Evidence That In-Service Professional Learning for Educational Leaders Matters

Abstract

Educator leadership requires continuous development, including extended professional learning opportunities for principals in the field. This is also true for district leaders who likely have even fewer robust opportunities to grow professionally. We conducted a comparative interrupted time series of publicly available student achievement data from New Mexico to analyze the impact of a university-based organization that partners with district leaders to provide intensive professional learning opportunities for district leaders and school principals. We found positive impacts on student achievement in math and for English learners in English language arts. Implications for educator preparation and in-service programs are considered.

Keywords

leadership for school improvement leadership program design leadership program evaluation principal preparation superintendent preparation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

Leithwood

Strauss

(2010). Leading data use in schools: Organizational conditions and practices at the school and district levels. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9, 292–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700761003731492

Anderson

S. E.

(2006). The school district’s role in educational change. International Journal of Educational Reform, 15(1), 13–37.

Barnett

A. G.

van der Pols

J. C.

Dobson

A. J.

(2005). Regression to the mean: What it is and how to deal with it. International Journal of Epidemiology, 34(1), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyh299

Beesley

A. D.

Clark

T. F.

(2015). How rural and nonrural principals differ in high plains U.S. states. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(2), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956x.2015.1022114

Bryk

A. S.

Sebring

P. B.

Allensworth

Luppescu

Easton

J. Q.

(2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press.

Chrispeels

J. H.

Castillo

Brown

(2000). School leadership teams: A process model of team development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(1), 20–56. https://doi.org/10.1076/0924-3453(200003)11:1;1-#;ft020

Cobb

Jackson

Henrick

Smith

T. M.

(2018). Systems for instructional improvement: Creating coherence from the classroom to the district office. Harvard Education Press.

Cosner

DeVoto

Andry Rah’man

(2018). Drawing in the school context as a learning resource in school leader development: Application-oriented projects in active learning designs. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 13(3), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775118763872

Davis

S. H.

Darling-Hammond

(2012). Innovative principal preparation programs: What works and how we know. Planning and Changing, 43(1–2), 25–45.

10.

de la Torre Allensworth

E., M.

Jagesic

Sebastian

Salmonowicz

Meyers

Gerdeman

(2013). Turning around low-performing schools in Chicago: Full report. Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/sites/default/files/2018-10/Turnaround%20Report%20-%20Long%20Version%20FINAL.pdf

11.

Deming

W. E.

(2000). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.

12.

DeVoto

Reedy

M. A.

(2021). Are states under ESSA prioritizing education leadership to improve schools? Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 16, 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775119890637

13.

Drago-Severson

Maslin-Ostrowski

Hoffman

A. M.

(2012). Resisting fragmentation: Calling for a holistic approach to professional practice and preparation for educational leaders. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 7(1), 44–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775112440628

14.

Drago-Severson

Maslin-Ostrowski

Hoffman

A. M.

Barbaro

(2014). Managing adaptive challenges: Learning with principals in Bermuda and Florida. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 9(1), 6–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775113498376

15.

Duke

Salmonowicz

(2010). Key decisions of a first-year ‘turnaround’ principal. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143209345450

16.

Fancera

S. F.

Bliss

J. R.

(2011). Instructional leadership influence on collective teacher efficacy to improve school achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(3), 349–370. https://doi-org.proxy01.its.virginia.edu/10.1080/15700763.2011.585537

17.

Fullan

(2006). The future of educational change: System thinkers in action. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-006-9003-9

18.

Fullan

(2010). All systems go: The change imperative for whole system reform. Corwin.

19.

Fullan

Quinn

(2016). Coherence: The right drivers in action for schools, districts, and systems. Corwin.

20.

Fusarelli

B. C.

Fusarelli

L. D.

Drake

T. A.

(2019). NC state’s principal leadership academies: Context, challenges, and promising practices. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 14(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775118819678

21.

Garet

M. S.

Porter

A. C.

Desimone

Birman

B. F.

Yoon

K. S.

(2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915

22.

Grissom

J. A.

Egalite

A. J.

Lindsay

C. A.

(2021). How principals affect students and schools: A systematic synthesis of two decades of research. The Wallace Foundation. http://www.wallacefoundation.org/principalsynthesis

23.

Hallinger

Heck

R. H.

(1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345980090203

24.

Harris

Larsen

(2016). The effects of the New Orleans post-Katrina school reforms on student academic outcomes. Tulane University, Education Research Alliance for New Orleans.

25.

Herman

Gates

S. M.

Chavez-Herrerias

E. R.

Harris

(2018). School leadership interventions under the every student succeeds act: A review of the evidence base, initial findings. RAND.

26.

Hess

F. M.

Kelly

A. P.

(2005). Learning to lead? What gets taught in principal preparation programs. Harvard University. https://tinyurl.com/879vsf8e

27.

Hitt

D. H.

Tucker

P. D.

(2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research, 86, 531–569. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315614911

28.

A. D.

(2008). The problem with “proficiency”: Limitations of statistics and policy under no child left behind. Educational Researcher, 37(6), 351–360. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x08323842

29.

Honig

M. I.

(2012). District central office leadership as teaching: How central office administrators support principals’ development as instructional leaders. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(4), 733–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x12443258

30.

Honig

M. I.

Copland

M. A.

Rainey

Lorton

J. A.

Newton

(2010). Central office transformation for district-wide teaching and learning improvement. https://tinyurl.com/2r5oovn2

31.

Ishimaru

A. M.

(2020). Just schools: Building equitable collaborations with families and communities. Teachers College Press.

32.

Johnson

S. M.

Marietta

Higgins

M. C.

Mapp

K. L.

Grossman

(2015). Achieving coherence in district improvement: Managing the relationship between the central office and schools. Harvard Education Press.

33.

Khalifa

M. A.

Gooden

M. A.

Davis

J. E.

(2016). Culturally responsive school leadership: A synthesis of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1272–1311. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316630383

34.

Leithwood

(2010). Characteristics of school districts that are exceptionally effective in closing the achievement gap. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9, 245–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700761003731500

35.

LiCalsi

Citkowicz

Friedman

L. B.

Brown

(2015). Evaluation of Massachusetts district and school turnaround assistance: Impact of School Redesign Grants (SRG). American Institutes for Research. https://tinyurl.com/7lpzrs4k

36.

Lochmiller

C. R.

(2014). Leadership coaching in an induction program for novice principals: A 3-year study. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 9(1), 59–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775113502020

37.

Louis

K. S.

Leithwood

Wahlstrom

K. L.

Anderson

S. E.

(2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings. The Wallace Foundation. https://tinyurl.com/f1ndfgi6

38.

Manna

(2015). Developing excellent school principals to advance teaching and learning: Considerations for state policy. The Wallace Foundation.

39.

Marks

H. M.

Printy

S. M.

(2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39, 370–397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x03253412

40.

Meyers

C. V.

(2020a). An urban district’s struggle to preserve school turnaround change. Urban Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085920966031

41.

Meyers

C. V.

(2020b). District-led school turnaround: A case study of one district’s efforts to initiate multiple school turnarounds. Leadership & Policy in Schools, 19(4), 710–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2019.1637902

42.

Mintrop

MacLellan

A. M.

Quintero

M. F.

(2001). School improvement plans in schools on probation: A comparative content analysis across three accountability systems. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(2), 197–218.

43.

Mintrop

Trujillo

(2007). The practical relevance of accountability systems for school improvement: A descriptive analysis of California schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(4), 319–352.

44.

Murphy

(2009). Turning around failing schools: Policy insights from the corporate, government, and non-profit sector. Educational Policy, 23(6), 796–830. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904808320677

45.

Newmann

F. M.

Smith

Allensworth

Bryk

A. S.

(2001). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737023004297

46.

NM Statute § 22-2E-4. (2016). Chapter 22 – public schools article 2E – A-B-C-D-F schools rating section 22-2E-4 – annual ratings; letter grades. https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/2016/chapter-22/article-2e/section-22-2e-4

47.

Papay

J. P.

(2017). The effects of school turnaround strategies in Massachusetts. https://www.shankerinstitute.org/sites/default/files/ASI%20Presentation%20-%20School%20Turnaround%20-%20April%202017%20-%20To%20Post.pdf

48.

Peck

Reitzug

U. C.

(2014). School turnaround fever: The paradoxes of a historical practice promoted as a new reform. Urban Education, 49, 8–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912472511

49.

Player

Katz

(2016). Assessing school turnaround: Evidence from Ohio. The Elementary School Journal, 116, 675–698. https://doi.org/10.1086/686467

50.

Quinn

Fullan

(2017). Coherence making: Whole system change strategy. In Malone

H. J.

Rincón-Gallardo

Kew

(Eds.), Future directions of educational change: Social justice, professional capital, and systems change (pp. 223–237). Routledge.

51.

Reames

(2010). Shifting paradigms: Redesigning a principal preparation program’s curriculum. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 5(12), 436–459.

52.

Schmidt

W. H.

Houang

R. T.

(2012). Curricular coherence and the common core state standards for mathematics. Educational Researcher, 41(8), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x12464517

53.

Schueler

B. E.

(2019). A third way: The politics of school district takeover and turnaround in Lawrence, Massachusetts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(1), 116–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x18785873

54.

Schueler

B. E.

Goodman

J. S.

Deming

D. J.

(2017). Can states take over and turn around school districts? Evidence from Lawrence, Massachusetts. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716685824

55.

Shadish

W. R.

Cook

T. D.

Campbell

D. T.

(2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs of generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin Company.

56.

Spillane

J. P.

Halverson

Diamond

J. B.

(2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x030003023

57.

Strunk

K. O.

Marsh

J. A.

Hashim

A. K.

Bush-Mecenas

Weinstein

(2016a). The impact of turnaround reform on student outcomes: Evidence and insights from the Los Angeles Unified School District. Education Finance and Policy, 11(3), 251–282. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00188

58.

Strunk

K. O.

Marsh

J. A.

Bush-Mecenas

S. C.

Duque

M. R.

(2016b). The best laid plans: An examination of school plan quality and implementation in a school improvement initiative. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 259–309.

59.

Sullanmaa

Pyhältö

Pietarinen

Soini

(2019). Differences in state- and district-level stakeholders’ perceptions of curriculum coherence and school impact in national curriculum reform. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(3), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-08-2018-0153

60.

Thessin

R. A.

(2019). Establishing productive principal/principal supervisor partnerships for instructional leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 57(5), 463–483. https://doi.org/10.1108/jea-09-2018-0184

61.

Waters

Marzano

R. J.

(2006). School district leadership that works: The effect of superintendent leadership on student achievement. McREL. http://www.ctc.ca.gov/educator-prep/ASC/4005RR_Superintendent_Leadership.pdf

62.

Wong

Cook

T. D.

Steiner

P. M.

(2015). Adding design elements to improve time series designs: No child left behind as an example of causal pattern-matching. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 8(2), 245–279.

63.

Woulfin

S. L.

Rigby

J. G.

(2017). Coaching for coherence: How instructional coaches lead change in the evaluation era. Educational Researcher, 46(6), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x17725525

64.

Yatsko

Lake

Nelson

E. C.

Bowen

(2012). Tinkering toward transformation: A look at federal school improvement grant implementation. Center on Reinventing Public Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED532630.pdf

65.

Zavadsky

(2012). School turnarounds: The essential role districts. Harvard Education Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB