J.ArtilesA. J.ThomasG.JohnstoneC. J. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of inclusion and diversity in education (pp. 446–467). Sage Publications Ltd.
23.
KingE. F. (2018). Developing teacher capacity in Cambodia: An expanded model. Asian Education and Development Studies, 7(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-06-2017-0053
24.
KurodaK.KartikaD.KitamuraY. (2017). Implications for teacher training and support for inclusive education in Cambodia: An empirical case study in a developing country. JICA Research Institute.
25.
LambrechtJ.LenkeitJ.HartmannA.EhlertA.KniggeM.SpörerN. (2022). The effect of school leadership on implementing inclusive education: How transformational and instructional leadership practices affect individualised education planning. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(9), 943–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1752825.
26.
MoEYS. (2008). Policy on education for children with disabilities.
27.
MoEYS. (2018). Policy on inclusive education.
28.
MoEYS. (2019a). The 8th national forum on inclusive education for children with disabilities.
29.
MoEYS. (2019b). Education strategic plan 2019-2023.
30.
MoEYS. (2023). Statistics on students with disabilities at pre-primary, primary, lower secondary, and upper secondary schools in Cambodia in academic year 2021-2022.
31.
PiersonM. R.HowellE. J. (2013). Two high schools and the road to full inclusion: A comparison study. Improving Schools, 16(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480213501063
32.
RavetJ.MtikaP. (2021). Educational inclusion in resource-constrained contexts: A study of rural primary schools in Cambodia. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28(1), 16–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2021.1916104
33.
RGC. (2009). The law on the protection and the promotion of rights of persons with disabilities.
34.
RoundP. N.SubbanP. K.SharmaU. (2016). ‘I don’t have time to be this busy.’ Exploring the concerns of secondary school teachers towards inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 20(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2015.1079271
ShahR.DasA.DesaiI.TiwariA. (2016). Teachers’ concerns about inclusive education in Ahmedabad, India. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 16(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12054
37.
SharmaU. (2001). The attitudes and concerns of school principals and teachers regarding the integration of students with disabilities into regular schools in Delhi, India [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne].
38.
SharmaU.DesaiI. (2002). Measuring concerns about integrated education in India. Asia and Pacific Journal on Disability, 5(1), 2–14.
39.
SmithR.LeonardP. (2005). Collaboration for inclusion: Practitioner perspectives. Equity & Excellence in Education, 38(4), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680500299650
40.
SokalL.SharmaU. (2014). Canadian in-service teachers’ concerns, efficacy, and attitudes about inclusive teaching. Exceptionality Education International, 23(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.5206/eei.v23i1.7704
41.
StubbsS. (2008). Inclusive education: Where there are few resources. The Atlas Alliance Publication.
42.
SubbaA. B.YangzomC.DorjiK.ChodenS.NamgayU.CarringtonS.NickersonJ. (2019). Supporting students with disability in schools in Bhutan: Perspectives from school principals. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(1), 42–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1514744
43.
SzetoE. (2021). How do principals’ practices reflect democratic leadership for inclusion in diverse school settings? A Hong Kong case study. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220915922
44.
TalmorR.Reiter*S.FeiginN. (2005). Factors relating to regular education teacher burnout in inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 20(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856250500055735
45.
UNESCO. (2015). Incheon declaration and framework for action for the implementation of sustainable development goal 4.
46.
UrtonK.WilbertJ.KrullJ.HennemannT. (2023). Factors explaining teachers’ intention to implement inclusive practices in the classroom: Indications based on the theory of planned behaviour. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104225
47.
YadavM.DasA.SharmaS.TiwariA. (2015). Understanding teachers’ concerns about inclusive education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16, 653–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9405-6
48.
YanT.DengM. (2019). Regular education teachers’ concerns on inclusive education in China from the perspective of concerns-based adoption model. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(4), 384–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1435741
49.
YanZ.SinK. F. (2014). Inclusive education: Teachers’ intentions and behaviour analysed from the viewpoint of the theory of planned behaviour. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.757811
