How Graduate-Level Preparation Influences the Effectiveness of School Leaders: A Comparison of the Outcomes of Exemplary and Conventional Leadership Preparation Programs for Principals
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online February, 2011
How Graduate-Level Preparation Influences the Effectiveness of School Leaders: A Comparison of the Outcomes of Exemplary and Conventional Leadership Preparation Programs for Principals
Purpose: This study attempted to determine the influence of exemplary leadership preparation on what principals learn about leadership, their use of effective leadership practices, and how their practices influence school improvement and the school’s learning climate. The authors also investigated how the frequency of effective leadership practices related to the strength of district support and the extent of school problems and student poverty. Finally, the authors examined the contribution of exemplary leadership preparation to variations in school improvement progress and school effectiveness climate. Research Design: The study, using survey research conducted in 2005, compared 65 principals who had graduated from one of four selected exemplary leadership preparation programs to a national sample of 111 principals. The authors used structural equation modeling to find the best fit. Findings: Participation in an exemplary leadership preparation program was significantly associated with learning about effective leadership and engaging in these practices, particularly where stronger preparation program and internship quality existed. Frequent use of effective leadership practices was positively associated with school improvement progress and school effectiveness climate. Taken together, exemplary leadership preparation had a positive but mediated influence on variations in school improvement progress and school effectiveness climate; the relationship was even stronger when focusing on preparation program and internship quality measures. Conclusions: Faculty investments in preparation program and internship quality will positively contribute to the leadership knowledge of graduates and their leadership practices and school improvement progress. These results yield significant implications for policy makers, universities, and other providers of leadership preparation.
Ajzen, I. ( 1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
2.
Bagozzi, R.P., & Yi, Y. ( 1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models Journal of theAcademy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
3.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. ( 1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4.
Bollen, K. ( 1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley.
5.
Bottoms, G., & O’Neill, K. (2001). Preparing a new breed of school principals: It’s time for action. Atlanta, GA: Southern Regional Education Board.
6.
Brand, S., Felner, R., Minsuk, S., Seitsinger, A., & Dumas, T. ( 2003). Middle school improvement and reform: Development and validation of a school-level assessment of climate, cultural pluralism, and school safety. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 570-588.
7.
Brown, K.M., Anfara, V.A., Jr., & Roney, K. ( 2004). Student achievement in high performing, suburban middle schools and low performing, urban middle schools: Plausible explanations for the differences. Education and Urban Society, 36, 428-456.
8.
Browne, M.W., & Cudeck, R. ( 1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
9.
Burns, J.M. ( 1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
10.
Carmines, E.G., & McIver, J.P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In G. W. Bohrnstedt & E. F. Borgatia (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65-115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11.
Center for Research on the Context of Teaching. ( 2002). Bay Area School Reform Collaborative, Phase1 (pp. 65-115). San Francisco, CA: Bay Area School Reform Collaborative .
12.
Curran, P.J., Finch, J.F., & West, S.G. ( 1996). The robustness of test statistics to non-normality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16-29.
13.
Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., Meyerson, D., Orr, M.T., & Cohen, C. ( 2007). Preparing leaders for a changing world. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, Educational Leadership Institute.
14.
Darling-Hammond, L., Meyerson, D., La Pointe, M.M., & Orr, M.T. ( 2009). Preparing principals for a changing world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
15.
Davis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., Meyerson, D., & LaPointe, M. ( 2005). Review of research. School leadership study. Developing successful principals. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, Educational Leadership Institute .
16.
Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. ( 2000). Introducing LISREL. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
Educational Research Service. (2000). The principal, keystone of a high-achieving school: Attracting and keeping the leaders we need. Arlington, VA: Author.
18.
Farkas, S., Johnson, J., Duffett, A., & Foleno, T. ( 2001). Trying to stay ahead of the game: Superintendents and principals talk about school leadership. New York, NY: Public Agenda.
19.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. ( 1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research , 18, 39-50.
20.
Goldring, E.B., & Pasternack, R. (1994). Principals’ coordinating strategies and school effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5, 239-253.
21.
Hale, E.L., & Moorman, H.N. ( 2003). Preparing school principals: A national perspective on policy and program innovations. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership, Illinois Education Research Council .
22.
Hallinger, P. ( 2005, April). Instructional leadership: How has the model evolved and what have we learned?Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal , Canada.
23.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. ( 1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 5-44.
24.
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. ( 1998). Exploring the principal’s contributions to school effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement , 9(2), 157-191.
25.
Hoyle, R., & Panter, A. ( 1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
Institute for Educational Leadership. (2000 ). Leadership for student learning: Reinventing the principalship . Report of the Taskforce on the Principalship. Washington, DC: Author.
27.
Jackson, B.L., & Kelley, C. ( 2002). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership . Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 192-212.
28.
Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
29.
Kirkpatrick, D.L. ( 1998). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA : Berrett-Koehler.
30.
Kottkamp, R.B., & Rusch, E.A. ( 2009). The landscape of scholarship on the education of school leaders, 1985-2006. In M. D. Young, G. M. Crow, J. Murphy , & R. T. Ogawa (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 23-85). New York, NY: Routledge.
31.
Lad, K., Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Shoho, A. ( 2005, November). Leadership preparation admission criteria: Examining the spectrum from open enrollment to elite selection. Paper presented at the annual convention of the University Council of Educational Administration, Nashville, TN.
32.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. ( 1999). The relative effects of principal and teacher sources of leadership on student engagement with school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(Suppl.), 679-706.
33.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. ( 2000). Principal and teacher leadership effects: A replication . School Leadership & Management, 20(4), 415-434.
34.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. ( 2005, April). A review of transformational school leadership research. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
35.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. ( 2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 496-528.
36.
Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., Coffin, G., & Wilson, P. ( 1996). Preparing school leaders: What works? Journal of School Leadership, 6, 316-342.
37.
Leithwood, K., Louis, K.S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. ( 2004). How leadership influences student learning. Toronto, Canada: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement and Ontario Institute for Studies in Education .
38.
Leithwood, K., & Riehl, C. ( 2005). What we know about successful school leadership . In W. Firestone & C. Riehl (Eds.), A new agenda: Directions for research on educational leadership (pp. 22-47). New York, NY : Teachers College Press.
39.
Levine, A. ( 2005). Educating school leaders. Washington, DC: The Education Schools Project.
40.
MacCallum, R. ( 1995). Model specification: Procedures, strategies, and related issues. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 16-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41.
McCarthy, M.M. ( 1999). The evolution of educational leadership preparation programs . In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration: A project of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 119-139). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
42.
McCarthy, M.M., & Forsyth, P.B. ( 2009). An historical review of research and development activities pertaining to the preparation of school leaders. In M. D. Young, G. M. Crow, J. Murphy, & R. T. Ogawa (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 86-128). New York, NY : Routledge.
43.
McLaughlin, M., & Talbert, J. ( 2002). Reforming districts. In A. M. Hightower, M. Knapp, J. A. Marsh, & M. McLaughlin (Eds.), School districts and instructional renewal (pp. 173-192). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
44.
Muijs, D., Harris, A., Chapman, C., Stoll, L., & Russ, J. ( 2004). Improving schools in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas-A review of research evidence. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 149-175.
45.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration. ( 2002). Instructions to implement standards for advanced programs in educational leadership for principals, superintendents, curriculum directors and supervisors. Arlington, VA: Author.
46.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration. ( 2005). A listing of nationally recognized educational leadership preparation programs at NCATE accredited colleges and universities . Retrieved from http://www.npbea.org/ELCC/ELCCapproved_and_denied_list_0805.pdf
47.
Orr, M.T. ( 2003, April). Evaluating educational leadership development: Measuring leadership, its development and its impact. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association , Chicago, IL.
48.
Orr, M.T. ( 2006a). Mapping innovation in leadership preparation in our nation’s schools of education. Phi Delta Kappan , 87, 492-499.
49.
Orr, M.T. ( 2006b). Research on leadership education as a reform strategy . Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 1, 1-5.
50.
Orr, M.T. ( 2009). Program evaluation in leadership preparation and related fields. In M. D. Young & G. Crow (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (pp. 457-498). New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
Orr, M.T., & Barber, M.E. ( 2007). Collaborative leadership preparation: A comparative study of innovative programs and practices. Journal of School Leadership , 16, 709-739.
52.
Orr, M.T., King, C., & LaPointe, M.M. (2009). Districts developing leaders: Eight districts’ lessons on strategy, program approach and organization to improve the quality of leaders for local schools (Report prepared for the Wallace Foundation). Newton, MA: Education Development Center.
53.
Orr, M.T., & Pounder, D.G. ( 2006). UCEA/TEA-SIG Taskforce on Evaluating Leadership Preparation Programs. Taskforce report: Six years later and future directions . Austin, TX: University Council of Educational Administration. Retrieved from http://www.ucea.org/evaluation/about.html
54.
Orr, M.T., Silverberg, R., & LeTendre, B. ( 2006, April). Comparing leadership development From pipeline to preparation to advancement: A study of multiple institutions’ leadership preparation programs. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
55.
Osterman, K.F., & Sullivan, S. ( 1996). New principals in an urban bureaucracy: A sense of efficacy . Journal of School Leadership, 6, 661-690.
56.
Pounder, D.G., & Merrill, R.J. ( 2001). Job desirability of the high school principalship: A job choice theory perspective. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 22-57.
57.
Robinson, V.M.J., Lloyd, C.A., & Rowe, K.J. ( 2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635-674.
58.
Sanders, N.M., & Simpson, J. ( 2005). State policy framework to develop highly qualified administrators . Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
59.
Schumaker, R.E., & Lomax, R.G. ( 2004). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
60.
Sebring, P.B., Allensworth, E., Bryk, A.S., Easton, J.Q., & Luppescu, S. ( 2006). The essential supports for school improvement . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, Consortium on Chicago School Research.
61.
Shen, J., Rodriguez-Campo, L., & Rincones-Gomez, R. (2000). Characteristics of urban school principals: A national trend study. Education and Urban Society, 32, 481-491.
62.
Southern Regional Education Board. (2006). Schools can’t wait: Accelerating the redesign of university principal preparation programs. Atlanta, GA: Author.
63.
Sweetland, S., & Hoy, W.K. ( 2000). School characteristics and educational outcomes: Toward an organizational model of student achievement in middle schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 703-729.
64.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C.R. ( 2005, November). Cultivating principals’ sense of efficacy: Supports that matter. Paper presented at the annual convention of the University Council of Educational Administration , Nashville, TN.
65.
U.S. Department of Education. (2004). Innovations in education: Innovative pathways to school leadership . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Innovation and Improvement.
66.
Waters, J.T., Marzano, R.J., & McNulty, R.A. ( 2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. Aurora, CO: McREL.
67.
Young, M.D., Crow, G., Ogawa, R., & Murphy, J. ( 2009). The handbook of research on leadership preparation . New York, NY: Routledge.
